Skip to main content
Help us understand how you use our websites. Take part in our 30 minute study now.

Rapid formation and rupture of an infectious basilar artery aneurysm from meningitis following suprasellar region meningioma removal: a case report



Infectious basilar artery (BA) aneurysm has been occasionally reported to be generated from meningitis following transcranial operation. However, infectious BA aneurysm formed by intracranial infection after endoscopic endonasal operation has never been reported.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old man who was diagnosed with suprasellar region meningioma received tumor removal via endoscopic endonasal approach. After operation he developed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and intracranial infection. The patient ultimately recovered from infection after anti-infective therapy, but a large fusiform BA aneurysm was still formed and ruptured in a short time. Interventional and surgical measures were impossible due to the complicated shape and location of aneurysm and state of his endangerment, therefore, conservative anti-infective therapy was adopted as the only feasible method. Unfortunately, the aneurysm did not disappear and the patient finally died from repeating subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).


Though extremely rare, it was emphasized that infectious aneurysm can be formed at any stage after transnasal surgery, even when the meningitis is cured. Because of the treatment difficulty and poor prognosis, it was recommended that thorough examination should be timely performed for suspicious patient to make correct diagnosis and avoid fatal SAH.

Peer Review reports


As a peculiar type of aneurysm, infectious intracranial aneurysms (IIAs) account for only about 1–6% of all intracranial aneurysms [1, 2], most of which are secondary to infectious endocarditis [3,4,5]. According to the systematic review conducted by Ali Alawieh et al., nearly 70% of all IIAs are resulted from infectious endocarditis [6]. Occasionally, some other infectious factors such as bacterial meningitis and cavernous thrombophlebitis can also lead to IIAs [4,5,6,7]. Compared with other conventional intracranial aneurysms, IIAs usually predict worse prognosis because of higher aneurysmal rupture rate [5]. The systematic review by Amit Singla et al. in 2015 revealed that the mortality rate of IIAs is 26.7% after conservative treatment and 15.1% after surgical or interventional therapy [8].

Most IIAs are located at distal branches of anterior circulation, with posterior circulation rarely involved. According to sporadic case reports about IIAs of vertebrobasilar artery, they were most commonly secondary to infection following transcranial surgery. However, infectious BA aneurysm formed after endoscopic endonasal operation has never been reported. In this study, it was reported that a rare case of infectious BA aneurysm secondary to intracranial infection after removal of meningioma in suprasellar region via endoscopic endonasal approach. The peculiarity of current case lies in the fact that the aneurysm is originated even after recovery of infection. Afterwards, a systematic review of relative literatures was performed.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old male presenting with paroxysmal headache was admitted to our hospital. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an oval tumor located at suprasellar region, neighboring to BA (Fig. 1a-c). Three dimensional-reconstructed image from preoperative MRI showed that the BA and its branches were normal (Fig. 1d). The patient was diagnosed as meningioma based on the preoperative MRI. Surgical removal of tumor was performed via endoscopic endonasal approach. He developed CSF rhinorrhea 17 days after operation and endoscopic repair was timely conducted the next day.

Fig. 1

Preoperative brain MRI. a Axial T1WI MRI before the first operation showed an isointense lesion located at suprasellar region which was regular in shape and near the BA apex and PCA. b Sagittal T2WI MRI showed the lesion was isointense and closely related to the third ventricle. Moreover, there was no abnormity of BA. c Sagittal contrast-enhanced T1WI MRI showed the tumor was homogeneously enhanced and the BA was also shown. d Three dimensional-reconstructed image from preoperative MRI showed no aneurysm at BA and its branches

On the second day after repair operation, he developed fever and neck rigidity. The lumbar puncture showed an opening pressure as high as 33 cm H2O, glucose of CSF was 0.36 mg/dL, protein of CSF was 213 mg/dl, and white blood cell count was 19223*10^6 cells/L with 81% polymorphonuclear granulocyte. Intracranial infection was diagnosed based on the laboratory report and clinical symptoms. Whereas, the CSF bacterial culture result was negative. Meropenem and vacocin vancomycin were both intravenously and intrathecally used for anti-inflammatory treatment. The intracranial infection got significant improvement after 2 weeks of anti-inflammatory therapy.

