Skip to main content

Pre-hospital and intrahospital workflow optimization for patients with suspected ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion - findings from a tertiary care facility

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of recanalization treatment in patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) is highly time dependent. We aimed to investigate the effects of an optimization of prehospital and intrahospital pathways on time metrics and efficacy of endovascular treatment in ischemic stroke due to LVO.

Methods

Patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) at the Hospital of St. John of God Vienna, Austria, between 2013 and 2020 were extracted from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Study endpoints including time metrics, early neurological improvement and functional outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months were compared before and after optimization of prehospital and intrahospital pathways.

Results

Two hundred ninety-nine patients were treated with MT during the study period, 94 before and 205 after the workflow optimization. Workflow optimization was significantly associated with time metrics improvement (door to groin puncture time 45 versus 31 min; p < 0.001), rates of neurological improvement (NIHSS ≥ 8: 30 (35%) vs. 70 (47%), p = 0.04) and radiological outcome (TICI ≥ 2b: 71 (75%) versus 153 (87%); p = 0.013). Functional outcome (mRS 0–2: 17 (18%) versus 57 (28%); p = 0.067) and mortality (34 (37%) versus 54 (32%); p = 0.450) at 3 months showed a non-significant trend in the later time period group.

Conclusion

The implementation of workflow optimization was associated a significant reduction of intrahospital time delays and improvement of neurological and radiological outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective and proven treatment in patient’s ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) [1]. The benefit of the recanalization is highly time dependent. Various concepts exist to reduce prehospital time metrics [2]. Additionally, of importance is to optimize intrahospital workflows within a multidisciplinary approach. Current guidelines recommend as targets a door to needle time (DNT) of 30–60 min and a door to reperfusion time (DRT) between 90 and 120 min [3]. Study designs that investigate workflow optimization were very heterogeneous. A meta-analysis of prehospital optimization reported an increase of IV tPA treatment (IVT) rate, shorter time metrics for LVO patients [4]. However, mortality and rate of good functional outcome did not differ significantly [4]. Intrahospital workflow optimization was associated significantly with shorter door to needle times, lower mortality, lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and higher reperfusion rates within 60 min [5]. In 2016, we optimized our prehospital and intrahospital workflows to achieve a time to treatment reduction using as standard operating procedure. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of this optimization on treatment times metrics, radiological and functional outcome.

Methods

The study population consisted of consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients treated between 2013 and 2020 in a comprehensive stroke center at the Hospital of St. John of God in Vienna, Austria. Patient’s data were extracted from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry (ASUR). ASUR is a nationwide prospective registry of the Austrian stroke unit network founded by the Federal Ministry of Health. Anonymized data on baseline characteristics, risk factors and etiology, acute management, and functional outcome at discharge and at 3 months are registered for all patients admitted to one of currently 39 stroke units in Austria. Data collection and clinical ratings are performed by experienced stroke neurologists using standardized definitions of variables and scores. To ensure high data quality, immediate electronic data entry is performed. The web-based database includes online plausibility checks and a help function. Biannual educational meetings serve to guarantee uniform data documentation. A detailed methodological description has been published previously [6].

For the means of current study, we included only patients directly referred to our stroke center. Following variables were extracted from the registry and entered the analysis: age, sex, IV tPA treatment (IVT) rate, spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) occurrence according to ECASS 3 [7] criteria, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission and discharge from stroke unit, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) – pre-stroke, at discharge and at 3 months follow-up, risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation), onset to door time (ODT), onset to recanalization time (ORT), door to groin puncture time (DPT) and door to recanalization time (DRT). We compared patients treated with MT before and after optimization of the prehospital and intrahospital workflows (2013–2016 versus 2016–2020). In 2016, an interdisciplinary standard operating procedure (SOP) has been designed and activated encompassing following points:

  1. 1)

    Prehospital notification using a LVO identification score (Austrian Prehospital stroke Scale (APSS, [8]) by the emergency medical service (EMS) car

  2. 2)

    Prehospital electronic collection of patient’s data including medical history and actual medication using a direct view-only access to the central EMS system.

