Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Neurology

Research article
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Association between different acute stroke therapies and development of post stroke seizures

  • Jillian Naylor1, 5Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Arthur Thevathasan1,
  • Leonid Churilov2,
  • Ruibing Guo3,
  • Yunyun Xiong3,
  • Miriam Koome1,
  • Ziyi Chen4,
  • Ziyuan Chen1,
  • Xinfeng Liu3,
  • Patrick Kwan1 and
  • Bruce C. V. Campbell1
BMC Neurology201818:61

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1064-x

©  The Author(s). 2018

Received: 31 October 2017

Accepted: 26 April 2018

Published: 3 May 2018

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Epilepsy is a major complication of stroke. We aimed to establish whether there is an association between intravenous thrombolysis, intra-arterial thrombolysis and post stroke seizure (PSS) development. Improved understanding of the relationship between reperfusion therapies and seizure development may improve post-stroke monitoring and follow-up.

Methods

This was a retrospective, multicentre cohort study conducted at the Royal Melbourne Hospital and Jingling Hospital Nanjing. We included patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke admitted 2008–2015. Patients were divided into four treatment groups 1. IV-tPA only, 2. Intra-arterial therapies (IAT) only, 3. IAT + IV-tPA and 4. stroke unit care only (i.e. no IV-tPA or IAT). To assess the association between type of reperfusion treatment and seizure incidence we used multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, stroke severity, 3-month functional outcome and prognostic factors.

Results

There were 1375 stroke unit care-only patients, of whom 28 (2%) developed PSS. There were 363 patients who received only IV-tPA, of whom 21 (5.8%) developed PSS. There were 93 patients who received IAT only, of whom 12 (12.9%) developed PSS and 112 that received both IV-tPA + IAT, of which 5 (4.5%) developed PSS. All reperfusion treatments were associated with seizure development compared to stroke unit care-only patients: IV-tPA only adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.7, 95%CI 1.8–7.4, p < 0.0001; IAT aOR 5.5, 95%CI 2.1–14.3, p < 0.0001, IAT + IV-tPA aOR 3.4, 95% CI 0.98–11.8, p = 0.05. These aORs did not differ significantly between treatment groups (IV-tPA + IAT versus IV-tPA p = 0.89, IV-tPA + IAT versus IAT, p = 0.44).

Conclusions

Patients receiving thrombolytic or intra-arterial reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke are at higher risk of epilepsy and may benefit from longer follow-up. No evidence for an additive or synergistic effect of treatment modality on seizure development was found.

Keywords

Ischemic strokePost stroke seizuresIntravenous tissue plasminogen activatorIntra-arterial thrombectomy

Background

With greater public awareness of the importance of early stroke recognition and more efficient treatment delivery (e.g. code stroke, telemedicine), there has been a welcome increase in the proportion of patients arriving at hospital within the timeframe to be eligible for reperfusion therapies [1]. Numerous randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the superiority of reperfusion therapies, including endovascular thrombectomy and IV-tPA, over standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients with large artery occlusion [2–6]. These advances have contributed to a 68% increase in the number of stroke survivors between 1990 and 2010 [7]. Given the improved immediate outlook of acute stroke, there is a need to understand whether these interventions also affect long term complications.

Epilepsy is one of the major complications of stroke. Post-stroke epilepsy poses a considerable burden to stroke survivors and, even when well-controlled with medications, negatively impacts their quality of life [8]. Seizures develop in 2–14% of patients who have had an ischemic stroke [9]. Such wide variation in the reported incidence and prognostic factors [10] has been attributed to differences in follow-up duration, definition and classification of seizures, and characteristics of the study population [11].

Whether the recent advances in reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke have influenced the incidence of seizure development has not been well studied. Two studies have found that thrombolysis increases the likelihood of acute symptomatic seizures, within 7 days, post ischemic stroke, [12, 13] whilst others have shown no association [14]. Few have examined post-stroke seizures following intra-arterial therapies (IAT).

This study aimed to investigate whether there is an association between different acute stroke treatments and post stroke seizure development. A better understanding of the relationship between acute stroke therapies and the development of seizures may lead to improved post stroke monitoring and follow-up.

