This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A rare presentation of atypical demyelination: tumefactive multiple sclerosis causing Gerstmann’s syndrome
- Sharmilee Gnanapavan†1, 2,
- Zane Jaunmuktane†3,
- Kelly Pegoretti Baruteau4,
- Sakthivel Gnanasambandam4 and
- Klaus Schmierer1, 2Email author
© Gnanapavan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 10 October 2013
Accepted: 17 March 2014
Published: 2 April 2014
Tumefactive demyelinating lesions are a rare manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS). Differential diagnosis of such space occupying lesions may not be straightforward and sometimes necessitate brain biopsy. Impaired cognition is the second most common clinical manifestation of tumefactive MS; however complex cognitive syndromes are unusual.
We report the case of a 30 year old woman who presented with Gerstmann’s syndrome. MRI revealed a large heterogeneous contrast enhancing lesion in the left cerebral hemisphere. Intravenous corticosteroids did not stop disease progression. A tumour or cerebral lymphoma was suspected, however brain biopsy confirmed inflammatory demyelination. Following diagnosis of tumefactive MS treatment with natalizumab effectively suppressed disease activity.
The case highlights the need for clinicians, radiologists and surgeons to appreciate the heterogeneous presentation of tumefactive MS. Early brain biopsy facilitates rapid diagnosis and management. Treatment with natalizumab may be useful in cases of tumefactive demyelination where additional evidence supports a diagnosis of relapsing MS.
Gerstmann’s syndrome is a rare disorder resulting from damage to the angular gyrus of the dominant parietal lobe leading to dysgraphia, dyscalculia, finger agnosia and left-right disorientation . In adults this syndrome is usually seen after stroke. In younger patients inflammation, malignancy and abscesses need to be considered .
A 30 year old, right-handed woman was admitted with a two week history of word finding difficulties. There was subtle expressive and receptive dysphasia alongside acalculia, agraphia, finger agnosia and left-right disorientation (Additional file 1), and right-sided homonymous hemianopia.
She was treated with intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (MP), 1 g daily for three consecutive days with no clinical effect. Two weeks later the patient developed severe headache with intractable vomiting. Repeat MRI head revealed increase in size of the previously detected lesion and three new lesions (Figure 1H-L).
Following histological confirmation of demyelination, and six weeks after first presentation, treatment with natalizumab 300 mg IV once every four weeks was started. As part of her peri-operative care, she was also given oral dexamethasone, initially in a dose of 4 mg bd, tapered in steps of 1 mg bd every two weeks. The last dose of dexamethasone was taken one week prior to her first follow-up MRI (Figure 1M-O) four weeks after commencing natalizumab. At this time point improvement in language fluency and content was recorded, underpinned by MRI evidence of reduction in size of all lesions, and no new lesions (Figure 1M,N). After the fourth natalizumab infusion mini mental state examination score was 27/30 (pre-treatment score = 18) and Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination (ACE-R) score 82/100 (pre-treatment score = 61). The second video illustrates the improvement of the patient’s cognitive function (Additional file 2). No further relapses were observed after 16 months of clinical follow-up and 14 months after commencing natalizumab treatment (MRI Figure 1O-Q). However, two complex-partial epileptic seizures occurred six and eight months after disease onset. After starting treatment with lamotrigine 25 mg bd no further seizures occurred.
Severe cognitive impairment is unusual at presentation of MS, and alternative causes need to be ruled out .
Gerstmann’s syndrome has been reported in highly active relapsing-remitting MS in combination with other cognitive deficits . In a large series of pathologically confirmed tumefactive MS cognitive abnormalities were found to be frequent (43% in 168 patients) with higher cognitive involvement (aphasia, apraxia and agnosia) in 25% of cases. However, these cases were polysymptomatic . Isolated lesions causing a specific cognitive syndrome such as in our case are exceptionally rare.
In most instances of demyelination, the associated clinical picture, MRI appearances, and CSF findings are sufficient to make a diagnosis. Despite the presence of oligo-clonal bands predominant in the CSF, however, the clinical deterioration and lack of treatment response to high-dose i.v. steroids associated with an increase in size of the tumefactive lesion and the occurrence of additional brain lesions prompted us to obtain a brain biopsy.
