Skip to main content

Changes in electrophysiological findings of spinal muscular atrophy type I after the administration of nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec: two case reports

Abstract

Background

Recently, there have been significant advances in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Although clinical improvement in patients with SMA after the treatment has been reported, changes in electrophysiological findings, especially needle electromyography (EMG), have rarely been reported. Herein, we report the posttreatment changes in EMG and nerve conduction study findings over time in two patients with SMA type I.

Case presentation

Patient 1: A 2.5-year-old girl was diagnosed with SMA type I at 1 month of age. She received nusinersen four times and onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) was administered at 6 months of age. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes of the median and tibial nerves increased over time. The needle EMG after the treatment showed high-amplitude motor unit potentials (MUPs) suggestive of reinnervation during voluntary contraction, which were not seen before the treatment. However, fibrillation potentials at rest were still seen after the treatment. Patient 2: A 2-year-old girl was diagnosed with SMA type I at 6 months of age. She had received nusinersen two times and OA was administered at 7 months of age. The CMAP amplitudes and the MUPs presented similar changes as presented in Case 1.

Conclusion

This is the first report on the changes in needle EMG findings after treatment in patients with SMA type I. These findings suggested that peripheral nerve reinnervation occurred after the treatment, although active denervation was still present. The accumulation of these findings will be important for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for SMA in the future.

Peer Review reports

Background

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder caused by deletions or variants in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, and approximately 95% of all patients with this condition have a homozygous SMN1 deletion [1, 2]. It causes motor neuron degeneration and progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, resulting in significant motor disability, respiratory and swallowing dysfunction. It is classified into types 1 through 4 based on the age of onset, symptoms, and maximum motor milestones achieved [3]. Patients diagnosed with SMA type 1, known as Werdnig–Hoffmann disease, display symptoms in the first 6 months of infancy, and never achieve the ability to sit independently. The neighboring SMN2 can, in part, compensate for nonfunctional SMN1; hence, higher SMN2 copy numbers in SMA are associated with later onset and milder phenotypes [4, 5].

Recently, there have been significant advances in the therapeutic field, and three different drugs have been approved [6]. Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide drug, and risdiplam, a small-molecule drug, modify the pre-mRNA splicing of SMN2 to increase the production of functional SMN, albeit by different mechanisms [7, 8]. The other therapy known as onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) is a form of adeno-associated virus serotype 9 vector-based gene therapy delivering a transgene encoding human SMN proteins [9, 10]. Although clinical improvement in patients with SMA after these treatments has been reported [7,8,9,10], changes in electrophysiological findings have rarely been reported. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes in nerve conduction study (NCS) of patients with SMA type I treated with nusinersen or OA have been reported to increase over time compared to nontreated patients [7, 9]. However, changes in needle electromyography (EMG) findings after these treatments have not yet been reported. In this paper, we report changes in NCS and needle EMG findings over time in two cases with SMA type I after treatment with nusinersen and OA.

Case presentation

Patient 1

The proband was born to nonconsanguineous parents at 37 weeks of gestation. She was noted to have muscle hypotonia during the 1-month medical checkup appointment and was referred to our hospital. Her physical examination revealed muscle hypotonia and weakness, wrist drop, tongue fasciculations, and the absence of limb tendon reflex. She was able to lift only her forearm against gravity, but unable to lift her upper arms and lower limbs. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification of the SMN showed homo deletions of SMN1 exons 7 and 8 and two copies of the SMN2; thus, she was diagnosed with SMA type I. She had received nusinersen four times since she was 2 months old, and OA was administered at 6 months of age. After the treatment, she got to be able to lift her entire upper limbs against gravity first compared to her lower limbs. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) score was 18 at 2 months (before nusinersen started), 37 at 6 months (before OA was administered), 46 at 1 year (6 months after OA), and 58 at 2 years (18 months after OA). She acquired head control at 10 months, sitting without support at 1 year, and rolling over at 1 year and 7 months. She is now 2 and a half years old and training to stand using a long leg brace (Table 1). She has had no problems with respiratory or swallowing function.