Methods

Setting

This was a retrospective, multicentre cohort study conducted at the Royal Melbourne Hospital and Jingling Hospital, Nanjing. Subjects at both centres were identified from prospectively maintained clinical databases of patients admitted with an ischemic stroke. The Royal Melbourne Hospital, located in Victoria, Australia, provides IV-tPA therapy to acute ischemic stroke patients who arrive to the hospital within 4.5 h of stroke onset. It also serves as the state-wide referral centre for intra-arterial therapies, including endovascular thrombectomy and intra-arterial urokinase. Jingling Hospital is located in Jiangsu province, China, where most patients received stroke unit care only. Ethical approval of the study was granted by the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (project number QA2010089) and patient consent was waived.

Patient groups

We included patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke admitted to the two hospitals between 2008 and 2015. Patients with a history of epilepsy or seizures prior to their stroke were excluded. Patients included were divided into 4 groups based on the type of acute reperfusion treatment received: 1. IV-tPA only, 2. IAT only, 3. IAT + IV-tPA and 4. stroke unit care only (i.e. no IV-tPA or IAT). For the purpose of analyses, patients receiving ‘stroke unit care only’ were regarded as controls.

Clinical data collection

Clinical data was collected and entered into the databases at both centres when the patients were admitted to the emergency department, transferred to stroke wards and returned to stroke follow-up clinics. Data included patient demographics, age, sex, pre-morbid modified Rankin score (mRS), admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, admission blood pressure and stroke risk factors such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, dyslipidemia, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and smoking. Clinical follow-up information included the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3-months post onset with good outcome defined as mRS 0–2. Hemorrhagic transformation was assessed using the ECASS classification [15] on follow-up 24 h CT brain imaging, blinded to seizure data collection.

Seizure follow-up

Patients with post stroke seizures were identified if they experienced seizures up to 2 years from stroke onset. This cut-off was chosen based on previous findings that suggested that the highest risk of seizure development was within the first year [16]. Occurrence of post stroke seizures was ascertained by reviewing follow-up medical records and via telephone interview using a questionnaire from previous studies [14, 17–19], modified from a validated screening questionnaire [20]. This questionnaire was translated into Chinese for use at the Jingling Hospital Nanjing. Events were recorded as seizures if the symptoms included motor or autonomic components, with or without impairment of consciousness, as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy [21].

Statistical analyses

To assess homogeneity between the two sites, the seizure occurrence within 2 years post-stroke between the control groups across the two sites was compared using Fisher’s Exact test with corresponding effect estimated as Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). When no significant difference in seizure incidence between the two sites was found, the control groups were combined.

The demographic, clinical and risk factor characteristics for the control group, IAT only, IV-tPA only and IAT + IV-tPA combined groups were summarised as median (IQR) for continuous characteristics and as counts (proportions) for categorical characteristics, and compared using either Kruskall-Wallis test or Fisher’s Exact test depending on the nature of the distribution.

To assess the association between the types of treatment (reperfusion: IAT only, IV-tPA only, IAT + IV-tPA; with controls) and seizure occurrence within 2 years, logistic regression modelling with seizure occurrence as an output and treatment groups as inputs was used. The analysis was adjusted for the following a priori chosen covariates known to be associated with post stroke seizures: age, baseline NIHSS and 3 month mRS [16, 22–26]. Corresponding effect sizes were summarised as adjusted ORs with 95%CI. For robustness analysis, extra covariates that demonstrated statistically significant association with seizure occurrence on univariate analyses were subsequently included in the model.

To further investigate the robustness of the modelling outcomes, we performed a sensitivity analysis to assess the potential association between thrombectomy and seizures with a control group more closely matching the patients who receive thrombectomy. We used a selection criterion of NIHSS≥6 as per AHA/ASA guidelines for thrombectomy eligibility [27]. We additionally performed a sensitivity analysis including only patients with an NIHSS> 8 to further increase specificity for large vessel occlusion [28].

Statistical analyses were performed using STATA IC (v13.1, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA), p-value < 0.05 was treated as indicative of statistical significance.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 1943 patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke were included in the analysis (757 from Melbourne and 1186 from Nanjing). The overall incidence of post-stroke seizures within 2 years was 3.3% (65/1943). No significant difference in seizure occurrence was identified between the Melbourne (1/189, 0.53%) and the Nanjing (27/1186, 2.3%) stroke unit care-only patients (OR 0.24, 95%CI 0.0–1.4, p = 0.1). Consequently, these patients were combined into a single control group for the multivariable regression models to assess the influence of treatment on seizure development. In the combined cohort, 1375 patients were controls, of which 27 (2, 95%CI 1.3–2.8%) developed post stroke seizures. There were 363 patients treated with IV-tPA only. Of these, 21/363 (5.8, 95%CI 3.6–8.7%) patients developed post stroke seizures. There were 93 patients who received IAT only, with 12 (12.9, 95%CI 6.8–21.4%) developing post stroke seizures. There were 112 patients treated with IAT and IV-tPA, of whom 5 (4.5, 95%CI 1.5–10%) developed post stroke seizures.

