Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

BMC Neurology volume 24, Article number: 48 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

This meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Method

We conducted a manual search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with a search deadline set for February 1, 2023. Data analysis was performed using Stata version 15.0.

Result

A total of 9 randomized controlled studies were included, involving a total of 316 people, including 159 mesenchymal stem cells and 147 control groups. Results of meta-analysis: Compared to a placebo group, the administration of mesenchymal stem cells resulted in a significant reduction in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores among patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke [SMD=-0.99,95% CI (-1.93, -0.05)]. Compared to placebo, barthel index [SMD = 0.48,95% CI (-0.55,1.51)], modified rankin score [SMD = 0.45, 95% CI (1.11, 0.21)], adverse events (RR = 0.68, 95% CI (0.40, 1.17)] the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Based on current studies, mesenchymal stem cell transplantation can ameliorate neurological deficits in patients with ischemic stroke to a certain extent without increasing adverse reactions. However, there was no significant effect on Barthel index and Modified Rankin score.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Ischemic stroke (IS) is a prevalent neurological disorder characterized by a substantial incidence, a high disability rate, frequent recurrence, and numerous associated complications. This condition often leaves individuals with varying degrees of residual dysfunction, imposing a substantial medical and societal burden on both families and communities [1, 2]. Based on partial data, in the year 2020, the age-standardized prevalence rate of stroke stood at 1114.8 per 100,000 individuals. Additionally, the incidence rate was recorded at 246.8 per 100,000, while the fatality rate was 114.8 per 100,000. The annual incidence of severe acute ischemic stroke stood at 270 cases per 100,000 individuals, with a corresponding mortality rate of 26% [1,2,3,4]. For patients with acute ischemic stroke, the main treatment at home and abroad is to restore cerebral blood flow through timely reperfusion, save the ischemic tissue and reduce the rate of disability [5]. intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has been proven to be effective and safe in intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) patients with acute cerebral infarction within 4.5 h of the onset, but it lacks an ideal means for functional recovery after tissue injury [3, 4, 6, 7].

In recent years, stem cell transplantation therapy has been recognized as a unique advantage in the field of ischemic stroke treatment [5, 8]. A large number of studies [9,10,11, 13, 14] have shown that MSCs transplantation has obvious efficacy in IS animal models, which are mainly evaluated according to the improvement in behavioral and histological aspects. In terms of behavior, the ability to remove adhesions is often used to evaluate the autosensory deficit, the spindle test to evaluate the motor function, the limb placement test to evaluate the motor sensory integrity, the balance beam walking test to evaluate the motor coordination function and the nerve function injury score to evaluate the degree of nerve function deficit. Relevant experiments showed that the nerve function improved significantly after MSCs transplantation [12, 13, 15]. In terms of histology, the infarct volume was observed by magnetic resonance imaging or TTC staining. In numerous studies, the infarct volume was consistently found to be significantly diminished in the group treated with Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) in comparison to the model group [14, 16]. However, there are still many controversies regarding the treatment of acute ischemic stroke by mesenchymal stem cells in clinical practice [15, 17]. Therefore, this meta-analysis is expected to solve the above-mentioned controversies and provide a new treatment option for clinicians and patients.

Methods

The protocol has been duly registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database under the registration number CRD42023407508.

Retrieval strategy

Search PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of science for randomized controlled articles on mesenchymal stem cell therapy for acute ischemic stroke published as of February 1, 2023. The search term was (mesenchymal stem cells, acute ischemic stroke). For specific search strategies (Table S1).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The included population met diagnostic criteria for acute ischemic stroke [16, 18]. The experimental group received mesenchymal stem cell intervention and the control group received placebo treatment. The main outcome indexes were BI: Barthel index; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; mRS: Modified Rankin score; Secondary outcome indicators were adverse reactions. The type of study included was randomized controlled. Exclusion criteria are: conference abstracts, literature reviews, meta-analyses, duplicate publications, animal experiments, case reports, conference abstracts, unavailable full text and unavailable data will be excluded.

Data extraction

Two separate reviewers conducted an independent assessment of the literature to facilitate data extraction. By reviewing the title, abstract, and full text of the literature, we conducted a direct screening of papers that were readily assessable for inclusion. To incorporate literature into the review, it is essential to refer to the opinions of relevant experts and assess the full-text articles by direct downloading and careful examination. Throughout the screening phase, it is imperative to adhere rigorously to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extract relevant observational metrics from both sets of studies and perform a meticulous cross-verification of the gathered data to guarantee data consistency. In the process of data extraction, the primary components encompassed the following: the name of the initial author, publication year, country of origin, type of mesenchymal stem cells, dosage of transplanted stem cells, sample size, gender distribution, age demographics, intervention methodologies, and outcome metrics.