DWI, which provides estimates of water diffusion in biologic tissues, can be used in the assessment of tumours. Diffusion within a neoplasm is a marker of its cellularity as cells constitute a barrier to diffusion. As CNS lymphomas are highly cellular tumours, diffusion is restricted, making them appear hyper-intense on DWI and hypo-intense on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps . However, large tumefactive lesions, such as in our case, may be indistinguishable from neoplasms as both can lead to mass effect/oedema, a hypo-intense rim on T2 weighted scans, venular enhancement, peripheral restriction on DWI, and a variable degree of ring-enhancement . Clinical deterioration and rapid enlargement of the tumefactive lesion in our case, with restricted diffusion despite IVMP treatment, confounded the diagnosis of MS and underpinned the need for biopsy to exclude primary CNS lymphoma.
The findings on proton MRS of an NAA/Cr ratio well below normal may be indicative of axonal dysfunction or loss whilst the significantly increased Cho/Cr ratio suggested increased cell-membrane metabolism. However, these findings, as well as the ‘inverted doublet’ shape of the lactate curve may occur in tumefactive demyelinating lesions and tumours alike . Thus, like DWI, MRS did not enable a non-invasive diagnosis in our case.
The evidence regarding prognosis and disease course of tumefactive MS remains controversial. Lesions larger than 5cm have been reported as being associated with a higher disability at follow-up , and patients who develop clinically definite MS after tumefactive presentation appeared to have a more aggressive disease course . On the other hand, Wattamwar and co-workers described a series of 14 patients who made an excellent recovery from their large demyelinating lesions .
There is no standard immunomodulatory treatment for people with tumefactive MS. Treatment choices include IVMP, β-Interferons, plasma exchange (PLEX), rituximab and natalizumab [4, 11–14]. In their recent review Hardy et al. proposed an algorithm for the acute management using IVMP and/or PLEX followed by disease modification using immunomodulatory agents . The disease course in our patient suggests excellent treatment response to natalizumab, further supporting the diagnosis of relapsing MS (with tumefactive lesion leading to first presentation). Trial evidence shows natalizumab may be effective within weeks after a single infusion. In a study comparing two doses of natalizumab (3 mg and 6 mg/kilogram body weight) with placebo, Miller et al. reported significant reduction of gadolinium-enhancing lesions four weeks after their first infusion of either dose . However, despite the initial lack of treatment response to IVMP in our case, a subsequent corroborating effect of peri-operative dexamethasone on the clinical course and resolution of lesions cannot be excluded. Of note, tumefactive lesions have also been reported in the context of switching immunomodulatory therapy in people with MS as described following a switch to fingolimod from natalizumab  and IFN , respectively. An inhibitory effect of fingolimod on the regulatory T cell pool has been hypothesized as a potential cause, though the evidence is so far inconclusive .
In summary, we present video, MRI and pathological evidence of a case of tumefactive MS which posed a diagnostic dilemma due to its atypical clinical and radiological presentation, and lack of response to steroid treatment. Clinicians, radiologists and surgeons need to appreciate the heterogeneous presentation of this disorder, and an early brain biopsy is often necessary for rapid diagnosis and management. Treatment with natalizumab may be useful in cases of tumefactive demyelination where additional evidence supports a diagnosis of relapsing MS.
We confirm that a signed consent from the patient has been obtained for the publication of this report, the images and videos.
We acknowledge the expert advice by consultant neuropathologists Professor Silvia Marino, Professor Tamas Revesz and Professor Sebastian Brandner. KS has been supported by a Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) Clinical Senior Lectureship.
