Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison to other series regarding the endovascular treatment, the angiographic and the clinical improvement, and the favourable outcome. Comparison to other series concerning primary and secondary endpoints

From: Angioplasty with the scepter C dual lumen balloon catheter and postprocedural result evaluation in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage related vasospasms

Series

No. Of patients

Endovascular Treatment

Angiographic improvement

Clinical improvement

Favourable outcome (mRS 0–2)

Bejjani et al., 1998 [15]

31

TBA +/− papavarine

N/A

72%

80%

Coyne et al., 1994 [14]

13

TBA

N/A

31

38

Eskridge et al., 1994 [13]

50

TBA

N/A

61

N/A

Fujii et al., 1995 [16]

19

TBA

94

63

89

Polin et al., 2000

38

TBA +/− papaverine

82

29

53

Jestaedt et al., 2008 [25]

38

TBA

100

N/A

21

Hoh and Ogilvy 2005 [26]

530

TBA

N/A

62

N/A

Jun et al., 2010

60

TBA +/−verapamil

100

N/A

61 (the only IA group incl.)

Biondi et al., 2004

25

Nimodipine

42

76

72

Feng et al., 2002

29

Verapamil

34

29

N/A

Badjatia et al., 2004

18

Nicardipine

100

42

N/A

Our study

17

TBA +/− papaverine or nimodipine

100

23

53