Risk of bias evaluate

The quality of the studies included in this review was independently assessed by two researchers. We utilized the bias analysis tool outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 to evaluate the quality of these included studies [6, 17, 19]. The evaluation included seven aspects: random sequence generation (selectivity bias), assignment concealment (selectivity bias), implementor and participant blinding (implementation bias), outcome evaluator blinding (observation bias), data results integrity (follow-up bias), selective reporting of study results (reporting bias), and other sources of bias. The seven projects were individually assessed in accordance with the aforementioned criteria, with the aim of conducting a comprehensive quality evaluation of the incorporated studies. This process involved generating a methodological quality assessment table, a bias risk graph, and a summary chart of bias risk.

Data analysis

The collected data were entered into Stata 15.0 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) for the purpose of conducting statistical analyses. The assessment of heterogeneity was performed using either the I2 statistic or the Q statistic. I2 values of 0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% correspond to the absence of heterogeneity, minimal heterogeneity, moderate heterogeneity, and substantial heterogeneity, respectively. When the I2 statistic was equal to or greater than 50%, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to investigate potential origins of heterogeneity. When heterogeneity was less than 50%, we employed a fixed-effects model. Furthermore, we utilized both the random-effects model and conducted the Egger test to assess the presence of publication bias.

Results

Literature screening

Using manual retrieval, we obtained a grand total of 3,059 articles, which reduced to 2,659 articles once duplicates were removed. Further scrutiny of titles and abstracts narrowed the selection down to 23 articles. Ultimately, following a thorough review of the full-text versions, 9 articles [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] were included in the analysis (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of the study process. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analysis

Full size image

The basic characteristics table of included literature

A total of nine randomized controlled studies were incorporated in this analysis, encompassing a combined study population of 316 participants. Of these, 159 received mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy, while 147 constituted the control groups. Specifically, eight of the studies [20, 21, 23,24,25,26,27,28, 18, 19, 21,22,23,24,25,26] utilized bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, while one study [20, 22] employed adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. The administered doses of mesenchymal stem cells across these studies varied, ranging from 1 × 105 to 5 × 107 cells per treatment. Further details regarding the specific characteristics of these studies can be found in Table S2.

Risk of bias assessment

In this study, we examined nine articles, all of which provided comprehensive explanations regarding their randomization methods and the use of blinding. Among these articles, four [18,19,20,21, 25,26,27,28] also detailed the blinding techniques employed for outcome evaluators. The assessment of bias risk in these articles is visually depicted in Figs. 2 and 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Risk bias of graph

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Risk bias of summary

Full size image

Meta analysis of Barthel index

A total of 3 articles [18, 20, 22,23,24,25] mentioned the Barthel index, involving a total of 78 people, including 38 people in the mesenchymal stem cell group and 40 people in the placebo group, and heterogeneity test (I2 = 73.2%, P = 0.024). Therefore, random effects model was adopted to analyze the included studies. Analysis results [SMD = 0.48,95%CI (-0.55,1.51)] suggested that compared with placebo, mesenchymal stem cells had no significant statistical significance for Barthel index in patients with acute ischemic stroke (Figure S1). In cases where heterogeneity exceeded 50%, a sensitivity analysis was undertaken. The outcomes of this analysis demonstrated that the index’s sensitivity was minimal, ensuring the stability of the results (Figure S2).

Meta analysis of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale

A total of 4 articles [7,8,9,10, 20, 22, 24, 25, 7,8,9, 27, 18, 20, 22, 23] mentioned the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, involving a total of 97people, including 39 people in the mesenchymal stem cell group and 58 people in the placebo group, and heterogeneity test (I2 = 73.2%, P = 0.011). Therefore, random effects model was adopted to analyze the included studies. Analysis results [SMD=-0.99,95%CI (-1.93, -0.05)] suggested suggest that compared with placebo, mesenchymal stem cells can significantly reduce the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale in patients with acute ischemic stroke (Figure S3). In cases where heterogeneity exceeded 50%, a sensitivity analysis was performed. The findings from this analysis revealed that the index’s sensitivity was low, and the results of the analysis demonstrated stability (refer to Figure S4).