There was a significant difference in baseline NIHSS across treatment groups median (IQR): IAT + IV-tPA = 17 (13–21), IAT = 18 (13–21), IV-tPA only = 10 (6–17), control = 2 (0–7), p = 0.0001. There was a significant difference in age at stroke across the treatment groups median (IQR): IAT + IV-tPA = 70 (59–78), IAT = 67 (54–77), IV-tPA only = 74 (65–77) control = 62 (52–70), p = 0.0001. There was a significant difference in mRS 0–2 at 3 months across the treatment groups: IAT + IV-tPA = 59/112 (52.7%), IAT = 36/93 (38.7%), IV-tPA only = 191/363 (52.6%) control = 839/1375 (61.0%), p < 0.0001. Baseline characteristics are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline demographics and stroke risk factors across treatment group

 

IAT + IV-tPA, n = 112

IAT only n = 93

IV-tPA only, n = 363

Control, n = 1375

p-value

Age (median, IQR)

70 (59–78)

67 (54–77)

74 (65–82)

62 (52–70)

0.0001a

Female Sex (n,%)

45 (40.2)

50 (54)

175 (48.2)

477 (34.7)

< 0.001b

Systolic Blood Pressure (median, IQR)

- x

- x

150 (133–167)

136 (128–150)

0.0001a

Diastolic Blood Pressure (median, IQR)

- x

- x

80 (70–90)

80 (72–88)

0.50a

NIHSS baseline (median, IQR)

17 (13–21)

18 (13–21)

10 (6–17)

2 (0–7)

0.0001a

Hypertension (n,%)

66 (58.9)

42 (45)

264 (73.0)

823 (59.8)

< 0.001b

Diabetes (n,%)

19 (17.0)

19 (20.4)

106 (29.2)

299 (21.7)

0.05b

Dyslipidaemia (n,%)

33 (29.5)

28 (30)

191 (52.6)

53 (4)

< 0.001b

Smoking (n,%)

- x

- x

88 (24)

438 (32)

0.001b

Atrial Fibrillation (n,%)

43 (38.4)

31 (33.3)

115 (31.7)

114 (8.3)

< 0.001b

Hemorrhagic Transformation (n,%)

28 (25)

28 (30)

63 (17)

-x

0.001b

3-month mRS (0–2) (n,%)

59 (53)

36 (39)

191 (53)

839 (61)

< 0.001b

Post Stroke Seizures (n,%)

5 (4.5)

12 (12.9)

21 (5.8)

28 (2)

< 0.001b

aKruskall-Wallis test

bFisher’s Exact test

xunavailable

The association of IAT, IV-tPA and IAT + IV-tPA with post stroke seizure development

The univariate analysis for baseline variables age, NIHSS at baseline and the 3-month mRS of 0-2 and their association with post stroke seizures are provided in Table 2. In multivariable logistic regression adjusted for baseline NIHSS, age, and mRS at 3 months, administration of IV-tPA (without IAT) was significantly associated with increased odds of seizure development: adjusted OR 3.7, 95%CI 1.8–7.4, p < 0.0001. Similarly, there was an independent association between treatment with IAT only and increased odds of seizure development compared to controls: adjusted OR 5.5, 95%CI 2.1–14.3, p < 0.0001. There was also a trend towards increased seizure risk in patients treated with combined IAT + IV-tPA compared to controls: OR 3.4, 95%CI 0.98–11.8, p = 0.05 (Fig. 1). For the purpose of robustness analysis, we included extra baseline adjustment covariates and risk factors that were significantly associated with seizure development in univariate analysis and were recorded for all treatments: sex, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and dyslipidemia (Table 1). Including these variables as extra covariates increased the collinearity in the regression model and rendered some standard error estimates less stable, but the adjusted estimates for the effects for individual treatment groups remain quantitatively similar: IAT only OR 6.6, 95%CI 2.5–17.8, p < 0.001, IV-tPA only OR 2.9, 95%CI 2.3–10.7, p < 0.001, IV-tPA+ IAT OR 4.3, 95%CI 1.2–15.3, p = 0.03. Consistently with largely overlapping confidence intervals, the odds of post stroke seizures in the three treatment groups did not differ (IV-tPA + IAT versus IV-tPA p = 0.89, IV-tPA + IAT versus IAT, p = 0.44, Fig. 1).
Table 2

