Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Precipitating and relieving factors of migraine versus tension type headache

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Neurology201212:82

  • Received: 22 June 2012
  • Accepted: 22 August 2012
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



To determine the differences of precipitating and relieving factors between migraine and tension type headache.


This is a cross sectional study. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 250 migraine patients and 250 patients diagnosed as tension type headache from the specialized headache clinic in Dept. of Neurology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital. Data were collected through a predesigned questionnaire containing information on age, sex, social status and a predetermined list of precipitating and relieving factors.


In this study, the female patients predominated (67%). Most of the patients were within 21–30 years age group (58.6%). About 58% of them belonged to middle class families. The common precipitating factors like stress, anxiety, activity, journey, reading, cold and warm were well distributed among both the migraine and tension type headache (TTH) patients. But significant difference was demonstrated for fatigue (p < 0.05), sleep deprivation (p < 0.05), sunlight (p < 0.01) and food (p < 0.05), which were common among migraineurs. In consideration of relieving factors of pain, different maneuvers were commonly tried by migraineurs and significant difference were observed for both analgesic drug and massage (p < 0.05), which relieved migraine headache. But maneuvers like sleep, rest and posture were used by both groups.


The most frequent precipitating factors for headache appear to be identical for both migraine and TTH patients. Even though some factors like fatigue, sleep deprivation, sunlight and food significantly precipitate migraine and drug, massage are effective maneuver for relieving pain among migrianeurs.


  • Headache
  • Tension type headache (TTH)
  • Migraine


Headache is the commonest neurological condition in terms of number of people affected [1]. A number of studies have reported that headache sufferers claim factors precipitating or triggering their headache and list is not a short one (stress, emotion, flickering light, noise, fatigue, food, season etc.) [2, 3]. But studies devoted to specific triggers related to migraine and tension type headache (TTH) are rare. Henry et al. [4] evaluated these triggers among migraineurs. Rasmussen [5] used an unique structured headache interview method. Robbins [6] gathered information on triggers at first visit to headache clinic. Peatfield [7] studied the relation of food with headache. Only Larmande et al [8] evaluated the climate as a possible precipitating factor. Martin et al [9] grouped these precipitators into two major classes; the negative effect (stress, anxiety, depression) and the visual disturbance (flicker, glare, eyestrain).Attention to trigger factors plays a prominent role in the clinical management of headaches. Schulman and Silberstein [10] advise, for example, that “wherever possible, practitioners should help susceptible patients learn to avoid triggers”, and Skaer [11] states that “migraine prevention is best achieved by avoidance of known migraine triggers”. The logic of this advice is very clear and, of course, if individuals could avoid any factor that could trigger a headache then they would not get a headache. In the practice of headache management, precipitating factors are established for patients to avoid. They also provide insight into the mechanisms involved in the headaches, facilitating diagnosis. The question addressed in this study was as to see whether there are precipitating and relieving factors that separate the two most common headache conditions, ie, migraine and tension-type headache.


This is an observational study carried out in weekly Headache outdoor clinic of Department of Neurology, DMCH. We reviewed the records of 250 migraine and same number of tension type headache (TTH) patients. All the patients were diagnosed clinically following the International Classification of Headache Disorder version-2 (ICHD-II) criteria by consultant neurologists at the clinic. The clinical diagnosis was considered as gold standard, considering the detail history of headache, examination findings and the vast clinical experience of the consultant neurologist in diagnosing headache disorder with the support of ICHD classification criteria. All the subtypes of migraine (migraine with aura, without aura, chronic migraine, probable migraine) were considered under the broad terminology of migraine headache. We included only those patients in whom headache could be classified convincingly either as migraine or TTH. Any patient of headache disorder with comorbid illness or more than one type of headache (combination of migraine and TTH, medication over use) were excluded from the study. We have used a predetermined check list of 11 established precipitating factors and 5 relieving factors for headache (Table 1). The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of Dhaka Medical College hospital. Data were collected from hospital records by preformed questionnaire containing information on age, sex, social status, precipitating and relieving factors. Data was analyzed using SPSS-16 system.
Table 1

List of headache precipitating and relieving factors

Precipitating factors:


1. Fatigue


2. Stress


3. Anxiety


4. Cold


5. Warm


6. Sunlight


7. Sleep deprivation/Insomnia


8. Food


9. Activity


10. Journey


11. Reading


Relieving factors:


1. Sleep


2. Drug


3. Rest


4. Posture


5. Massage



In this study we divided all the 500 headache patients equally into two groups: migraine and TTH, following the international headache society criteria. All the precipitating and relieving factors we looked for are listed in (Table 1). The female patients predominated in this study (67% female and 33% male). Most of the patients were within 21–30 years age group (58.6%), followed by 18.2% patients within 11–20 years. Only 1.6% patients were below 10 years and 0.4% above 60 years of age (Table 2). About 58% of them belonged to middle class families and 40.6% from lower socioeconomic back ground (Table 2). The distribution of precipitating factors is listed in (Table 3). Most of the patients reported multiple precipitating and relieving factors. The common precipitating factors like stress (81, 96), anxiety (68, 51), activity (34, 24), journey (58, 46), reading (11, 14), cold (24, 31) and warmth (16, 24) were well distributed among both the migraine and TTH patients. But significant difference was demonstrated for fatigue (p < 0.05), sleep deprivation (p < 0.05), sunlight (p < 0.01) and food (p < 0.05). The relieving factors are enlisted in (Table 4). Significant difference were observed for both drug (152, 126) and massage (17, 6) (p < 0.05), which relieved migraine headache. But factors like sleep (146, 131), rest (25, 21) and posture (4, 1) were well distributed within both groups. Interestingly, the migraineurs tried each maneuver for headache remedy more frequently than the TTH patient except for the massage.
Table 2

Socio demographic profile of the patients (n = 500)



































Socio-economic status











Table 3

Comparison of common precipitating factors among migraine and TTH

Precipitating factor

Migraine (%)

TTH (%)



110 (44)

70 (28)



34 (13)

18 (7)


Sleep deprivation

52 (20)




81 (32)

96 (38)



68 (27)

51 (20)



24 (9)

31 (12)



16 (6)

24 (9)



34 (14)

24 (9)



58 (23)

46 (18)



7 (2.8)




11 (4)

14 (5)


Table 4

Comparison of common relieving factors among migraine and TTH

Relieving factor

Migraine (%)

TTH (%)



152 (61)

126 (50)



146 (58)

131 (52)



17 (7)

6 (2.4)



25 (10)




4 (1.6)

1 (0.4)



Different precipitating factors for headache that we studied had been described by several authors previously [12, 13]. In this study we have observed that several precipitating factors were identical among both migraineurs and TTH patients. Factors related to endogenous psychogenic mechanism like stress, anxiety were well distributed among both groups as precipitator. Rasmussen [5] also reported stress and mental tension as most frequent precipitants for both migraine and tension type of headache. In a study of 494 patients with migraine headache Robbins L [6] et al. observed similarly that stress was the most cited precipitating factor. Stress/ anxiety does so by central mechanism through direct activation of the ascending reticular pathway. Other factors like journey, physical activity, exposure to cold/warm, reading were also common in both group of patients and did not show any significant difference. Contrary to this finding, in a population based study in Croatia Zivadinov R [14] et al. showed that stress was associated with migraine whereas physical activity was related to TTH. Journey, change in weather and temperature were also associated among patient of migraine with aura in his study. The difference might account on the social and environmental variation among population. Similar to Spierings ELH et al. [15] we didn’t find any precipitating factor that was significantly reported frequently by TTH patients than the migraineurs. Instead fatigue, deprivation from sleep, sunlight and food were more frequently indicated significantly by migraineurs than the TTH patients (p <0.05 in all of the factors). Our finding is also supported by the report of Chabriat H et al. [16] who showed that fatigue, sleep difficulty and food or drinks more frequently precipitate headache among migraineurs than the nonmigraneurs. Deprivation of sleep results in fatigue which in turn, activates the sympathetic outflow to boost metabolic process for availability of energy. The sympathetic activation subsequently thought to precipitate headache.

Most of the people with headache disorders practice many nonpharmacological measures to get the relief of the pain. However, it is not known whether behavior during the attack is headache-type-specific or a general response to head pain. Martins and Prarreira [17, 18] identified six maneuvers tried by the patients, most commonly the migraineurs to improve the headache during and attack. It is a common observation, by clinicians involved in the headache field that many patients use some instinctive manoeuvres, of their own accord that tend to alleviate their suffering. In our quest to identify the relieving factors we also observed that the rates of use of each maneuver were more frequent for the migraineurs, though the difference was not significant except for drug and massage. Other factors like sleep, rest and posture were well used by both groups. Both use of drug and massage was associated with relieve of pain in migraneurs. But this is quite contrary to the report of Bag B et al. [19] where massage relived pain among TTH patients. Unlike our observation, they also showed sleep, rest, change in posture were also significantly relieved pain with migraine patients.

