Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with extensive cytotoxic edema after blood transfusion: a case report and literature review

  • 1, 3Email author,
  • 1, 3,
  • 1, 3,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 3
BMC Neurology201818:190

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1194-1

  • Received: 4 November 2017
  • Accepted: 31 October 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is described as a clinical-radiological disease entity with good prognosis. In brain MRI, PRES generally presents with vasogenic edema. Although PRES is induced by various causes, a small number of PRES cases have occurred after red cell blood transfusion. It is unclear whether there are characteristic features in PRES after blood transfusion.

Case presentation

Here, we report a case of 75-year-old Japanese woman who had acute exacerbation of subacute anemia by bleeding from gastric ulcer. After receiving a red cell blood transfusion, she showed disturbance of consciousness with extensive cytotoxic and small vasogenic edema in the occipitoparietal area on brain MRI. She was diagnosed as PRES and suffered irreversible impairments of visual acuity and fields in both eyes. We summarized and discussed clinical features of cases with PRES after blood transfusion.

Conclusions

A total of 21 cases including the present one have been reported as PRES after blood transfusion. Of the cases, 20 of 21 were female, and 15 of 17 developed PRES in the course of chronic anemia lasting over 1 month. Anemia was severe in 15 of 20 cases, with hemoglobin levels < 3.5 g/dl. In 14 of 17 cases, hemoglobin levels increased to 5 g/dl by red cell blood transfusion until the onset of PRES. On brain MRI, 2 of 21 cases showed cytotoxic edema and 3 of 21 cases showed irreversible neurological disturbance. In this patient, the occurrence of PRES in subacute anemia and the presence of extensive cytotoxic brain edema with irreversible neurological deficits were characteristic points. When treating severe anemia, even with a subacute progression, we should consider a possibility that PRES occurs after blood transfusion with extensive cytotoxic brain edema and irreversible neurological changes.

Keywords

  • Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome
  • Blood transfusion
  • MRI
  • Cytotoxic edema
  • Neurological sequelae
  • Case report

Background

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) was first described as a clinical and radiological disease entity by Hinchey and colleagues in 1996 [1]. Usually, PRES presents subcortical vasogenic brain edema in patients with acute neurological symptoms, such as conscious disturbance, headache, seizure, and various visual disturbances. Vasogenic edema was observed in the bilateral parieto-occipital regions as elevation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1, 2]. The prognosis of PRES is generally good in terms of improvement and reversal of radiological and clinical findings. However, a previous paper reported atypical cases. These showed cytotoxic edema, neurological sequelae, and lack of hypertension [2]. Cytotoxic edema was observed as hyperintensity on diffusion weighted images (DWI) and decrease of ADC values in brain MRI.

PRES occurs in association with severe hypertension, renal failure, eclampsia, autoimmune disorders, and exposure to immunosuppressive agents. The clinical features of PRES caused by preeclampsia-eclampsia or calcineurin inhibitors are shown to be different from those caused by other triggers [35]. PRES is seen after red cell blood transfusion in a small number of patients [621]. However, there was no study analyzing these cases of PRES after blood transfusion. The clinical features of PRES after blood transfusion remains unclear. Here, we report a patient who had PRES after being treated for severe anemia with red cell blood transfusion. This case showed cytotoxic edema in the occipitoparietal regions on brain MRI, and developed irreversible visual disturbance. These features were different from typical PRES. We review previous cases of PRES after red cell blood transfusion and discuss the features of these cases with the supposed mechanism of brain damages caused by an increase in the hemoglobin (Hb) concentration.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old woman (height 132 cm, weight 34 kg) consulted a medical doctor with loss of appetite lasting for 1 week. She had taken aspirin, celecoxib, and amlodipine because of angina and hypertension. Laboratory examinations showed that her Hb decreased modestly to 10.7 g/dl. Two weeks later, she was admitted to our hospital because her anorexia had worsened day by day. On admission day 1, she was alert and fully oriented. Her blood pressure and pulse rate were stable. Laboratory examinations showed that the levels of Hb and hematocrit decreased remarkably to 4.8 g/dl and 15%, respectively. The values for white blood count and C-reactive protein (CRP) increased slightly to 9900 /mm3 and 4.64 mg/dl, respectively. Additionally, her albumin level decreased to 2.5 g/dl and the creatine level increased slightly to 1.14 mg/dl (estimated glomerular filtration rate was 41.7 ml/min). Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) failed to detect abnormal lesions. On admission day 2, she vomited large amounts of bright red blood. Her Hb level further decreased to 2.9 g/dl. She underwent an urgent transfusion of 560 ml of red blood cells. Endoscopic examination detected active bleeding from a gastric ulcer, and endoscopic clipping was performed against the bleeding lesion.

