Review
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Paraproteinemic neuropathy: a practical review

BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0532-4

©  Rison and Beydoun. 2016

Received: 16 July 2015

Accepted: 16 January 2016

Published: 28 January 2016

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

The term paraproteinemic neuropathy describes a heterogeneous set of neuropathies characterized by the presence of homogeneous immunoglobulin in the serum. An abnormal clonal proliferation of B-lymphocytes or plasma cells, which may or may not occur in the context of a hematologic malignancy, produces the immunoglobulins in excess. If malignancy is identified, treatment should be targeted to the neoplasm. Most cases, however, occur as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Few prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are available to inform the management of paraproteinemic neuropathies. Clinical experience combined with data from smaller, uncontrolled studies provide a basis for recommendations, which depend on the specific clinical setting in which the paraprotein occurs. In this review, we provide a clinically practical approach to diagnosis and management of such patients.

Keywords

Paraproteinemia Neuropathy Monoclonal gammopathy Electrodiagnostic studies Intravenous immunoglobulins Hematologic malignancy Diagnosis Treatment

Introduction

Peripheral neuropathy is defined as a disease or degenerative state of the peripheral nerves in which motor, sensory, or vasomotor nerve fibers are affected. The condition appears clinically as muscle weakness and atrophy, pain, and numbness [1]. Several monoclonal antibody-producing conditions are associated with peripheral neuropathy, and in these circumstances, the constellation of neurological symptoms are often referred to as paraproteinemic neuropathy (PPN) [2, 3]. As neuropathy is relatively common with M-protein and vice-versa, PPN may therefore be defined further as a heterogeneous group of neuropathies, which share the common feature of a homogeneous immunoglobulin in the serum [4]. Typically manifested neurologically as a length-dependent axonal loss sensorimotor polyneuropathy, PPN affects some or all sensory modalities causing allodynia, hyperpathia, cramps, or mild distal weakness (rarely it can be associated with more profound motor symptoms). Sometimes there is multiorgan involvement. Peripheral neuropathy symptoms may precede by years other clinical symptoms or diagnosis of the antibody-producing condition, whether it be hematologic malignancy or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance [5]. Therapies depend on the particular PPN subtype and the pathophysiology involved, and range from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange, and corticosteroids to rituximab and various chemotherapies.

Background

Paraproteinemia

Paraproteins are immunoglobulins that are produced in excess by an abnormal clonal proliferation of B-lymphocytes or plasma cells. These monoclonal proteins exist as heavy chain subtypes (IgG, IgA, IgG, and less commonly IgD or IgE) and light chain subtypes (kappa or lambda) [1]. Clonal proliferation may occur in the context of a hematologic malignancy or a premalignancy. Commonly associated disorders include multiple myeloma, cryoglobulinemia, lymphoma, amyloidosis, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, and POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein spike, and skin manifestations) syndrome [6].

Despite the range of associated hematologic disorders, paraproteins most commonly occur as a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) [7, 8]. MGUS is a common, age-related medical condition characterized by an accumulation of bone marrow plasma cells derived from a single abnormal clone without proliferation of malignant cells [8–10]. Three criteria define MGUS: A monoclonal paraprotein band less than 30 g/L (3 g/dL); plasma cells less than 10 % on bone marrow examination; and no evidence of bone lesions, anemia, hypercalcemia, or renal insufficiency related to the paraprotein [11]. MGUS-associated neuropathies are generally not treated, except in the case of a disabling IgM monoclonal gammopathy or when associated with chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (CIDP), as in certain cases of IgG or IgA monoclonal gammopathy. CIDP-MGUS (non-IgM) has the same clinical and electrodiagnostic characteristics as pure CIDP and has the same treatment choice and algorithms (please note however that many neurologists still try standard CIDP treatments first before considering immunosuppression, even though they are not as effective as in idiopathic CIDP) [12]. In the case of IgG monoclonal gammopathy, studies have shown improvement on impairment measures following treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide/prednisone, or fludarabine [11–13].

Multiple myeloma is part of the spectrum of diseases ranging from MGUS to plasma cell leukemia, and similar to MGUS, is characterized by proliferation of a plasma cell clone and subsequent overabundance of monoclonal paraprotein (M protein) [13].

Paraproteinemic neuropathy (PPN)

Several disorders of the peripheral nervous system are closely associated with the presence of excessive amounts of abnormal immunoglobulins in the blood [14]. PPN may be caused by interaction of antibodies with specific antigenic targets on peripheral nerves or by deposition of immunoglobulins or amyloid. The clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis of PPN differs based on the subtype and associated disorders [3]. There are three major clinical PPN subtypes:

  • Distal demyelinating symmetric neuropathy

  • Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) –like

  • Axonal sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy

Approximately 10 % of patients with a chronic sensorimotor neuropathy of unknown origin have an associated serum monoclonal gammopathy, and two-thirds of such cases are initially classified as MGUS [15, 16].

Clinical presentation of peripheral neuropathy associated with monoclonal proteins includes general symptoms of foot numbness, paresthesias, imbalance, gait ataxia, dysesthesia, and lancinating pain. In early stages, general signs include abnormal sensation in the legs referable to conduction in large fibers (touch, joint position, vibration). As the illness progresses, weakness in distal muscles with variable atrophy occurs [15, 17].

Paraproteins are detected in the serum of approximately 1 % of the general population [1, 7]. The prevalence of paraproteinemia rises with age, up to 5.3 % among individuals over 70 years and up to 10 % in people older than 80 years [10]. Among patients with cryptogenic neuropathy, the prevalence of paraproteinemia is 10 %. PPN is most commonly observed with IgM gammopathy (48 %), followed by IgG (37 %), and IgA (15 %). African Americans have a higher prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy [5].

Paraproteinemic disorders

Each of the individual paraproteinemic disorders exhibits a distinct neuropathic phenotype, and the typical clinical features are described below. The prognosis is often not well-defined and unknown in many cases.