Table 1 CHOP-INTEND score, motor development, and CMAP amplitudes of the median and tibial nerves in two patients

In NCS, motor nerve responses were evoked under intravenous sodium thiopental-induced sleep, while the skin temperature was kept higher than 31 °C. In needle EMG, a needle was inserted into deltoid and rectus femoris muscles during intravenous sodium thiopental-induced sleep. After recording at rest, we awakened the patient and recorded the examination of voluntary contraction. The CMAP amplitudes of the median and tibial motor nerves at 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years of age are shown in Table 1. Although the CMAP amplitudes of both nerves were very low before nusinersen started, they increased over time after the treatment, and that of the tibial nerve reached the normal range 18 months after OA administration. The MCVs of these nerves were always in the normal range. The F-wave evaluation was not performed because she was sedated. The needle EMG showed fibrillation potentials at rest in both the deltoid and rectus femoris muscles at 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years of age. During voluntary weak contractions, the amplitudes of motor unit potentials (MUPs) were mostly around 0.5 mV at 2 months of age; however, the MUPs at 1 year and 2 years of age showed high amplitudes that reached 7–8 mV (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The needle EMG findings in the deltoid muscles during voluntary weak contractions in two patients

1a: In patient 1, the amplitudes of the MUPs were mostly around 0.5mV at 2 months of age (left), but the MUPs at 1 year of age showed very high amplitude, reaching 7–8 mV (right)

1b: In patient 2, the amplitudes of the MUPs were mostly around 0.5mV at 6 months of age (left), but the MUPs at 1 year of age showed very high amplitude, reaching 6–7 mV (right)

Patient 2

The proband was born to nonconsanguineous parents at 37 weeks of gestation. Her parents observed that she had little limb movement. She was hospitalized at 6 months of age with atelectasis due to a common cold. She showed muscle hypotonia and weakness, and no antigravity movement of her upper and lower limbs. She also showed tongue fasciculations and paradoxical breathing. She was referred to our hospital and diagnosed with SMA type I, with homo deletions of SMN1 exons 7 and 8, and two copies of the SMN2. She had received nusinersen twice and OA was administered at 7 months of age. The CHOP-INTEND score was 15 at 6 months (before nusinersen started), 16 at 7 months (before OA was administered), 43 at 1 year (5 months after OA), and 49 at 2 years (17 months after OA) (Table 1). She revealed poor oxygenation at night at 1 year and 2 months of age and noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation was introduced. She had been fed through a gastric tube since she was 6 months old; however, she was able to take oral nutrition fully at 1 and a half years old. She has acquired rolling to side, but not acquired head control at her current age of 2 years.

NCS and needle EMG were performed in the same manner as in patient 1. The CMAP amplitudes of the median and tibial nerves at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of age are shown in Table 1. The MCVs of these nerves were always in the normal range. The F-wave evaluation was not done because she was sedated. Needle EMG revealed her fibrillation potential at rest in both the deltoid and rectus femoris muscles at 6 months and 1 year of age. During voluntary weak contractions, the amplitudes of the MUPs were mostly around 0.5 mV at 6 months; however, the MUPs at 1 year revealed a high amplitude that reached 6–7 mV (Fig. 1b).

Informed consent was obtained from the parents of each patient for the use of their child’s data.

Discussion and conclusion

We report changes in NCS and needle EMG findings over time in two cases with SMA type I treated with nusinersen and OA in this paper. NCS in patients with SMA typically shows decreased CMAP amplitudes reflecting chronic motor axonal degeneration, and CMAP amplitudes correlated with clinical severity and age [2, 11, 12]. The peroneal CMAP amplitude was reported to increase in infantile-onset SMA treated with nusinersen compared to the nontreated SMA [7]; the same has been reported for the ulnar CMAP in SMA treated with OA [9]. In our patients, the CMAP amplitudes of the median and tibial motor nerves were significantly lower than those of healthy children of the same age before the treatment [13]. However, they increased over time after the treatment and some of them reached the normal range. Previous papers have reported that patients with SMA gain better motor development, the earlier they are treated [7], and that patients with symptomatic SMA who received nusinersen showed a significant increase in CMAP and motor unit number estimation was more increased in patients with shorter disease durations [14]. The treatment was initiated earlier in patient 1 (2 months old) than in patient 2 (6 months old), so patient 1 probably had better acquisition of motor development and more elevated CMAP amplitude of the tibial nerve. In patient 1, the CMAP amplitude of the tibial nerve had better recovery compared to the median nerve. However, clinical improvement was greater in the upper limbs, so the difference in the degree of improvement in CMAP between upper and lower limbs may not necessarily reflect the degree of clinical improvement.

