Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of studies comparing IVT with non-IVT in AF pattents

From: Efficacy and safety of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Study

Study design

Comparison

No. of patients

age, y

Men (%)

Treatment

Hypertension (%)

Diabetes mellitus (%)

Dyslipidemia (%)

Baseline NIHSS

Onset to needle (min)

Mortality, %

SICH, %

Bluhmki 2009 [5]

prospective RCT

IVT/Non-IVT

53/55

NR

NR

rtPA

3–4.5 h

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

22.6/14.5, 90d

17.0/6.6

Zhang 2010 [7]

retrospective

IVT/Non-IVT

22/44

68.3/70.4

40.9/43.2

rtPA

< 4.5 h

72.7/63.6

13.6/20.5

NR

12.0/12.6

203.7/NR

18.2/20.5, 90d

18.2/6.8

Frank 2012 [9]

retrospective

IVT/Non-IVT

639/992

74.2/73.9

47.3/47.6

rtPA

< 3 h

71.1/75.5

NR

NR

15 /14

NR

21.8/23.2, 90d

2.7/0.9

Saposnik 2013 [11]

prospective

IVT/Non-IVT

316/1373

NR

NR

rtPA

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

26.3/18.1, 30d

NR

Padjen 2014 [20]

prospective

IVT/Non-IVT

34/97

68/72

58.8/51.5

rtPA

< 4.5 h

94.1/87.6

20.6/24.7

29.4/38.8

11/14

NR

14.7/45.4, 90d

5.9/4.1

Zhao 2016 [21]

retrospective

IVT/Non-IVT

151/116

71.3/73.5

43.7/43.1

rtPA

< 4.5 h

73.5/67.2

15.9/19.0

17.2/12.1

15.1/13.9

165.7/179.3

23.2/25.0, 90d

13.9/1.7

Yang 2019 [15]

retrospective

IVT/Non-IVT

47/31

71.2/74.7

34.0/58.1

rtPA

3-9 h

74.5/93.4

19.1/32.2

NR

11.5 /13.7

322.9 /310.4

10.6/14.8, 90d

2.1/0