Univariate Analysis for baseline variables and the association with post stroke seizures

 

IAT + IV-tPA, n = 112

OR, 95% CI, p-value

IAT only n = 93

OR, 95% CI, p-value

IV-tPA only, n = 363

OR, 95% CI, p-value

Control, n = 1375

OR, 95% CI, p-value

Age

1.0, 0.94–1.1, p = 0.9

0.94, 0.9–0.98, p = 0.003

1.0, 0.96–1.0, p = 0.95

0.99, 0.96–1.0, p = 0.33

NIHSS baseline

1.1, 0.9–1.3, p = 0.36

1.0, 0.92–1.1, p = 0.98

1.1, 1.0–1.1, p = 0.05

1.1,1.0–1.1, p < 0.0001

3-month mRS (0–2)

0.13, 0.01–1.3, p = 0.08

0.52, 0.12–2.2, p = 0.37

0.37, 0.14–0.97, p = 0.04

0.27, 0.12–0.62, p = 0.002

Figure 1
Fig. 1

Forest plot of treatment effects on seizure development post stroke. The effects shown are ORs with 95% CIs (adjusted for age, baseline NIHSS and 3 month mRS) using stroke unit care only group as a reference. No significant difference in seizure development post stroke between IAT, IV-tPA and IV-tPA + IAT treatment groups (IV-tPA + IAT versus IV-tPA p = 0.89, IV-tPA + IAT versus IAT, p = 0.44)

For the sensitivity analysis including only patients with an NIHSS ≥6 (to better match the controls with patients eligible for thrombectomy [27]), the results of the logistic regression were similar to the previous results: IV-tPA verses controls OR 3.2, 95%CI 1.4–7.4, p = 0.005, IAT verses controls OR 4.6, 95%CI 1.6–13.0, p = 0.004, IV-tPA + IAT versus controls OR 3.2, 95%CI 0.84–12.1, p = 0.09.

For the sensitivity analysis including only patients with an NIHSS> 8 (to further increase specificity for large vessel occlusion [28]) the results of the logistic regression were similar to the previous results: IV-tPA versus controls OR 3.9, 95%CI 1.5–9.7, p = 0.004, IAT versus controls OR 5.3, 95%CI 1.9–15.3, p = 0.002, IV-tPA + IAT versus controls OR 4.0, 95%CI 1.03–16.2, p = 0.045. Additional file 1 for the univariate and multivariable logistic regression has been presented.

Discussion

This study has demonstrated that acute stroke reperfusion therapies are significantly associated with seizure development. Specifically, we showed that in patients treated with IV-tPA only, independent of age, baseline stroke severity, stroke outcome and other baseline variables, there was a greater than threefold increase in the likelihood of developing seizures in comparison to controls. This was a similar effect to those patients treated with IV-PA+ IAT. We also found that in patients treated with IAT only, there was a greater than fivefold increase in the likelihood of developing seizures in comparison to controls. However, there was no evidence for an additive or synergistic effect of treatment modality.

There have been two studies that have reported an association between thrombolysis with IV-tPA and increased likelihood of acute symptomatic seizures, within 7 days, after an ischemic stroke [12, 13]. We have shown that the risk of seizures extends further than the acute symptomatic period. In this study, we found the development of seizure occurred over a 24-month period, and recommend longer-term follow-up of these higher risk patients. This could significantly improve the detection of late onset complications of stroke.

Our analysis was adjusted for prognostic factors for seizure development as well as factors that were significantly different between treatment groups, suggesting that the increased risk of post stroke seizure development may be inherent to the treatment itself. A number of potential mechanisms may account for this. Firstly, sudden changes in cerebral perfusion have been described to cause a clinical syndrome that includes seizures [29–31]. When perfusion is improved by revascularization procedures, it is suggested a cascade of inflammatory responses causes the reestablishment of brain circulation, contributing to the development of the reperfusion syndrome and subsequent seizures, with seizures a sign of good reperfusion [32]. Given that early onset seizures are a risk factor for later onset seizures and epilepsy development, potentially the benefit of reperfusion from acute stroke therapies is concomitantly increasing the risk of seizure development in these populations.

