Skip to main content

A paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis from an anorectal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report

A Correction to this article was published on 08 March 2022

This article has been updated



Paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (PLE) is a rare autoimmune neurological syndrome observed in cancer patients. PLE is difficult to diagnose and presents a variable response to treatment, depending on the characteristics of the tumor and neuronal autoantibodies.

Case presentation

A 64-year-old, Caucasian, non-smoker man presented with a rapidly developing cognitive impairment, personality change, spatial disorientation, and short-term memory loss associated with anorexia and cervical and inguinal lymph nodes. The 18F-FDG PET scan documented intensely hypermetabolic lymph nodes, which histologically corresponded to a metastasis from a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The brain MRI revealed a high T2-weighted FLAIR signal of the hippocamps, consisted with a PLE. The presence of anti-neuronal Hu antibodies confirmed the diagnosis. The patient underwent plasmapheresis, associated to a systemic chemotherapy resulting in a partial and temporary improvement of the neurological symptoms. Four cycles of intravenous immunoglobulins were also necessary. After six cures of chemotherapy, the lymph node metastases regressed. However, a new anorectal lesion was detected and was histologically confirmed as a primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, which was treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy. At the end of this treatment, the patient showed a rapid tumor progression leading to his death.


This case highlights the rare entity, PLE, which is difficult to diagnose and manage. In addition, this is the first published case of PLE associated with an anorectal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, which appeared after completion of systemic chemotherapy.


Paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (PLE) is an uncommon autoimmune neurological syndrome observed in cancer patients selectively affecting the limbic areas, including hyppocampus, amygdala, hypothalamus, cingulate gyrus and limbic cortex [1,2,3,4,5,6]. PLE is clinically characterized by subacute neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as altered mental status, dementia, mood changes, short-term memory deficit, confusion and seizures [3,4,5,6]. At the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PLE shows a typical increased signal on T2-weighted FLAIR imaging in the medial temporal lobes [3,4,5,6]. The diagnosis must be supported by the identification of specific neuronal autoantibodies [6]. The management is complex and based on a multidisciplinary and combined approach of immunotherapy and specific anticancer treatment [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The prognosis is usually poor and strictly related to the subtype of neuronal autoantibodies, clinical patient’s status and comorbidities, and cancer characteristics and stage [24,25,26].

We report a case of a patient showing a PLE associated to a rare, metastatic, anorectal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The primary tumor was diagnosed after completion of systemic chemotherapy.

Case presentation

A 64-year-old, Caucasian, non-smoker man was admitted to the neurology division for acute cognitive impairment, personality change, spatial disorientation, and short-term memory loss associated with anorexia. He had no relevant comorbidities. The patient’s history was uneventful. At the clinical examination, we found hard, irregular, cervical and inguinal lymph nodes of 1.5 × 1.5 cm of diameter. Biological tests were all in the normal ranges but chromogranin-A and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were elevated at 175 ng/ml (NV < 102 ng/ml) and 28 ng/ml (NV < 17 ng/ml). The brain MRI revealed T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signals of the para hippocampic gyrus and the hippocamps (Fig. 1a-b, red arrows). The electroencephalogram (EEG) showed a 1-min, left, fronto-temporal focal crisis. The 18F-FDG (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose) PET scan documented many cervical and inguinal hypermetabolic lymph nodes (Fig. 1c-d, red arrows), a hypermetabolism of the posterior surface of the right prostate lobe and the right hippocampus (Fig. 1e, red arrow), and a right prefrontal, parietal, and occipital cortical hypometabolism (Fig. 1e, white arrows).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagnosis of PLE associated with lymph node metastases of a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. a-b T2-weighted FLAIR signal of the para hippocampic gyrus and the hippocamps (brain MRI: coronal and axial section; red arrows). c-d Left, hypermetabolic peri-aortic and supraclavicular lymph node (PET-scan; red arrows). e Right hypermetabolism of the hippocampus (PET-scan; red arrow) and a right prefrontal, parietal and occipital hypometabolism (white arrows). f Massive tumor infiltration of poorly differentiated cells with scant cytoplasm, coarse chromatin, prominent mitotic and apoptotic figures, associated to a diffuse necrosis (histology; hematoxylin and eosin stain, 200x). g Positivity of tumor cells for CD56 (immunohistochemistry; 400x)

