Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the therapeutic effects of DBS in patients carrying VPD35 p.D620N mutation and sporadic PD

From: Identification of VPS35 p.D620N mutation-related Parkinson’s disease in a Taiwanese family with successful bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: a case report and literature review

Reference

VPD35 p.D620N mutation carriers

Age of onset (mean ± SD, years)

Age at receiving DBS (mean ± SD, years)

DBS stimulation details that gained the best clinical response

LEDD before DBS (mg)

LEDD one year after DBS (mg)

Improvement of UPDRS motor scores one year after DBS in “OFF” medications

LEDD five to eight years after DBS (mg)

Fleury V et al., 2013 [14]

+

(patient 1)

49

60

Monopolar stimulation of two most proximal contacts (3-) at 2.2 V in the right STN and 2.4 V in the left STN, with a frequency of 130 Hz and pulse duration of 60 ms.

1540

400

76%

550 (eight years after DBS)

 

+

(patient 2)

45

55

Monopolar stimulation of the 3rd and 4th distal contact (2–3-) in the right STN at 3.3 V and 3.0 V in the left STN, with a frequency of 180 Hz and pulse duration of 90 ms.

1276.5

300

36%

N.A.

Current study

+

(index patient)

42

55

Monopolar stimulation of the two dorsal contacts (6−/2-) at 4.4 V in the right STN and 3.2 V in the left STN, with a frequency of 160 Hz and pulse duration of 90 ms in the right STN and 60 ms in the left STN

1435

1000

37%

1160 (five years after DBS)

Aviles-Olmos I et al., 2014 [16]

-

41 sporadic PD patients

43.3 ± 9.8

56.2 ± 8.4

Monopolar stimulation

1471 ± 515

949 ± 572

45.5 ± 12.8%

668 ± 359 (five years after DBS)

  1. DBS deep brain stimulation, STN subthalamic nucleus, LEDD levodopa equivalent dose, SD standard deviation, N.A. not available