Although IV-tPA has been reported to have some neurotoxicity [33], the greater odds of developing seizures from any IAT treatment compared to any IV-tPA treatment would argue against a specific effect of IV-tPA and perhaps reperfusion itself is the issue. In our study, we showed that patients who underwent any intra-arterial therapy were significantly more likely to develop seizures than those with any IV-tPA. Of interest, there was a significant difference in rates of hemorrhagic transformation between the treatment groups (IAT, IV-tPA and IAT + IV-tPA). This was also suggested in a review of rates of HT in major clinical trials of ischemic stroke interventions where they found observable trends in increased HT in patients with intra-arterial therapies [34]. Potentially, the greater likelihood of developing post stroke seizures in patients undergoing IAT rather than IV-tPA may be due to increased rates of HT within this treatment group. An analysis of post stroke seizures due to HT across different treatment groups is a planned follow up analysis.

A limitation of this study is the retrospective design with the potential of bias towards identifying seizures in those patients receiving reperfusion therapies given that they may have received more monitoring in the stroke unit than those patients without reperfusion therapies. However, given that all patients were contacted via a phone call questionnaire we believe this would have minimised any bias towards treatment groups. Another limitation is that we do not understand the potential ethnicity-treatment interaction without a treated group from Nanjing. We cannot discount the potential effect of the treatment itself differing due to ethnicity, although we do not expect this. Future studies should incorporate a treatment group from separate ethnicities to examine a possible treatment-ethnicity interaction. Additionally, due to the low incidence of post stroke seizure development, future larger studies are required to improve the precision of incidence estimates. Finally, we were unable to perform a subanalysis on patients with large vessel occlusion as vessel occlusion status was not available in our control population. Even with adjustment for baseline NIHSS, initial stroke severity may still be contributing to the higher odds of seizures in the treated patients. It would be of interest to perform a future analysis specifically in large vessel occlusion patients.

Conclusion

Patients undergoing reperfusion therapies with IV-tPA and IAT were at considerably higher risk of post-stroke epilepsy than control patients. However, no additional effect from combined treatment was evident in this dataset. This association persisted despite adjustment for differences in stroke severity and other prognostic variables. We conclude that patients undergoing IAT and/or IV-tPA in acute ischemic stroke may benefit from longer stroke follow-up for late complications of treatment such as epilepsy.

Abbreviations

95%CI: 

95% confidence interval

ECASS: 

European cooperative acute stroke study

HT: 

Hemorrhagic Transformation

IAT: 

Intra-arterial therapy

IV-tPA: 

Intravenous-tissue plasminogen activator

mRS: 

modified Rankin scale

OR: 

Odds ratio

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JN – Conception and study design, drafting of manuscript, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. AT – Conception and study design, data acquisition, drafting of manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. LC – Conception and study design, statistical analysis, interpretation of results, drafting of manuscript, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. RG– Conception and study design, data acquisition, drafting of manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. YX– Conception and study design, data acquisition, drafting of manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. MK – Conception and study design, data acquisition, drafting of manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. ZC1– Conception and study design, data acquisition, drafting of manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. ZC2 – Conception and study design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. XL – Conception and study design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. PK - Conception and study design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work. BC - Conception and study design, drafting of manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data, revising manuscript critically for important intellectual content, given final approval for work to be published and will take accountability for all aspects of work.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This was a retrospective analysis of de-identified data collected as part of routine clinical care. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee and patient consent was waived. This study was submitted to the local Medical Ethics Committee at Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine and received ethical approval.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Melbourne Brain Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital and Department of Neurology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
(2)
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Heath, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
(3)
Department of Neurology, Jingling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
(4)
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
(5)
Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

