Skip to main content
Download PDF

Study protocol: EXERcise and Cognition In Sedentary adults with Early-ONset dementia (EXERCISE-ON)

BMC Neurology volume 12, Article number: 75 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Although the development of early-onset dementia is a radical and invalidating experience for both patient and family there are hardly any non-pharmacological studies that focus on this group of patients. One type of a non-pharmacological intervention that appears to have a beneficial effect on cognition in older persons without dementia and older persons at risk for dementia is exercise. In view of their younger age early-onset dementia patients may be well able to participate in an exercise program. The main aim of the EXERCISE-ON study is to assess whether exercise slows down the progressive course of the symptoms of dementia.

Methods/Design

One hundred and fifty patients with early-onset dementia are recruited. After completion of the baseline measurements, participants living within a 50 kilometre radius to one of the rehabilitation centres are randomly assigned to either an aerobic exercise program in a rehabilitation centre or a flexibility and relaxation program in a rehabilitation centre. Both programs are applied three times a week during 3 months. Participants living outside the 50 kilometre radius are included in a feasibility study where participants join in a daily physical activity program set at home making use of pedometers. Measurements take place at baseline (entry of the study), after three months (end of the exercise program) and after six months (follow-up). Primary outcomes are cognitive functioning; psychomotor speed and executive functioning; (instrumental) activities of daily living, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes include physical, neuropsychological, and rest-activity rhythm measures.

Discussion

The EXERCISE-ON study is the first study to offer exercise programs to patients with early-onset dementia. We expect this study to supply evidence regarding the effects of exercise on the symptoms of early-onset dementia, influencing quality of life.

Trial registration

The present study is registered within The Netherlands National Trial Register (ref: NTR2124)

Peer Review reports

Background

Early-onset dementia (EOD; < 66 years) is less common than late-onset dementia (LOD; > 65 years) [1]. In the majority of studies, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common subtype of EOD, followed by vascular dementia (VaD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) [2–4]. The clinical presentation of EOD, concerning cognitive and behavioural disturbances, is quite heterogeneous and depends on the neuropathological substrate [5–9]. EOD places a large psychological and economical burden on patients and caregivers because of the patients’ prominent role in society (having young children, working) at disease onset [10].

Despite the devastating impact of the disease, few intervention studies focus on this specific group of younger patients. Some pharmacological studies report the inclusion of (a small subset of) EOD patients [11–13]. Non-pharmacological intervention studies, such as exercise interventions studies, do not report to include EOD patients. Notably, there is an increasing number of studies examining the effects of exercise on cognitive and behavioural functioning in sedentary older people [14], in patients in a very early stage of LOD [15], and in patients in a moderate stage of LOD [16]. Most evidence of these studies points in the direction of beneficial effects of exercise on cognition in the aging population. Although, in view of their younger age many EOD patients may be better able to perform aerobic physical activity compared to healthy elders and LOD patients, certain dementia characteristics such as apathy may lead to sedentary and socially impoverished lifestyles [17–19]. Indeed, a ‘frontal’ presentation, i.e. symptoms as apathy and dysexecutive functioning, is relatively common in EOD patients [9].

A brain region that plays a pivotal role in executive functions is the prefrontal cortex [20]. Interestingly, especially those functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex react positively to increased physical activity [21]. The functioning of other cortical areas such as the parietal lobe also show a positive relationship with physical activity [22]. Involvement of the prefrontal and parietal cortices in exercise benefits stems form neuro-imaging studies in older adults that show greater task-related activity after an exercise intervention in regions of the prefrontal and parietal cortices during an executive function task [23]. It is noteworthy that particularly the prefrontal cortex and the parietal lobe are vulnerable in EOD [24, 25] and may therefore offer a potentially appropriate venue for intervention. Furthermore, EOD patients are relatively young and suffer from less physical inconveniences compared to LOD patients [26] which makes participation in an intensive exercise program feasible and may result in larger benefits of the intervention [27].

