Skip to main content
Download PDF

Early antithrombotic therapy in patients with postinterventional cerebral hyperdensity reduces early neurological deterioration after mechanical thrombectomy

BMC Neurology volume 23, Article number: 443 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Initiation of early antithrombotic therapy after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is crucial. We aimed to investigate whether early antithrombotic therapy influences early neurological deterioration (END) in AIS patients with postinterventional cerebral hyperdensity (PCHD) immediately after mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 108 consecutive anterior circulation AIS patients with PCHD immediately after MT. All patients were divided into END group and non-END group and END was defined as an increase of four points or more on the postinterventional National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score within the first 72 h after MT. Early antithrombotic therapy was defined as patients with PCHD who received antithrombotic therapy within 24 h after MT. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the association between early antithrombotic therapy and the risk of END.

Results

Among 108 patients, 27 (25%) patients developed END. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that early use of antithrombotic therapy (OR = 0.229, 95%CI = 0.083–0.626, P = 0.004) was an independent protector of END and postinterventional low density shadow exceeding 1/3 of the vascular territory (OR = 4.000, 95%CI = 1.157–13.834, P = 0.029) was an independent risk factor for END.

Conclusion

Antithrombotic therapy within 24 h after MT maybe associated with the reduced risk of END in anterior circulation AIS patients with PCHD.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a prevalent disease with high morbidity, disability, and mortality rates all around the world [1]. Currently, endovascular thrombectomy (MT) and thrombolysis are the most efficient treatments for AIS. But nearly 20% of patients who undergo MT will experience neurological deterioration within the first 72 h, partially as a result of vascular reocclusion [2]. According to a recent meta-analysis, 3–9% of AIS patients experienced vascular reocclusion within 24 h after MT, which is strongly associated with clinical deterioration and poor prognosis [3, 4]. Taking antithrombotic medicines as early as possible is crucial to prevent vascular reocclusion and thereby improve functional outcomes. However, it has been estimated that postinterventional cerebral hyperdensity (PCHD) may occur in up to 86% of AIS patients after MT [5]. Although 73–79% of them are contrast extravasation and only a small part is hemorrhagic transformation (HT) with no space-occupying effect, the use of antithrombotic drugs is still limited [6].

In general, the contrast extravasation and HT are distinguished by the high-density absorption of the non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) reassessment 24 h later. Although few hospitals have dual energy CT system that can tell the difference between HT and contrast extravasation, the positive predictive value of diagnostic accuracy of dual energy CT ranges from 33 to 100%, making it impossible to distinguish between the two accurately in most hospitals [7]. Although some doctors may prescribe antithrombotic treatments for PCHD patients, many are hesitant to do so for the few HT with no space-occupying effect in PCHD, which varies among doctors and hospitals [8].

Different pathophysiological pathways underlie HT and intracerebral hemorrhage [9, 10]. According to certain research, taking antithrombotic medications while having an asymptomatic HT will not result in more bleeding [11]. Moreover, a multicenter study also confirmed that early antiplatelet therapy is associated with a lower risk of END and a better neurological outcome in AIS patients when HT occurs after intravenous thrombolysis [12]. However, there has been no study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using antithrombotic medications following PCHD. Consequently, many PCHD patients are unable to take antithrombotic medications within 24 h after MT due to the lack of evidence-based medical evidence.

In recent years, some PCHD patients in our center have received antithrombotic therapy within 24 h after MT. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between early antithrombotic medication and early neurological deterioration (END) in anterior circulation AIS patients with PCHD after MT.

Materials and methods

Patients recruitment

This retrospective observational study was conducted in our hospital, a tertiary teaching hospital affiliated with Fudan University. We prospectively screened all AIS patients receiving MT from January 2019 to July 2022. The inclusion criteria were as follows: [1] aged 18 years or older; [2] patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, which consist of internal carotid artery (ICA), M1 segment of middle cerebral artery, M2 segment of middle cerebral artery, and A1 segment of anterior cerebral artery; [3] performed C-arm computed tomography (CT) immediately following MT in the operating room; [4] high density on the brain CT immediately following MT which met the standard diagnosis criteria for PCHD. Patients were disqualified if they fulfilled the following requirements: [1] acute renal insufficiency, severe infectious fever, diabetic ketoacidosis, and acute heart failure that might exacerbate symptoms; [2] lack of available data. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of our hospital (ref. no. 2022-043-01 K).

