Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Training-based changes in the proportion and magnitude of successful fall recoveries

From: The development and feasibility of treadmill-induced fall recovery training applied to individuals with chronic stroke

Fall Direction Initial Stepping Limb Variable First Session Last Session Change w/ training Cohen’s d
Anterior (Simulated Trips) Non-Paretic % Successful Trials (%) 91 (14) 99 (3) 8 (11) 0.73
Largest Disturbance (m/s2) 3.6 (0.9) 4.0 (1.0) 0.4 (0.9) 0.44
Paretic % Successful Trials (%) 77 (29) 89 (27) 13 (16) 0.81
Largest Disturbance (m/s2) 2.9 (1.4) 3.4 (1.4) 0.4 (0.4) 1.00
Posterior (Simulated Slips) Non-Paretic % Successful Trials (%) 79 (14) 90 (10) 11 (11) 1.00
Largest Disturbance (m/s2) 3.9 (1.2) 4.5 (1.2) 0.6 (0.6) 1.00
Paretic % Successful Trials (%) 60 (26) 75 (16) 15 (18) 0.83
Largest Disturbance (m/s2) 2.9 (1.3) 3.2 (1.1) 0.3 (0.5) 0.60
  1. Note: First session, last session, and change with training data are displayed as mean (SD)