The next day, her Hb improved to 8.9 g/dl. However, she did not respond to verbal or pain stimuli despite her eyes having opened. She showed normal light reflexes without anisocoria. On brain MRI (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, FLAIR), high signal intensities were seen in the bilateral cerebellar hemispheres, bilateral watershed regions, right thalamus, and white and gray matter of the bilateral occipital and occipitoparietal lobes. DWI also showed high signal intensities in these lesions, while ADC maps show low signal intensities in the cortical and subcortical regions with small high signal intensities in the surrounding area. These image patterns indicated that the lesions were damaged by extensive cytotoxic edema with restricted vasogenic edema (Fig. 1). Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) showed no stenosis or occlusion of brain arteries. MR venography and 3-dimensional CT angiography was negative for sinus thrombosis, although the left transverse sinus was hypoplastic.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

On admission day 2, axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images show abnormal hyperintense areas bilaterally in the cerebellar hemispheres, watershed regions, and white and grey matter of the occipital and occipitoparietal lobes. Axial FLAIR images show hyperintense areas in white matter predominating in the periventricular region indicating leukoaraiosis (a, b, c, d, e). Axial diffusion weighted image (DWI) images show hyperintense areas in these lesions and the right thalamus (f, g, h, i, j). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows low signal intensities in the bilateral cerebellar hemispheres and watershed regions (k, o). ADC map shows low signal intensities in the cortical and subcortical regions with small areas of high signal intensity in the surrounding area (l, m, n). These image patterns indicate that the lesions were damaged by extensive cytotoxic edema with restricted vasogenic edema. Most hyperintense areas on DWI on 2 days after admission disappeared by 7 days after admission (p, q, r, s, t)

During this process, the maximum systolic blood pressure was 130 mmHg. Laboratory examinations showed no abnormality in liver and coagulatory functions. The level of serum creatinine was stable. Autoantibodies, such as anti-nuclear antibody, anti-thyroid antibody, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, were negative. There was no mutation at position 3243 of the mitochondrial DNA. The cerebrospinal fluid was clear, colorless and acellular with a total protein level of 41 mg/dl and a glucose level of 79 mg/dl. Transthoracic echocardiography showed that myocardial wall motion was normal without foramen ovale or left ventricular thrombus. Holter electrocardiogram showed no atrial fibrillation. From these examination results, the clinical course, and characteristic MRI findings, we considered the possibility of PRES and performed conservative treatment by monitoring the fluctuations of blood pressure and vital signs.

On admission day 7, her responsiveness to external stimulation improved. However, her visual acuity had declined to 20/100 in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye, and visual field test showed defects of the left lower quadrants in both eyes. Her optic disc and retina were normal. Two months later, her Mini-Mental State Examination score improved to 16 from 8 on admission day 14. However, the disturbances of visual acuity and fields remained unrecovered. When compared with MRI findings, high signal intensities on DWI images were diminished on admission day 7 (Fig. 1). In addition, high signal intensities on FLAIR images were diminished until 4 months after onset, and these lesions alternatively involved low signal intensities, indicating cystic change (Fig. 2). There were no findings showing cardiogenic embolism and cerebral venous thrombus. The cystic lesion in posterior lobe seemed to represent ischemic change, because PRES is reported to cause ischemic change as a complication [22].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Hyperintense areas on axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image at 2 days after admission (a, b, c) gradually disappear at 2 months after admission (d, e, f) and 4 months after admission (g, h, i). However, at 4 months after admission several cystic changes remained in the cerebellar hemisphere, occipital region, and right thalamus (g, h, i)

