Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of studies included in the systematic review (n = 33)

From: Theta burst stimulation: what role does it play in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review of the existing evidence

Clinical feature

Group

Sample size(Male/Female)

Age (years)

Side(Left/Right)

Type (Ischemic/ Hemorrhagic)

Course of disease

TBS protocol

Targeted Area

Outcomes

Follow-up

Adjuvant therapy

Adverse effects (n)

Cognitive impairment

 Li et al.[18]

iTBS

16/12

69.50 ± 9.50

16/12

18/10

25.00 d

600 pulses, 100% RMT,

1 sess/d,

2 weeks

LH DLPFC

MMSE,

OCS

/

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

sneezing: 1

sham

18/12

66.00 ± 13.00

24/6

14/16

25.00 d

/

 Chu et al.[19]

iTBS

18/3

57.24 ± 14.03

12/9

13/8

4.00 ± 5.00 mon

600 pulses, 70% RMT,

1 sess/d,

6 weeks

LH DLPFC

MMSE,

LOTCA,

/

Computer-

assisted rehabilitation therapy

/

sham

13/7

66.75 ± 12.23

13/7

12/8

6.00 ± 4.00 mon

 Tsai et al.[17]

iTBS

11/4

60.13 ± 14.10

Left

7/8

18.47 ± 20.21 d

600 pulses, 80% RMT,

1 sess/d,

2 weeks

LH DLPFC

RBANS

/

N/A

/

sham

13/2

56.23 ± 12.00

10/5

38.00 ± 7.90 d

Visuospatial neglect

 Koch et al.[21]

cTBS

N/A

61.40 ± 13.02

Right

Ischemic

46.80 d

600 pulses, 80% AMT,

2 sess/d,

2 weeks

LH PPC

BIT

2 weeks

Computer-

assisted rehabilitation therapy

/

sham

N/A

71.89 ± 4.86

36.90 d

 Fu et al.[11]

cTBS

8/2

55.10 ± 13.96

Right

5/5

43.70 ± 23.50 d

801 pulses, 80% RMT,

4 sess/d,

14 days

LH PPC

SCT,

LBT

4 weeks

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

slight dizziness: 2

sham

8/2

59.50 ± 12.68

59.50 ± 12.00 d

/

 Yang et al.[9]

cTBS

5/4

49.45 ± 10.78

N/A

6/3

104.85 ± 

36.38 d

801 pulses, 80% RMT,

4 sess/d,

2 weeks

LH PPC

SCT,

LBT

1 mon

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

N/A

sham

3/7

47.70 ± 11.81

6/4

105.91 ± 37.59 d

 Fu et al.[22]

cTBS

9/3

60.17 ± 14.05

Right

N/A

41.83 ± 20.56 d

600 pulses, 80% RMT, 4sess/day,

10 days

LH PPC

SCT,

LBT

/

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

/

control

62.00 ± 9.78

N/A

36.17 ± 17.50 d

600 pulses, 40% RMT,

4 sess/day,

10 days

 Cao et al.[20]

iTBS

6/1

55.00 ± 12.00

Right

N/A

32.00 ± 17.00 d

600 pulses, 80% RMT,

2 sess/day,

2 weeks

LH DLPFC

SCT,

LBT

/

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

N/A

control

5/1

62.00 ± 10.00

N/A

36.00 ± 17.00 d

600 pulses, 40% RMT,

2 sess/day,

2 weeks

 Nyffeler et al.[13]

8cTBS

5/5

67.80 ± 10.13

Right

N/A

26.80 ± 20.89 d

801 pulses, 100% RMT, 4sess/day,

2 days

LH PPC

CBS

3 mons

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

/

16cTBS

6/4

74.30 ± 10.23

N/A

22.90 ± 10.34 d

801 pulses, 100% RMT,

4 sess/day,

4 days

sham

7/3

70.60 ± 11.44

N/A

25.80 ± 11.26 d

801 pulses, 100% RMT, 4sess/day,

2 days

 Hopfner et al.[10]

cTBS

5/7

62.00 ± 10.60

Right

N/A

32.42 ± 11.95 d

801 pulses, 100% AMT,

2 sess/day,

2 weeks

LH PPC

BCT

/

Smooth pursuit training

N/A

sham

4/2

65.40 ± 15.20

N/A

32.42 ± 11.95 d

 Vatanparasti et al.[12]

cTBS

5/2

67.50 ± 8.40

N/A

4/3

N/A

801 pulses, 80% RMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

LH PPC

SCT,

LBT

/

Prism adaptation

/

sham

5/2

65.50 ± 10.20

4/3

N/A

Aphasia

 Chou et al.[26]

iTBS

15/14

62.70 ± 12.70

Left

20/9

17.60 ± 20.80 mon

600 pulses, 80% RMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

LH IFG

CCAT

/

Speech and language therapy

/

sham

20/9

61.60 ± 14.70

20/9

16.50 ± 24.60 mon

 Allendorfer et al.[24]

iTBS

12/6

59.61 ± 10.54

Left

Ischemic

4.62 ± 4.17 y

600 pulses, 80% AMT,

1 sess/day,

3 weeks

LH IFG

BNT,SFT,COWAT,

WAB-R AQ,PPVT,

3 mons

N/A

N/A

Sham

4/2

43.78 ± 13.98

3.94 ± 3.56 y

 Szaflarski et al.[25]

iTBS

14/7

59.39 ± 13.83

Left

Ischemic

3.90 ± 4.02 y

600 pulses, 80% AMT,

1 sess/day,

3 weeks

LH IFG

BNT,SFT,COWAT,

WAB

3 mons

N/A

N/A

sham

4/2

48.78 ± 11.34

4.62 ± 4.02 y

 Zheng et al.[23]

cTBS

13/2

53.13 ± 11.26

Left

N/A

42.80 ± 12.91 d

600 pulses, 80% AMT,

1 sess/day,

3 weeks

RH pSTG

WAB-AQ

/

Speech and language therapy

N/A

Sham

11/3

66.33 ± 13.77

N/A

50.50 ± 21.93 d

Spasticity /Upper Extremity

/Hand

 Chen et al.[29]

iTBS

7/4

52.90 ± 11.10

6/5

2/9

 > 6 mon

600 pulse,

80% AMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

AH M1

MAS,

FMA-UE,

ARAT

/

Physical and occupational

therapy

/

sham

7/4

52.60 ± 8.30

9/2

3/8

 Kuzu et al.[27]

cTBS

6/1

61.30 ± 9.80

2/5

Ischemic

14.50 ± 1.60 mon

600 pulse,

80% AMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

UH M1

MAS,

FMA-UE

4 weeks

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

/

sham

2/4

65.00 ± 4.60

3/3

14.50 ± 2.00 mon

 Chen et al.[28]

iTBS

13/3

57.38 ± 8.04

4/12

10/6

80.13 ± 35.19 d

600 pulse,

80% AMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

Ipsilesional CB

MAS

/

Physical therapy

/

sham

12/4

51.44 ± 9.19

9/7

8/8

101.50 ± 54.15 d

 Watanabe et al.[31]

iTBS

5/3

72.50 ± 6.50

4/4

N/A

 < 1 week

600 pulses, 110%RMT,

1 sess /day,

10 days

AH M1

FMA-UE,

MAS

/

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

/

sham

3/3

75.20 ± 5.50

1/5

N/A

 Ackerley et al.[32]

iTBS

6/3

61

3/6

N/A

20 mon

600 pulses, 90% AMT,

1 sess /day,

10 days

AH M1

FMA-UE, ARAT

1 mon and

3 mons

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

/

sham

6/3

71

3/6

N/A

18 mon

 Chen et al.[33]

iTBS

8/4

54.36 ± 10.56

7/5

6/6

5.01 ± 

4.39 mon

600 pulses,

80% AMT,

2 sess/day,

15 days

AH M1

MAS, FMA-UE,

ARAT,

NHPT,

BBT,

/

Virtual reality-based cycling training

/

sham

10/1

48.95 ± 9.63

7/4

2/9

7.99 ± 

5.41 mon

 Talelli et al.[38]

iTBS

7/6

54.4 ± 15.8

9/4

Ischemic

17.50 ± 5.10 mon

600 pulses, 80% AMT,

1 sess /day;

2 weeks

AH M1

NHPT,

JTT,

grip strength

1 mon and

3 mons

Physical therapy

/

sham

9/3

58.5 ± 12.0

5/7

38.50 ± 57.20 mon

cTBS

7/5

55.8 ± 12.4

2/10

29.80 ± 19.70 mon

600 pulses, 80% AMT,

1 sess /day,

2 weeks

UH M1

sham

6/6

59.4 ± 12.4

7/5

49.60 ± 76.90 mon

 Sung et al.[34]

iTBS

9/3

64.20 ± 11.90

N/A

8/4

8.10 ± 1.5 mon

600 pulses, 80% AMT,

10 sess/day,

4 weeks

AH M1

FMA-UE,

WMFT

/

Physical therapy and occupational therapy

/

sham

11/3

63.10 ± 12.80

N/A

9/5

8.20 ± 1.60 mon

 Khan et al.[35]