Anti-MAG neuropathy is described as “distal acquired demyelinating symmetric” (DADS) sensory and motor neuropathy. It is usually very slowly progressive and predominately distal with sensory ataxia, little or no weakness, and frequent tremor. This condition usually has a benign course with little functional deterioration over time; however, the neuropathy may evolve more rapidly at certain stages. At least one report showed that 10 and 15 years after onset, 24 % and 50 % of patients were disabled, respectively [18].

IgG/A MGUS with associated neuropathy resembling chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a relapsing or progressive sensori-motor disorder involving the peripheral nerves with symmetrical proximal and distal weakness of the four limbs, sensory involvement and areflexia. About 80 % of patients respond to one of the typical CIDP treatments (please see the treatment section). Some patients stabilize without therapy [19].

IgG/A MGUS with associated axonal neuropathy is a sensory or sensori-motor axonal neuropathy involving distal extremities in a length-dependent fashion. Initial presentation typically entails distal lower limb sensory symptoms and signs, with motor weakness at later stages. The progression is slow and often does not require any treatment [17].

Cryoglobulinemia (most frequently mixed cryoglobulinemia) with neuropathy is characterized by multifocal axonal neuropathy, as a mononeuropathy multiplex pattern, secondary to necrotizing vasculitis. Pain can be a distinguishing feature of cryoglobulenic neuropathy. Sensory fibers are more commonly affected than motor fibers, with approximately 5 % of patients experiencing pure motor neuropathy [20–22].

Primary (AL) amyloidosis coexists with multiple myeloma in 10 % of cases, and 20 % of patients with AL present with a neuropathy [14]. The neuropathy itself is mostly symptomatic in the distal lower limbs, predominately sensory, and of the small fiber painful type. Autonomic dysfunction is frequent. Symptoms of amyloidosis include pain, weight loss, macroglossia, organomegaly, or cardiomyopathy. If left untreated, it has a poor prognosis with median survival less than 18 months from onset [23–25].

CANOMAD syndrome (Chronic Ataxic Neuropathy with Ophthalmoplegia, M-protein, cold Agglutinins and Disialosyl antibodies [anti-ganglioside, anti-GD1b, and anti-GQ1b]) is a rare phenotype associated with an IgM MGUS [26]. It may correspond to a chronic form of Miller Fisher syndrome, a rare variant of Guillain–Barré syndrome that manifests with ataxia, areflexia, and ophthalmoplegia. Ataxia is profound, severely impairing function, but motor strength remains relatively spared [27].

POEMS (Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, M-protein, Skin changes) syndrome is a rare entity featuring sclerotic bone lesions, Castleman’s disease (a very rare disorder characterized by non-cancerous growths that may develop in the lymph node tissue at a single site or throughout the body), papilledema, ascites, and skin changes including nail clubbing and hyperpigmentation [28, 29]. Neuropathy is the main feature and often precedes the diagnosis of osteosclerotic myeloma. Positive sensory symptoms and slowly progressive, predominately distal weakness occurs [30]. If untreated, POEMS syndrome has a poor prognosis with a median survival of 12–33 months [31].

Neuropathies associated with lymphoma are heterogeneous with variable prognosis depending on the type. Demyelinating forms may have a more favorable prognosis [32]. Aggressive B cell lymphoma, usually associated with proximal infiltration suggested by isolated radiculopathy, has a poor prognosis. Axonal multiple mononeuropathies related to distal infiltration have better outcomes [33–35].

Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) can result in peripheral neuropathy in up to 47 % of patients. Most patients with WM-related neuropathy complain of sensory loss and unsteady gait. Less commonly there is a predominant motor neuropathy which may be associated with elevated titers of IgM antibodies targeting ganglioside GM1 [36].

Testing strategy

A general and detailed neurological exam should be performed to characterize the neuropathic phenotype. Tests should include a hematology panel as well as serum and urine protein electrophoresis with immunofixation. Table 1 describes diagnostic tests, including urinalysis, imaging studies, electrodiagnostic tests, and biopsies.
Table 1

Diagnostic tests for PPN

Test

Description

Comments

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)

Venous blood sample.

ESR elevation is primarily due to increased levels of Ig (clonal or polyclonal) or fibrinogen

Serum total protein and albumin

Venous blood sample.

Protein elevated in:

Normal range:

 Monoclonal gammopathy

Serum total protein: 6 to 8 g/dL

 Dehydration

Serum albumin: 4 to 6 g/dL

 Myeloma

 Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia

 Sarcoidosis

 Collagen vascular disease

Serum protein electrophoresis

Venous blood sample.

Indicated if serum protein and/or globulin is elevated or clinical findings raise suspicion of monoclonal gammopathy.

M protein, if present, is a discrete spike in the γ, β or α2 region.

MGUS, M peak: 0.5 to 3 g/dL, amount directly related to probability of progression to multiple myeloma or a related plasma cell malignancy.

Serum M spike present in 80 % of patients with myeloma.

Immunofixation

Venous blood sample.

Indicated when an M spike is found on serum electrophoresis or when clinical findings present suspicion of multiple myeloma, other plasma cell malignancy, amyloidosis, or WM.

Monoclonal immunoglobulin:

MGUS: IgG (73 %), IgA (11 %), IgM (14 %), IgD, κ or λ light chains

Defines the heavy and light chain type of the abnormal serum protein, which can discriminate between MGUS, multiple myeloma, other plasma cell malignancies, WM, and amyloidosis.

Multiple myeloma: IgG (50 %), IgA (20 %), IgD (few), free light chains (17 %)

WM: IgM-κ

Amyloidosis: IgG, IgA, IgD, IgM, κ or λ light chains; 30 % non-secretory

Osteosclerotic myeloma: IgG-λ or IgA-λ

Heavy-chain disease: IgG, IgA, IgM, no light chain

Serum light chain quantitation

Venous blood sample.

Provides a rapid, accurate, quantitative measurement of λ and κ light-chain in serum.

κ free light chain: 3.3 to 19.4 mg/L

Increased light chain levels are seen in most plasma cell disorders, especially the more malignant disorders such as multiple myeloma.

λ free light chain: 5.7 to 26.3 mg/L

Free light chain (FLC) ratio may be a risk factor for progression to malignancy [66].

Unlike urine Bence-Jones protein assays, results are not affected by changes in renal function.