Discussion and conclusions

Methods

This review was based on a literature search for articles concerning PRES after blood transfusion that were published from 1997 through August 2017. By using the Medline database (PubMed, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD; keywords: posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and blood transfusion) and further checking the reference lists of articles, 20 cases of PRES after red cell blood transfusion were identified. In this report, a total of 21 cases including the present one, were reviewed.

The distribution of brain lesions was divided into three areas: anterior circulation (AC), posterior circulation (PC), and deep structure (DS) territories. AC includes the frontal, temporal and parietal lobes. PC includes the occipital lobe, cerebellum and brainstem. DS includes the basal ganglia, deep white matter and corpus callosum [23]. Patients with sickle cell anemia who developed PRES after blood transfusion were excluded because sickle cell anemia itself was reported to cause PRES [24].

Results of literature review

Table 1 shows the characteristics of 21 cases of PRES after blood transfusion. The mean age of onset was 43.6 years (range 6–77 years). Twenty cases (95%) were in females, and all adult cases were in females. The primary causes of anemia varied, such as gynecological disease (10 cases), renal failure (3 cases), iron deficiency anemia (2 cases), aplastic anemia (2 cases), cancer surgery (2 cases), thalassemia (1 case), and gastrointestinal bleeding (1 case). In the majority of PRES cases after blood transfusion (15 (88%) of 17 assessable cases) had been affected by chronic anemia lasting over 1 month. The mean Hb value before blood transfusion was 3.4 g/dl (range 1.4–9.2). Severe anemia (Hb < 3.5 g/dl) was observed in 15 (75%) of 20 assessable cases. The mean Hb value after blood transfusion was 6.7 g/dl (range 3.2–10.4). Hb increased to ≥5 g/dl in 14 (82%) of 17 assessable cases just before the onset of PRES. The mean onset of neurological symptoms after blood transfusion was 7.1 days (range 1–18 days). The period from blood transfusion to the occurrence of PRES is known to depend on some factors, including the patient’s condition, disease complication, and total amount and speed of blood transfusion [19]. Neurological symptoms were encephalopathy (9 cases, 43%), seizure (15 cases, 71%), headache (13 cases, 62%), visual disturbance (11 cases, 52%), and focal deficit (2 cases, 10%). The number of cases with hypertension was small (8 cases, 38%), in contrast to the data showing that 80–85% cases of PRES exhibit hypertension [2]. Neurological sequelae, such as consciousness disturbance, visual disturbance and hemiplegia, were found in 3 cases (14%). PRES brain lesions after blood transfusion were seen in the PC territory (20 cases, 95%), the AC territory (13 cases, 62%), and the DS territory (3 cases, 14%). On brain MRI, 2 cases (9%) presented with cytotoxic edema, and vasoconstriction was identified in 9 cases (43%). Vasoconstriction was caused by cerebral angiography in 3 cases and MR angiography in 6 cases.
Table 1

Previous reports PRES after blood transfusion and our case

Patient No.

Age/Sex

Cause of anemia

Course of anemia

Hb(g/dl) pre/post BT

Volume of BT (ml)

Symptom onset after BT (days)