  3. 3)

    Electronic pre-administration of patient’s admission including pre-administration of neuroimaging, endovascular and anesthetic procedures

  4. 4)

    Reducing of blood sampling at admission

  5. 5)

    Definition of specific roles and tasks for all team members using a dedicated SOP

  6. 6)

    Definition of specific anesthesiologist and interventional radiologist on call for the MT procedure.

  7. 7)

    Preliminary alarm for all team members on hospital admission in case of patients with severe stroke symptoms (APSS ≥ 4) including alerting of the angio suite program manager

  8. 8)

    Definite alarm for all team member at the time of identification of LVO in neuroimaging with the code urgency equivalent to cardiopulmonary arrest

  9. 9)

    IVT in the computertomography (CT) room, equipment for monitoring and IVT stationary in CT room

  10. 10)

    Additional anesthesiologist (resident) for the angio suite

  11. 11)

    Rapid sequence intubation standards and rigid blood pressure targets defined by dedicated standard operating procedure

  12. 12)

    Process monitoring and feedback rounds

For the evaluation of effects of optimization following study endpoints have been defined:

  • Procedure endpoints: Changes of times including ODT, DPT, DRT

  • Early neurological improvement between admission NIHSS and NIHSS at 24–48 h more or equal 8 points

  • Functional outcome (dichotomized mRS 0–2) and mortality at 3 month follow up

  • Radiological outcome (Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3) after MT

Data of patients treated with MT in other comprehensive stroke centers in Austria were extracted from ASUR and used as control group in a sensitivity analysis.

Statistics

Results are presented as median, range, and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables, while categorical variables are summarized by absolute x (n) and relative (%) frequenciesPatients were categorized one group before and after implementation of new workflows. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the locations of continuous and ordinal variables without a normal distribution. Pearson's Chi Square test was comparing frequency and distribution of categorical variables. All statistics were performed using statistical software SPSS, version 27, IBM.

Ethics

The Austrian stroke unit registry is part of a governmental quality assessment program for nationwide stroke care and is financed by the Federal Ministry of Health. Prospective data entry is mandatory for stroke units. All data are anonymized and centrally administered by the Gesundheit Oesterreich GmbH—the national research and planning institute for health care, a competence and funding center of health promotion. All scientific analyses included in this study were approved and supervised by a national academic review board. Based on this setting, informed consent for patients enrolled in the registry was waived.

Results

Study population

Two hundred ninety-nine patients undergoing MT in our stroke center entered the analysis. In this cohort 56% were female with a mean age of 73 (Standard deviation (SD 14) and a median admission NIHSS of 16 (IQR 11, 20). We compared 94 patients treated before and 205 treated after implementation of the workflow optimization protocol. Baseline characteristics differed significantly between both groups. Patients in the after group showed higher rates of risk factors (hypertension 77% vs. 82%, p = 0.070; smoking 15% vs. 24%; p = 0.010; myocardial infarction 11% vs. 19%, p = 0.001). Patients in this group had significant less severe strokes (admission NIHSS 18 vs 16, p = 0.001) and equal levels of pre-stroke independence (mRS 0 74% vs. 69% 0, p = 0.302). The rate of IV tPA administration was significant higher in the before group (76% vs. 54%, p = 0.001). The locations of the artery occlusions were equally distributed in both groups. (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of baseline patient characteristics before and after optimization of the prehospital and intrahospital workflows

Time metrics and outcomes

The implementation of the new workflow led to a significant decrease of all intrahospital pathways (DPT 45 min vs. 31 min (p < 0.001) and DRT 102 versus 75 min, p < 0.001).