The test is expensive and not widely available.

Autoantibody panels

Normal:

Measures presence and titer of antibodies.

Absence of antibody

Anti-MAG antibody assesses distal demyelinating sensory neuropathy.

Anti-GM1 antibody assesses multifocal motor neuropathy.

Anti-GQ1b antibody assesses Miller-Fisher.

Please note that absolute absence of autoantibodies is not required for a “normal” test for many antibodies at different labs.

Cryoglobulins

Normal:

Serum blood specimen collected and separated while warm for cryoprecipitation over a period of up to 7 days.

Less than 80 μg/ml

At very high cryoglobulin titer states, cryoprecipitates during blood collection produce structures on peripheral blood smears that may be mistaken for leukocytes or platelets by automated cell differential analyzers.

24-h urine protein quantification and electrophoreses

Detects excretion of monoclonal immunoglobulin.

Dipstick test for proteinuria primarily detects albumin and often misses M protein.

Normal:

Urinary protein excretion less than 150 mg/day.

Recommended for patients with serum M spike or clinically-based suspicion of monoclonal gammopathy.

Small amount of Bence-Jones protein not uncommon

Urine immunofixation

Characterizes urinary monoclonal immunoglobulin following test of 24-h urine and should be done if serum M spike is greater than 1.5 g/dL.

Indicated if multiple myeloma, WM, primary amyloidosis, or a related disorder is suspected, even if routine urinalysis is negative for protein, 24-h urine is within normal limits, or if no M spike is seen on electrophoresis of concentrated urine sample.

Electrodiagnostic (electro-myelogram and nerve conduction studies)

Determines whether symptoms are due to a muscle or nerve disorder by measuring conduction velocities and the presence or absence of conduction blocks.

Determines whether the polyneuropathy is axonal or demyelinating.

Tests help to localize the anatomic site of a lesion that is causing pain, and determine the presence of active denervation.

Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy

A sample is taken usually from the posterior superior iliac crest region.

Required if a high M protein level is found to investigate the possibility of multiple myeloma or lymphoma.

Normal result is age-appropriate cellularity and lineage distribution and < 10 % plasma cells.

May reveal clinically inapparent involvement.

Requires local anesthesia and the assistance of an attendant.

Risk of infection and bleeding.

Radiographic skeletal bone survey

Two dimensional radiographs of the entire skeleton.

Survey detects lytic and sclerotic lesions as well as fractures which may be pathologic.

There is a relatively high radiation exposure.

Cerebrospinal fluid analysis

Investigate CIDP and leptomeningeal lymphomatous infiltration.

Elevated protein level is common in PPN.

Infiltration of the CNS by Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma will show clonal lymphocytes.

Viral infection may result in increased CSF lymphocytes but will not be clonal.

Autoantibodies can be tested within the CSF but the results may differ depending on the laboratory used. Absolute absence of autoantibodies is not required for a “normal” test for many antibodies at different labs.

Nerve biopsy

Biopsy of the superficial peroneal nerve is ideal so that a muscle biopsy of the peroneus brevis muscle may be done simultaneously; other choices include sural or superficial radial sensory nerves.

Identifies abnormal density of small and large axons and abnormal myelin sheaths.

Reserved for cases in which it is difficult to identify whether the process is predominantly axon degeneration or demyelination, or for cases where there is patchy, asymmetric, or focal involvement.

Evaluates suspected cases of infiltrative neoplasms, paraproteinemic vasculitis, or amyloidosis.

A negative nerve biopsy does not exclude amyloid neuropathy.

Please note that as with serum and CSF autoantibody testing, results may differ depending on the laboratory used.

Muscle biopsy

See “Nerve biopsy” for best incision site.

The procedure helps distinguish between an atypical neurogenic disorder and a primary myopathic disorder.

Fat biopsy

A normal result is no amyloid protein.

The test is most often done when there is suspicion of amyloidosis.

Skin biopsy

Examines the degree of myelination of small fiber neurons.

Helps ascertain the presence or absence of small fiber neuropathy.

Epidermal nerve twig analysis via skin biopsy is sometimes done if small fiber neuropathy is suspected.

Whole-body computerized tomography scan

The scan can detect lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and ascites.

Intravenous contrast is usually required for better visualization of lymphoid structures.

Positron emission tomography scan

Functional images assess metabolic activity within various structures, including lymph nodes and may detect nodal, extranodal, and bone marrow involvement by lymphoma.

PET scan can be used concurrently with non-contrast CT scan to combine functional and anatomic imaging.

Acute inflammation and infection can also result in increased uptake safety profile of the procedure, even though it is less sensitive than biopsy.

For patients who are found to have a paraproteinemia, diagnostic testing leans towards investigations of possible hematologic neoplasms. If none are discovered, then other diseases should be considered, including primary (AL) amyloidosis and cryoglobulinemia [22, 24]. Monoclonal proteins should be characterized by protein electrophoresis and immunofixation of the serum and the urine. Detailed electrophysiology includes determination of DML (distal motor latency)/MNCV (motor nerve conduction velocity)/TLI (terminal latency index), assessment for CB (conduction block)/ATD (abnormal temporal dispersion). If results of the CBC and/or peripheral smear examination are abnormal, a bone marrow biopsy is recommended, in consult with a hematologist. Even if the results of the CBC and/or peripheral smear examination are normal, then a bone marrow biopsy is still considered and usually recommended based on consultation with a hematologist before the diagnosis of MGUS is made. A skeletal X-ray survey can detect the presence of lytic lesions.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis including cytology and neuroimaging studies (MR neurography) may exclude leptomeningeal infiltration, especially in the presence of lymphoma. Nerve and muscle biopsy are occasionally performed to exclude infiltrative neoplasms, paraproteinemic vasculitis, or AL. If vasculitis is suspected, biopsy of the sural nerve is indicated. Alternatively, biopsy of the superficial peroneal nerve and peroneus brevis muscle obtains both nerve and muscle with a single incision and may increase the yield of identifying vasculitic pathology by up to 10 %. In the work-up of possible AL, abdominal fat aspiration biopsy is preferred over nerve biopsy due to the more favorable safety profile of the former procedure, despite lower sensitivity. If small fiber neuropathy is suspected, epidermal nerve twig analysis via skin biopsy may be performed.