The patient referred to a percutaneous ultrasound-guided core biopsy of both, cervical and inguinal, lymphadenopathies and the prostate gland. Histology revealed a massive infiltration of small, poorly differentiated, tumor cells with a scant cytoplasm and prominent mitotic figures (Fig. 1f). At the immunohistochemistry, tumor cells were positive for CD56 (Fig. 1g) and synaptophysin, and negative for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, CK-7, CK-20, chromogranin-A, p53, PAX8, GATA-3, and TTF-1 according to the diagnosis of a lymph node metastasis of a poorly differentiated, small cell neuroendocrine tumor. The proliferation index (Ki-67) was elevated at 90%. Prostate histology was consisted with a prostatitis. The lumbar ponction did not reveal a pleocytosis (1 white cell/mm3; NV < 1 cells/mm3) but elevated protein levels (1,15 g/L; NV < 0,40 g/L) without any evidence of tumor cells. We documented the presence in the serum and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of anti-neuronal Hu antibodies in the absence of other neuronal autoantibodies, including anti-Yo, anti-Ri, anti-CV2, anti-Ma2, anti-SOX1, anti-GAD65, anti-Tr, anti-Zic4, anti-Titin, anti-amphiphysin, anti leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 (LGl1), and anti contactin associated protein 2 (CASPR2). The molecular analysis of Cytomegalovirus and Human Herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) genome in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was negative. This biological pattern confirmed the diagnosis of PLE.

The patient underwent several cycles of plasmapheresis combined with high-dose corticosteroids that partially and temporarily improved neurological symptoms. We started also a systemic chemotherapy by a cisplatin/etoposide regimen. After three cycles of chemotherapy, lymph node metastases partially regressed. The brain MRI revealed a radiological improvement of the limbic lesions (Fig. 2a-b, red arrows) but patient’s neurological symptoms quickly worsened and the patient presented with many episodes of partial epileptic seizures and confusion. In this context, we administered four cycles of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIgs) in addition to the systemic chemotherapy leading to a rapid and progressive improvement of the neurological symptoms.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tumor response to chemotherapy and radiological improvement of the PLE. a-b Reduction of the T2-weighted FLAIR signal of the para hippocampic gyrus and the hippocamps after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (brain MRI: coronal and axial section; red arrows). c-d Partial regression of the left, hypermetabolic peri-aortic adenopathy and complete response of the left, hypermetabolic supraclavicular lymph node after 6 cycles of chemotherapy (PET-scan; red arrows). e Residual, left hypermetabolism of the hippocampus (brain PET-scan; red arrow) and right prefrontal, parietal and occipital cortical hypometabolism (brain PET-scan; white arrows) after 6 cycles of chemotherapy

After six cycles of systemic chemotherapy, the whole body CT and 18F-FDG PET scan showed a regression of metastatic lymphadenopathies (Fig. 2c-d, red arrows), an improvement of brain abnormalities (Fig. 2e, red and white arrows) but the presence of a new, anorectal, hypermetabolic tumor lesion (Fig. 3a-b, red arrows). The colonoscopy (Fig. 3c, black arrow) and pelvic MRI (Fig. 3d-e, red arrows) documented a voluminous tumor of the right rectal wall of 62 × 84 × 162 mm of diameter, infiltrating the prostate, the right seminal vesicle, the internal anal sphincter, the levator ani and the puborectalis muscle. The percutaneous biopsy revealed a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Diagnosis of a primary, anorectal small cell tumor. a-b Voluminous, hypermetabolic anorectal tumor lesion (PET-scan: axial and sagittal section; red arrows) diagnosed after 6 cycles of chemotherapy. c Tumor lesion of the right wall of the anorectal region (Colonoscopy; black arrows). d-f Voluminous tumor of the right rectal wall of 62 × 84 × 162 mm of diameter, infiltrating the prostate, the right seminal vesicle, the internal anal sphincter, the levator ani and the puborectalis muscle (pelvic MRI: coronal, sagittal and axial section; red arrows)

