Skip to main content

Table 3 Results indicating that there was a high consensus that ambulation in patients should be preserved for as long as possible

From: The role of ataluren in the treatment of ambulatory and non-ambulatory children with nonsense mutation duchenne muscular dystrophy - a consensus derived using a modified Delphi methodology in Eastern Europe, Greece, Israel and Sweden

Theme

Statement

Overall Agreement

Consensus

Loss of ambulation

Ataluren (in addition to standard of care) significantly delays the loss of ambulation in patients with nmDMD

85.0%

High

Ataluren (in addition to standard of care) is expected to result in the same treatment effect in each surviving muscle fibre irrespective of the nmDMD patients’ ambulatory status

65.0%

None

If a nmDMD patient receiving ataluren loses ambulation, they should continue treatment with ataluren

95.0%

Very high

There is life beyond loss of ambulation. There are still lots of important functions of the muscles such as being able to use the hands and arms, fine motor skills and respiratory muscles – all these functions should be maintained for as long as possible

100.0%

Very high

Delaying the loss of ambulation in patients with nmDMD may reduce the development of scoliosis

90.0%

High

Delaying the loss of ambulation in patients with nmDMD delays the decline of respiratory function

100.0%

Very high

Delaying the loss of ambulation in patients with nmDMD is related to the decline of upper limb function

75.0%

High

  1. The threshold for consensus defined as > 66%, with consensus being defined as high at > 66% and very high at > 90% of respondents selecting agree or strongly agree