In contrast, the changes in needle EMG findings after these therapeutic interventions have not yet been reported. Needle EMG in patients with SMA reveals abnormal spontaneous activity, including fibrillation potentials at rest reflecting active denervation and long durations and high amplitudes of MUPs during voluntary contraction reflecting chronic compensatory changes of reinnervation. However, in severely affected patients like SMA type I, MUPs may reveal reduced amplitudes and durations because of severe active denervation [2]. McDonald described that MUPs were lower in infants with amplitudes ranging from 150 µV to approximately 2000 µV, and generally MUPs more than 1000 µV in 0–3-year-old children are rare [15]. In our patients, needle EMG after the treatment showed high-amplitude MUPs that reached 6–8 mV during voluntary weak contractions, which were not seen before the treatment. It is known that high-amplitude MUPs are seen when nerve reinnervation occurs after denervation [16]; so, it is suggested that peripheral nerve reinnervation occurs after these treatments, but it does not necessarily prove recovery of motor neurons. In fact, fibrillation potentials suggestive of denervation were still seen in both patients. There are no reports on the changes in needle EMG findings in patients with SMA after the treatment; so, we need to follow how these reinnervation and denervation findings change. The accumulation of these findings will be important for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for SMA in the future.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this report are available from the corresponding author, TM, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. D’Amico A, Mercuri E, Tiziano FD, Bertini E. Spinal muscular atrophy. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-6-71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold WD, Kassar D, Kissel JT. Spinal muscular atrophy: diagnosis and management in a new therapeutic era. Muscle Nerve. 2015;51:157–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Munstat TL, Davies KE. International SMA consortium meeting. Neuromuscul Disord. 1992;2:423–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8966(06)80015-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lefebvre S, Burglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995;80:155–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calucho M, Bernal S, Alias L, March F, Vencesla A, Rodriguez-Alvarez FJ, et al. Correlation between SMA type and SMN2 copy number revisited: an analysis of 625 unrelated spanish patients and a compilation of 2834 reported cases. Neuromuscul Dis. 2018;28:208–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2018.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schorling DC, Pechmann A, Kirschner J. Advances in treatment of spinal muscular atrophy - new phenotypes, new challenges, new implications for care. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2020;7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/JND-190424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1723–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Darras BT, Masson R, Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska M, Rose K, Xiong H, Zanoteli E, et al. Risdiplam-treated infants with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy versus historical controls. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:427–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2102047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Zeaidy SA, Kolb SJ, Lowes L, Alfano LN, Shell R, Church KR, et al. AVXS-101 (onasemnogene abeparvovec) for SMA1: comparative study with a prospective natural history cohort. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2019;6:307–17. https://doi.org/10.3233/JND-190403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendell JR, Al-Zaidy SA, Lehman KJ, McColly M, Lowes LP, Alfano LN, et al. Five-year extension results of the phase 1 START trial of onasemnogene abeparvovec in spinal muscular atrophy. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78:834–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swoboda KJ, Prior TW, Scott CB, McNaught TP, Wride MC, Reyna SP, et al. Natural history of denervation in SMA: relation to age, SMN2 copy number, and function. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:704–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yonekawa T, Komaki H, Saito Y, Sugai K, Sasaki M. Peripheral nerve abnormalities in pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Brain Dev. 2013;35:165–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2012.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan CS, Conlee EM, Sharma R, Sorenson EJ, Boon AJ, Laughlin RS. Nerve conduction normal values for electrodiagnosis in pediatric patients. Muscle Nerve 2019;60:155–160. doi: 10.1002/mus.26499.

  14. Kariyawasam D, D’Silva A, Howells J, Herbert K, Geelan-Small P, Lin CS,. Motor unit changes in children with symptomatic spinal muscular atrophy treated with nusinersen. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;92:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324254.

  15. McDonald CM. Electrodiagnosis in pediatrics. Musculoskeletal Key. https://musculoskeletalkey.com/electrodiagnosis-in-pediatrics/ Accessed 14 May 2023.

  16. Rubin DI. Normal and abnormal voluntary activity. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160:281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00018-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI under the grant numbers JP19K08316 (T. M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TM conceived the idea of the study, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. TK contributed to electrophysiological study and analysis and evaluation of the results. YT, KH, RE and TS collected the data. KK and TM supervised the conduct of the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript and revised it on intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoko Mizuno.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors declare that that the study complies with the ethical requirements of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University. The Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University has confirmed that ethical approval is not required for a case report. Informed parental consents to participate were obtained from the individual included in the study.

Consent for publication

The author has received the written informed consent from the parents of each patient for publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mizuno, T., Kanouchi, T., Tamura, Y. et al. Changes in electrophysiological findings of spinal muscular atrophy type I after the administration of nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec: two case reports. BMC Neurol 23, 392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03420-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03420-2

Keywords