The earlier mentioned positive effects of exercise combined with the characteristics of EOD patients, makes the lack of studies examining the effects of physical activity in the EOD population a remarkable observation. An elaborate description of the theory behind this observation is described in our review, also including a brief summary of part of the present study protocol [28]. In the present manuscript we present the detailed description of the entire protocol. This study is the first to investigate the exercise effects on cognition and behaviour in EOD patients. In the “EXERcise and Cognition In Sedentary adults with Early‐ONset dementia study” (EXERCISE-ON study), three different exercise programs are offered to persons with EOD: an aerobic exercise program in a rehabilitation centre, a flexibility and relaxation program in a rehabilitation centre and a daily physical activity program at home using pedometers (for a description see section Interventions). The present study is divided into two parts: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a feasibility study. The main aim of this study is to assess, making use of an RCT design, whether exercise slows down the progressive course of the symptoms of dementia, with respect to cognition, in particular psychomotor speed and executive functioning, and (instrumental) activities of daily living ((i)ADL), and may subsequently lead to better quality of life and less caregiver burden. In addition, a feasibility study is conducted to evaluate whether a physical activity program offered at home using pedometers can bring positive effects for EOD patients and their caregivers.

Methods/Design

Study design

This study consists of two parts. The main study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with one hundred EOD patients. In addition a feasibility study will be conducted with fifty EOD patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Trial design.

Full size image

Participants

This study will include persons with a diagnosis of EOD: AD, VaD, FTD or other types of dementia. Participants will be recruited primarily in the Alzheimer centre of the VU University medical centre (VUmc) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Secondarily, participants will be recruited through affiliate memory clinics. A careful screening process, including medical history, physical, neurological, and neuropsychological examination as well as laboratory tests, electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), will lead to the identification of patients with EOD. Diagnoses are made based on a multidisciplinary consensus team conference, according to the clinical criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) [29], on the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) for probable AD [30]; and on the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) for VaD [31]. Initially participants are recruited by a neurologist during a clinic visit where the patient, caregiver, and other family members are informed of the diagnosis. After provisional consent the study is explained (verbally and by use of printed material) by the principal investigator (AH), after which formal written consent is obtained.

Inclusion criteria are the following: 1) Diagnosis of EOD (onset of complaints < 66 years) (among others: AD, VaD, FTD); 2) Relatively early stage of dementia (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > 15 [32]); 3) Primary caregiver available. Participants will be excluded from participation when they 1) are wheelchair-bound; 2) are diagnosed with a neurodegenerative disease that primarily results in motor impairments, such as Parkinson's disease; 3) are diagnosed with serious cardiovascular disease, such as heart failure; 4) have a history of substance abuse; 5) had a head injury involving loss of consciousness greater than 15 minutes; 5) have a history of major psychiatric illness (e.g. personality disorder, schizophrenia); 6) have severe visual problems; 7) have severe hearing problems; 8) have insufficient proficiency of the Dutch language.

Randomization

After obtaining written informed consent and completion of the baseline measurement, patients are assigned to one of the exercise programs. Originally, it was planned to randomize patients in one of three exercise programs, with an allocation ration of 1:1:1. However, during the pilot study travel distance to the rehabilitation centres appeared to be a restraint for many patients (even when patients were brought with taxis). The randomization procedure had to be adjusted. Patients who are living within 50 kilometres of one of the participating rehabilitation centres are randomly assigned to either the aerobic exercise program or the flexibility and relaxation exercise program. The allocation ratio is 1:1. To ensure the allocation ratio block randomization is used (block size is 4). Randomization is provided by e-mail. An anonymous list with identification numbers is sent to an independent researcher who is blinded to the identity of the patients. This independent researcher keeps the randomization list. Patients living outside a 50 kilometre radius of one of the rehabilitation centres are included in the daily physical activity program at home using pedometers.

Interventions

Patients living within a radius of 50 kilometres of one of the rehabilitation centres are randomly assigned to one of the following programs:

Aerobic exercise program in a rehabilitation centre

This aerobic exercise program aims to improve the cardiorespiratory fitness of the participants. Activities consist of a warming-up, a core activity, i.e. cycling on a cycling ergometer, and a cooling down. The program endures three months, takes place three times a week, and is build up in duration and intensity [33]. Group size varies from 2 to 5 participants. This program is guided by a physical therapist (JB).

Flexibility and relaxation program in rehabilitation centre

The setting of this program is the same as for the aerobic exercise program (duration, frequency, group size, rehabilitation centre, and physical therapist). The difference is in the activities and the intensity of the program. Activities consist of stretching and toning exercises in combination with relaxation exercises. No build up is used.

