Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between patient’s subgroups regarding sleep architecture

From: Impact of site, size and severity of ischemic cerebrovascular stroke on sleep in a sample of Egyptian patients a polysomnographic study

Stage%

Group

Min

Max

Mean

S.D

F

Sig

Stage 1%

A

1

28

7.59

5.143

1.327

.270

B

2

13

6.63

3.019

  

C

0

12

5.20

4.077

  

Stage 2%

A

33

76

53.75

10.856

1.159

.319

B

26

72

50.96

10.813

  

C

41

57

49.30

4.900

  

Stage3&4%

A

2

45

22.03

9.759

.905

.408

B

10

42

21.58

8.070

  

C

18

43

26.00

8.138

  

REM%

A

0

50

16.44

9.293

3.248

.043*

B

0

60

21.17

11.343

  

C

14

29

22.60

4.088

  

REM L

A

25

180

72.6

27.1

8.01

0.001*

B

25

181

79.49

33.589

  

C

59

175

99.11

27.589

  
  1. A Subcortical infarcts, Cortical infarcts, C Brain stem infarcts
  2. 1% Percentage of stage 1, 2% Percentage of stage 2, 3&4% Percentage of stage 3& 4, REM % Percentage of stage REM REM L REM latency)
  3. •P > 0.05 = Non Significant, P ≤ 0.05 = Significant
  4. •P ≤ 0.01 = Highly significant, P ≤ 0.005 = Very highly significant
Back to article page

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us