VEGF testing for POEMS

In patients with M-protein, endocrine and skin changes, and demyelinating polyneuropathy, testing for elevated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may help diagnose POEMS. A retrospective study found that VEGF levels in patients with POEMS syndrome were markedly elevated compared with patients with other plasma cell dyscrasias (P < .001), peripheral neuropathy (P < .001), and connective tissue disease/vasculitis (P < .009). The best VEGF cut-off for POEMS diagnosis was 146 pg/mL; however, a cut-off of 200 pg/mL had a specificity of 95 % with a sensitivity of 68 % in support of a POEMS diagnosis (level of evidence: 3) [37].

Paraproteinemia treatment strategy

Many of the treatments for PPN are chemotherapy agents that may have significant impact on lifestyle. Psychological support for both the patient and family is often needed. As lifestyle modifications generally recommended in clinical practice, patients are counseled to remain as active as possible, abstain from alcohol, and stop smoking, if applicable. Several specialties may collaborate on treatment plans, including hematology for chemotherapy, neurology for pain management, radiation oncology for radiotherapy of plasmacytomas in POEMS syndrome, surgery for removal of solitary plasmacytomas in POEMS syndrome, and physical/occupational/recreational/speech/rehabilitation therapy [17]. Table 2 lists treatments directed to paraproteinemia.
Table 2

Treatment for paraproteinemia

Treatment

Indication

Dose

Major contraindications

Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG)

FDA-approved treatment for CIDP

2 g/kg intravenously for 3–5 days, followed by maintenance dose of 1 g/kg every 3 weeks, followed by clinical reassessment

Hypersensitivity to IVIG

FDA-approved treatment for multifocal motor neuropathy

0.5-2.4 g/kg per month with clinical assessment followed by clinical reassessment

IgA deficiency

Treatment for IgA/IgG-MGUS-CIDP

 

Immunoglobulin A deficiency

Alternative treatment for IgM-MGUS-distal demyelinating neuropathy (or rituximab, off-label use)

Treatment of CANOMAD (off label use)

Corticosteroids

First line treatment for CIDP associated with M protein (off-label use)

Prednisone:

Corticosteroid hypersensitivity

An alternative treatment for IgM/A/G-MGUS (after rituximab or plasma exchange, off label use)

1 to 1.5 mg/kg/day orally

Fungal infection

Several treatment dosing regimens are available and duration is not agreed upon.

Azathioprine

Alternative immunosuppressive treatment (after IVIG or corticosteroids) for CIDP associated with M protein (off-label use)

 

Pregnancy (category D)

Hypersensitivity to azathioprine

Rituximab

Alternative treatment for IgM-MGUS (off-label use)

Four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m2 rituximab [51]

Hypersensitivity to rituximab

Alternative therapy for multifocal motor neuropathy (after IVIG, off label use)

Chlorambucil

Alternative therapy for IgM-MGUS (off label use)

0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg orally daily for 3 to 6 weeks

Hypersensitivity to chlorambucil

FDA pregnancy category D

Fludarabine

Alternative therapy for IgM-MGUS (off label use)

40 mg/m2 for 5 days every 28 days

Hypersensitivity to fludarabine

FDA pregnancy risk category D

Melphalan

Treatment for POEMS

For POEMS (high dose): 10 mg/m2 for 4 days every 28 days [58]

Hypersensitivity to melphalan

In combination with prednisone as treatment for AL

For AL: 0.15 mg/kg once daily for 7 days every 6 weeks, increasing the dose by 2 mg in each 6 week course. Should be used in combination with prednisone.

Should not be used in patients whose disease has demonstrated prior melphalan resistance

Plasmapheresis (plasma exchange)

Alternative treatment of IgG/A MGUS

3 to 5 exchanges every other day

Risks associated with frequent vascular access

May be helpful in severe cases of cryoglobulinemia.

Risk of transmission of infective agents if fresh plasma is used as replacement fluid

Anaphylaxis and allergic reactions may occur with reinfusion of plasma substitute

Autologous peripheral stem cell transplant

First line treatment of POEMS syndrome

Myeloablative doses of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy followed by infusion of peripheral blood stem cells

Patients who undergo HCT are at risk for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections

Alternative treatment of AL, used in combination with melphalan

Early adverse effects include: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mouth sores

Later adverse effects include: cataracts, sterility, increased risk of other neoplasias

Radiation therapy

First line treatment of dominant sclerotic plasmacytoma in POEMS syndrome

Radiation therapy delivered to osteosclerotic lesions in doses of 40–50 Gy

Adverse effects depend upon the location of the area irradiated

Increased risk of developing second malignancies in patients with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

The mode and method of monitoring depends on the particular condition. Treatment decisions from a neurology standpoint usually are not based only on M-protein levels but rather the clinical picture, including severity, progression, and topography of motor deficit all which are important in selecting appropriate treatment. Additionally for MGUS patients, periodic (every 6–12 months) immunoglobulin quantitation and serum immunofixation may be done to determine changes in monoclonal protein level [8]. We consider treatment (always in consult with a hematologist) when the serum monoclonal protein rises above a concentration of 1.5 g/dL [38, 39]. Occasionally, serial electrodiagnostic studies are used to monitor disease response or progression [36]. Complications from the neuropathy itself include neuropathic ulcers and pain, Charcot joints, orthostasis, and predisposition to peripheral injury given lack of sensation [40].

PPN treatment first aims for paraprotein quantity reduction and the diminishing of cells producing the paraproteins, which may lead to improvement of neurological symptoms. IgM PPN sometimes responds to immunotherapies, but the potential benefits should be balanced against possible side effects, as well as the typically slow disease progression [18]. IgG and IgA PDN may be indistinguishable from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy clinically, electrophysiologically, and in response to treatment. The presence of paraprotein-related vasculitis or AL may also require treatment modification [19].

Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG)

A systematic Cochrane review identified seven randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in reducing disability and impairment resulting from IgM anti-MAG paraprotein-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy. The primary outcome measure was the change in Neuropathy Impairment scale or Modified Rankin after six months, and secondary outcomes included shorter-term changes in impairment scale scores as well as paraprotein levels after six months. None of the seven trials provided adequate evidence to support immunotherapies based on the primary outcome measured at six months [41]. However, two short-term trials of IVIG showed statistically significant improvements in Modified Rankin Scale at two weeks and 10-m walk time at four weeks (level of evidence, 2). Other studies have indicated that IVIG was effective in 15 % to 20 % of patients [42–44]. A prospective study of 22 patients indicated that IVIG induced a short-term benefit in 50 % of patients with IgM paraprotein-associated neuropathies (11 of 19 patients had elevated anti-MAG antibodies) [45]. These findings suggest IVIG may provide benefit for some patients.

IVIG adverse effects may include allergic reactions, cephalgia, aseptic meningitis, hemolysis, renal adverse effects mostly in sucrose-based preparations, and hypercoagulable states (e.g., DVT, PE, and MI).

Plasmapheresis (plasma exchange)

This blood purification procedure removes antibodies, thereby preventing them from binding their targets. The procedure removes the blood, separates blood cells from plasma, and returns purified blood, diluted with a plasma substitute, to the circulation [46]. Plasmapheresis is used for certain patients with IgG/A MGUS-associated neuropathy and may be helpful in severe cases of cryoglobulinemia. Plasmapheresis has only short term efficacy and must be repeated to maintain effectiveness. The procedure has limited utility for treatment of IgM-associated PPN.

A systematic review of treatments for IgG or IgA paraproteinemic peripheral neuropathy identified one relevant randomized controlled trial with 18 participants. Results showed plasma exchange had modest improvement over sham plasma exchange over a short-term follow up (level of evidence: 2) [47].

Corticosteroids

A review of case reports and uncontrolled studies indicated that corticosteroids, when given in conjunction with other therapies, produced a response in about half of the patients with high anti-MAG IgM, but was seldom effective as a single therapy [43]. Corticosteroids have potential adverse effects on numerous organ systems (dermatologic, metabolic, cardiovascular, immune, gastrointestinal, central nervous system, bone), and patients receiving long-term or high doses of corticosteroids should be monitored for the development or worsening of these conditions. Long-term use (usually >3 weeks) or doses greater than physiological amounts (7.5 mg prednisone), may lead to clinically relevant suppression of the pituitary-adrenal axis, or exogenous Cushing syndrome. Corticosteroids may cause immunosuppression, which may mask signs of infection and increase patient susceptibility to infection. Patients should not receive live attenuated vaccines during therapy [48, 49].

Azathioprine

After IVIG or corticosteroids, azathioprine is an alternative immunosuppressive treatment for CIDP [21]. The US FDA requires a boxed warning to advise of increased risk of neoplasia, particularly lymphoma (hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma) and skin cancers associated with use of azathioprine. The drug is a purine analog that causes immune suppression and subnormal response to infections or vaccines. Infections should be treated vigorously and live vaccines avoided. There is risk of irreversible or delayed bone marrow suppression. Individuals with thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) deficiency may be unusually susceptible to myelosuppression. There is also a risk of pancreatitis and hepatotoxicity, which may be dose-related. A gastrointestinal hypersensitivity reaction characterized by severe nausea and vomiting has also been reported and may occur in the first few weeks of treatment. Hepatic or renal impairment may require a dose reduction. CBC, renal and liver function should be monitored periodically.

Rituximab

This monoclonal antibody targets the CD20 antigen on B lymphocytes and is a first-line treatment for IgM-MGUS (off-label use). A small randomized study determined the effectiveness of rituximab versus placebo on symptoms of neuropathy in patients with anti-MAG IgM demyelinating polyneuropathy. Twenty-six patients were randomized to four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m2 rituximab or placebo. After 8 months, 4 of 12 rituximab-treated patients improved by at least one INCAT score (a measure of leg disability) compared with 0 of 13 patients taking placebo (P = .036) (level of evidence, 2) [50]. Another double blind placebo controlled trial of rituximab randomized 54 patients with IgM anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy to receive rituximab or placebo. The primary outcome was the mean change in INCAT sensory score at 12 months, which showed no significant difference between treatment arms. However, with six patients in the rituximab group dropping out of the study, the per protocol analysis showed significant improvement in the rituximab group for secondary endpoints of INCAT disability scale and self-evaluation scale (P = .027 and P = .016, respectively) [51]. Both trials indicate statistically significant improvement in clinical rating scales (as secondary outcomes in some cases) suggesting that the use of rituximab for patients with anti-MAG IgM demyelinating polyneuropathy may provide benefit. Although some may not improve and the worsening is part of the disease progression, some patients may worsen after rituximab, especially if IgM levels are very high, similarly as with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia [52–54].

Chlorambucil

The alkylating agent chlorambucil is well tolerated by most patients but immunosuppression and bone marrow suppression may develop, which may lead to an increased susceptibility to infections or bleeding. Neutropenia can occur after the third week of chlorambucil therapy and continue for up to 10 days after the last dose. CBC should be monitored weekly.

Fludarabine

Fludarabine is used as alternative therapy for IgM-MGUS, and the efficacy of the cytotoxic purine antimetabolite has been demonstrated in very small case series, both alone and in combination with rituximab [55, 56]. Use of fludarabine can cause severe bone marrow suppression. Life-threatening and sometimes fatal autoimmune hemolytic anemia and immune thrombocytopenic purpura have been reported following one or more cycles of fludarabine therapy in approximately 5 % of patients. Nausea/vomiting during intravenous fludarabine treatment is common. CBC should be monitored weekly.

Melphalan

Melphalan in combination with prednisone may reduce the monoclonal protein level and even prolong survival in AL, but the specific effect of this regimen on peripheral neuropathy is not known [57]. Melphalan is used for treatment of POEMS syndrome. A study from China on 31 patients with POEMS reported that high-dose melphalan plus dexamethasone resulted in good hematologic and neurologic responses [58]. The drug may cause a secondary malignancy; melphalan is leukemogenic in humans. Myelosuppressive effects of melphalan can increase the risk of infection or bleeding. The dosage of melphalan should be reduced or therapy discontinued at the first signs of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. CBC should be monitored closely.