Data collection and imaging analysis

All data were collected prospectively. PCHD is defined as non-solid visually distinct parenchymal hyperdense areas found on the first postinterventional CT immediately following MT, with a surface area of at least 0.1 cm3, an increased density of at least 5 HU in comparison to the unaffected contralateral side, without a space-occupying effect, and adhering to the grey-white matter boundaries of typical anatomic structures(13). MT procedures included stent retrievers (SR) thrombectomy, contact aspiration (CA), or combined SR and CA. When the forward flow was difficult to maintain or the artery dissection was found during the operation, the treatment of stent implantation would be performed. For PCHD patients with successful reperfusion and without residual severe stenosis, the preoperative blood pressure was controlled to about 120–150/60–100 mmHg.

Antithrombotic therapy of PCHD patients following MT in this study was performed as follows. Considering the hyperdense without a space-occupying effect on the CT and the intraoperative heparinization, tirofiban (a maintenance dose of 0.2-0.3 mg/h for about 24 h without a loading dose and overlap with oral dual antiplatelet therapy for 4–6 h) was given only in the case of stent implantation and residual severe stenosis. For other atherosclerotic occlusion patients, oral dual antiplatelet therapy without a loading dose was given as soon as possible in 24 h. While for cardioembolic patients, oral antiplatelet therapy without a loading dose was performed (compared to dual antiplatelet therapy, single antiplatelet therapy was applied only to some cardioembolic patients with severe stroke symptom and low density on CT > 1/3 vascular territory after MT), and the time of initiating oral anticoagulant therapy (overlapping with low-molecular‐weight heparin in some cases, especially when warfarin was used) was determined by residual infarction volume and the stroke severity after MT. Oral antiplatelet agents were chosen from aspirin (100 mg/day), clopidogrel (75 mg/day), and cilostazol (100 mg twice daily, with a starting dose of 50 mg twice daily). Aspirin combined with clopidogrel is used as a conventional oral dual antiplatelet therapy. When aspirin or clopidogrel was contraindicated, cilostazol was prescribed as an alternative. When oral single antiplatelet therapy was chosen, the sequence of drug applications would be aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol. Oral anticoagulant agents used in our department included warfarin (overlapping with low‐molecular‐weight heparin for at least 5 days and titrating with an INR range of 2–3), dabigatran (110 mg twice daily), and rivaroxaban (15 mg/day). Warfarin was usually used in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation, while either dabigatran or rivaroxaban was applied in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Low‐molecular‐weight heparin used in our department included enoxaparin (20–40 mg twice daily) and nadroparin (2050–4100 anti-Xa units twice daily). In particular, note that these antithrombotic strategies for PCHD patients were applied to some patients in 24 h, while others got antithrombotic medications after 24 h follow-up CT or even later CT re-examination. Because some attendings in our department were also worried about the safety and efficacy of early antithrombotic medication in AIS patients with PCHD.

Onset to reperfusion time (OTR), door to puncture time (DTP), and stroke subtype were evaluated by experienced neurologists. The Trial of Org 10,172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria were used to classify stroke subtypes. Stroke nurses gathered demographic and baseline information on patients with age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. In addition to baseline data such as stroke subtype and atrial fibrillation, postoperative stent implantation and residual stenosis were also collected to adjust for the effect of the relationship between antithrombotic and END.

A cranial non-contrast CT scan was usually conducted upon admission, immediately after MT, and during postoperative follow-up. Low density on immediate cranial non-contrast CT after MT was to assess the postinterventional obvious ischemia, and the TICI score was applied to the MT angiography to assess the degree of recanalization. The TICI score of 2b or 3 was considered successful recanalization. Massive cerebral infarction is defined as the low density shadow of head CT immediately after MT exceeding 1/3 of the vascular territory [13]. The initial occlusion site was evaluated by head and neck CT angiography before MT and confirmed by digital cerebral angiography of the occluded vessel. All the images were analyzed by two experienced neurologists who were blind to clinical features and study outcomes. In case of disagreement, images were reviewed until a consensus was reached.

Clinical outcome

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used to evaluate stroke severity before MT, immediately after MT, 72 h following MT, and whenever there is a deterioration in neurological function. END was defined as an increase of four points or more on the postinterventional NHISS score within the first 72 h after MT.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 26.0, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). All patients were divided into END group and non-END group. Normal-distribution continuous data were reported as mean ± SD and compared using the t-test, whereas non-normal-distribution continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were presented numerically (percentages, %) and compared between the groups using the relevant Fisher exact or Pearson χ 2 tests. A subsequent multivariate logistic regression analysis included the variables for which P<0.1 in the univariate analysis. P<0.05 (two-sided) was used to determine statistical significance.