- Clark C, Howard R, Rosser M, Shorvon S: Neurology: A Queen Square Textbook. 2009, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wallner-Blazek M, Rovira A, Fillipp M, Rocca MA, Miller DH, Schmierer K, Frederiksen J, Gass A, Gama H, Tilbery CP, Rocha AJ, Flores J, Barkhof F, Seewann A, Palace J, Yousry T, Montalban X, Enzinger C, Fazekas F: Atypical idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating lesions: prognostic implications and relation to multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2013, 260 (8): 2016-2022. 10.1007/s00415-013-6918-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartmann C, Meyer J, Balss J, Capper D, Mueller W, Christians A, Felsberg J, Wolter M, Mawrin C, Wick W, Weller M, Herold-Mende C, Unterberg A, Jeuken JW, Wesseling P, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A: Type and frequency of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are related to astrocytic and oligodendroglial differentiation and age: a study of 1,010 diffuse gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2009, 118 (4): 469-474. 10.1007/s00401-009-0561-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ehrle N, Maarouf A, Chaunu MP, Sabbagh-Peignot S, Bakchine S: Acquired and developmental Gerstmann syndrome. Illustration from a patient with multiple sclerosis. Revue neurologique. 2012, 168 (11): 852-860. 10.1016/j.neurol.2011.11.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lucchinetti CF, Gavrilova RH, Metz I, Parisi JE, Scheithauer BW, Weigand S, Thomsen K, Mandrekar J, Altintas A, Erickson BJ, König F, Giannini C, Lassmann H, Linbo L, Pittock SJ, Brück W: Clinical and radiographic spectrum of pathologically confirmed tumefactive multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2008, 131 (Pt 7): 1759-1775.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Haldorsen IS, Espeland A, Larsson EM: Central nervous system lymphoma: characteristic findings on traditional and advanced imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011, 32 (6): 984-992. 10.3174/ajnr.A2171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiriyama T, Kataoka H, Taoka T, Tonomura Y, Terashima M, Morikawa M, Tanizawa E, Kawahara M, Furiya Y, Sugie K, Kichikawa K, Ueno S: Characteristic neuroimaging in patients with tumefactive demyelinating lesions exceeding 30 mm. J Neuroimaging. 2011, 21 (2): e69-e77. 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00502.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saindane AM, Cha S, Law M, Xue X, Knopp EA, Zagzag D: Proton MR spectroscopy of tumefactive demyelinating lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002, 23 (8): 1378-1386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selkirk SM, Shi J: Relapsing-remitting tumefactive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2005, 11 (6): 731-734. 10.1191/1352458505ms1214cr.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wattamwar PR, Baheti NN, Kesavadas C, Nair M, Radhakrishnan A: Evolution and long term outcome in patients presenting with large demyelinating lesions as their first clinical event. J Neurol Sci. 2010, 297 (1–2): 29-35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seifert CL, Wegner C, Sprenger T, Weber MS, Bruck W, Hemmer B, Sellner J: Favourable response to plasma exchange in tumefactive CNS demyelination with delayed B-cell response. Mult Scler. 2012, 18 (7): 1045-1049. 10.1177/1352458511429012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Launay M, Lebrun C, Giordana E, Chanalet S, Thomas P: Clinical, radiographic, prognostic and therapeutic aspects of demelinating disease with tumefactive demyelinating lesions. Rev Neurol. 2011, 167 (1): 14-22. 10.1016/j.neurol.2010.07.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalanie H, Harandi AA, Bakhshandehpour R, Heidari D: Multiple Large Tumefactive MS Plaques in a Young Man: A Diagnostic Enigma and Therapeutic Challenge. Case reports in radiology. 2012, 2012: 363705-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fan X, Mahta A, De Jager PL, Kesari S: Rituximab for tumefactive inflammatory demyelination: a case report. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012, 114 (10): 1326-1328. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.03.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardy TA, Chataway J: Tumefactive demyelination: an approach to diagnosis and management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013, 84 (9): 1047-1053. 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller DH, Khan OA, Sheremata WA, Blumhardt LD, Rice GP, Libonati MA, Willmer-Hulme AJ, Dalton CM, Miszkiel KA, O'Connor PW: A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348 (1): 15-23. 10.1056/NEJMoa020696.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jander S, Turowski B, Kieseier BC, Hartung HP: Emerging tumefactive multiple sclerosis after switching therapy from natalizumab to fingolimod. Mult Scler. 2012, 18 (11): 1650-1652. 10.1177/1352458512463768.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castrop F, Kowarik MC, Albrecht H, Krause M, Haslinger B, Zimmer C, Berthele A, Hemmer B: Severe multiple sclerosis relapse under fingolimod therapy: incident or coincidence?. Neurology. 2012, 78 (12): 928-930. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824c46ad.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meluzinova E, Bojar M, Havrdova E, Liskova P, Kappos L: Severe multiple sclerosis relapse under fingolimod therapy. Mult Scler. 2012, 18 (4 suppl): 459-Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/14/68/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.