Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-analysis study characteristics

From: Arterial spin labeling (ASL-MRI) versus fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET) in diagnosing dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Citation

Target Condition

Sample Size (Diseased/ Healthy)

Assessment Method (Visual/Quantitative)

Sensitivity

(FDG-PET/ASL-MRI)

Specificity

(FDG-PET/ASL-MRI)

Positive predictive value

(FDG-PET/ASL-MRI)

Negative predictive value

(FDG-PET/ASL-MRI)

Anazodo et al. [2017] [27]

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD)

10/10

Visual

0.88/0.66

0.90/0.62

0.90/0.63

0.88/0.65

Ceccarini et al. [2020] [19]

Different types of dementia

27/30

Visual

0.93/0.64

0.70/0.71

0.73/0.66

0.91/0.68

Quantitative

0.79/0.57

0.63/0.81

0.65/0.72

0.76/0.67

Fällmar et al. [2017] [20]

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD)

20/38

Visual

0.96/0.53

0.54/0.84

0.71/0.80

0.91/0.60

Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

25/38

Musiek et al. [2012] [31]

Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

15/19 (qualitative assessment)

Visual

0.66/0.63

0.97/0.92

0.95/0.86

0.78/0.76

13/18 (quantitative assessment)

Quantitative

0.72/0.77

0.92/0.92

0.87/0.87

0.82/0.85

Tosun & Jagust et al. [2016] [34]

Early mild cognitive impairment (early-MCI)

30/34

Quantitative

0.90/0.83

0.88/0.84

0.86/0.82

0.90/0.84

Late mild cognitive impairment (late-MCI)

25/34

0.87/0.74

0.88/0.74

0.84/0.67

0.90/0.79

Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

20/34

0.95/0.80

0.94/0.88

0.90/0.79

0.96/0.88

Tosun & Rabinovici et al. [2016] [35]

Behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD)

32/15

Quantitative

0.79/0.78

1.00/0.92

1.00/0.96

0.62/0.59

Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

28/15

0.78/0.86

1.00/0.92

1.00/0.95

0.70/0.77