Clinical finding

Lesion distribution

Cytotoxic edema

Vasoconstriction

Hypertension

Sequelae

Reference

1

45/F

Myoma uteri

Chronic

2.0/10.0

800

2

S, H

AC, PC

No

Yes

Yes

None

6

2

48/F

Myoma uteri

Chronic

3.0/8.0

1000

6

E, S, F

AC, DS

No

Yes

No

None

7

3

47/F

Aplastic anemia

Chronic

1.5/10.9

NR

7

E, S, H, V

PC

No

Yes

No

None

8

4

58/F

Cancer surgery

NR

7.7/10.9

1400

9

E, S

PC

No

No

Yes

E

9

5

77/F

Cancer surgery

Acute

9.2/13.3

2800

18

E, S

PC

No

No

Yes

None

9

6

32/F

Myoma uteri

Chronic

5.7/12.5

1600

5

H

PC

No

Yes

No

None

10

7

11/M

Iron deficiency anemia

NR

NR/NR

NR

NR

S, V

AC, PC

No

No

No

None

11

8

42/F

Renal failure

Chronic

5.7/11.7

400

6

S, H, V

PC

No

Yes

No

None

12

9

56/F

Corpus uteri cancer

Chronic

2.0/9.2

2000

6

E, S, V

PC

No

No

Yes

None

13

10

28/F

Aplastic anemia

Chronic

3.2/9.6

1640

8

H, V

AC, PC

No

No

No

None

14

11

57/F

Iron deficiency anemia

Chronic

2.0/10.0

1120

10

S, H

AC, PC

No

No

Yes

None

14

12

50/F

Hypermenorrhea

Chronic

1.5/NR

3000

NR

S, H

AC, PC

No

Yes

Yes

None

15

13

46/F

Myoma uteri

Chronic

1.4/NR

2500

15

H, V

AC, PC

Yes

Yes

Yes

None

15

14

36/F

Hypermenorrhea

Chronic

1.4/11.3

1120

12

E, S

AC, PC, DS

No

No

No

V, F

16

15

6/F

Thalassemia

NR

4.8/NR

280

2

E, H

PC

No

No

No

None

17

16

36/F

Myoma uteri

Chronic

1.7/8.8

560

2

E, S, H, V

AC, PC

No

No

Yes

None

18

17

45/F

Renal failure

Chronic

3.4/7.9

800

4

H, V

AC, PC

No

Yes

No

None

19

18

47/F

Renal failure

Chronic

3.0/10.4

750

NR

S, H, V

PC

No

Yes

No

None

19

19

40/F

Hypermenorrhea

Chronic

3.1/8.6

840

4

S, H, V, F

AC, PC

No

No

No

None

20

20

35/F

Abortion

NR

3.4/13.8

700

10

S

AC, PC

No

No

No

None

21

21

75/F

Gastrointesional bleeding

Subacute

2.9/8.9

560

1

E, V

AC, PC, DS

Yes

No

No

V

Our case

Abbreviations: PRES posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, NR not reported, Hb hemoglobin, BT blood transfusion, E encephalopathy, S seizure, H headache, V visual disturbance, F focal deficit, AC anterior circulation, PC posterior circulation, DS deep structure

Discussion

Although the exact mechanism of PRES after blood transfusion is unclear, a rapid increase in the Hb level and viscosity by the blood transfusion is thought to trigger the occurrence of PRES. This increase could induce acute vascular endothelium dysfunction and an elevation of vascular resistance, leading to endothelial damage and extravascular leakage of fluid and macromolecule in the brain. Also, the velocity of brain blood flow is shown to increase in patients with severe anemia [25]. It raises an idea that rapid elevation of vascular resistance or vascular constriction factors in blood products damages vascular endothelial cells [26]. Consequently, these changes are thought to cause PRES [6]. However, a previous paper showed that anemia itself caused PRES under a hemorrhagic shock state with sepsis or multiple organ failure [27]. The present patient was not consistent with that prior case because our patient had no signs or symptoms of sepsis or multiple organ failure. There was a possibility that rapid elevation of Hb levels affected the occurrence of PRES. The elevation of Hb levels by blood transfusion is dependent on the volume of circulating blood, which is associated with the body weight [28]. It is possible that Hb levels rapidly elevated from 2.9 g/dl to 8.9 g/dl by transfusing 560 ml of blood, because the body weight of this patient was low. This rapid elevation of Hb levels may affect the occurrence of PRES.

