Assessment of rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage in China: findings from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance

Table 4 Multivariable models of factors associated with outcomes of SAH patients with and without rehabilitation assessment during hospitalization

Variable	Patients eligible for DS with or without GCS score, OR (95%CI , P value)* N = 11,234		Patients eligible for DS with GCS score, OR (95%CI , P value)# N = 6381
Length of stay > 14 days	1.96 (1.81–2.12)	< 0.0001**	2.17 (1.95–2.42)	< 0.0001^##
Disability at discharge-mRS score (2–5)	1.49 (1.36–1.64)	< 0.0001	1.84 (1.62–2.09)	< 0.0001
In-hospital mortality	0.39 (0.3–0.51)	< 0.0001	0.44 (0.32–0.62)	< 0.0001
Discharge to home	1.40 (1.28–1.54)	< 0.0001	1.24 (1.1–1.41)	0.0007
Discharge to rehabilitation centre	3.23 (1.81–5.75)	0.0001	6.39 (2.28–17.93)	0.0004

The first column includes all patients (including those with missing admission GCS scores); the second column is restricted to patients for whom admission GCS scores were recorded
^*adjusted variables: Hospital length of stay, Region, Hospital grade, Admission to the Stroke unit, Dysphagia screening, DVT prophylaxis, Vessel evaluation; **adjusted variables: Region, Hospital grade, Admission to the stroke unit, Dysphagia screening, DVT prophylaxis, Vessel evaluation; ^#(Sensitivity analysis): adjusted variables: GCS score, Hospital length of stay, Region, Hospital grade, Admission to the stroke unit, Dysphagia screening, DVT prophylaxis, Vessel evaluation; ^##(Sensitivity analysis): adjusted variables: GCS score, Region, Hospital grade, Admission to the stroke unit, Dysphagia screening, DVT prophylaxis, Vessel evaluation

ISSN: 1471-2377