Patients living outside the 50 kilometre radius from one of the rehabilitation centres are included in the following program:

Daily physical activity program at home using pedometers

This program takes place at the participant’s home. The program is based on the COACH method [34], developed by the interfaculty Centre for Human Movement Sciences of the University of Groningen (Netherlands) and the Centre for Movement and Research (CBO), Groningen (Netherlands). The COACH method is an evidence-based method to stimulate sedentary individuals to enhance physical activity participation in daily life, using “exercise counselling”. The exercise counselling is focused on intrinsic motivation [35], since this type of motivation is predominantly related to sedentariness [36] and is often disturbed in patients with brain damage [37]. Patients develop a benchmark for physical activity in several phases. Using 3 interviews, following motivational interviewing [38] and goal setting techniques [39, 40], the participant’s attitude towards physical activity is discussed and changed if necessary. The interviews are given by a neuropsychologist (in training).

Setting

Both the aerobic exercise program and the flexibility and relaxation program are given in two rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands (i.e. Reade, hospital Amstelland, Amstelveen; department of rehabilitation, Jeroen Bosch hospital,’s Hertogenbosch). The third exercise program (pedometer) is offered nation-wide at the patients’ homes.

Measurements and procedures

Each participant will undergo three measurements: baseline measurement (entry of the study, prior to randomization), post measurement (end of the exercise program, three months after baseline measurement), and follow-up measurement (six months after baseline measurement). A measurement consists of a neuropsychological examination during approximately 2 hours. Thoroughly trained master students Clinical Neuropsychology, blinded to group allocation will administer the tests. In the week following the neuropsychological examination the participants wear a pedometer and an actiwatch activity monitor for one week. Participants that are able to visit one of the rehabilitation centres also receive a physical examination during 30 minutes.

Primary outcome measures

  1. 1.

    Cognitive functioning

Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS)-COG[41]. The ADAS-COG is designed to evaluate cognitive disorders in persons with AD. The ADAS-COG is often used in clinical trials for dementia [42, 43].

  1. 2.

    Psychomotor speed/executive functioning

Trail Making Test (TMT) [44]. The TMT consists of two parts. Part A gives a measure for psychomotor speed. The more complex Part B gives an indication of cognitive flexibility, which is a part of executive functioning.

  1. 3.

    (Instrumental) activities of daily living ((i)ADL)

Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) [45]. To gain insight in the (i)ADL of participants, the DAD questionnaire is administered. The DAD is an informant-report questionnaire specifically designed for persons with a (beginning) dementia. The DAD is administered to the caregiver and provides information with respect to how the patient performs (i)ADL’s and whether he/she is taking initiative to do things.

  1. 4.

    Quality of life

The Dementia-Quality of Life (D-QOL) [46] is a valid instrument to assess the quality of life in persons with a mild to moderate stage of dementia [47]. The D-QOL is a self-report questionnaire and consists of propositions in 5 subscales: self-esteem, positive effect, negative effect, feelings of belonging, and enjoying the environment.

Secondary outcome measures

Physical measures

Physical fitness is assessed using the Åstrand cycle test[48], which is a submaximal measure of fitness and is used to estimate the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Walking speed is measured using the 6 Minutes Walk Test[49]. Balance and strength of the lower extremities is measured by the Sit to Stand Test[50]. Finally, the level of physical activity (steps/day) is assessed using a pedometer (OMRON HJ-113) [51, 52]. Participants are also asked to report their level of physical activity during the last week. This is assessed using a self-report questionnaire, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)[53].

Neuropsychological measures

An extensive neuropsychological battery is administered. Regarding episodic memory the “Face Recognition” from the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT)[54] is used to measure face recognition. Short term memory is measured using the “Digit span forwards”, working memory using the “Digit span backwards” from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Revised (WAIS-R)[55]; Word fluency is assessed using “category fluency” (animals and occupations) from the Groninger Intelligence Test (GIT)[56]; The Stroop Colour Word Test[57] short version is used to measure interference and inhibition. Coding, psychomotor-, and processing speed is measured using the subtest “Symbol substitution” from the (WAIS-R)[55, 58]. Furthermore, visuospatial capacity is assessed by the “Perceptual closure” subtest from the GIT [56]. Finally, self-efficacy is measured using a self-report questionnaire: General Self-efficacy scale (GES): Dutch version [59].

Rest-activity rhythm

The rest-activity rhythm is assessed using the Actiwatch activity monitor; Cambridge Neurotechnology Ltd., Cambridge, Great Britain [60].