The rates of wake-up strokes were equal in both groups (12 (13%) vs. 34 (17%); p = 0.395). Patients in the after group showed significant better radiological outcome (TICI ≥ 2b 71 (75%) versus 153 (87%); p = 0.013) and early neurological improvement of NIHSS ≥ 8 (30(35%) vs. 70(47%), p = 0.04). SICH occurred equally in both groups (n(%): 5(5%) vs. 9(4%), p = 0.724). Functional outcome (mRS 0–2: 17 (18%) vs. 57 (28%); p = 0.067) and mortality (34 (37%) vs. 54 (32%); p = 0.450) at 3 months showed a positive trend, however, did not differ significantly. (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of outcome parameters before and after optimization of the prehospital and intrahospital workflows

Sensitivity analysis using control group including data of patients treated using thrombectomy in other comprehensive stroke centers in Austria

Three thousand eight hundred twenty-four patients treated with thrombectomy in other comprehensive stroke centers between 2013 and 2020 in Austria were used as a control group. The control group included 1898 (49%) female with a mean age of 74 (SD 14). These patients showed comparable onset to door times, however, significant longer intrahospital times as compared to patients treated at Hospital St. John of God (intervention group) (ODT 63 min vs. 63 min, p = 0.166; DPT 99 min vs. 35 min, p < 0.001; DRT 146 min vs. 87 min, p < 0.001). To verify the impact of implementation of the new workflow in our center, we compared with workflow metrics before and after 2016 cumulatively in other stroke centers: The population did not differ significantly in age (n: 73(SD 14) vs 72 (SD 14), p = 0.079), sex (n(%): 168(56%) vs. 1898 (50%); p = 0.088) and baseline characteristics. In contrast to the findings of our center, the time metrics of intrahospital pathways before and after 2016 (DPT 104 versus 98 min, p = 0.190; DRT 151 versus 141 min, p = 0.100) decreased, however, the difference was not significant.

Discussion

We demonstrated that the optimization of intrahospital workflows may lead to a significant reduction of intrahospital time metrics. These results were stable between 2016 and 2020 and were not affected significantly by the COVID19 pandemic. In contrat, intrahospital workflow time benchmarks changed only non-significantly in other centers.

Furthermore, our data showed significant higher rates of neurological improvement and radiological outcome in the after group. Safety endpoint (SICH occurrence) did not differ significantly and was in line with large registry observations [9]. These effects translated into a non-significant trend to better functional outcome at 3 months.

The rate of bridging thrombolysis decreased over time significantly. After the benefits of MT has been proven by MR CLEAN et al. [1] and other trials [10,11,12,13] the rate of MT was increasing and more patients with contraindication to IVT were selected for MT. During the study period the role of IVT in front of MT was controversial [14], we do not suppose it would have affected our results in means of functional outcome.

Every part of the stroke pathways was optimized. We implemented a score (APSS [8]) to detect patients with suspected LVO in the prehospital setting. The reduction of pre-hospital time metrics using APSS has been published previously [15].

The highest potential for pathway optimization between imaging and groin puncture was documented in previous studies [5]. The immediate alert of the interventional radiologist and the anesthesiology team at the time point of the LVO detection seem to reduce the potential time delay in this time window.

Current guidelines recommended a door to puncture time under 90 min [2]. Our center reached significant shorter door to puncture times already before optimization (45 min versus 100 min, p < 0.001) and also significant shorter door to puncture time as compared to the mean of other centers (mean DPT 35 min vs. 99 min, p < 0.001) (data not shown). After implementation of the optimized pathways in our center time metrics could be reduced further for another 14 min. Other European networks reported a reduction of DPT for 15 min after structured stroke simulation [16]. Furthermore, each 5 cases/year increase in MT case volume was associated with 3% shorter door to reperfusion time, up to a case volume of 40 per year [17].

All MTs were performed under general anesthesia using rapid sequence intubation and rigid blood pressure protocols. A meta-analysis of three small, randomized trials indicated more favorable functional outcome using general anesthesia [18] however, later meta-analyses suggested no outcome benefits over non-general anesthesia techniques [19] leaving this topic basically unresolved.

