Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants

From: Use of whole body vibration therapy in individuals with moderate severity of cerebral palsy- a feasibility study

 

Age group (yr)

Dx

GMFCS

GMFM-66 IS

2MWT (meters)

TUG (seconds)

PEDI

Self-care

Mobility

Social function

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

VT01

41–45

Ataxia

III

50.6

50.9

44

39.6

63

80

47

47

28

28

54

54

VT02

31–35

Sp dip

III

49.9

49.9

74.7

61.2

34

40

56

57

32

32

57

57

VT03

41–45

Sp dys quad

III

50.9

51.6

73.1

75.2

42

52

59

61

52

52

65

65

VT04

35–40

Sp dys quad

II/III*

55.4

55.9

93.1

109.5

19

19

61

61

32

32

30

30

VT05

35–40

Sp L hemi

III

50.1

50.1

37.8

40.1

42

41

61

65

39

40

62

62

VT06

35–40

Sp dys quad

II/III*

52.6

55.2

71.5

86.7

10

10

58

58

56

56

60

60

VT07

6–10

Ataxia

II/III*

62.7

65.6

58.3

63.1

18

18

39

40

38

38

39

39

VT08

6–10

Sp dys quad

III

55.9

58.1

69.5

72.7

20

17

58

58

37

37

59

59

VT09

6–10

Sp dip

III

51.3

52.9

55.3

64.7

34

27

61

61

42

42

60

60

VT10

11–15

Equi to sp. quad

III

44.6

42.4

9.9

9.6

192

136

36

36

17

18

37

37

VT11

16–20

Sp quad

IV

39

39

NA

NA

NA

NA

42

42

6

10

61

61

VT12

16–20

Sp tri

III

59.1

56.2

33.7

37.5

32

27

66

68

45

47

60

60

VT13

16–20

Sp dip

III

53.1

52.6

60.5

65.1

21

21

69

69

36

36

48

48

VT14

21–25

Equi sp. quad

III

47.3

50.3

54.1

38.2

25

29

42

42

36

36

31

31

  1. 2MWT 2-min walk test, Dip Diplegia, dys Dystonia, Dx Diagnosis, equi Equivalent to, GMFM-66 IS Gross Motor Function Measure 66 Item Set, hemi Hemiplegia, L Left, PEDI Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, quad Quadriplegia, Sp Spastic, TUG Timed up and go test, tri Triplegia
  2. *These 3 participants had mixed clinical features of GMFCS levels II and III. They all relied on use of a walking aid with supervision (VT7) or wheeled mobility (VT4 and VT6) for long distances in outdoor environments. All were able to walk without a walking aid for short distances in indoor environments but their balance raised safety concerns; hence, VT7 used a walking frame most of the time. Neither VT4 nor VT6 were able to hold any walking aid due to the dystonic features in their upper limbs
  3. NA- data not available as VT11 used a body-weight-support walking frame for therapeutic walking only and required moderate manual assistance