There are two characteristic points distinguishing the present patient. First, the patient presented with extensive cytotoxic edema on brain MRI. In cases with PRES after blood transfusion, the frequency of cytotoxic edema was less than that of vasogenic edema. Cytotoxic edema was found in only 11–30% of previous cases with PRES [2, 29]. However, it is unclear how cytotoxic edema occurs in PRES after blood transfusion, and whether the cytotoxic edema in PRES causes irreversible damages is under debate [2, 4, 22, 2933]. In addition, the present patient showed cytotoxic edema over an extensive area as compared with other cases with cytotoxic edema. In the present patient, this extensive cytotoxic edema may have helped to cause the irreversible visual disturbance. Indeed, while the number of cases with extensive cytotoxic edema is very small, those cases are generally associated with irreversible changes and incomplete clinical recovery [2, 22, 2932]. Therefore, the clinical course of the present patient may suggest that rapidly correcting anemia with red cell blood transfusion should be avoided to prevent PRES. It supports an idea that cytotoxic edema causes irreversible damages in PRES. To address this issue, it is necessary to collect similar cases with neurological sequelae.

Second, the period of anemia in the present patient was shorter those that reported in previous cases. Most cases (88% of all reported cases of PRES after blood transfusion) had had chronic anemia lasting over 1 month [68, 10, 1216, 1820]. In these typical cases, it assumed that a rapid improvement of oxygenation by blood transfusion induces PRES by disturbing the balance of vessels, which is maintained by chronic hypoxic vasodilation [6]. In the present patient, the period of anemia during which Hb decreased from 10.7 to 2.9 was 14 days. The presence of other factors may exacerbate the occurrence of PRES. Severe anemia itself (Hb 2.9 g/dl) may affect the occurrence of PRES. Also, previous reports have demonstrated that elevation of CRP levels [34], hypoalbuminemia [35, 36], and renal injury [37] are candidate factors affecting the occurrence of PRES. Elevation of CRP levels has been shown to exacerbate PRES by increasing the vulnerability of the blood–brain barrier by inflammation-associated endothelial damage [34]. Hypoalbuminemia affects the development of edema in PRES by reducing colloid osmotic pressure [35, 36]. Renal injury is reported to mediate endothelial cell damage, which is a poor prognosis factor [37]. The present patient presented with elevated CRP levels, hypoalbuminemia, and renal injury. These factors may affect the occurrence of PRES after blood transfusion in patients with subacute severe anemia.

Finally, most cases of PRES after blood transfusion are female. The proportion of female PRES patients after blood transfusion is much greater than the proportion of female patients among all PRES patients, including eclampsia, because previous reports show that female patients account for 56–68% of all PRES patients [22, 29, 33, 34, 3640]. The reason why many cases with PRES after blood transfusion were female remained unclear. About half of PRES after blood transfusion accompanied vasoconstriction. In general, the frequency of vasoconstriction is reported to be 18% in PRES [22, 37]. This suggests that the frequency of vasoconstriction in PRES after blood transfusion is higher than that in PRES induced by other causes. Decrease in estrogen levels may affect to cause vasoconstriction [41, 42], because estrogen suppresses vascular constriction [43]. Also, there is a tendency that almost papers concerning PRES after blood transfusion were published from Asia [6, 817, 19, 21]. To clarify whether genetic factors associate with the occurrence of PRES after blood transfusion, it is necessary to further analyze clinical features by accumulating cases with PRES after blood transfusion.

Conclusion

In general, PRES after blood transfusion occurs in patients with chronic severe anemia and it appears vasogenic edema in the brain with good prognosis. However, as shown in this patient, PRES after blood transfusion rarely occurs in patients with subacute severe anemia and it caused irreversible damages. Clinical findings of this patient suggest that irreversible damages may be caused by extensive development of cytotoxic edema in the brain. Additionally, if the anemia is urgently corrected by blood transfusion, clinicians should check for the presence of risk factors, including elevation of CRP levels, hypoalbuminemia, renal injury, and female sex, and perform the blood transfusion slowly with carefully monitoring the increase of Hb levels.