At the 15th day after the first repair operation, CSF rhinorrhea was confirmed to continue and once again, endoscopic repair for CSF leak was performed. BA and its branches were exposed during the second repair operation and no abnormity was shown, nevertheless a lot of infectious floccules surrounding the trunk of BA were clearly revealed (Fig. 2). During the whole surgery, BA was not touched by any surgical instruments, so traumatic injury was avoided. Whereafter, intracranial infection was completely healed but the patient still developed headache and gradually aggravated consciousness disturbance. The patient developed sudden severe headache and loss of consciousness 12 days after the second repair operation. Brain computerized tomography (CT) scan revealed hydrocephalus and SAH predominantly at prepontine cistern (Fig. 3a). Physical examination showed the dilation of left pupil and disappearance of light reaction. Urgent tracheal intubation and ventricle puncture and drainage were performed. Twenty-four hours later, the right pupil also dilated and lost the light reaction. Brain CT rechecked showed SAH was aggravated (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 2

Intraoperative photograph from the second repair operation clearly showed bilateral SCA, PCA, oculomotor nerves, and BA. No fusiform aneurysm was observed at BA, but surface of BA and left SCA was covered with many infectious floccules

Fig. 3

a Brain CT scan performed immediately after attack of sudden severe headache and loss of consciousness showed SAH at prepontine cistern and fourth ventricle. b Brain CT rechecked in the next day after SAH showed SAH was aggravated. c-d DSA showed an enormous fusiform aneurysm at the trunk of BA, which gave rise to some aneurismal secondary cysts. Moreover, original sites of bilateral SCA and PCA were also involved

Digital substraction angiography (DSA) showed a large fusiform aneurysm at BA (Fig. 3c-d). It was believed the aneurysm was formed by spread of contiguous infection into arterial wall. DSA revealed remarkable dilatation and tortuosity of BA, which gave rise to some aneurismal secondary cysts. Moreover, original sites of bilateral superior cerebellar artery (SCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) were also involved. Coupled with the state of his endangerment (Hunt-Hess grade 5) and infectious environment, both open surgery and interventional therapy were impossible and only the conservative anti-inflammatory treatment was continued. Ultimately, the aneurysm did not disappear and he died from repeating SAH 17 days later.

We adhered to CARE guidelines/methodology.

Discussion and conclusions

IIAs are very rare, 70–80% of which are secondary to left-sided bacterial endocarditis [4, 9, 10]. Ferdinand K Hui et al. retrospectively analyzed 168 patients with infectious endocarditis who received DSA, revealing that 8.9% of all patients are concomitant with IIAs [11]. On the other hand, intracranial infection following craniocerebral operations is another important source of IIAs [1, 7, 12,13,14]. Other more rare reasons of IIAs include orbital cellulitis, bacterial pneumonia, osteomyelitis of the skull and sinus infections [6, 15].

According to literature reports, viridans group streptococci and Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogenic bacteria, which is responsible for 57 to 91% of all IIAs [15,16,17]. As no positive results were obtained from the blood and CSF culture in the patient, meropenem and vacocin vancomycin were empirically adopted both intravenously and intrathecally for the anti-inflammatory treatment.

Generally speaking, IIAs are formed by inflammation and destruction of intracranial arterial walls. Bacterial embolus from primary infection can arrive at the vasa vasorum of normal intracranial arteries, leading to the occlusion of the vasa vasorum and intense inflammation in the adventitia and muscle layer, which then resulted in weakness of intracranial arterial walls and formation of aneurysm dilation. IIAs are always pseudoaneurysms because the muscular layer is usually involved [15, 18].

Among patients with bacterial meningitis, IIAs are believed to be caused by dispersion of septic microemboli into nearby intracranial arteries. As for the current patient, no abnormity of BA and bilateral PCA other than some infectious floccules around the trunk of BA was shown during the second repair operation (Fig. 2), intraoperative traumatic injury of BA was also excluded. Whereas, the patient developed symptoms of SAH a few days later. Therefore, it was believed that the aneurysm was infectious in origin and formed and ruptured in a short period after the second repair operation.

