Series | No. Of patients | Endovascular Treatment | Angiographic improvement | Clinical improvement | Favourable outcome (mRS 0–2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bejjani et al., 1998 [15] | 31 | TBA +/− papavarine | N/A | 72% | 80% |
Coyne et al., 1994 [14] | 13 | TBA | N/A | 31 | 38 |
Eskridge et al., 1994 [13] | 50 | TBA | N/A | 61 | N/A |
Fujii et al., 1995 [16] | 19 | TBA | 94 | 63 | 89 |
Polin et al., 2000 | 38 | TBA +/− papaverine | 82 | 29 | 53 |
Jestaedt et al., 2008 [25] | 38 | TBA | 100 | N/A | 21 |
Hoh and Ogilvy 2005 [26] | 530 | TBA | N/A | 62 | N/A |
Jun et al., 2010 | 60 | TBA +/−verapamil | 100 | N/A | 61 (the only IA group incl.) |
Biondi et al., 2004 | 25 | Nimodipine | 42 | 76 | 72 |
Feng et al., 2002 | 29 | Verapamil | 34 | 29 | N/A |
Badjatia et al., 2004 | 18 | Nicardipine | 100 | 42 | N/A |
Our study | 17 | TBA +/− papaverine or nimodipine | 100 | 23 | 53 |