Several limitations have to be mentioned. The indication for MT and treatment time window has broadened significantly during the study period [20] and led to higher rates of advanced neuroimaging and higher MT rates. Together with the learning curve of interventionists and changing endovascular techniques and devices during the study period these factors comprise important unmeasured confounders. Further limitations arise from the retrospective, non-randomized character of the study. Thus, our results have to be interpreted with caution and regard to the above-mentioned limitations. On the other hand, the strength of our study is the rigorously collected prospective dataset reflecting closely the real-world setting in hospitalized acute stroke patients.

Conclusion

Optimization of intrahospital workflows was associated to a significant reduction of time metrics and higher rates of neurological improvement.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJ, van Walderveen MA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PL, van Rooij WJ, van den Berg JS, van Hasselt BA, Aerden LA, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JC, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder TH, Heijboer RJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Beenen LF, van den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YB, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CB, Dippel DW; MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411587. Epub 2014 Dec 17. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):394.

  2. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344–418. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30. Erratum in: Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e440-e441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Santana Baskar P, Cordato D, Wardman D, Bhaskar S. In-hospital acute stroke workflow in acute stroke - Systems-based approaches. Acta Neurol Scand. 2021;143(2):111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chowdhury SZ, Baskar PS, Bhaskar S. Effect of prehospital workflow optimization on treatment delays and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2021;28(7):781–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baskar PS, Chowdhury SZ, Bhaskar SMM. In-hospital systems interventions in acute stroke reperfusion therapy: a meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2021;144(4):418–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brainin M, Steiner M, Austrian Stroke Registry for Acute Stroke Units. Acute stroke units in Austria are being set up on a national level following evidence-based recommendations and structural quality criteria. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15(Suppl 1):29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bluhmki E, Chamorro A, Dávalos A, Machnig T, Sauce C, Wahlgren N, Wardlaw J, Hacke W. Stroke treatment with alteplase given 3.0–4.5 h after onset of acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS III): additional outcomes and subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(12):1095–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krebs S, Roth D, Knoflach M, Baubin M, Lang W, Beisteiner R, Purrucker J, Poli S, Sykora M. Design and Derivation of the Austrian Prehospital Stroke Scale (APSS) to predict severe stroke with large vessel occlusion. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021;25(6):790–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabrera-Maqueda JM, Alba-Isasi MT, Díaz-Pérez J, Albert-Lacal L, Morales A, Parrilla G. Bridging therapy and occlusion site influence symptomatic hemorrhage rate after thrombectomy: a daily practice study in 623 stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;50(3):279–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Roy D, Jovin TG, Willinsky RA, Sapkota BL, Dowlatshahi D, Frei DF, Kamal NR, Montanera WJ, Poppe AY, Ryckborst KJ, Silver FL, Shuaib A, Tampieri D, Williams D, Bang OY, Baxter BW, Burns PA, Choe H, Heo JH, Holmstedt CA, Jankowitz B, Kelly M, Linares G, Mandzia JL, Shankar J, Sohn SI, Swartz RH, Barber PA, Coutts SB, Smith EE, Morrish WF, Weill A, Subramaniam S, Mitha AP, Wong JH, Lowerison MW, Sajobi TT, Hill MD, ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1019–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, Yan B, Dowling RJ, Parsons MW, Oxley TJ, Wu TY, Brooks M, Simpson MA, Miteff F, Levi CR, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Faulder KC, Steinfort BS, Priglinger M, Ang T, Scroop R, Barber PA, McGuinness B, Wijeratne T, Phan TG, Chong W, Chandra RV, Bladin CF, Badve M, Rice H, de Villiers L, Ma H, Desmond PM, Donnan GA, Davis SM, EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1009–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, Albers GW, Cognard C, Cohen DJ, Hacke W, Jansen O, Jovin TG, Mattle HP, Nogueira RG, Siddiqui AH, Yavagal DR, Baxter BW, Devlin TG, Lopes DK, Reddy VK, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Singer OC, Jahan R; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285–95.