Results

Clinical characteristics of patients

During the study period, we collected 308 consecutive AIS patients receiving MT. Among all the patients who received MT, PCHD occurred in 121 (39.3%) patients. After excluding patients with severe infectious fever (n = 1), acute renal insufficiency (n = 1), acute heart failure (n = 2), and posterior circulation stroke (n = 9), there were 108 patients included in this study. Figure 1 shows a diagram depicting study recruitment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagram of the study recruitment

Full size image

There were 73 (67.6%) men and 35 (32.4%) women, aged 25 to 96 (68.56 ± 14.32) years. Antithrombotic therapy was applied to 51 (47.2%) patients with PCHD within 24 h after MT. Vascular risk factors included diabetes mellitus (n = 63, 58.3%), atrial fibrillation (n = 52, 48.1%), hypertension (n = 65, 60.2%), and smoking (n = 23, 21.3%). All patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they had END or not. END occurred in 27 (25.0%) of the 108 patients. Patients in the END group had more portion of low density on CT > 1/3 vascular territory (33.3% vs. 11.1% P = 0.027) than those in the non-END group, and they showed more severe neurological deficits before MT (NHISS score 19.00 vs. 16.00, P = 0.014). Antithrombotic treatment was used less frequently in the END group than in the non-END group within 24 h after MT (22.2% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.003, illustrated Fig. 2). Demographic features and risk factors are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Antithrombotic therapy use in END and non-END groups

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of PCHD patients according to the presence/absence of END
Full size table

Multivariate regression analysis of factors related to END

Variables with P < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. After adjusting for potential confounders(NIHSS scores before MT, diabetes mellitus, stent implantation, and low density on CT after MT), multivariate analysis revealed that the use of antithrombotic therapy within 24 h after MT (OR = 0.229, 95%CI = 0.083–0.626, P = 0.004) was an independent protector of END and low density shadow exceeding 1/3 of the vascular territory (OR = 4.000, 95%CI = 1.157–13.834, P = 0.029) was an independent risk factor for END (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate Regression Analysis of Factors Related to END
Full size table

Forest plot of odds ratios for END

As shown in Fig. 3, forest plot revealed that low density > 1/3 vascular territory was a risk factor for END, whereas antithrombotic therapy was a protective factor (P < 0.05). Other indicators did not achieve statistical significance.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot of odds ratios for END

Full size image

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, PCHD may be a meaningful concept which hasn’t been widely recognized, and our manuscript is the first study to investigate the relationship between early antithrombotic therapy and END in PCHD patients. Early antithrombotic therapy decreased the occurrence of END in patients with PCHD, and we also discovered that low CT density in more than one-third of the vascular territory following MT is an independent risk factor of END.

PCHD is a common complication following interventional stroke therapy [14]. The degree of PCHD corresponding to bleeding or contrast staining is unclear. When ischemia damage is restricted to the endothelial cell layer, PCHD is assumed to be contrast staining. However, PCHD may also be associated with hemorrhagic transformation when ischemia damage impairs the basal lamina [15, 16]. Although contrast extravasation occurs in 73–79% of PCHD, the remaining few HT without a space-occupying effect remains a major concern for antithrombotic therapy after MT [6]. Some studies have recommended distinguishing hemorrhage from contrast based on whether or not PCHD persists after 24 h or have advocated density criteria to predict (> 90 HU) or rule out (50 HU) underlying hemorrhage on follow-up CT [17, 18]. However, there are no accurate density thresholds on immediate postinterventional CT that make it possible to reliably distinguish between hemorrhage and contrast staining with acceptable specificity and sensitivity. In our study, the incidence of PCHD on immediate CT following MT was 39.3%, which was consistent with the incidence of PCHD reported by others (31.2–84.2%) [5, 19,20,21].