References

  1. Fassbender K, Balucani C, Walter S, Levine SR, Haass A, Grotta J. Streamlining of prehospital stroke management: the golden hour. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(6):585–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, Albers GW, Cognard C, Cohen DJ, Hacke W, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A, San Roman L, Serena J, Abilleira S, Ribo M, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2296–306.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJ, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Roy D, Jovin TG, Willinsky RA, Sapkota BL, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1019–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Investigators E-I. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2365–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, Moran AE, Sacco RL, Anderson L, Truelsen T, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):245–54.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Myint PK, Staufenberg EF, Sabanathan K. Post-stroke seizure and post-stroke epilepsy. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(971):568–72.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Menon B, Shorvon SD. Ischaemic stroke in adults and epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2009;87(1):1–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Pitkanen A, Loscher W, Vezzani A, Becker AJ, Simonato M, Lukasiuk K, Grohn O, Bankstahl JP, Friedman A, Aronica E, et al. Advances in the development of biomarkers for epilepsy. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(8):843–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lossius MI, Ronning OM, Slapo GD, Mowinckel P, Gjerstad L. Poststroke epilepsy: occurrence and predictors--a long-term prospective controlled study (Akershus stroke study). Epilepsia. 2005;46(8):1246–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. De Reuck J, Van Maele G. Acute ischemic stroke treatment and the occurrence of seizures. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112(4):328–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Alvarez V, Rossetti AO, Papavasileiou V, Michel P. Acute seizures in acute ischemic stroke: does thrombolysis have a role to play? J Neurol. 2013;260(1):55–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tan ML, Ng A, Pandher PS, Sashindranath M, Hamilton JA, Davis SM, O'Brien TJ, Medcalf RL, Yan B, Jones NC. Tissue plasminogen activator does not alter development of acquired epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2012;53(11):1998–2004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Hoxter G, Mahagne MH, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. The European cooperative acute stroke study (ECASS). JAMA. 1995;274(13):1017–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bladin CF, Alexandrov AV, Bellavance A, Bornstein N, Chambers B, Cote R, Lebrun L, Pirisi A, Norris JW. Seizures after stroke: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(11):1617–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Koome M, Churilov L, Chen Z, Chen Z, Naylor J, Thevathasan A, Yan B, Kwan P. Computed tomography perfusion as a diagnostic tool for seizures after ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(6):577–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen A, Akinyemi RO, Hase Y, Firbank MJ, Ndung'u MN, Foster V, Craggs LJ, Washida K, Okamoto Y, Thomas AJ, et al. Frontal white matter hyperintensities, clasmatodendrosis and gliovascular abnormalities in ageing and post-stroke dementia. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 1):242–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen Z, Churilov L, Koome M, Chen Z, Naylor J, Kwan P, Yan B. Post-stroke seizures is associated with low Alberta stroke program early CT score. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(5–6):259–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Keezer MR, Pelletier A, Stechysin B, Veilleux M, Jette N, Wolfson C. The diagnostic test accuracy of a screening questionnaire and algorithm in the identification of adults with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55(11):1763–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, Elger CE, Engel J Jr, Forsgren L, French JA, Glynn M, et al. ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55(4):475–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang C, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhang JG, Hu W, Ge M, Zhang K, Shao X. Risk factors for post-stroke seizures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2014;108(10):1806–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Camilo O, Goldstein LB. Seizures and epilepsy after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2004;35(7):1769–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanaka T, Yamagami H, Ihara M, Motoyama R, Fukuma K, Miyagi T, Nishimura K, Toyoda K, Nagatsuka K. Seizure outcomes and predictors of recurrent post-stroke seizure: a retrospective observational cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136200.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Berges S, Moulin T, Berger E, Tatu L, Sablot D, Challier B, Rumbach L. Seizures and epilepsy following strokes: recurrence factors. Eur Neurol. 2000;43(1):3–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Krakow K, Sitzer M, Rosenow F, Steinmetz H, Foerch C, Arbeitsgruppe Schlaganfall H. Predictors of acute poststroke seizures. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30(6):584–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Hoh BL, Jauch EC, Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, et al. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(10):3020–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Inoue M, Noda R, Yamaguchi S, Tamai Y, Miyahara M, Yanagisawa S, Okamoto K, Hara T, Takeuchi S, Miki K, et al. Specific factors to predict large-vessel occlusion in acute stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;4:886–91.Google Scholar
  29. van Mook WN, Rennenberg RJ, Schurink GW, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Mess WH, Hofman PA, de Leeuw PW. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(12):877–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hafeez F, Razzaq MA, Levine RL, Ramirez MA. Reperfusion seizures: a manifestation of cerebral reperfusion injury after administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;16(6):273–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Jean WC, Spellman SR, Nussbaum ES, Low WC. Reperfusion injury after focal cerebral ischemia: the role of inflammation and the therapeutic horizon. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(6):1382–96. discussion 1396-1387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Silverman IE, Restrepo L, Mathews GC. Poststroke seizures. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(2):195–201.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang YF, Tsirka SE, Strickland S, Stieg PE, Soriano SG, Lipton SA. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) increases neuronal damage after focal cerebral ischemia in wild-type and tPA-deficient mice. Nat Med. 1998;4(2):228–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sussman ES, Connolly ES Jr. Hemorrhagic transformation: a review of the rate of hemorrhage in the major clinical trials of acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2013;4:69.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us