Demographic and control variables

At baseline, demographic information, i.e. age, sex, educational attainment (using the system of Verhage, ranging from 1 (low) to 7 (high) [61]), diagnosis of dementia, number of years since diagnosis, and currently prescribed medications will be collected. To determine whether there has been a change in subjective physical functioning and in the amount of encouragement needed to start exercising several questions are asked during recruitment. Outcome measures will also be controlled for co-morbid medical conditions (medical chart), depressive symptoms: Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [62–64], and Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype [65, 66], in view of possible moderating effects on treatment outcome.

Statistical analysis

In the statistical analysis an intention-to-treat analysis will be performed in order to minimize bias [67]. Differences in the outcome measures between the aerobic exercise program and the flexibility and relaxation program on the three measurement moments will be analysed using a Linear Mixed Model (LMM) with contrasts. Time and treatment condition will be considered as a within-subjects and a between-subjects variable respectively. To analyse possible effects of the daily physical activity program at home using pedometers also a LMM is used, with time as within-subjects variable. Post-hoc analyses will be conducted to differentiate between persons who were physically active and persons who were physically inactive, based on pedometer outcomes on baseline measurement.

Sample size

The sample size calculation (using G*power [68]) is based upon two meta-analyses concerning studies in which the effects of physical training on cognition was investigated in either older adults with a cognitive disorder or dementia [69] or in healthy sedentary older adults [14]. Summary effect sizes in these studies were respectively Hedges’ g = 0.57 and g = 0.68, which are considered medium effect sizes. Since in the RCT part of the present study the control group receives an intervention existing of flexibility and relaxation exercises, in contrast to a control group who does not perform any physical activity, we assume a small effect size instead of a medium effect size (f = .1). For 80 % power, the sample size requirement (using a 5 % significance level) is 82 persons in total. Accounting for participants who withdraw from the study, as is seen in other intervention studies with healthy older adults [70] and patients with dementia [16] the total study population is targeted at 100 participants.

In the feasibility study a small to medium effect size was used (f = .15), in order to avoid Type II errors. Keeping the parameters equal to the situation above, the estimated sample size is 38 persons. Accounting for participants who withdraw from the study, the study population for this part of the study is targeted at 50 persons.

Ethical and legal considerations

The protocol is reviewed and approved by the Extramural Medicine institute (EMGO) which is part of the Dutch School of Primary Care Research (CaRe) (ref: WC2009-046). Ethical aspects of the protocol were approved by the accredited Medical Review Ethics Committee (aMREC) of the VUmc (ref: 2009–220) according to the Declaration of Helsinki (2008). The research has been included in the general assessment and registration form (ABR form) (ref: NL27426.029.09) and in The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) (ref: NTR2124).

Discussion

The EXERCISE-ON study will evaluate whether exercise slows down the progressive course of the symptoms of dementia in EOD patients. Characteristics of EOD patients, such as apathy, loss of initiative, together with their age and physique, make them good candidates for a physical activity program.

This study has several strengths. Despite the devastating impact of EOD on the lives of patients and their families, few specific treatments are available for EOD patients. First of all, EOD patients are dependent on facilities developed primarily for elderly, and second of all, EOD patients are underrepresented in scientific studies. Some pharmacological studies report the inclusion of (a small subset of) EOD patients. To our knowledge the present study is the first study that offers exercise interventions to EOD patients. Another strength is that the exercise programs are offered in different settings. This is the first study that brings patients suffering from dementia into a rehabilitation setting involving the guidance of an experienced physical therapist. In the rehabilitation centres patients are exposed to fellow EOD patients. Fellow patients can share experiences and tips, which may help getting grip on the consequences of a chronic disease [71]. The daily activity program is offered at participants homes. Particular this setting stimulates potential implementation in the future.

A challenge in this study is the inclusion of a sufficient number of participants. EOD is a rare condition, the proportion of people with EOD varies between 7.3 % to 31 % in studies from Japan, the UK, and the USA [4, 10, 72, 73]. Furthermore, it is expected that EOD patients have busier lives and are involved in more activities in contrast to patients suffering from dementia at an older age, similar to healthy adults of middle and older age [74]. To overcome this challenge we include multiple rehabilitation centres and also offer a home-based daily physical activity program to patients that are not able to travel to one of the rehabilitation centres.

In summary, the EXERCISE-ON study is an innovative study examining possible beneficial effects of exercise on symptoms, with respect to cognition, (i)ADL, and quality of life, of EOD. Study results may contribute substantially to care facilities for EOD patients. Furthermore, exercise may offer a new set of coping skills for this patient group.

