Skip to main content

Table 6 Definitive therapeutic choice and shunt settings in patients with diagnosed IIH after conducting telemetric ICP monitoring

From: Long-term telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring for diagnosis and therapy optimisation of idiopathic intracranial hypertension

ID

The Definitive Applied Therapy

VP-shunt valve pressure settings in cm H2O (differential/gravitational) on conclusion of ICP monitoring*

Number of subsequent shunt valve adjustments after surgery

1

VP Shunt (M.blue plus®)

5/25

0

2

ETV + Plexus chorideus coagulation

Not Applicable

0

3

Stenting of the transverse sinus

Not Applicable

0

4

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

5/28

2

5

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

7/30

2

6

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

0/36

6

7

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

10/24

4

8

Change of VP Shunt valves to proSA® Shunt System

6/26

3

9

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

8/30

3

10

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

6/30

3

11

VP Shunt (M.blue plus®)

10/34

2

12

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

9/36

5

13

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

8/28

0

14

Explantation of VP Shunt. Exclusion of IIH.

Not Applicable

2

15

Exclusion of IIH; no treatment for IIH

Not Applicable

0

16

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

8/20

3

17

ETV

Not Applicable

0

18

Changes of VP Valves to proSA® Shunt System

7/32

2

19

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

2/40

6

20

VP Shunt (proSA® Shunt System)

4/28

5

Average therapeutic shunt valve setting in the cohort

6,3/29,8

Total number of adjustments in all patients = 48

Average therapeutic shunt valve setting excluding patients under 18 years of age

6/30,58

  1. *The 2 numbers separated by a slash refer to the valve settings of the differential and gravitational units, respectively. The utilised shunt systems were ProSA® Shunt System (Miethke GmbH, Germany) and M.blue plus® (Miethke GmbH, Germany)