Symptomatic treatment strategy

Symptomatic treatment of the neuropathy itself usually involves membrane stabilizers, tricyclic anti-depressants, and/or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology summarize evidence-based information on pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for painful neuropathy [59].

Gabapentin

A structural analogue of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), gabapentin is a first line treatment for neuropathic pain and is effective for a variety of neuropathic pain conditions. It exerts its anti-nociceptive effect by binding the alpha-2 delta calcium channel in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. It should be used with caution in renal insufficiency; the dose must be adjusted.

Pregabalin

Designed as a more potent successor to gabapentin, pregabalin is effective for a variety of neuropathic conditions. It should be used with caution in renal insufficiency; the dose must be adjusted.

Valproate

Valproate agent should be used with caution in hepatic impairment; dose reduction is required. The US FDA requires a boxed warning to advise of hepatic failure resulting in fatalities and to advise of teratogenic effects, such as neural tube defects, when used in pregnancy.

Dextromethorphan

N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists such as dextromethorphan block the activation of NMDA receptors, which is contributory to development of central sensitization resulting in hyperalgesia, hyperpathia, allodynia, and reduced functionality of opioid receptors. Side effects may include light-headedness, drowsiness, visual disturbances, and hot flushes; the agent should be used with caution in patients who are sedated or debilitated [60].

Tramadol

The mixed opioid, mu agonist and inhibitor of uptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, should be used with caution in renal and hepatic impairment; dose reduction is required. In rare instances anaphylactic reactions have been reported. The agent may cause CNS depression, which may impair physical or mental abilities.

Duloxetine

Duloxetine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) used for symptomatic treatment for peripheral neuropathy. It is FDA approved for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). The US FDA requires a boxed warning to advise of suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults (18 to 24 years of age) with major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders.

Amitriptyline

Amitriptyline is the most widely used tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), and is used off-label for symptomatic treatment of peripheral neuropathy. The US FDA requires a boxed warning to advise of suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults (18 to 24 years of age) with major depressive disorder and other psychiatric disorders.

Venlafaxine

The serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine is used off-label for symptomatic treatment of peripheral neuropathy. The US FDA requires a boxed warning to advise of suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults (18 to 24 years of age) with major depressive disorder and other psychiatric disorders. In patients with renal impairment (GFR 10–70 ml/min), reduce total daily dose by 25 to 50 %. In patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment, reduce total daily dose by 50 %.

Autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation

As a first line treatment for POEMS syndrome and alternative treatment (in combination with melphalan) for AL, autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation entails administration of myeloablative doses of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy followed by infusion of peripheral blood stem cells [61, 62].

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is given to stimulate peripheral blood stem cells followed by hematopoietic stem cell mobilization four to six days later. Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are mobilized using a variety of techniques. Following initiation of a mobilization regimen, patients are monitored by peripheral blood CD34 counts. Apheresis begins when the peripheral CD34+ counts have reached a target level (i.e., 10 CD34 cells/μl). After completion of the preparative chemotherapy, PBPCs are reinfused. A period of pancytopenia follows and red blood cell and platelet transfusions are administered as necessary while G-CSF is used to speed neutrophil engraftment. Lifelong follow up is necessary to monitor for complications and recurrence. Patients are at risk for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Early adverse effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and mouth sores; later adverse effects include cataracts, sterility, and increased risk of other neoplasias.

Efficacy of the procedure for peripheral neuropathy symptom improvement is based on small case series, and data suggest that most patients achieve at least some neurologic improvement. A small study of 9 patients with POEMS syndrome evaluated the extent and time course of neurologic improvement after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Within 3 months, neurologic improvement began, and all the patients showed substantial neurologic recovery during the next 3 months. At the end of follow-up periods (8 to 49 months, median 20 months), neuropathy was still improving and no patients had recurrence of symptoms (level of evidence: 3) [62].

Radiation therapy

Radiation therapy as a first line treatment for dominant sclerotic plasmacytoma in POEMS syndrome is delivered to osteosclerotic lesions in doses of 40–50 Gy. More than 50 % of patients treated with radiation show improvement of the neuropathy, but improvement in some patients may be delayed, occurring after six months or longer [31].

Physical, occupational, speech, recreational, and rehabilitative therapies

For training in performance of activities of daily living, physical therapy that focuses on compensatory strategies to accommodate for limbs with a loss of sensation and weakness is often done by patients with peripheral neuropathies. Amyloidosis as a paraprotein can cause gastroparesis/dysphagia, which is also seen in CANOMAD and can result from medication toxicity. Speech therapy focused on training in swallowing may attenuate symptoms in patients suffering gastroparesis or dysphagia [63, 64]. Recreational therapy helps patients recover basic motor functioning, to build confidence and socialize more effectively. Treatments may incorporate arts and crafts, sports, games, dance, drama, and/or music. Patients with chronic disease, especially the elderly, who are isolated and at risk for depression, may benefit from these therapies, which can improve socialization and diminish isolation.

Orthotics

For the prevention of foot ulcers and infections, orthotics are molded cushion inserts for the foot that distribute pressures, reduce high stress areas, and provide shock absorption.

Acupuncture

A method of Chinese medicine aims to produce analgesia by insertion of sharp, thin needles into the body at very specific points. Acupuncture has produced improvement in both subjective symptoms and objective nerve conduction study findings [65].

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

TENS is a form of electroanalgesia that reduces pain through nociceptive inhibition at the presynaptic level in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. A TENS unit consists of 1 or more electrical-signal generators, a battery, and a set of electrodes. The TENS unit is small and programmable, and the generators can deliver trains of stimuli with variable current strengths, pulse rates, and pulse widths. Patients may experience skin irritation due to drying out of the electrode gel. TENS is contraindicated in patients with a demand-type pacemaker.