The natural history of IIAs is still under debate. Kang-Ho Choi reported a patient with IIA from bacterial meningitis, which was formed within 24–48 h from the spread of infection [19]. Robert M. Koffie once reported a special case of IIA, who died of enlargement and rupture of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm within only 24 h [20]. Previous animal model showed that IIAs can be formed within 24 h since the drop of inflammatory embolus [18]. Our patient developed intracranial infection after CSF leak from suprasellar cistern, then the nearby BA was invaded by inflammatory embolus from surgical field and fusiform aneurysm was formed within a short time. It was believed that the BA aneurysm was formed within a few days from second repair operation to the attack of SAH. It is very strange that in current patient the aneurysm was formed after recovery of intracranial infection, which has been rarely reported.

IIAs secondary to infectious endocarditis are often peripheral to the first bifurcation of a intracranial artery in the anterior circulation [21, 22], with distal branches of MCA most commonly involved [3, 10, 23, 24]. On the other hand, IIAs induced by bacterial meningitis are frequently localized to more proximal regions of intracranial arteries [1, 9, 25, 26]. All in all, most IIAs are located at the anterior circulation regardless of the infection source. A systematic review including 86 patients from 11 studies indicated that 93.2% of those IIAs are located at anterior circulation, while only 6.8% are located at posterior circulation [27]. CSF leak and intracranial infection are common after sellar region tumor removal via the endoscopic endonasal approach. However, it is extremely rare that IIAs can be formed following endoscopic operation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a large infectious BA aneurysm secondary to CSF leak and intracranial infection after endoscopic transnasal surgery.

Other than anterior circulation IIAs that are often induced by bacterial endocarditis, IIAs of vertebro-basilar artery are more commonly secondary to bacterial meningitis, with higher mortality rate [1]. A systematic review revealed that IIA at vertebro-basilar artery (vertebrobasilar junction) was observed in only one case among all 62 patients. This case received endovascular balloon occlusion treatment and retained with disabling stroke [25]. Daniel L. barrow reported two cases of BA IIAs in 1990. One case was induced by fungal infection after craniotomy and died of aneurysm rupture. The other 12-year-old patient developed proximal BA IIA secondary to bacterial meningitis, and recovered well after surgical clipping of aneurysm [13]. Currently, the largest single center sample of BA IIAs has been reported by Sudheeran Kannoth et al. Among 25 patients with 29 IIAs in the study, all three patients with BA IIAs died of aneurysm rupture at last [1].

Due to the unique formation mechanism and morphological characteristics, the therapeutic strategy of IIAs is different from that of other regular aneurysms. It has been widely believed that IIAs should be individually treated based on whether the aneurysm ruptures or not, the location of aneurysm, whether the parent artery supplies the eloquent brain tissue or not. Some unruptured aneurysms can be resolved with the antibiotic therapy, but fatal rupture and bleeding can also occur during the conservative treatment [22]. It is still controversial for the treatment of unruptured IIAs [1, 4, 28, 29]. Some doctors recommend that besides the antibiotic therapy, active surgical or interventional treatment is needed for all unruptured IIAs in consideration of the high rupture and mortality rates [2, 17].

Interventional measures including direct aneurysm occlusion in more proximal locations and parent vessel occlusion in distal lesions are suitable for those IIAs not accompanied with evident intracranial hematoma [25]. More and more IIAs can be well controlled by the interventional therapy in recent years. It has been reported that embolization by Onyx is a safe and effectual treatment option for some IIAs [30, 31]. Geoffrey Appelboom reported that a patient with IIA at cavernous segment ICA secondary to meningitis is successfully treated by flow-diverting stent graft [7].

In some cases, interventional therapy can result in ischemic complications. If rupture of IIAs results in severe intracranial hematoma and space-occupying effect, interventional therapy will not be suitable. By the opening surgery parent vessel sacrifice and aneurysm clipping could be performed in addition to evacuation of hematoma. Ruptured IIAs of the distal MCA could be also treated by trapping and bypass surgery [32]. Nussbaum et al. reported that, good outcomes can be achieved for some complex PCA or basilar aneurysm by low-flow or high-flow bypass treatment [33].