Meta analysis of modified Rankin score

A total of 4 articles [18, 20, 22,23,24,25, 27] mentioned modified Rankin score, involving a total of 130 people, including 46 people in the mesenchymal stem cell group and 84 people in the placebo group, and heterogeneity test (I2 = 62.5%, P = 0.046). Therefore, random effects model was adopted to analyze the included studies. Analysis results [SMD=-0.45,95%CI (-1.11, 0.21)] suggested that compared with placebo, mesenchymal stem cells had no significant statistical significance for modified Ranking score in patients with acute ischemic stroke (Figure S5).In response to heterogeneity exceeding 50%, a sensitivity analysis was performed, revealing that the sensitivity of this parameter was minimal, and the analysis findings remained consistent (Figure S6).

Meta analysis of adverse events

A total of 5 articles [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26, 28] mentioned adverse events, involving a total of 166 people, including102 people in the mesenchymal stem cell group and 64 people in the placebo group, and heterogeneity test (I2 = 56.4%, P = 0.057). Therefore, random effects model was adopted to analyze the included studies. Analysis results [RR = 0.68,95%CI (0.40, 1.17)] suggested that compared with placebo, mesenchymal stem cells had no significant statistical significance for adverse events in patients with acute ischemic stroke (Figure S7).

Publication bias

The Egger test was employed to assess the publication bias of the included metrics, including the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Modified Rankin Score, and adverse events. Results (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale P = 0.352, Modified Rankin score P = 0.829, adverse events P = 0.280) There is no publication bias in these indicators (Figure S8-S10).

Discussion

Mesenchymal stem cells were first described by FRIEDENSTEIN in 1970 as spindle bone marrow stromal cells attached to plastics [28, 29]. In 1991, CAPLAN [29, 30] coined the term “mesenchymal stem cells” and predicted that these mesodermal derived cells would become the preferred method of autologous therapy for regenerative purposes. Following developments in recent decades, mesenchymal stem cells have been widely used in clinical trials and to treat a variety of diseases, including blood disorders, graft-versus host diseases, autoimmune diseases, and so on. Even severe cases of novel coronavirus pneumonia [30, 31].

In this study, mesenchymal stem cell transplantation can improve the neurological deficits in ischemic stroke patients to a certain extent. Studies have shown that the therapeutic mechanism of MSCs mainly involves several aspects: (1) immune regulation: Transplanted MSCs mediate immunosuppression, regulate the activation of inflammatory cytokines and microglia through CD200, an anti-inflammatory cytokine overexpressed by stem cells in hypoxic environments, and reduce the number of microglia/macrophages [30,31,32]. Or induce microglia to become M2-type polarized, which inhibits inflammatory response, so as to reduce nerve damage in stroke rats [32, 33]. (2) Apoptosis: calcineurin IS a kind of threonine/phosphatase, which plays an important role in neurohomeostasis. Is induces the overradicalization of calcineurin to trigger apoptosis signals. MSCs transplantation can inhibit apoptosis by reducing the expression of calcineurin in neurons. Stem cell transplantation may also reduce secondary cell death by inhibiting inflammation [33,34,35]. (3) Neuron damage: Neuron damage can be caused by a variety of mechanisms, calcium overload, oxidative stress and other mechanisms play an important role in IS induced neuron damage. The transplanted MSCs can relieve calcium overload by upregulating the expression of calcium pump SPCA1, which is mainly located in the Golgi apparatus, reduce mitochondrial dysfunction and enhance antioxidant effect by upregulating an antioxidant enzyme UBIAD1. In addition, MSCs can affect the protein clearance pathway after injury. Inhibit the conversion of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway to autophagy pathway and play a role in limiting neuronal damage p [35,36,37]. (4) Neuronutrition: MSCs can induce the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor and other cytokines, nourish nerves, improve the survival rate of neurons in infarction area, and promote the neuroprotective effect [37, 38]. (5) Endogenous neurogenesis: By increasing the expression of chemokines and polysialase, the transplanted MSCs can increase the migration of endogenous neural progenitors, promote the proliferation of endogenous oligodendrocyte progenitors, promote myelin formation, trigger the formation of nerve cells and enhance the function of neurons. It can down-regulate the inhibitory factor Nogo-A which inhibits axon growth and neuron regeneration and promote neurogenesis [12, 38,39,40].

Although similar study [40] have been conducted before, more Chinese articles were included in this study, and blinding method was rarely mentioned in the included articles, and the time interval was longer. Moreover, the theory obtained in this study is inconsistent with the previous research, which was disturbed by the Chinese research, so our results are more credible.