Conclusions

Individual paraproteinemic disorders exhibit distinct neuropathic phenotypes, often with characteristic, identifiable clinical features. Frequently, prognoses are not well-defined, and in many cases, unknown. Testing should include a general and detailed neurological exam to characterize phenotype, and may include various diagnostic tests depending on the case. PPN treatment often calls for collaboration among several specialties, including hematology, neurology, radiation oncology, surgery, and physical/occupational/recreational/speech/rehabilitation therapy. Treatments for PPN often involve chemotherapy agents that may significantly impact a patient’s lifestyle. For these individuals and their families, psychological support is often needed.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Jennifer Kelly Shepphird, PhD, of JKS Science & Medical Writing, LLC (www.jkswriting.com) for her assistance in the production of the manuscript tables along with revision of the main manuscript to conform with journal standards. We also gratefully acknowledge and are very appreciative of the reviewers whose detailed comments and thoughtful suggestions helped us to significantly improve our manuscript.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles County Medical Center, Medical Director PIH Health-Whittier Stroke Program, Neurology Consultants Medical Group
(2)
University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles County Medical Center

References

  1. Rajabally YA. Neuropathy and paraproteins: review of a complex association. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(11):1291–8. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03380.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zivkovic SA, Lacomis D, Lentzsch S. Paraproteinemic neuropathy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(9):1422–33. doi:10.1080/10428190903111922.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kwan JY. Paraproteinemic neuropathy. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(1):47–69. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2006.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rojas-Garcia R, Gallardo E, Illa I. Paraproteinemic neuropathies. Presse medicale (Paris, France: 1983). 2013;42(6 Pt 2):e225–34. doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2013.02.329.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Martyn CN, Hughes RA. Epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62(4):310–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Kelly Jr JJ, Kyle RA, O’Brien PC, Dyck PJ. Prevalence of monoclonal protein in peripheral neuropathy. Neurology. 1981;31(11):1480–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Saleun JP, Vicariot M, Deroff P, Morin JF. Monoclonal gammopathies in the adult population of Finistere, France. J Clin Pathol. 1982;35(1):63–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Gosselin S, Kyle RA, Dyck PJ. Neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Ann Neurol. 1991;30(1):54–61. doi:10.1002/ana.410300111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Offord JR, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(13):1362–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa054494.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford J, Eye MK, Cohen HJ. Evaluation of monoclonal gammopathies in the “well” elderly. Am J Med. 1987;82(1):39–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003;121(5):749–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorson KC. An update on the management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2012;5(6):359–73. doi:10.1177/1756285612457215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Shah D, Seiter K. Multiple Myeloma. 2015. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/204369-overview-showall.Google Scholar
  14. Kyle R, Dyck PJ. Neuropathy associated with the monoclonal gammopathies. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, editors. Peripheral Neuropathy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 2255–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nobile-Orazio E, Barbieri S, Baldini L, Marmiroli P, Carpo M, Premoselli S, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: prevalence and immunopathogenetic studies. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;85(6):383–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rison RA, Beydoun SR. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-motor neuron disease, monoclonal gammopathy, hyperparathyroidism, and B12 deficiency: case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Reports. 2010;4:298. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-4-298.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorson KC. Clinical features, evaluation, and treatment of patients with polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). J Clin Apher. 1999;14(3):149–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Niermeijer JM, Fischer K, Eurelings M, Franssen H, Wokke JH, Notermans NC. Prognosis of polyneuropathy due to IgM monoclonal gammopathy: a prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2010;74(5):406–12. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ccc6b9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hadden RD, Nobile-Orazio E, Sommer C. European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on Management of Paraproteinaemic demyelinating neuropathies. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society. J Periph Nerv. 2010;15:185–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferri C, La Civita L, Cirafisi C, Siciliano G, Longombardo G, Bombardieri S, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in mixed cryoglobulinemia: clinical and electrophysiologic investigations. J Rheumatol. 1992;19(6):889–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Caniatti LM, Tugnoli V, Eleopra R, Tralli G, Bassi R, De Grandis D. Cryoglobulinemic neuropathy related to hepatitis C virus infection. Clinical, laboratory and neurophysiological study. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 1996;1(2):131–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Garcia-Bragado F, Fernandez JM, Navarro C, Villar M, Bonaventura I. Peripheral neuropathy in essential mixed cryoglobulinemia. Arch Neurol. 1988;45(11):1210–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Systemic amyloidosis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1990;10(1):49–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Benson MD, Kincaid JC. The molecular biology and clinical features of amyloid neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2007;36(4):411–23. doi:10.1002/mus.20821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Beydoun SR, Rison RA, Commins D. Secondary amyloidosis as a life-ending event in multifocal motor neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(10):1396–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Willison HJ, O’Leary CP, Veitch J, Blumhardt LD, Busby M, Donaghy M, et al. The clinical and laboratory features of chronic sensory ataxic neuropathy with anti-disialosyl IgM antibodies. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 10):1968–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Delmont E, Jeandel PY, Hubert AM, Marcq L, Boucraut J, Desnuelle C. Successful treatment with rituximab of one patient with CANOMAD neuropathy. J Neurol. 2010;257(4):655–7. doi:10.1007/s00415-009-5412-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dispenzieri A, Suarez GA, Kyle R. POEMS syndrome. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas P, editors. Peripheral Neuropathy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Sanders; 2005. p. 2453–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Rison RA. Papilloedema and hypertrichosis: the varied and harried manifestations of POEMS syndrome. BMJ case reports. 2009. doi:10.1136/bcr.09.2008.1000.