Abbreviations

EXERCISE-ON:

EXERcise and Cognition In Sedentary adults with Early-ONset dementia

EOD:

Early-Onset Dementia

LOD:

Late-Onset Dementia

AD:

Alzheimer’s Disease

VaD:

Vascular Dementia

FTD:

Frontotemporal Dementia

RCT:

Randomized Controlled Trial

(i)ADL:

(instrumental) Activities of Daily Living

VUmc:

VU University medical centre

EEG:

Electroencephalogram

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

DSM-IV-TR:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-Text Revision

NINCDS-ADRDA:

National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association

NINDS-AIREN:

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences

MMSE:

Mini Mental State Examination

CBO:

“Centrum voor Beweging en Onderzoek” (Dutch), Centre for Movement and Research

ADAS-COG:

Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognition

TMT:

Trail Making Test

DAD:

Disability Assessment for Dementia

D-QOL:

Dementia-Quality of Life

VO2max:

Maximal Oxygen uptake

PASE:

Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly

RBMT:

Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test

WAIS-R:

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised

GIT:

Groninger Intelligence Test

GES:

General Self-efficacy Scale

CES-D:

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale

ApoE:

Apolipoprotein E

LMM:

Linear Mixed Model

EMGO:

Extramural Medicine institute

CaRe:

Dutch School of Primary Care Research

aMREC:

Accredited Medical Ethical Committee

ABR form:

General assessment and registration form

NTR:

The Netherlands National Trial Register.

References

  1. Lambert JC, Amouyel P: Genetic heterogeneity of Azheimer's disease: Complexity and advances. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007, 32 (Suppl 1): S62-S70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harvey RJ, Skelton-Robinson M, Rossor MN: The prevalence and causes of dementia in people under the age of 65 years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003, 74: 1206-1209. 10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sampson EL, Warren JD, Rossor MN: Young onset dementia. Postgrad Med J. 2004, 80: 125-139. 10.1136/pgmj.2003.011171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Vraamaak Elberling TV, Stokholm J, Hogh P, Waldemar G: Diagnostic profile of young and middle-aged memory clinic patients. Neurol. 2002, 59: 1259-1262. 10.1212/WNL.59.8.1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frisoni GB, Pievani M, Testa C, Sabattoli F, Bresciani L, Bonetti M, Beltramello A, Hayashi KM, Toga AW, Thompson PM: The topography of grey matter involvement in early and late onset Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2007, 130: 720-730. 10.1093/brain/awl377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Froelich-Fabre S, Skoglund L, Ostojic J, Kilander L, Lindau M, Glaser A, Basun H, Lannfelt L: Clinical and molecular aspects of frontotemporal dementia. Neurodegener Dis. 2004, 1: 218-224. 10.1159/000080989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, Freedman M, Kertesz A, Robert PH, Albert M, Boone K, Miller BL, Cummings J, Benson DF: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration - A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998, 51: 1546-1554. 10.1212/WNL.51.6.1546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neary D, Snowden J, Mann D: Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2005, 4: 771-780. 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70223-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Snowden JS, Stopford CL, Julien CL, Thompson JC, Davidson Y, Gibbons L, Pritchard A, Lendon CL, Richardson AM, Varma A, Neary D, Mann D: Cognitive phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease and genetic risk. Cortex. 2007, 43: 835-845. 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70683-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shinagawa S, Ikeda M, Toyota Y, Matsumoto T, Matsumoto N, Mori T, Ishikawa T, Fukuhara R, Komori K, Hokoishi K, Tanabe H: Frequency and clinical characteristics of early-onset dementia in consecutive patients in a memory clinic. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis. 2007, 24: 42-47. 10.1159/000102596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heyman A, Schmechel D, Wilkinson W, Rogers H, Krishnan R, Holloway D, Schultz K, Gwyther L, Peoples R, Utley C, Haynes C: Failure of long term high-dose lecithin to retard progression of early-onset Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm. 1987, 24: 279-286.