Table 2 Comparison between cases with good and poor clinical outcomes of RIVT
From: Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic review
Influencing factors | Good-outcome group (18 cases) | Poor-outcome group (6 cases) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
Male [cases (%)] | 11 (61.11%) | 3 (50.00%) | 0.494 |
Age (year) [median (min, max)] | 69.25 (42, 87) | 78.00 (51, 83) | 0.156 |
ACC involved in the index stroke [cases (%)] | 12 (75.00%) | 4 (66.67%) | 0.541 |
ACC involved in the recurrent stroke [cases (%)] | 14 (82.35%) | 5 (83.33%) | 0.73 |
TOAST classification | |||
LAA [cases (%)] | 7 (43.75%) | 2 (33.33%) | 0.523 |
CE [cases (%)] | 5 (31.25%) | 3 (50.00%) | 0.369 |
SAO [cases (%)] | 4 (25.00%) | 1 (16.67%) | 0.581 |
Baseline NIHSS of the index stroke [median (min, max)] | 7.00 (2, 14) | 14.50 (6, 19) | 0.1 |
Baseline NIHSS of the recurrent stroke [median (min, max)] | 10.40 (2, 22) | 18.00 (8, 24) | 0.056 |
OTT of the previous IVT (min) [median (min, max)] | 106.67 (44, 240) | 120.00 (35, 350) | 0.953 |
OTT of the RIVT (min) [median (min, max)] | 85.00 (33, 220) | 179.50 (44, 420) | 0.221 |
The interval between two IVT (day) [median (min, max)] | 9.50 (0.25, 90) | 18.00 (2, 73) | 0.974 |
Good outcome after previous IVT [cases (%)] | 18 (100.00%) | 4 (66.67%) | 0.054 |