Abbreviations

AC: 

Anterior circulation

ADC: 

Apparent diffusion coefficient

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CT: 

Computed tomography

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic acid

DS: 

Deep structure

DWI: 

Diffusion weighted image

FLAIR: 

Fluid attenuated inversion recovery

Hb: 

Hemoglobin

MRA: 

Magnetic resonance angiography

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

PC: 

Posterior circulation

PRES: 

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusion of this article is included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

YN and MS examined and scripted the manuscript. AT, HN, and NY helped to draft the manuscript and performed analyses. SA supported for the critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors approved the contents of this case report.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors declare that ethics approval was not required for this case report.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained directly from both the patient and the patient’s husband for publication of this case report and any accompanying images at the same time.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Neurology, Aino Hospital, 11-18 Takadacho, Osaka Ibaraki, 567-0011, Japan
(2)
Division of Internal Medicine, Aino Hospital, 11-18 Takadacho, Osaka Ibaraki, 567-0011, Japan
(3)
Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki Osaka, 569-8686, Japan

References

  1. Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, Breen J, Pao L, Wang A, et al. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:494–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Fugate JE, Rabinstein AA. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical and radiological manifestations, pathophysiology, and outstanding questions. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:914–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Liman TG, Bohner G, Heuschmann PU, Scheel M, Endres M, Siebert E. Clinical and radiological differences in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome between patients with preeclampsia-eclampsia and other predisposing diseases. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:935–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wagih A, Mohsen L, Rayan MM, Hasan MM, Al-Sherif AH. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): restricted diffusion does not necessarily mean irreversibility. Pol J Radiol. 2015;80:210–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnett MM, Hess CP, Roberts JP, Bass NM, Douglas VC, Josephson SA. Presentation of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in patients on calcineurin inhibitors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112:886–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ito Y, Niwa H, Iida T, Nagamatsu M, Yasuda T, Yanagi T, et al. Post-transfusion reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome with cerebral vasoconstriction. Neurology. 1997;49:1174–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Boughammoura A, Touzé E, Oppenheim C, Trystram D, Mas JL. Reversible angiopathy and encephalopathy after blood transfusion. J Neurol. 2003;250:116–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Heo K, Park S, Lee JY, Lee BI, Lee SK. Post-transfusion posterior leukoencephalopathy with cytotoxic and vasogenic edema precipitated by vasospasm. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15:230–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kawano H, Suga T, Terasaki T, Hashimoto Y, Baba K, Uchino M. Posterior eneephalopathy syndrome in two patients after eaner surgery with transfusion. Rinsho Sinkeigaku. 2004;44:427–31.Google Scholar
  10. Huang YC, Tsai PL, Yeh JH, Chen WH. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome caused by blood transfusion: a case report. Acta Neurol Taiwanica. 2008;17:258–62.Google Scholar
  11. Gümüş H, Per H, Kumandaş S, Yikilmaz A. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in childhood: report of nine cases and review of the literature. Neurol Sci. 2010;31:125–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sato Y, Hirose M, Inoue Y, Komukai D, Takayasu M, Kawashima E, et al. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome after blood transfusion in a patient with end-stage renal disease. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2011;15:942–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wada KI, Kano M, Machida Y, Hattori N, Miwa H. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome induced after blood transfusion for severe anemia. Case Rep Clin Med. 2013;2:332–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhao ZY, He F, Gao PH, Bi JZ. Blood transfusion-related posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol Sci. 2014;342:124–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Dou YH, Fuh JL, Chen SP, Wang SJ. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome after blood transfusion. Headache. 2014;54:736–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Shiraishi W, Une H, Iwanaga Y, Yamamoto A. Case of post-transfusion posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with cerebral hemorrhage that may be associated with fat-soluble vitamin deficiency. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2014;54:518–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarkar S, Kumar R. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after transfusion in Hb E-beta thalassemia. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh K, Gupta R, Kamal H, Silvestri NJ, Wolfe GI. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome secondary to blood transfusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:592–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang H, Xu Z, Zheng Z, Lou H, Yue W. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome following red blood cells transfusion: a case series of 7 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cevallos CA, Berman BS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after blood transfusion. J Neurol Sci. 2016;367:245–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sudulagunta SR, Sodalagunta MB, Kumbhat M, Settikere Nataraju A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome(PRES). Oxf Med Case Rep. 2017;4:43–6.Google Scholar