In order to obtain a better control of this new tumor lesion, we started a concomitant chemoradiotherapy with a carboplatin/etoposide regimen. After completion of treatment, the patient developed a diplopia, which was related to a left intraorbital metastasis. The 18F-FDG PET scan showed also lung, hepatic, lymph node, and peritoneal multiple metastases. In this contexte, we administered a palliative systemic chemotherapy by weekly topotecan but the patient’s clinical conditions quickly worsened leading to his death.

Discussion and conclusion

PLE is a rare, autoimmune neurological syndrome affecting the limbic areas [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. It is usually associated with small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, thymoma, ovarian teratoma and Hodgkin lymphoma [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].

PLE is clinically characterized by subacute confusion, altered mental status, mood changes, short-term memory deficit, dementia and seizures [1,2,3,4,5]. The subacute development of short-term memory loss (< 3 months) is usually considered the hallmark of PLE, but other neurological symptoms, such as cerebellar ataxia, progressive encephalomyelopathy, and peripheral neuropathy may be more clinically relevant [3, 4].

CSF analysis shows a mild-to-moderate lymphocytic pleocytosis (usually < 100 white blood cells/mm3) in 60–80% of patients and an elevated IgG index or oligoclonal bands in approximately 50% of cases [3,4,5,6].

Brain MRI often reveals an increased signal on T2-weighted FLAIR imaging in the medial temporal lobes, the unilateral or the absence of the temporal involvement being very uncommon [3,4,5,6]. In this latter case, the diagnosis should be confirmed by the identification of specific anti-neuronal antibodies as several non-immune, neurological disorders could present a similar unilateral radiological picture, including seizures, HHV-6 encephalitis or gliomas [3,4,5,6]. HHV-6 encephalitis can precisely mimic PLE but it often shows a particular radiological pattern, including a less confined involvement of the limbic system, haemorrhagic aspects, restricted diffusion abnormalities and contrast uptake, and prominent signs of oedema and mass effect involving one or both inferior-medial temporal lobes, inferior frontal lobes and cingulate gyrus. In addition, the clinical setting is different [3,4,5,6].

Several published studies have clearly confirmed the pathogenic role of few anti-neuronal antibodies in PLE. Classical PLE with temporal lobe seizures is associated with onconeural autoantibodies directed against intracellular antigens, including anti-Hu, anti-Ma2, anti-amphiphysin, and anti collapsin response mediator protein 5 (CRMP5). Recently, many autoantibodies to neuronal extracellular epitopes have been described, such as the voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) complex, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR), γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABABR), LGI1, and CASPR2 [3,4,5,6, 12].

Histologically, PLE shows particular inflammatory features, including perivascular lymphocytic cuffs, neuronal loss, reactive microglial nodules and gliosis of the temporal lobe [3].

The diagnosis remains a challenge and generally requires a combination of clinical, biological, and radiological findings [3,4,5,6]. Additionally, metabolic and inflammatory encephalopathy, neurotoxic drugs, brain tumors and neurodegenerative disorders must be excluded [3,4,5,6]. The brain MRI is more useful to rule out other disorders [3]. The 18F-FDG PET scan might be necessary, particularly when MRI is not conclusive [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].

The identification of specific circulating autoantibodies is essential for a definitive diagnosis [3,4,5,6]. The onconeural antibodies targeting intracellular proteins of the neuroectodermal tissues are usually characterized by a permanent lymphocyte-T mediated neuronal loss with a low response to the immunomodulatory treatment. On the contrary, the prognosis of PLE associated to the autoantibodies targeting the cell surface antigens is usually better as the neuronal dysfunction is often reversible after the immunosuppressive treatment [3,4,5,6].