In our patient, the aneurysm was large and involved in the original sites of bilateral SCA and PCA. Basilar sacrifice with bypass might have saved his life, but it was not conducted for some reasons at last. Firstly, severe SAH developed in a short time at this patient. When basilar aneurysm was confirmed by DSA, the patient was in a very danger condition (Hunt-Hess grade 5). In consideration of his state of endangerment, it was believed that he could hardly tolerate aggressive bypass operation. Secondly, because of previous severe intracranial infection, basilar artery and bilateral PCA were surrounded by a lot of infectious floccules. It was assumed that it was not feasible to perform bypass operation under this environment. Therefore, conservative anti-inflammatory treatment was adopted as the only feasible method. Unfortunately, the aneurysm did not disappear and resulted in fatal SAH.

IIA of BA is a very rare and dangerous complication from meningitis after endoscopic endonasal surgery, which can be formed and enlarged in a short time even after recovery from intracranial infection. Because of the treatment-difficulty and poor-prognosis, it was recommended that thorough examination should be timely performed for suspicious patient to make correct diagnosis and avoid fatal SAH.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article.



Basilar artery


Cerebrospinal fluid


Computed tomography angiography


Digital subtraction angiography


Internal carotid artery


Infectious intracranial aneurysm


Infectious intracranial aneurysms


Middle cerebral artery


Magnetic resonance imaging


Posterior cerebral artery


Subarachnoid hemorrhage


Superior cerebellar artery


T1-weighted imaging


T2-weighted imaging


  1. 1.