  13. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A, San Román L, Serena J, Abilleira S, Ribó M, Millán M, Urra X, Cardona P, López-Cancio E, Tomasello A, Castaño C, Blasco J, Aja L, Dorado L, Quesada H, Rubiera M, Hernandez-Pérez M, Goyal M, Demchuk AM, von Kummer R, Gallofré M, Dávalos A, REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2296–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer U, Kaesmacher J, S Plattner P, Bütikofer L, Mordasini P, Deppeler S, Cognard C, Pereira VM, Siddiqui AH, Froehler MT, Furlan AJ, Chapot R, Strbian D, Wiesmann M, Bressan J, Lerch S, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Gralla J, SWIFT DIRECT study investigators. SWIFT DIRECT: solitaire™ with the intention for thrombectomy plus intravenous t-PA versus DIRECT Solitaire™ stent-retriever thrombectomy in acute anterior circulation stroke: methodology of a randomized, controlled, multicentre study. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(6):698–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krebs S, Sykora M, Krammel M, Girsa M, Auer A, Greisenegger S, Neumann C, Beisteiner R, Lang W, Roth D. Prehospital triage optimization of patients with large vessel occlusion by Austrian prehospital stroke scale. Acta Neurol Scand. 2022;146(3):246–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bohmann FO, Tahtali D, Kurka N, Wagner M, You SJ, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Berkefeld J, Hartmetz AK, Kuhlmann A, Lorenz MW, Schütz A, Kress B, Henke C, Tritt S, Meyding-Lamadé U, Steinmetz H, Pfeilschifter W. A network-wide stroke team program reduces time to treatment for endovascular stroke therapy in a regional stroke-network. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(3–4):141–148.

  17. Menon BK, Xu H, Cox M, Saver JL, Goyal M, Peterson E, Xian Y, Matsuoka R, Jehan R, Yavagal D, Gupta R, Mehta B, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, Smith EE. Components and trends in door to treatment times for endovascular therapy in get with the guidelines-stroke hospitals. Circulation. 2019;139(2):169–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schönenberger S, Möhlenbruch M, Pfaff J, Mundiyanapurath S, Kieser M, Bendszus M, Hacke W, Bösel J. Sedation vs Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment (SIESTA) - a randomized monocentric trial. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(6):969–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schönenberger S, Hendén PL, Simonsen CZ, Uhlmann L, Klose C, Pfaff JAR, Yoo AJ, Sørensen LH, Ringleb PA, Wick W, Kieser M, Möhlenbruch MA, Rasmussen M, Rentzos A, Bösel J. Association of general anesthesia vs procedural sedation with functional outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019;322(13):1283–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11455. Erratum in: JAMA. 2019 Dec 24;322(24):2445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nannoni S, Strambo D, Sirimarco G, Amiguet M, Vanacker P, Eskandari A, Saliou G, Wintermark M, Dunet V, Michel P. Eligibility for late endovascular treatment using DAWN, DEFUSE-3, and more liberal selection criteria in a stroke center. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(9):842–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None of the remaining authors received funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.K. drafted manuscript, performed statistics, J.F. data quality management, data aquisition, A.S. data aquisition, A.C. supervision, manuscript drafting. C.N. reviewed radiological results, manuscript drafting. W.L. study design, supervision. M.S. study design, statistics, manuscript drafting, supervision. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Sykora.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The need for written informed consent was waived by the ethics committee of the Hospital St. John of God due to retrospective nature of the study. The study is approved by the Ethics committee of the Hospital St. John of God. All analyses were performed in accordance with current GCP guidelines and the Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No Author reported any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krebs, S., Ferrari, J., Schürer, A. et al. Pre-hospital and intrahospital workflow optimization for patients with suspected ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion - findings from a tertiary care facility. BMC Neurol 22, 497 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-03033-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-03033-1

Keywords

  • LVO
  • Mechanical thrombectomy
  • Ischaemic stroke
  • Workflow