Although this study found that mesenchymal stem cells can improve NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) in patients with acute ischemic stroke, it still has the following limitations: first, the number of included studies is small and the number of people included in each study is small, which may affect the study; second, the dosage of mesenchymal stem cells used in included studies is inconsistent. Thirdly, transplantation methods and time window of mesenchymal stem cells were included in the study, and due to the small sample size, subgroup analysis could not be further conducted according to different transplantation methods, time window and number of transplanted cells.

Conclusion

Based on current studies, mesenchymal stem cell transplantation can ameliorate neurological deficits in patients with ischemic stroke to a certain extent without increasing adverse reactions. However, there was no significant effect on Barthel index and Modified Rankin score. However, due to the limitations of the study, more high-quality and large sample studies are expected to prove our conclusion in future studies.

Data availability

All the data involved in the literature are available.

Abbreviations

IS:

Ischemic stroke

IVT:

Intravenous thrombolysis

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

BI:

Barthel index

NIHSS:

National Institute of Health Stroke Scale

mRS:

Modified Rankin score

References

  1. Feske SK. Ischemic stroke. Am J Med. 2021;134(12):1457–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walter K, What. Is Acute Ischemic Stroke? Jama. 2022;327(9):885.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saini V, Guada L, Yavagal DR. Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to acute ischemic stroke interventions. Neurology. 2021;97(20 Suppl 2):6–s16. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang G, Pan Y, Zhang R, Wang M, Meng X, Li Z, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of Malnutrition risk in patients with Acute ischemic stroke: results from the Third China National Stroke Registry. Stroke. 2022;53(1):111–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mendelson SJ, Prabhakaran S. Diagnosis and management of transient ischemic attack and Acute ischemic stroke: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(11):1088–98. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26867.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Paul S, Candelario-Jalil E. Emerging neuroprotective strategies for the treatment of ischemic stroke: an overview of clinical and preclinical studies. Exp Neurol. 2021;335:113518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao Y, Zhang X, Chen X, Wei Y. Neuronal injuries in cerebral infarction and ischemic stroke: from mechanisms to treatment (review). Int J Mol Med. 2022;49(2). https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2021.5070.

  8. Kim HY, Kim TJ, Kang L, Kim YJ, Kang MK, Kim J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived magnetic extracellular nanovesicles for targeting and treatment of ischemic stroke. Biomaterials. 2020;243:119942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119942.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Asgari Taei A, Nasoohi S, Hassanzadeh G, Kadivar M, Dargahi L, Farahmandfar M. Enhancement of angiogenesis and neurogenesis by intracerebroventricular injection of secretome from human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells in ischemic stroke model. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;140:111709. oi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111709.

  10. Kaiser EE, Waters ES, Yang X, Fagan MM, Scheulin KM, Sneed SE, et al. Tanshinone IIA-Loaded nanoparticle and neural stem cell therapy enhances recovery in a Pig ischemic stroke model. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022;11(10):1061–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szac062.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Passarelli JP, Nimjee SM, Townsend KL. Stroke and neurogenesis: bridging clinical observations to New mechanistic insights from animal models. Transl Stroke Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-022-01109-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Zhang Q, Wang W, Lin F, Wang S, Zhao J. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: a look into treatment mechanism and therapeutic potential. J Neurol. 2021;268(11):4095–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10138-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao T, Zhu T, Xie L, Li Y, Xie R, Xu F, et al. Neural stem cells therapy for ischemic stroke: Progress and challenges. Transl Stroke Res. 2022;13(5):665–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-022-00984-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Z, Dong X, Tian M, Liu C, Wang K, Li L, et al. Stem cell-based therapies for ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01762-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ikegame Y, Yamashita K, Nakashima S, Nomura Y, Yonezawa S, Asano Y, et al. Fate of graft cells: what should be clarified for development of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke? Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00322.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lebedeva ER, Ushenin AV, Gurary NM, Gilev DV, Olesen J. Diagnostic criteria for acute headache attributed to ischemic stroke and for sentinel headache before ischemic stroke. J Headache Pain. 2022;23(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01372-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bang OY, Lee JS, Lee PH, Lee G. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in stroke patients. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(6):874–82. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung JW, Chang WH, Bang OY, Moon GJ, Kim SJ, Kim SK, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2021;96(7):e1012–e23. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. de Celis-Ruiz E, Fuentes B, Alonso de Leciñana M, Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Borobia AM, Gutiérrez-Zúñiga R, et al. Final results of allogeneic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in Acute Ischemic Stroke (AMASCIS): a phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Center, Pilot Clinical Trial. Cell Transpl. 2022;31:9636897221083863. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897221083863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fang J, Guo Y, Tan S, Li Z, Xie H, Chen P, et al. Autologous endothelial progenitor cells transplantation for Acute ischemic stroke: a 4-Year Follow-Up study. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.18-0012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaillard A, Hommel M, Moisan A, Zeffiro TA, Favre-Wiki IM, Barbieux-Guillot M, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells improve Motor Recovery in Subacute Ischemic Stroke: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Transl Stroke Res. 2020;11(5):910–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00787-z.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Law ZK, Tan HJ, Chin SP, Wong CY, Wan Yahya WNN, Muda AS, et al. The effects of intravenous infusion of autologous mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with subacute middle cerebral artery infarct: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial on safety, tolerability and efficacy. Cytotherapy. 2021;23(9):833–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee J, Chang WH, Chung JW, Kim SJ, Kim SK, Lee JS, et al. Efficacy of intravenous mesenchymal stem cells for Motor Recovery after ischemic stroke: a neuroimaging study. Stroke. 2022;53(1):20–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee JS, Hong JM, Moon GJ, Lee PH, Ahn YH, Bang OY. A long-term follow-up study of intravenous autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with ischemic stroke. Stem Cells. 2010;28(6):1099–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Savitz SI, Yavagal D, Rappard G, Likosky W, Rutledge N, Graffagnino C, et al. A phase 2 Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Internal Carotid Artery infusion of autologous bone marrow-derived ALD-401 cells in patients with recent stable ischemic stroke (RECOVER-Stroke). Circulation. 2019;139(2):192–205. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jia H, He J, Zhao L, Hsu CC, Zhao X, Du Y, et al. Combination of stem cell therapy and acupuncture to treat ischemic stroke: a prospective review. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02761-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS. The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970;3(4):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.1970.tb00347.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res. 1991;9(5):641–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou L, Zhu H, Bai X, Huang J, Chen Y, Wen J et al. Potential mechanisms and therapeutic targets of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):195. Potential mechanisms and therapeutic targets of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke.

