Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of FMA-UE, WMFT, and MBI points between two groups

From: Effects of motor imagery based brain-computer interface on upper limb function and attention in stroke patients with hemiplegia: a randomized controlled trial

Variables

 

BCI group (n = 30)

CR group (n = 30)

Estimated Difference

BCI vs. CR

(95%CI)

P-value

FMA-UE

Baseline

29.0(21.8, 42.3)

36.0(24.0, 43.3)

−2.5 (− 10.0 to 3.0)

0.351

Final

46.0(33.8, 55.8)

39.5(27.8, 45.0)

6.0 (0.0 to 13.0)

0.049

 

Change-value

11.0(8.0, 16.3)

4.0(2.8, 5.0)

8.0 (5.0 to 10.0)

< 0.001

WMFT

Baseline

30.5(22.0, 43.8)

31.5(24.8, 45.5)

−2.0 (− 9.0 to 4.0)

0.433

Final

51.5(38.0, 59.8)

40.0(32.8, 50.3)

9.0 (1.0 to 17.0)

0.033

Change-value

13.5(9.8, 22.3)

5.0(3.8, 6.3)

8.0 (6.0 to 11.0)

< 0.001

MBI

Baseline

54.5(45.0, 65.8)

52.5(43.8, 68.5)

0.0 (− 7.0 to 7.0)

0.965

Final

80.0(70.0, 93.3)

62.5(48.8, 72.2)

18.0 (9.1 to 25.0)

< 0.001

 

Change-value

24.0(16.8, 30.0)

6.5(4.0, 9.0)

17.0 (12.0 to 21.0)

< 0.001

  1. Medians and 25 and 75% quartiles are shown; Change-value:final-baseline; BCI: brain-computer interface; CR: conventional rehabilitation; FMA-UE: Fugl-Meyer Motor Function of Upper Extremity Scale; WMFT: Wolf Motor Function Test; MBI: Modified Barthel Index