After the use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and MT treatments, stroke care has shifted toward hyperacute stage management [22]. END is a prevalent and dreaded post-treatment consequence. Additionally, END is always associated with a poor three-month clinical prognosis, necessitating attentive and frequent monitoring of these stroke patients [23, 24]. The incidence of END in AIS ranges from 4.3 to 30% following MT therapy [2, 25, 26]. Our study demonstrates that the incidence of END was 25% after MT in anterior circulation stroke patients with PCHD. Furthermore, patients with PCHD who did not receive antithrombotic therapy had a 36.8% incidence of END, while those who did had a much lower 22.2% incidence. However, according to a recent research, 46.8% of patients with PCHD after MT experienced END [20]. The difference may be explained by the fact that antithrombotic therapy reduces the occurrence of END.

Many studies have demonstrated the use of antithrombotics in AIS patients can reduce the incidence of END. A previous observational study showed that taking aspirin when a stroke first occurred reduced the incidence of END by 97% [27]. A prospective cohort study also confirmed that pre-stroke aspirin use was independently associated with a lower incidence of END in AIS patients with atherothrombosis [28]. Moreover, It has also been proved that dual antiplatelet therapy is superior to single therapy in the early treatment of AIS [29]. Moreover, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy also dramatically decreased the incidence of END in patients with acute non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, particularly those with large-artery stenosis [30]. For patients with AIS and large artery occlusive disease, treatment with LMWH within 48 h of stroke may reduce END during the first 10 days, mainly by preventing stroke progression [31]. Most recently, a multicenter study demonstrated that antiplatelet therapy did not increase the risk of hemorrhage expansion when HT was present [12]. These findings imply that antithrombotic therapy is beneficial in the treatment of ischemic stroke.

PCHD is thought to indicate varying degrees of ischemia damage to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), including contrast extravasation and HT [6, 32, 33]. The fundamental goal of a postinterventional CT is to rule out hemorrhage, therefore the presence of PCHD poses a diagnostic dilemma that may prevent the patient from receiving further treatment, such as the rapid initiation of antiplatelet therapy or the administration of anticoagulants [34, 35]. According to some studies, HT and intracerebral hemorrhage are caused by various pathophysiological mechanisms. Destruction of the blood-brain barrier is the pathological basis of hemorrhage transformation [36, 37]. Nevertheless, intracerebral hemorrhage is mostly caused by the localized dilatation or necrosis of the artery wall brought on by chronic hypertension, resulting in the formation of miliary microaneurysms and an increase in the fragility of the artery wall. When the blood pressure of a patient suddenly rises, the cerebral artery ruptures and bleeds [38]. Prior research has shown that early antiplatelet therapy is associated with a lower risk of END and a better neurological outcome in AIS patients when HT occurs after intravenous thrombolysis [12]. The 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke also pointed out that the decision to initiate or continue antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy can be made based on clinical evaluation results (IIB/-NR) [39]. Moreover, RESTART randomized trial found that antithrombotic therapy is beneficial for patients with a history of intracerebral hemorrhage [40]. Therefore, it makes sense that antithrombotic therapy can be safe and reduce END in PCHD patients following MT.

There are some strengths in our study. First, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first article that has specifically focused on whether antithrombotic therapy within 24 h in PCHD patients with anterior circulation stroke after MT could reduce the incidence of END. Second, to make sure that our results were as accurate as feasible, we did not include posterior circulation stroke and medical comorbidities that could lead to neurological deterioration in our analysis. However, our study also has some limitations that need to be considered. First, this analysis was performed retrospectively and without blinding, which has a chance of selection bias. Second, our study was single-center and limited in sample size, which means that despite rigorous adjustment for potentially confounding factors, we cannot eliminate the possibility of residual confounding in this observational study. And the findings should be validated in Large-scale prospective studies.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that early antithrombotic therapy is associated with reduced risk of END in anterior circulation AIS patients with PCHD after MT. A further multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial is warranted to confirm our findings.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AIS:

Acute ischemic stroke

END:

Early neurological deterioration

PCHD:

Postinterventional cerebral hyperdensity

MT:

Mechanical thrombectomy

NIHSS:

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

HT:

Hemorrhagic transformation

CT:

Computed tomography

OTR:

Onset to reperfusion time

DTP:

Door to puncture time

TOAST:

Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment

References

  1. Collaborators GN. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):459–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen NH, Zhang YM, Jiang FP, Liu S, Zhao HD, Hou JK, et al. FLAIR vascular hyperintensity predicts early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic Stroke receiving endovascular thrombectomy. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(6):3747–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li X, Gu F, Ding J, Bian J, Wang N, Shu R, et al. The predictors and prognosis for unexpected reocclusion after mechanical thrombectomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(23):1566.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Saqqur M, Molina CA, Salam A, Siddiqui M, Ribo M, Uchino K, et al. Clinical deterioration after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment: a multicenter transcranial Doppler study. Stroke. 2007;38(1):69–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tijssen M, Hofman P, Stadler A, van Zwam W, de Graaf R, van Oostenbrugge R, et al. The role of dual energy CT in differentiating between brain haemorrhage and contrast medium after mechanical revascularisation in acute ischaemic Stroke. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(4):834–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. You SH, Kim B, Kim BK, Suh SI. MR Imaging for differentiating contrast staining from Hemorrhagic Transformation after Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute ischemic Stroke: Phantom and Patient Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(12):2313–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi Y, Shin NY, Jang J, Ahn KJ, Kim BS. Dual-energy CT for differentiating acute intracranial Hemorrhage from contrast staining or calcification: a meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 2020;62(12):1617–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Almqvist H, Holmin S, Mazya MV. Dual energy CT after Stroke thrombectomy alters assessment of hemorrhagic Complications. Neurology. 2019;93(11):e1068–e75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho KH, You SH, Cho BH, Yu S, Park HK, Cho AH. Differentiation of hemorrhagic infarction from primary intracerebral Hemorrhage in the chronic period. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;79:118–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Niesen WD, Schläger A, Reinhard M, Fuhrer H. Transcranial sonography to Differentiate Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage from Cerebral Infarction with Hemorrhagic Transformation. J Neuroimaging. 2018;28(4):370–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. England TJ, Bath PM, Sare GM, Geeganage C, Moulin T, O’Neill D, et al. Asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation of infarction and its relationship with functional outcome and Stroke subtype: assessment from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial. Stroke. 2010;41(12):2834–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhong W, Yan S, Chen Z, Luo Z, Chen Y, Zhang X et al. Stroke outcome of early antiplatelet in post-thrombolysis haemorrhagic infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022.

  13. Neuberger U, Kickingereder P, Schönenberger S, Schieber S, Ringleb PA, Bendszus M, et al. Risk factors of intracranial Hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy of anterior circulation ischemic Stroke. Neuroradiology. 2019;61(4):461–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tijssen MP, Hofman PA, Stadler AA, van Zwam W, de Graaf R, van Oostenbrugge RJ, et al. The role of dual energy CT in differentiating between brain haemorrhage and contrast medium after mechanical revascularisation in acute ischaemic Stroke. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(4):834–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rudd MA, Johnstone MT, Rabbani LE, George D, Ware JA, Loscalzo J. Thrombolytic therapy causes an increase in vascular permeability that is reversed by 1-deamino-8-D-vasopressin. Circulation. 1991;84(6):2568–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dekeyzer S, Nikoubashman O, Lutin B, De Groote J, Vancaester E, De Blauwe S, et al. Distinction between contrast staining and Hemorrhage after endovascular Stroke treatment: one CT is not enough. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(4):394–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon W, Seo JJ, Kim JK, Cho KH, Park JG, Kang HK. Contrast enhancement and contrast extravasation on computed tomography after intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2004;35(4):876–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Payabvash S, Qureshi MH, Khan SM, Khan M, Majidi S, Pawar S, et al. Differentiating intraparenchymal Hemorrhage from contrast extravasation on post-procedural noncontrast CT scan in acute ischemic Stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(9):737–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lummel N, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Bernau C, Pfefferkorn T, Patzig M, Janssen H, et al. Hyperattenuated intracerebral lesions after mechanical recanalization in acute Stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(2):345–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Shao Y, Xu Y, Li Y, Wen X, He X. A new classification system for Postinterventional Cerebral Hyperdensity: the influence on Hemorrhagic Transformation and Clinical Prognosis in Acute Stroke. Neural Plast. 2021;2021:6144304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Parrilla G, García-Villalba B, Espinosa de Rueda M, Zamarro J, Carrión E, Hernández-Fernández F, et al. Hemorrhage/contrast staining areas after mechanical intra-arterial thrombectomy in acute ischemic Stroke: imaging findings and clinical significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(9):1791–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Saver JL, Altman H. Relationship between neurologic deficit severity and final functional outcome shifts and strengthens during first hours after onset. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1537–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Vynckier J, Maamari B, Grunder L, Goeldlin MB, Meinel TR, Kaesmacher J et al. Early neurologic deterioration in Lacunar Stroke: Clinical and Imaging predictors and Association with Long-Term Outcome. Neurology. 2021.