The management of PLE is complex and based on a multidisciplinary combined approach, including immunotherapy and specific anticancer treatment [23,24,25,26]. Different immunomodulator treatments, such as corticosteroids, plasma exchange, immune adsorption or IVIgs, have been reported in the literature with variable results [23,24,25,26]. The anticancer treatment plays a pivotal role and should always be used in combination with immunotherapy as this combined approach clearly appears more effective [23,24,25,26]. A relatively small percentage of PLE patients experienced symptom stabilization or neurological improvement after immunomodulatory therapy, although most failed to achieve a response until the primary tumor was controlled [24, 25].

In our case, the patient presented with a PLE associated to a rare anorectal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma that was diagnosed after completion of systemic chemotherapy. Considering the lack of response to plasmaferesis and high-dose corticosteroids, four cycles of IVIgs were administered in addition to chemotherapy leading to a quickly clinical improvement of neurological symptoms. We performed also a concomitant chemoradiotherapy for a better control of the anorectal tumor but the patient showed a rapid, multi-visceral, tumor progression leading to his death.

This case highlights the rare entity, PLE, which is difficult to diagnose and manage. At our knowledge, it is the first published case of a PLE associated to an anorectal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The diagnosis of the primary tumor was a challenge as the patient presented only with metastatic lymph nodes at his first clinical examination. The 18F-FDG PET scan showed an abnormal hypermetabolism of the posterior surface of the right prostate lobe. The clinical examination and the prostate biopsy did not document any pathological lesion but this does not exclude a microscopic tumor of the anorectal mucosa. It is impossible to histologically discriminate a primary anorectal tumor from a metastasis. However, despite the excellent response of lymph node metastases after completion of chemotherapy, a new, voluminous anorectal tumor was diagnosed at the same site where the first 18F-FDG PET scan found the abnormal hypermetabolism. All these considerations and the clinical behavior of this new lesion, which progressed during chemotherapy in contrast to lymph node metastases, support the hypothesis of a primary anorectal tumor, which was resistant to chemotherapy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on raisonable request. All data and materials are available for review at the Division of Medical Oncology, CHR Metz-Thionville, in an electronic format.