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thal LJ, Calvani M, Amato A, Carta A: A 1-year controlled trial of acetyl-L-carnitine in early-onset AD. Neurol. 2000, 55: 805-810. 10.1212/WNL.55.6.805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Gool WA, Weinstein HC, Scheltens PK, Walstra GJM: Effect of hydroxychloroquine on progression of dementia in early Alzheimer's disease: an 18-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2001, 358: 455-460. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05623-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Colcombe S, Kramer AF: Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: A meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci. 2003, 14: 125-130. 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scherder EJA, Van Paasschen J, Deijen JB, Van Der Knokke S, Orlebeke JFK, Burgers I, Devriese PP, Swaab DF, Sergeant JA: Physical activity and executive functions in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment. Aging Ment Health. 2005, 9: 272-280. 10.1080/13607860500089930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eggermont LHP, Swaab DF, Hol EM, Scherder EJA: Walking the line: a randomised trial on the effects of a short term walking programme on cognition in dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009, 80: 802-804. 10.1136/jnnp.2008.158444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kipps CM, Mioshi E, Hodges JR: Emotion, social functioning and activities of daily living in frontotemporal dementia. Neurocase. 2009, 15: 182-189. 10.1080/13554790802632892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Konstantakopoulos G, Ploumidis D, Oulis P, Patrikelis P, Soumani A, Papadimitriou GN, Politis AM: Apathy, cognitive deficits and functional impairment in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2011, 133: 193-198. 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landes AM, Sperry SD, Strauss ME, Geldmacher DS: Apathy in Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001, 49: 1700-1707. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49282.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stuss DT, Alexander MP: Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a conceptual view. Psychol Res-Psychol Forsch. 2000, 63: 289-298. 10.1007/s004269900007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Colcombe SJ, Erickson KI, Raz N, Webb AG, Cohen NJ, McAuley E, Kramer AF: Aerobic fitness reduces brain tissue loss in aging humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003, 58: 176-180. 10.1093/gerona/58.2.M176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosano C, Venkatraman VK, Guralnik J, Newman AB, Glynn NW, Launer L, Taylor CA, Williamson J, Studenski S, Pahor M, Aizenstein H: Psychomotor Speed and Functional Brain MRI 2 Years After Completing a Physical Activity Treatment. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010, 65: 639-647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Colcombe SJ, Kramer AF, Erickson KI, Scalf P, Mcauley E, Cohen NJ, Webb A, Jerome GJ, Marquez DX, Elavsky S: Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 3316-3321. 10.1073/pnas.0400266101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mosconi L, Herholz K, Prohovnik I, Nacmias B, De Cristofaro MTR, Fayyaz M, Bracco L, Sorbi S, Pupi A: Metabolic interaction between ApoE genotype and onset age in Alzheimer's disease: implications for brain reserve. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005, 76: 15-23. 10.1136/jnnp.2003.030882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Seo SW, Im K, Lee JM, Kim ST, Ahn HJ, Go SM, Kim SH, NA DL: Effects of demographic factors on cortical thickness in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011, 32: 200-209. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seltzer B, Sherwin I: A comparison of clinical-features in early-onset and late-onset primary degenerative dementia - one entity or 2. Arch Neurol. 1983, 40: 143-146. 10.1001/archneur.1983.04050030037006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rolland Y, van Kan GA, Vellas B: Physical activity and Alzheimer's disease: From prevention to therapeutic perspectives. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008, 9: 390-405. 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hooghiemstra AM, Eggermont LHP, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Scherder EJA: Exercise and early-onset Alzheimer's disease: theoretical considerations. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2012, 2: 132-145. 10.1159/000335493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). 2000, American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC, Text Revision, 4

