Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison with MAPE, SMAPE, RAE, RRSE and RMSE between Linear and machine learning methods

From: Comparison of multiple linear regression and machine learning methods in predicting cognitive function in older Chinese type 2 diabetes patients

 

MAPE

SMAPE

RRSE

RMSE

Linear

0.61

0.135

0.855

4.172

RF

0.599

0.131

0.851

4.153

SGB

0.606

0.126

0.852

4.159

NB

0.599

0.124

0.82

4.003

XGBoost

0.439

0.113

0.697

3.403

  1. Data showed as mean; RF Random forest, SGB Stochastic gradient boosting, NB Naïve Bayes classifier, XGBoost eXtreme gradient boosting, MAPE Mean absolute percentage error, SMAPE Symmetric MAPE, RAE Relative absolute error, RRSE Root relative squared error, RMSE Root mean square error. The errors were used to compare the accuracies of the models. The smaller the errors, the better the model was