  22. Li Y, Gor D, Walicki D, Jenny D, Jones D, Barbour P, et al. Spectrum and potential pathogenesis of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21:873–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao B, Liu FL, Zhao B. Association of degree and type of edema in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with serum lactate dehydrogenase level: initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:2844–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Solh Z, Taccone MS, Marin S, Athale U, Breakey VR. Neurological PRESentations in sickle cell patients are not always stroke: a review of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:983–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Brass LM, Pavlakis SG, DeVivo D, Piomelli S, Mohr JP. Transcranial Doppler measurements of the middle cerebral artery. Effect of hematocrit. Stroke. 1988;19:1466–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Singhal AB. Cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bartynski WS, Boardman JF, Zeigler ZR, Shadduck RK, Lister J. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in infection, sepsis, and shock. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:2179–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Brown E, Hopper JJ, Hodges JJ, Bradley B, Wennesland R, Yamauchi H. Red cell, plasma, and blood volume in the healthy women measured by radiochromium cell-labeling and hematocrit. J Clin Invest. 1962;41:2182–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Bartynski WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 1: fundamental imaging and clinical features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1036–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ay H, Buonanno FS, Schaefer PW, Le DA, Wang B, Gonzalez RG, et al. Posterior leukoencephalopathy without severe hypertension: utility of diffusion-weighted MRI. Neurology. 1998;51:1369–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Koch S, Rabinstein A, Falcone S, Forteza A. Diffusion-weighted imaging shows cytotoxic and vasogenic edema in eclampsia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1068–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Covarrubias DJ, Luetmer PH, Campeau NG. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: prognostic utility of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1038–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pande AR, Ando K, Ishikura R, Nagami Y, Takada Y, Wada A, et al. Clinicoradiological factors influencing the reversibility of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a multicenter study. Radiat Med. 2006;24:659–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Siebert E, Bohner G, Liebig T, Endres M, Liman TG. Factors associated with fatal outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a retrospective analysis of the Berlin PRES study. J Neurol. 2017;264:237–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ishikura K, Ikeda M, Hamasaki Y, Hataya H, Shishido S, Asanuma H, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children: its high prevalence and more extensive imaging findings. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48:231–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee VH, Wijdicks EF, Manno EM, Rabinstein AA. Clinical spectrum of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:205–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fugate JE, Claassen DO, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF, Kozak OS, Rabinstein AA. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: associated clinical and radiologic findings. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:427–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Liman TG, Bohner G, Heuschmann PU, Endres M, Siebert E. The clinical and radiological spectrum of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: the retrospective Berlin PRES study. J Neurol. 2012;259:155–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Junewar V, Verma R, Sankhwar PL, Garg RK, Singh MK, Malhotra HS, et al. Neuroimaging features and predictors of outcome in eclamptic encephalopathy: a prospective observational study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:1728–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Gao B, Yu BX, Li RS, Zhang G, Xie HZ, Liu FL, et al. Cytotoxic edema in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: correlation of MRI features with serum albumin levels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1884–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kawano H, Motoyama T, Ohgushi M, Kugiyama K, Ogawa H, Yasue H. Menstrual cyclic variation of myocardial ischemia in premenopausal women with variant angina. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:977–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Moussavi M, Korya D, Panezai S, Peeraully T, Gizzi M, Kirmani JF. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in a 35-year-old woman following hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4:e35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Akishita M, Ouchi Y, Miyoshi H, Orimo A, Kozaki K, Eto M, et al. Estrogen inhibits endothelin-1 production and c-fos gene expression in rat aorta. Atherosclerosis. 1996;125:27–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement