Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between cued recall scores and FPG/TBR/TAR/TIR/GRI after controlling for confounding factors

From: Relationship between key continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and specific cognitive domains in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

 

β

95% CI

P values

Model 1

   

FPG

-0.307

(-0.441 - -0.092)

0.003

Model 2

   

TBR< 3.9 mmol/L (%)

-0.214

(-0.186 - -0.008)

0.033

TAR> 13.9 mmol/L (%)

-0.216

(-0.053 - -0.003)

0.030

TAR10.1–13.9 mmol/L (%)

0.206

(0.001–0.067)

0.042

TIR (%)

0.086

(-0.011–0.026)

0.399

GRI

-0.154

(-0.030–0.004)

0.129

Model 3

   

TBR< 3.9 mmol/L (%)

-0.327

(-0.234 - -0.062)

0.001

TAR> 13.9 mmol/L (%)

-0.031

(-0.038–0.030)

0.818

TAR10.1–13.9 mmol/L (%)

0.343

(0.025–0.089)

0.001

Model 4

   

TBR< 3.9 mmol/L (%)

-0.212

(-0.186 - -0.006)

0.036

TAR> 13.9 mmol/L (%)

-0.218

(-0.054 - -0.003)

0.030

TAR10.1–13.9 mmol/L (%)

0.203

(0.001–0.067)

0.046

  1. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, duration of disease, education and BMI.
  2. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, duration of disease, education and BMI.
  3. Model 3 includes all variables in model 2 plus FPG.
  4. Model 4 includes all variables in model 2 plus depression scale.
  5. FPG, fasting plasma glucose; TIR, time in range; TAR, time above range; TBR, time below range
  6. GRI, glycemia risk index
Back to article page

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us