  31. Yang H, Chen J. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes carrying long noncoding RNA ZFAS1 alleviate oxidative stress and inflammation in ischemic stroke by inhibiting microRNA-15a-5p. Metab Brain Dis. 2022;37(7):2545–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-022-00997-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Q, Zhao SF, Xiao X, Liu YN, Wang XL, Du YX. Combined treatment of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and Fasudil promotes neurovascular remodeling and neurological function recovery in ischemic stroke. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2022;194(2):801–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03679-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sheykhhasan M, Poondla N. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell treatment improves post-stroke cerebral function recovery by regulating gut microbiota in rats. World J Stem Cells. 2022;14(8):680–3. https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v14.i8.680.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sánchez-Castillo AI, Sepúlveda MR, Marín-Teva JL, Cuadros MA, Martín-Oliva D, González-Rey E et al. Switching roles: Beneficial effects of Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells on Microglia and their implication in neurodegenerative diseases. Biomolecules. 2022;12(2).

  35. Helsper S, Yuan X, Bagdasarian FA, Athey J, Li Y, Borlongan CV, et al. Multinuclear MRI reveals early efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy in Stroke. Transl Stroke Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-022-01057-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hao L, Yang Y, Xu X, Guo X, Zhan Q. Modulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells on microglia in ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1073958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1073958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou G, Wang Y, Gao S, Fu X, Cao Y, Peng Y, et al. Potential mechanisms and perspectives in ischemic stroke treatment using stem cell therapies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:646927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.646927.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Shabanizadeh A, Rahmani MR, Yousefi-Ahmadipour A, Asadi F, Arababadi MK. Mesenchymal stem cells: the potential therapeutic cell therapy to reduce Brain Stroke Side effects. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(5):105668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roever L, Jickling GC. Mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic stroke: hope or hype? Neurology. 2021;96(7):301–2. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu F, Wang J. Meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Chin Tissue Eng Res. 2023;27(01):76–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all those who participated in the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (32060189).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Province, China

    Huanjia Huang, Jian Zhang, Jinmei Lin & Shengliang Shi

Authors
  1. Huanjia Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinmei Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shengliang Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.H.H., and J.Z. were involved in study concept and design and study supervision. All authors contributed to acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. H.H. was involved in drafting of the manuscript.HH and J.Z. contributed to critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.H.H., J.Z., J.L., and SS were involved in statistical analysis. H.H. and J.Z. contributed to administrative, technical, or material support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengliang Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, H., Zhang, J., Lin, J. et al. Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 24, 48 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03542-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03542-1

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us