  30. Soubrier MJ, Dubost JJ, Sauvezie BJ. POEMS syndrome: a study of 25 cases and a review of the literature. French Study Group on POEMS Syndrome. Am J Med. 1994;97(6):543–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuwabara S, Dispenzieri A, Arimura K, Misawa S, Nakaseko C. Treatment for POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, and skin changes) syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:Cd006828. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006828.pub3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Viala K, Behin A, Maisonobe T, Leger JM, Stojkovic T, Davi F, et al. Neuropathy in lymphoma: a relationship between the pattern of neuropathy, type of lymphoma and prognosis? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(7):778–82. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.125930.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly JJ, Karcher DS. Lymphoma and peripheral neuropathy: a clinical review. Muscle Nerve. 2005;31(3):301–13. doi:10.1002/mus.20163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Viala K, Maisonobe T, Stojkovic T, Koutlidis R, Ayrignac X, Musset L, et al. A current view of the diagnosis, clinical variants, response to treatment and prognosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010;15(1):50–6. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8027.2010.00251.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rajabally YA, Simpson BS, Beri S, Bankart J, Gosalakkal JA. Epidemiologic variability of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with different diagnostic criteria: study of a UK population. Muscle Nerve. 2009;39(4):432–8. doi:10.1002/mus.21206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yeung KB, Thomas PK, King RH, Waddy H, Will RG, Hughes RA, et al. The clinical spectrum of peripheral neuropathies associated with benign monoclonal IgM, IgG and IgA paraproteinaemia. Comparative clinical, immunological and nerve biopsy findings. J Neurol. 1991;238(7):383–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. D’Souza A, Hayman SR, Buadi F, Mauermann M, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, et al. The utility of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with POEMS syndrome. Blood. 2011;118(17):4663–5. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-06-362392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV, Landgren O, Blade J, Merlini G, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia. 2010;24(6):1121–7. doi:10.1038/leu.2010.60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Fanning S, Hussein M. Monoclonal Gammopathies of Uncertain Origin. 2014. Medscape, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/204297-medication. Accessed September 18, 2015.Google Scholar
  40. Vital A. Paraproteinemic neuropathies. Brain Pathol (Zurich, Switzerland). 2001;11(4):399–407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Lunn MP, Nobile-Orazio E. Immunotherapy for IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein paraprotein-associated peripheral neuropathies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:Cd002827. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002827.pub3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dalakas MC, Quarles RH, Farrer RG, Dambrosia J, Soueidan S, Stein DP, et al. A controlled study of intravenous immunoglobulin in demyelinating neuropathy with IgM gammopathy. Ann Neurol. 1996;40(5):792–5. doi:10.1002/ana.410400516.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Nobile-Orazio E, Meucci N, Baldini L, Di Troia A, Scarlato G. Long-term prognosis of neuropathy associated with anti-MAG IgM M-proteins and its relationship to immune therapies. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 4):710–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Gorson KC, Ropper AH, Weinberg DH, Weinstein R. Treatment experience in patients with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(6):778–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Comi G, Roveri L, Swan A, Willison H, Bojar M, Illa I, et al. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in IgM paraprotein associated demyelinating neuropathy. J Neurol. 2002;249(10):1370–7. doi:10.1007/s00415-002-0808-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Guillevin L, Pagnoux C. Indications of plasma exchanges for systemic vasculitides. Ther Apher Dial. 2003;7(2):155–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stork AC, Lunn MP, Nobile-Orazio E, Notermans NC. Treatment for IgG and IgA paraproteinaemic neuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:Cd005376. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005376.pub3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Shepherd JE, Grabenstein JD. Immunizations for high-risk populations. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2001;41(6):839–49. quiz 923-835.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): use of vaccines and immune globulins for persons with altered immunocompetence (1993). MMWR Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports/Centers for Disease Control 42 (Rr-4):1-18Google Scholar
  50. Dalakas MC, Rakocevic G, Salajegheh M, Dambrosia JM, Hahn AF, Raju R, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2009;65(3):286–93. doi:10.1002/ana.21577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Leger JM, Viala K, Nicolas G, Creange A, Vallat JM, Pouget J, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy. Neurology. 2013;80(24):2217–25. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318296e92b.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Treon SP, Branagan AR, Hunter Z, Santos D, Tournhilac O, Anderson KC. Paradoxical increases in serum IgM and viscosity levels following rituximab in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(10):1481–3. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kosmidis ML, Dalakas MC. Practical considerations on the use of rituximab in autoimmune neurological disorders. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2010;3(2):93–105. doi:10.1177/1756285609356135.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Noronha V, Fynan TM, Duffy T. Flare in neuropathy following rituximab therapy for Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(1), e3. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.6474.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson HC, Lunn MP, Schey S, Hughes RA. Successful treatment of IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy with fludarabine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(5):575–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Gruson B, Ghomari K, Beaumont M, Garidi R, Just A, Merle P, et al. Long-term response to rituximab and fludarabine combination in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2011;16(3):180–5. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8027.2011.00343.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Kyle R, Kelly CM, Dyck PJ. Amyloidosis and Neuropathy. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas P, editors. Peripheral Neuropathy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 2427–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Li J, Zhang W, Jiao L, Duan MH, Guan HZ, Zhu WG, et al. Combination of melphalan and dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome. Blood. 2011;117(24):6445–9. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-12-328112.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Neurology AA. Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. 2011. https://www.aan.com/Guidelines/home/GetGuidelineContent/480. Accessed September 18, 2015.Google Scholar
  60. Carlsson KC, Hoem NO, Moberg ER, Mathisen LC. Analgesic effect of dextromethorphan in neuropathic pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(3):328–36. doi:10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.0325.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Vesole DH, Perez WS, Akasheh M, Boudreau C, Reece DE, Bredeson CN. High-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with primary systemic amyloidosis: a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(7):880–8. doi:10.4065/81.7.880.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Kuwabara S, Misawa S, Kanai K, Suzuki Y, Kikkawa Y, Sawai S, et al. Neurologic improvement after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in POEMS syndrome. Neurology. 2008;71(21):1691–5. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000323811.42080.a4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Costigan DJ, Clouse RE. Achalasia-like esophagus from amyloidosis. Successful treatment with pneumatic bag dilatation. Dig Dis Sci. 1983;28(8):763–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lopez-Cepero Andrada JM, Jimenez Arjona J, Amaya Vidal A, Rubio Garrido J, Navas Relinque C, Soria de la Cruz MJ, et al. Pseudoachalasia and secondary amyloidosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;25(6):398–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Schroder S, Liepert J, Remppis A, Greten JH. Acupuncture treatment improves nerve conduction in peripheral neuropathy. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14(3):276–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01632.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA, Therneau TM, Larson D, Benson J, et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111(2):785–9. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-08-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rison and Beydoun. 2016

Advertisement