    Google Scholar 

  30. McKhann G, Drachman DA, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price DL, Stadlan EM: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurol. 1984, 34: 939-944. 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pohjasvaara T, Mantyla R, Ylikoski R, Kaste M, Erkinjuntti T: Comparison of different clinical criteria (DSM-III, ADDTC, ICD-10, NINDS-AIREN, DSM-IV) for the diagnosis of vascular dementia. Stroke. 2000, 31: 2952-2957. 10.1161/01.STR.31.12.2952.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mchugh PR: Mini-Mental State - Practical Method for Grading Cognitive State of Patients for Clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healty adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998, 30: 975-991. 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Blok BMJ, de Greef MHG, ten Hacken NHT, Sprenger SR, Postema K, Wempe JB: The effects of a lifestyle physical activity counseling program with feedback of a pedometer during pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD: A pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006, 61: 48-55. 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hospes G, Bossenbroek L, ten Hacken NHT, van Hengel P, de Greef MHG: Enhancement of daily physical activity increases physical fitness of outclinic COPD patients: Results of an exercise counseling program. Patient Educ Couns. 2009, 75: 274-278. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ryan RM, Deci EL: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000, 55: 68-78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van den Broek MD: Why does neurorehabilitation fail?. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005, 20: 464-473. 10.1097/00001199-200509000-00007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Markland D, Ryan RM, Tobin VJ, Rollnick S: Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2005, 24: 811-831. 10.1521/jscp.2005.24.6.811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Achtziger A, Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P: Implementation intentions and shielding goal striving from unwanted thoughts and feelings. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008, 34: 381-393. 10.1177/0146167207311201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gollwitzer PM: Implementation intentions - Strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol. 1999, 54: 493-503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL: A New Rating-Scale for Alzheimers-Disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984, 141: 1356-1364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Connor DJ, Sabbagh MN: Administration and Scoring Variance on the ADAS-Cog. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008, 15: 461-464.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Doraiswamy PM, Bieber F, Kaiser L, Krishnan KR, ReuningScherer J, Gulanski B: The Alzheimer's disease assessment scale: Patterns and predictors of baseline cognitive performance in multicenter Alzheimer's disease trials. Neurol. 1997, 48: 1511-1517. 10.1212/WNL.48.6.1511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Reitan RM: The Relation of the Trail Making Test to Organic Brain Damage. J Consult Psychol. 1955, 19: 393-394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gelinas I, Gauthier L, McIntyre M, Gauthier S: Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer's disease: The disability assessment for dementia. Am J Occup Ther. 1999, 53: 471-481. 10.5014/ajot.53.5.471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brod M, Stewart AL, Sands L, Walton P: Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: The dementia quality of life instrument (DQoL). Gerontologist. 1999, 39: 25-35. 10.1093/geront/39.1.25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Van der Steen JT, van Campen C, Bosboom PR, Gerritsen DL, Kleemans AH, Schrijver TL, Jonker C: Quality of life and dementia. II. Selection of a measurement instrument for well-being appropriate for the reference model. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2001, 32: 259-264.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Takken T: Inspanningstests. 2004, Elsevier Gezondheidszorg, Maarssen

    Google Scholar 

  49. Du H, Newton PJ, Salamonson Y, Carrieri-Kohlman VL, Davidson PM: A review of the six-minute walk test: Its implication as a self-administered assessment tool. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009, 8: 2-8. 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2008.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC: A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999, 70: 113-119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Melanson EL, Knoll JR, Bell ML, Donahoo WT, Hill JO, Nysse LJ, Lanningham-Foster L, Peters JC, Levine JA: Commercially available pedometers: considerations for accurate step counting. Prev Med. 2004, 39: 361-368. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sugden JA, Sniehotta FF, Donnan PT, Boyle P, Johnston DW, Mcmurdo MET: The feasibility of using pedometers and brief advice to increase activity in sedentary older women - a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008, 8: 169-10.1186/1472-6963-8-169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Schuit AJ, Schouten EG, Westerterp KR, Saris WHM: Validity of the physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): According to energy expenditure assessed by the doubly labeled water method. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997, 50: 541-546. 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00010-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddely A: The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. 1987, Thames Valley Test Company, Titchfield

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wechsler D: Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. 1981, Psychological Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  56. Luteijn F, van der Ploeg FAE: Handleiding Groninger Intelligentie Test (Manual Groningen Intelligence Test). 1983, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  57. Macleod CM: Half A Century of Research on the Stroop Effect - An Integrative Review. Psychol Bull. 1991, 109: 163-203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kreiner DS, Ryan JJ: Memory and motor skill components of the WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding subtest. Clin Neuropsychol. 2001, 15: 109-113. 10.1076/clin.15.1.109.1906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bosscher RJ, Smit JH, Kempen GIJM: Algemene competentieverwachtingen bij ouderen; een onderzoek naar de psychometrische kenmerken van de algemene competentieschaal (ALCOS) (general competency expectations in elderly; a study into the psychometric properties of the general competency scale). Ned Tijdschr Psychol. 1997, 52: 239-248.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Oosterman JM, Van Someren EJW, Vogels RLC, van Harten B, Scherder EJA: Fragmentation of the rest-activity rhythm correlates with age-related cognitive deficits. J Sleep Res. 2009, 18: 129-135. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00704.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Verhage F: Intelligence and Age: Study With Dutch People Aged 12–77 [in Dutch]. 1964, Van Gorcum, Assen

