Table 4 C1 vs. C2, Five Split-Half Replications
Replication 1 | |
Training Set (n = 217) | Test Set (n = 213) |
C1: 84/89 correct, 94.38% | C1: 72/80 correct, 90.00% |
C2: 121/128 correct, 94.53% | C2: 124/133 correct, 93.23% |
Replication 2 | |
Training Set (n = 203) | Test Set (n = 227) |
C1: 80/84 correct, 95.24% | C1: 75/85 correct, 88.24% |
C2: 110/119 correct, 92.44% | C2: 130/142 correct, 91.55% |
Replication 3 | |
Training Set (n = 228) | Test Set (n = 202) |
C1: 78/85 correct, 91.76% | C1: 68/84 correct, 80.95% |
C2: 133/143 correct, 93.01% | C2: 111/118 correct, 93.07% |
Replication 4 | |
Training Set (n = 212) | Test Set (n = 218) |
C1: 83/86 correct, 96.51% | C1: 71/83 correct, 85.54% |
C2: 120/126 correct, 95.24% | C2: 117/135 correct, 86.67% |
Replication 5 | |
Training Set (n = 218) | Test Set (n = 212) |
C1: 77/84 correct, 91.67% | C1: 74/85 correct, 87.06% |
C2: 129/134 correct, 96.27% | C2: 120/127 correct, 94.49% |
Average Correct Test Set | |
C1 = 86.36% | |
C2 = 91.80% | |