    Kannoth S, Iyer R, Thomas SV, Furtado SV, Rajesh BJ, Kesavadas C, et al. Intracranial infectious aneurysm: presentation, management and outcome. J Neurol Sci. 2007;256:3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kannoth S, Thomas SV. Intracranial microbial aneurysm (infectious aneurysm): current options for diagnosis and management. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:120–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yang YS, Shang ST, Lin JC, Chiu CH, Chang FY. A ruptured cerebral mycotic aneurysm caused by Abiotrophia defectiva endocarditis. Am J Med Sci. 2010;339:190–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chun JY, Smith W, Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Wilson CB, Lawton MT. Current multimodality management of infectious intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:1203–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ding D, Raper DM, Carswell AJ, Liu KC. Endovascular stenting for treatment of mycotic intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:1163–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alawieh A, Chaudry MI, Turner RD, Turk AS, Spiotta AM. Infectious intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review of epidemiology, management, and outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:708–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Appelboom G, Kadri K, Hassan F, Leclerc X. Infectious aneurysm of the cavernous carotid artery in a child treated with a new-generation of flow-diverting stent graft: case report. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:E623–4 discussion E624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Singla A, Fargen K, Blackburn S, Neal D, Martin TD, Hess PJ, et al. National treatment practices in the management of infectious intracranial aneurysms and infective endocarditis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:741–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ducruet AF, Hickman ZL, Zacharia BE, Narula R, Grobelny BT, Gorski J, et al. Intracranial infectious aneurysms: a comprehensive review. Neurosurg Rev. 2010;33:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wu FZ, Lai PH. Evolution and regression of intracranial infectious aneurysm diagnosed by brain computed tomographic angiography. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:1147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hui FK, Bain M, Obuchowski NA, Gordon S, Spiotta AM, Moskowitz S, et al. Mycotic aneurysm detection rates with cerebral angiography in patients with infective endocarditis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:449–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hamisch CA, Mpotsaris A, Timmer M, Reiner M, Stavrinou P, Brinker G, et al. Interdisciplinary treatment of intracranial infectious aneurysms. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42:493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Barrow DL, Prats AR. Infectious intracranial aneurysms: comparison of groups with and without endocarditis. Neurosurgery. 1990;27:562–72 discussion 572-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kasliwal MK, Reddy VS, Sinha S, Sharma BS, Das P, Suri V. Bilateral anterior cerebral artery aneurysm due to mucormycosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16:156–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Park W, Ahn JS, Park JC, Kwun BD, Lee DH. Treatment strategy based on experience of treating intracranial infectious aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:351–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Peters PJ, Harrison T, Lennox JL. A dangerous dilemma: management of infectious intracranial aneurysms complicating endocarditis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:742–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Allen LM, Fowler AM, Walker C, Derdeyn CP, Nguyen BV, Hasso AN, et al. Retrospective review of cerebral mycotic aneurysms in 26 patients: focus on treatment in strongly immunocompromised patients with a brief literature review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:823–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Molinari GF, Smith L, Goldstein MN, Satran R. Pathogenesis of cerebral mycotic aneurysms. Neurology. 1973;23:325–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Choi KH, Park MS, Kim JT, Nam TS, Choi SM, Lee SH, et al. Infectious intracranial aneurysm presenting with a series of strokes as a complication of pneumococcal meningitis. Eur Neurol. 2012;68:260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Koffie RM, Stapleton CJ, Torok CM, Yoo AJ, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Codd PJ. Rapid growth of an infectious intracranial aneurysm with catastrophic intracranial hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:603–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bohmfalk GL, Story JL, Wissinger JP, Brown WE Jr. Bacterial intracranial aneurysm. J Neurosurg. 1978;48:369–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ahmadi J, Tung H, Giannotta SL, Destian S. Monitoring of infectious intracranial aneurysms by sequential computed tomographic/magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:45–9 discussion 49-50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fusco MR, Stapleton CJ, Griessenauer CJ, Thomas AJ, Ogilvy CS. Endovascular treatment of intracranial infectious aneurysms in eloquent cortex with super-selective provocative testing: case series and literature review. Interv Neuroradiol. 2016;22:148–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Harris A, Levy E, Kanal E, Pollock A, Cahill AM, Omalu BI, et al. Infectious aneurysm clipping by an MRI/MRA wand-guided protocol. A case report and technical note. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;35:90–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gross BA, Puri AS. Endovascular treatment of infectious intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev. 2013;36:11–9 discussion 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Han MS, Jung SH, Kim TS, Joo SP. Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment of an Intracranial Infectious Aneurysm in Bacterial Meningitis: A Case Report and Review of Literature. World Neurosurg. 2016;90:700.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Petr O, Brinjikji W, Burrows AM, Cloft H, Kallmes DF, Lanzino G. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for intracranial infectious aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroradiol. 2016;43:309–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Urakami T, Hamada Y, Magarihuchi H, Yamakuchi H, Aoki Y. Enterococcal endocarditis complicated with ruptured infected-intracranial aneurysm: with pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic documentation in proof of the successful antimicrobial treatment. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20:810–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chang SH, Lee CC, Chen SY, Chen IC, Hsieh MR, Chen SC. Infectious intracranial aneurysms caused by Granulicatella adiacens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;60:201–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Grandhi R, Zwagerman NT, Linares G, Monaco EA 3rd, Jovin T, Horowitz M, et al. Onyx embolization of infectious intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:353–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Eddleman CS, Surdell D, DiPatri A Jr, Tomita T, Shaibani A. Infectious intracranial aneurysms in the pediatric population: endovascular treatment with Onyx. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24:909–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ota T, Yoshino M, Horiba A, Yokoya S, Mizutani T. Ruptured infectious aneurysms of the distal MCA treated with trapping and STA-MCA bypass surgery. Br J Neurosurg. 2012;26:767–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nussbaum ES, Kallmes KM, Lassig JP, Goddard JK, Madison MT, Nussbaum LA. Cerebral revascularization for the management of complex intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2019;131:1297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors sincerely thank all colleagues of neurosurgery department in Xuan Wu Hospital.



Author information




XW collected data and drafted the manuscript. GC, ML, JL, HG, and GS were responsible for the clinical management of the patient and searching of relevant literatures. YB revised the manuscript and supervised the study. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhai Bao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from direct relative of the patient for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images. Copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Chen, G., Li, M. et al. Rapid formation and rupture of an infectious basilar artery aneurysm from meningitis following suprasellar region meningioma removal: a case report. BMC Neurol 20, 94 (2020).

Download citation


  • Infectious intracranial aneurysms
  • Bacterial meningitis
  • Endoscopic transnasal operation
  • Septic microemboli