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gatz JL, Tyas SL: St John P, Montgomery P: Do depressive symptoms predict Alzheimer's disease and dementia?. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005, 60: 744-747. 10.1093/gerona/60.6.744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Potter GG, Steffens DC: Contribution of depression to cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults. Neurologist. 2007, 13: 105-117. 10.1097/01.nrl.0000252947.15389.a9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Radloff LA: The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977, 1: 385-401. 10.1177/014662167700100306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bizzarro A, Marra C, Acciarri A, Valenza A, Tiziano FD, Brahe C, Masullo C: Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele differentiates the clinical response to donepezil in Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis. 2005, 20: 254-261. 10.1159/000087371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Podewils LJ, Guallar E, Kuller LH, Fried LP, Lopez OL, Carlson M, Lyketsos CG: Physical activity, APOE genotype, and dementia risk: Findings from the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005, 161: 639-651. 10.1093/aje/kwi092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Porta N, Bonet C, Cobo E: Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60: 663-669. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A: G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007, 39: 175-191. 10.3758/BF03193146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Heyn P, Abreu BC, Ottenbacher KJ: The effects of exercise training on elderly persons with cognitive impairment and dementia: A meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004, 85: 1694-1704. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lautenschlager NT, Cox KL, Flicker L, Foster JK, van Bockxmeer FM, Xiao JG, Greenop KR, Almeida OP: Effect of Physical Activity on Cognitive Function in Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2008, 300: 1027-1037. 10.1001/jama.300.9.1027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. van Uden-Kraan C, Drossaert C, Taal E, Smit W: Bernelot Moens H, van de Laar M: Determinants of engagement in face-to-face and online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res. 2011, 13: e106-10.2196/jmir.1718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. McMurtray A, Clark DG, Christine D, Mendez MF: Early-onset dementia: Frequency and causes compared to late-onset dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis. 2006, 21: 59-64. 10.1159/000089546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yokota O, Sasaki K, Fujisawa Y, Takahashi J, Terada S, Ishihara T, Nakashima H, Kugo A, Ata T, Ishizu H, Kuroda S: Frequency of early and late-onset dementias in a Japanese memory disorders clinic. Eur J Neurol. 2005, 12: 782-790. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01072.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Shaw BA, Liang J, Krause N, Gallant M, McGeever K: Age Differences and Social Stratification in the Long-Term Trajectories of Leisure-Time Physical Activity. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010, 65: 756-766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by “Roomsch Catholijk Oude Armen Kantoor” (RCOAK). The RCOAK is a charitable foundation that supports projects that promote the quality of life of elderly and frail populations in the Netherlands.

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following persons:

Rob J. van Marum, MD, PhD (hospital Jeroen Bosch,’s Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands).

Jos P.C.M. van Campen, MD, drs. (hospital Slotervaart, Amsterdam, the Netherlands).

Herman-Jan Kessler (department of Physiotherapy, hospital Amstelland, Amstelveen, the Netherlands).

Manon Cornet (Reade, hospital Amstelland, Amstelveen, the Netherlands).

Frank van Eijkeren (department of Physiotherapy, hospital Jeroen Bosch, ‘s Hertogenbosch, the Neterlands).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Astrid M Hooghiemstra, Laura HP Eggermont & Erik JA Scherder

  2. Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Astrid M Hooghiemstra, Philip Scheltens & Wiesje M van der Flier

  3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Wiesje M van der Flier

  4. Department of Physiotherapy, Hospital Amstelland, Amstelveen, The Netherlands

    Jet Bakker

  5. Department of Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Mathieu HG de Greef

  6. Reade, location Hospital Amstelland, Amstelveen, The Netherlands

    Peter A Koppe

Authors
  1. Astrid M Hooghiemstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura HP Eggermont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philip Scheltens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wiesje M van der Flier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jet Bakker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mathieu HG de Greef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peter A Koppe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Erik JA Scherder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid M Hooghiemstra.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ES, LE, and PK conceived the idea of this study. ES and LE wrote the grant application of the study. AH, LE and ES developed the intervention programs and the protocol of outcome measures. AH coordinates the study under direct supervision of LE and ES. PS and WMF enable the recruitment and selection of EOD patients in the Alzheimer Center of the VUmc and have an advisory role in the project. PK screens the participants on motor disturbances before participation. JB executes the exercise interventions. MG supplied the daily physical activity program at home using pedometers and trained AH in performing the interviews. AH was the primary author for this manuscript. LE and ES helped draft this manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hooghiemstra, A.M., Eggermont, L.H., Scheltens, P. et al. Study protocol: EXERcise and Cognition In Sedentary adults with Early-ONset dementia (EXERCISE-ON). BMC Neurol 12, 75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-75

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-75

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Early-onset dementia
  • Presenile dementia
  • Intervention
  • Physical activity
  • Exercise
  • Randomized controlled trial

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us