  24. Kobeissi H, Ghozy S, Seymour T, Bilgin C, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF. Early neurological deterioration as a predictor of outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for Stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interv Neuroradiol. 2022:15910199221135289.

  25. Li W, Yuan S, Sui X, Bian H, Wei M, Chen Z, et al. Higher serum occludin after successful reperfusion is associated with early neurological deterioration. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022;28(7):999–1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun D, Tong X, Huo X, Jia B, Raynald, Wang A, et al. Unexplained early neurological deterioration after endovascular treatment for acute large vessel occlusion: incidence, predictors, and clinical impact: data from ANGEL-ACT registry. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022;14(9):875–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Castillo J, Leira R, Moro MA, Lizasoain I, Serena J, Dávalos A. Neuroprotective effects of aspirin in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Neurosci Lett. 2003;339(3):248–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin J, Han Z, Yi X, Luo H, Zhou Q, Zhou J. Prestroke Aspirin Use is Associated with Clinical outcomes in ischemic Stroke patients with atherothrombosis, small artery Disease, and Cardioembolic Stroke. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019;26(6):528–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. He F, Xia C, Zhang JH, Li XQ, Zhou ZH, Li FP, et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for preventing early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic Stroke. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(1):83–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xia H, Wang Z, Tian M, Liu Z, Zhou Z. Low-molecular-weight heparin Versus Aspirin in Early Management of Acute ischemic Stroke: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:823391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Q, Chen C, Chen XY, Han JH, Soo Y, Leung TW, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin and early neurologic deterioration in acute Stroke caused by large artery occlusive Disease. Arch Neurol. 2012;69(11):1454–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Amans MR, Cooke DL, Vella M, Dowd CF, Halbach VV, Higashida RT, et al. Contrast staining on CT after DSA in ischemic Stroke patients progresses to infarction and rarely hemorrhages. Interv Neuroradiol. 2014;20(1):106–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Renú A, Amaro S, Laredo C, Román LS, Llull L, Lopez A, et al. Relevance of blood-brain barrier disruption after endovascular treatment of ischemic Stroke: dual-energy computed tomographic study. Stroke. 2015;46(3):673–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Molina CA, Selim MH. The dilemma of resuming anticoagulation after intracranial Hemorrhage: little evidence facing big fears. Stroke. 2011;42(12):3665–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Taussky P, Tawk RG, Daugherty WP, Hanel RA. Medical therapy for ischemic Stroke: review of intravenous and intra-arterial treatment options. World Neurosurg. 2011;76(6 Suppl):9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arba F, Piccardi B, Palumbo V, Biagini S, Galmozzi F, Iovene V, et al. Blood-brain barrier leakage and hemorrhagic transformation: the Reperfusion Injury in ischemic StroKe (RISK) study. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(9):3147–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bernardo-Castro S, Sousa JA, Brás A, Cecília C, Rodrigues B, Almendra L, et al. Pathophysiology of blood-brain barrier permeability throughout the different stages of ischemic Stroke and its implication on Hemorrhagic Transformation and Recovery. Front Neurol. 2020;11:594672.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wakai S, Nagai M. Histological verification of microaneurysms as a cause of Cerebral Haemorrhage in surgical specimens. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52(5):595–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Furie KL, Jayaraman MV. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2018;49(3):509 – 10.

  40. Collaboration R. Effects of antiplatelet therapy after Stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10191):2613–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients for their support and involvement in the study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grants/awards 82173646 and 81973157.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yunhe Luo, Min Chu and Daosheng Wang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201100, China

    Yunhe Luo, Min Chu, Xin Gu, Delong Wang, Jin Zheng & Jing Zhao

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Daosheng Wang

Authors
  1. Yunhe Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daosheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xin Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Delong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jin Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All seven authors contributed to the study concept and design. YL, MC, XG and DaW contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the data. YL and DeW contributed to image review. DeW, JinZ, and JingZ are responsible for drafting revision and the overall content as guarantors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Delong Wang, Jin Zheng or Jing Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We confirmed that our study was carried out in accordance with Helsinki declaration. The study was approved by the ethics committees of Minhang Hospital of Fudan University (ref. no. 2022-043-01 K). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Chu, M., Wang, D. et al. Early antithrombotic therapy in patients with postinterventional cerebral hyperdensity reduces early neurological deterioration after mechanical thrombectomy. BMC Neurol 23, 443 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03497-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03497-9

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us