Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariable models of factors associated with documentation of rehabilitation assessment among SAH patients

From: Assessment of rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage in China: findings from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance

Variable

Patients eligible for DS with or without GCS score, OR (95%CI, P value)

N = 11,234

Patients eligible for DS with GCS score, OR (95%CI, P value)

N = 6381

OR (95% CI)

P value

OR (95% CI)

P value

Admission to stroke unit

 NICU + ICU vs stroke unit

0.71 (0.63–0.82)

 < 0.0001

0.67 (0.57–0.80)

 < 0.0001

 Other vs stroke unit

0.74 (0.66–0.83)

 < 0.0001

0.80 (0.69–0.93)

0.0041

Hospital length of stay

1.04 (1.04–1.05)

 < 0.0001

1.05 (1.05–1.06)

 < 0.0001

Dysphagia screening

 Yes vs No

1.88 (1.73–2.04)

 < 0.0001

1.70 (1.51–1.90)

 < 0.0001

DVT prophylaxis

 Yes vs No

1.56 (1.41–1.72)

 < 0.0001

1.62 (1.43–1.83)

 < 0.0001

Vessel evaluationa

 Yes vs No

1.80 (1.63–1.98)

 < 0.0001

1.71 (1.5–1.95)

 < 0.0001

Hospital grade

 Secondary hospital vs Tertiary hospital

0.70 (0.64–0.76)

 < 0.0001

0.76 (0.68–0.86)

 < 0.0001

Region

 East vs West

0.91 (0.81–1.01)

0.0817

––

 

 Central vs West

0.80 (0.72–0.89)

0.0001

––

 
  1. The first column includes all patients (including those with missing admission GCS scores); the second column is restricted to patients for whom admission GCS scores were recorded
  2. The admission GCS score was not included due to missing data in 43.2% of cases
  3. aVessel evaluation refers to the evaluation of blood vessels in the neck and intracranial