TBS

13/7

63.55 ± 12.67

6/14

Ischemic

17.10 ± 4.82 d

600 pulses,

60%RMT,

1 sess /day,

4 weeks

iTBS to AH M1 + cTBS to UH M1

FMA-UE

3 mon,

6 mon and

1 y

Physical therapy

N/A

no sti

12/8

64.60 ± 12.99

5/15

16.40 ± 5.58 d

 Di Lazzaro et al.[37]

cTBS

3/3

59.5 ± 12.4

1/5

Ischemic

34.80 ± 17.50 mon

600 pulses, 80% AMT,

1 sess /day,

10 days

AH M1

ARAT,

NHPT,

JTT

1 mon and

3 mons

Physical therapy

/

sham

4/2

57.5 ± 12.3

2/4

30.00 ± 27.60 mon

 Zhang et al.[36]

cTBS + 

iTBS

9/5

58.21 ± 9.00

8/6

6/8

50.57 ± 32.01 mon

600 pulses, 70% RMT,

1 sess /day,

3 weeks

AH M1

FMA-UE,

ARAT

2 weeks

Robot-

assisted training

N/A

sham cTBS + 

iTBS

7/7

59.50 ± 8.56

8/6

8/6

63.93 ± 46.80 mon

sham cTBS + 

sham iTBS

8/6

64.00 ± 5.39

7/7

10/4

50.86 ± 29.50 mon

 Nicolo et al.[30]

cTBS [14]

7/7

62.40 ± 12.30

4/10

13/1

5.30 ± 1.80 weeks

600 pulses, 70% RMT,

3 sess/week,

3 weeks

UH M1

FMA-UE, NHPT

1 mon

Physical therapy

/

sham [13]

8/5

64.30 ± 17.10

3/10

10/3

4.70 ± 1.40 weeks

Lower Extremity /Balance

 Koch et al.[40]

iTBS

13/4

64.00 ± 11.30

6/11

Ischemic

15.18 ± 6.63 mon

600 pulse,

80% AMT,

2 sess/day,

3 weeks

ipsilesional CB

BBS,

FMA-LE

3 weeks

Physical therapy

/

sham

10/7

8/9

15.88 ± 6.00 mon

 Liao et al.[42]

iTBS

12/3

51.53 ± 9.22

11/4

7/8

70.40 ± 44.43 d

600 pulse,

80% AMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

ipsilesional CB

BBS,

FMA-LE

/

Physical therapy

slight headache: 1

sham

9/6

55.40 ± 8.10

9/6

8/7

86.53 ± 45.26 d

/

 Lin et al.[41]

iTBS

1/9

60.80 ± 8.10

5/5

7/3

359.00 ± 171.00 d

1200 pulses, 100% midline MT,

2 sess/week,

5 weeks

Bilateral M1

BBS,

FMA-LE

/

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

/

sham

2/8

61.10 ± 9.70

6/4

9/1

384.00 ± 270.00 d

 Xie et al.[39]

iTBS

13/5

52.35 ± 8.62

7/11

10/8

2.22 ± 1.70 mon

600 pulse,

80% AMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

contralesional CB

FMA-LE

/

Conventional rehabilitation therapies

/

sham

11/7

54.41 ± 7.01

6/12

10/8

2.91 ± 1.96 mon

Dysphagia

 Xie et al.[43]

iTBS

12/6

66.90 ± 11.30

9/9

14/4

21.10 ± 20.11 d

600 pulses, 80% RMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

Affected suprahyoid motor cortex

SSA,

WST,

MSS,

PAS

2 weeks

Conventional swallowing therapy

/

sham

14/6

62.80 ± 13.00

8/12

13/7

23.70 ± 16.00 d

 Rao et al.[44]

iTBS

22/11

63.42 ± 10.35

14/18

15/18

22.00 ± 8.00 d

600 pulses, 100% RMT,

1 sess/day,

2 weeks

Bilateral CB

FEDSS,

PAS,SSA,

FOIS

4 weeks

Conventional swallowing therapy

slight dizziness: 3

sham

24/7

65.90 ± 11.42

12/12

19/12

26.00 ± 3.00 d

/

  1. Abbreviations: AMT Active motor threshold, AH Affcted hemisphere, AQ Aphasia Quotient, ARAT Action Research Arm Test, BBS Berg Balance Scale, BBT Box and Block test, BCT Bird Cancellation Task, BIT Behavioral Inattention Test, BNT Boston Naming Test, CB Cerebellum, CBS Catherine Bergego Scale, CCAT Concise Chinese Aphasia Test, COWAT Controlled Oral Word Association Test, DLPFC Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, FEDSS Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale, FMA Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FOIS Functional Oral Intake Scale, IFG Inferior frontal gyrus, iTBS intermittent theta burst stimulation, JTT Jebsen Taylor Test, LBT Line bisection test, LE Lower extremity, LH Left hemisphere, LOTCA Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment, MAS Modified Ashworth scale, M1 Primary motor cortex, MMSE Mini‐mental state examination, MSS Murray Secretion Scale, NHPT Nine-hole peg test, N/A Not available, OCS Oxford cognitive screen, PAS Penetration/Aspiration Scale, PPC Posterior parietal cortex, PPVT Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, pSTG Posterior superior temporal gyrus, RH Right hemisphere, RBANS Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, RMT Resting motor threshold, SCT Star cancellation test, SFT Semantic Fluency Test, SSA Standardized Swallowing Assessment, UE Upper extremity, UH Unaffcted hemisphere, WAB-R Western Aphasia Battery-Revised, WMFT Wolf Motor Function Test, WST Water-swallowing test