We had some limitations in this study. Firstly, we could not match the age and sex among the two groups of patients due to wide variation of age and sex specific prevalence of headache and the retrospective nature of the study. Secondly, the chance of recall bias was minimized by the check list of precipitating and relieving factors in hospital records. Finally, the chance of observer biasness in diagnosis of headache disorder was also minimized as they followed the international headache society criteria (ICHD-II 2004) at the specialized headache clinic.


Most of the precipitating and relieving factors are common and similar in both migraine and TTH patients. Though some of them (fatigue, sleep deprivation, sunlight and food) are indicated significantly among migraineurs, there is no factor associated significantly with TTH. This difference is also true for relieving factors (drug and massage relived migraine headache). The careful monitoring of the precipitating factors of headache could be an important step in treatment, because their avoidance may lessen the frequency and severity of attacks. Furthermore, they may also provide a clue to the aetio-pathogenesis of headache. So the search for these precipitating and relieving factors should be continued in future.


The study was not funded by any donor agency.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Department of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh


  1. WHO report on South East Asia:,
  2. Martin PR: Psychological management of chronic headaches. 1993, Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Scopp AL: Headache triggers: Theory, research and clinical application — Part I. Headache Quarterly. 1992, 3: 32-38.Google Scholar
  4. Henry P, Michel P, Dartigues JF, et al: the GRIM. Epidemiology of migraine in France [in French]. In: La Migraine en France. 1993, John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, 27-48.Google Scholar
  5. Rasmussen BK: Migraine and tension-type headache in a general population: precipitating factors, female hormones, sleep pattern and relation to lifestyle. Pain. 1993, 53: 65-72. 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90057-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Robbins L: Precipitating factors in migraine: a retrospective review of 494 patients. Headache. 1994, 34: 214-216. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1994.hed3404214.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Peatfield RC: Relationships between food, wine, and beer-precipitated migrainous headaches. Heuduche. 1995, 35: 355-357. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3506355.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Larmande P, Hubert B, Sorabella A, et al: Influence of changes in climate and the calendar on the onset of a migraine crisis [in French]. Rev Neural. 1996, 152: 38-43.Google Scholar
  9. Martin PR, Milech D, Nathan PR: Towards a functional model of chronic headaches. Headache. 1993, 33: 461-470. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1993.hed3309461.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schulman EA, Silberstein SD: Symptomatic and prophylactic treatment of migraine and tension-type headache. Neurology. 1992, 42 (Suppl. 2): 16-21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Skaer TL: Clinical presentation and treatment of migraine. Clin Ther. 1996, 18: 229-245. 10.1016/S0149-2918(96)80004-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Peatfield RC, Olesen J: Precipitating factors. In: Oiesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P Welch KMA, eds. The Headaches. 1993, Raven Press, Ltd, New York, 241-245.Google Scholar
  13. Pearce JM: Neural aspects of migraine. Migraine: Clinical, Therapeutic, Conceptual and Research Aspects. Edited by: Blau JN. 1987, Chapman and Hall, London, 247-263.Google Scholar
  14. Zivadinov R, Willheim K, Sepic-Grahovac D, et al: Migraine and tension-type headache in Croatia: a population-based survey of precipitating factors. Cephalalgia. 2003 Jun, 23 (5): 336-43. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00544.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Spierings ELH, Ranke AH, Honkoop PC: Precipitating and aggravating factors of migraine versus tension type headache. Headache. 2001, 41: 554-558. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041006554.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chabriat H, Danchot J, Michel P, et al: Precipitating Factors of Headache. A Prospective Study in a National Control-Matched Survey in Migraineurs and Nonmigraineurs. Headache. 1999, 39: 335-338.Google Scholar
  17. Martins IP, Parreira E: Tricks to relieve migraine attacks. Headache Q. 2000, 11: 113-7.Google Scholar
  18. Martins IP, Parreira E: Behavioral response to headache: a comparison between migraine and tension-type headache. Headache. 2001, 41: 546-53. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041006546.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bag B, Karabulut N: Pain relieving factors in migraine and tension type headache. Int J Clin Pract. 2005, 59 (7): 760-763. 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00535.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Haque et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.