Change history





α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor


Collapsin response mediator protein 5


Cerebrospinal fluid




Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery


γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor


Human Herpesvirus-6


Intravenous immunoglobulins


Limbic encephalitis


Magnetic resonance imaging


N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor


Neuron-specific enolase


Paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis


Voltage-gated potassium channel


  1. Corsellis JA, Goldberg GJ, Norton AR. “Limbic encephalitis” and its association with carcinoma. Brain. 1968;91(3):481–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Honnorat J, Antoine JC. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, Benseler S, Bien CG, Cellucci T, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(4):391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graus F, Dalmau J. CNS autoimmunity: new findings and pending issues. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(1):17–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grativvol RS, Cavalcante WCP, Castro LHM, Nitrini R, Simabukuro MM. Updates in the diagnosis and treatment of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018;20(11):92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Höftberger R, Rosenfeld MR, Dalmau J. Update on neurological paraneoplastic syndromes. Curr Opin Oncol. 2015;27(6):489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shen K, Xu Y, Guan H, Zhong W, Chen M, Zhao J, et al. Paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis associated with lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shin KJ, Ji YI. Anti-Hu antibody-mediated limbic encephalitis associated with cervical cancer: A case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(6):1181–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Inoue T, Kanno R, Moriya A, Nakamura K, Watanabe Y, Matsumura Y, et al. A case of paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis in a patient with invasive thymoma with anti-glutamate receptor antibody-positive cerebrospinal fluid: a case report. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;24(4):200–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobayashi M, Nishioka K, Takanashi M, Hattori A, Shojima Y, Hayashida A, et al. Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis due to large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterus. J Neurol Sci. 2017;383:72–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pastuszak Ż, Stępień A, Tomczykiewicz K, Piusińska-Macoch R, Kordowska J, Galbarczyk D, et al. Limbic encephalitis - a report of four cases. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2017;42(2):213–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramanathan S, Mohammad SS, Brilot F, Dale RC. Autoimmune encephalitis: recent updates and emerging challenges. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(5):722–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt SL, Schmidt JJ, Tolentino JC, Ferreira CG, de Almeida SA, Alvarenga RP, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma associated with limbic encephalitis and early cerebral abnormalities detected by 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography-positron emission tomography: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2016;10:200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goffin KE, Ooms D, Ahmad R, Demaerel P, Van Paesschen W, Van Laere K, et al. Metabolic-structural concordance in paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(5):994–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cózar Santiago Mdel P, Sanchez Jurado R, Sanz Llorens R, Aguilar Barrios JE, Ferrer Rebolleda J. Limbic Encephalitis diagnosed with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(2):e101–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Da Rocha AJ, Nunes RH, Maia AC Jr, do Amaral LL. Recognizing autoimmune-mediated encephalitis in the differential diagnosis of limbic disorders. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(12):2196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Quartuccio N, Caobelli F, Evangelista L, Alongi P, Kirienko M, De Biasi V, et al. The role of PET/CT in the evaluation of patients affected by limbic encephalitis: A systematic review of the literature. J Neuroimmunol. 2015;284:44–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Masangkay N, Basu S, Moghbel M, Kwee T, Alavi A. Brain 18F-FDG-PET characteristics in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndrome and its correlation with clinical and MRI findings. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35(10):1038–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baumgartner A, Rauer S, Mader I, Meyer PT. Cerebral FDG-PET and MRI findings in autoimmune limbic encephalitis: correlation with autoantibody types. J Neurol. 2013;260(11):2744–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Serrano Vicente J, García Bernardo L, Durán Barquero C, Infante Torre JR, Rayo Madrid JI, Domínguez Grande ML. Brain metabolic changes in limbic encephalitis evidenced by 18FDG PET. Correlation with symptomatology. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2013;32(3):201–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher RE, Patel NR, Lai EC, Schulz PE. Two different 18F-FDG brain PET metabolic patterns in autoimmune limbic encephalitis. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37(9):e213–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim TJ, Lee ST, Shin JW, Moon J, Lim JA, Byun JI, et al. Clinical manifestations and outcomes of the treatment of patients with GABAB encephalitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2014;270(1–2):45–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gastaldi M, Thouin A, Vincent A. Antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalopathies and immunotherapies. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13(1):147–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grisold W, Giometto B, Vitaliani R, Oberndorfer S. Current approaches to the treatment of paraneoplastic encephalitis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2011;4(4):237–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pelosof LC, Gerber DE. Paraneoplastic syndromes: an approach to diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(9):838–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kinsella JA, Irani SR, Hollingsworth R, O'Shaughnessy D, Kane P, Foster M, et al. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis: audit of the NHS experience. JRSM Open. 2018;9(9):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Dr. Gehin William for the English revision.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The patient was admitted under the care of RL and underwent systemic chemotherapy by RL, MCC, GD, MC, and FP. Neuroradiology imaging was performed by LH and SBM. Diagnosis of PLE was made by MW. Plasmapheresis was performed by BS and ZT. The IVIgs were administrered by MW. Histology pictures were made by NM. Radiotherapy was performed by PQ. RL, MW, BS, MCC, GD, ZT, LH, SBM, NM, PQ, MC, and FP substantially contributed to conception, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. All authors have been involved in drafting, revising and approving the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaele Longo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

A written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. It is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the statement under Case presentation, second paragraph was corrected.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Longo, R., Wagner, M., Savenkoff, B. et al. A paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis from an anorectal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report. BMC Neurol 19, 304 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: