Skip to main content
Download PDF

Blocking CCR5 activity by maraviroc augmentation in post-stroke depression: a proof-of-concept clinical trial

BMC Neurology volume 24, Article number: 190 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a significant impediment to successful rehabilitation and recovery after a stroke. Current therapeutic options are limited, leaving an unmet demand for specific and effective therapeutic options. Our objective was to investigate the safety of Maraviroc, a CCR5 antagonist, as a possible mechanism-based add-on therapeutic option for PSD in an open-label proof-of-concept clinical trial.

Methods

We conducted a 10-week clinical trial in which ten patients with subcortical and cortical stroke, suffering from PSD. were administered a daily oral dose of 300 mg Maraviroc. Participants were then monitored for an additional eight weeks. The primary outcome measure was serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. The secondary outcome measure was a change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

Results

Maraviroc was well tolerated, with no reports of serious adverse events or discontinuations due to intolerance. The MADRS scores substantially reduced from baseline to week 10 (mean change: -16.4 ± 9.3; p < 0.001). By the conclusion of the treatment phase, a favorable response was observed in five patients, with four achieving remission. The time to response was relatively short, approximately three weeks. After the cessation of treatment, MADRS scores increased at week 18 by 6.1 ± 9.6 points (p = 0.014).

Conclusions

Our proof-of-concept study suggests that a daily dosage of 300 mg of Maraviroc may represent a well-tolerated and potentially effective pharmacological approach to treating PSD. Further comprehensive placebo-controlled studies are needed to assess the impact of Maraviroc augmentation on PSD.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05932550, Retrospectively registered: 28/06/2023.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Depression is a frequent neuropsychiatric complication of brain ischemia, associated with increased mortality, higher functional disability, lower quality of life and a greater risk for cognitive decline [1,2,3]. Accumulating evidence suggests that inflammatory processes and neural-immune interactions are involved in post-stroke depression (PSD) [4]. Related theories focus on synaptic plasticity as an important means of recovery from both diseases after converged molecular and cellular mechanisms, including inflammation causing atrophy of neurons, loss of glutamatergic synaptic connections, and dysfunction of the circuitry that is essential for mood regulation and cognitive function [5]. Indeed, PSD can be perceived as a psychoneuroimmunological disorder in which inflammatory mechanisms involving cytokines and chemokines play a crucial role. Both acute stroke and depressed patients consistently show higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, acute phase proteins, chemokines and cellular adhesion molecules [6, 7].

The C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) is involved in immune processes and neuroplasticity and is highly expressed in T cells and macrophages, as well as microglia, astrocytes, and neurons, in multiple brain regions [8]. CCR5 is a pro-inflammatory receptor and inhibition of its signaling has been shown to enhance plasticity processes in hippocampal and cortical circuits. Previous studies show that inhibiting CCR5 activity reduced the activation of glial cells, preserved the integrity of endothelial cell layers, reduced the infiltration of T cells, and decreased neuroinflammation [9]. Moreover, in a recent study conducted by our group and others, CCR5 blockade significantly promoted axonal sprouting in the pre-motor cortex after experimental stroke [10]. In humans, we have evaluated the effects of the loss-of-function mutation known as CCR5-Δ32 (which impairs, at least partially, the function of the CCR5 receptor) in 435 post-stroke patients (the TABASCO prospective cohort study). In patients who were carriers of the CCR5-Δ32 allelle (about 15% of the cohort), we found less depressive, anxiety, and post-traumatic symptoms 6, 12, and 24 months after their stroke, aside from showing a significantly better cognitive and functional outcome. These findings implied that impaired activity of the CCR5 may have therapeutic advantages in PSD recovery, and pointed to a mechanism-based treatment target for post-stroke depression, as drugs mimicking the action of this loss of function mutation are available [11].

On this basis, we performed a proof of concept open-labeled clinical trial using Maraviroc (Selzentry), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved CCR5 antagonist for R5-tropic HIV-1 infected patients, as a novel add-on intervention for PSD.

Maraviroc is a small molecule administered orally, metabolized by CYP3A4 [12]. It has a good pharmacokinetic profile, relatively low protein binding, and high bioavailability [13, 14]. The drug has been available in the US market since 2007 and has a known and satisfactory safety profile. Main adverse events include upper respiratory tract infections, cough, pyrexia, and rash [15].

We hypothesized that Maraviroc would be a safe and effective add-on treatment option for patients suffering from PSD.

Primary objective

To investigate the safety and tolerability of Maraviroc 300 mg per day in subjects with PSD.

Secondary objective

To evaluate the effect of Maraviroc 300 mg per day on improving depressive symptoms in subjects with PSD, as assessed by a change from baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score and in improving cognitive, functional, and behavioral outcomes.

Methods

Protocol approvals and patient consent

The study protocol (see Supplementary material) was approved by the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center ethics committee (REC Ref: 0056-20-TLV). Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants after they received a detailed description of the study.

Participants

Included were patients who developed a major depressive episode as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Fifth Edition (DSM-5) [16] up to 12 months after they suffered a stroke or transient ischemic (TIA) and were consecutively recruited from the outpatient clinics at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Patients were invited to participate in the study during their routine clinical evaluation after stroke. They were not specifically referred to the Post-stroke Clinic for depressive symptoms. Fifteen patients underwent screening for participation between October 19 2020 to June 1 2021. Ten were medically eligible and consented to the study.

Inclusion criteria were [1] age between 50 and 86 years; [2] diagnosis of stroke/TIA before study entrance and evidence of ischemic infarct on MRI; [3] meet DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode that developed up to 12 months after the documented stroke; [4] able to sign informed consent, comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, and other trial procedures.

Exclusion criteria were: [1] hemorrhages and cerebral edema; [2] significant acute medical illnesses that limit the use of Maraviroc, including: severely disturbed liver, kidney or lung function, anemia, hypothyroidism or uncontrolled diabetes; [3] significant acute neurologic illness including: impaired consciousness, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea, progressive supranuclear paralysis, brain tumor, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, hydrocephalus, Binswanger’s disease or severe aphasia; [5] dementia or major neurocognitive disorder as defined by DSM-5; [6] history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) positive; [7] current or past diagnosis of bipolar or related disorders, intellectual disability, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use disorders other than nicotine in the past year; [8] intent or plan to attempt suicide in near future; [9] began taking a new antidepressant or anxiolytic agent up to 3 months before enrollment.

Primary safety endpoint

Any serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) TEAEs leading to discontinuation.

Assessment

Safety evaluations included physical examination, body weight, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), clinical laboratory tests, concomitant therapies, and assessment of adverse events’ nature, frequency, and severity (AEs). All AEs, whether volunteered by the patient, discovered by study personnel during questioning, or detected through physical examination, laboratory test, or other means, were recorded in the patient’s medical record and on the appropriate case report forms.

Suicidal ideation and behavior were assessed by a senior psychiatrist, as well as continuous follow-up of mental state and AEs.

AEs were recorded by the following information: The severity grade was used as - mild: usually transient and generally not interfering with normal activities; moderate: sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; severe: prevents normal activities. The AE outcome (not recovered/not resolved; recovered/ resolved; recovering/resolving, recovered/resolved with sequelae; fatal; or unknown) was recorded.

The presence of a major depressive episode was determined in a structured interview by the study’s senior psychiatrist (OT). Depression severity was assessed using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) [17] and this questionnaire served as the endpoint measure.

We measured self-perception of the overall severity of depressive symptoms using the 16-item quick inventory of depressive symptoms- self-report, QIDS-SR16 [18], a validated depression evaluation tool. Other scales used were the clinical global impression scale (CGI) [19], and the 7-item patient-reported generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale- GAD-7 [20]. A neuropsychological assessment was based on the NeuroTrax computerized cognitive testing (NeuroTrax Corp., Bellaire, TX), using different versions at each visit.

Changes in depression and anxiety severity and medication side effects were assessed at weeks 2, 4, 7, and 10. Post-treatment assessments were held at weeks 14 and 18.

Changes in functional and behavioral outcomes were assessed using the Stroke impact scale (SIS), the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire – Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI).

See the schedule of all assessments in Supplementary material (Figure S1 and Table S1).

Fasting blood samples were taken with minimal stasis. High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentrations in blood were measured using a Boering BN II Nephelometer (DADE Boering, Marburg, Germany).

Treatment

Participants received an oral (PO) dose of Maraviroc 300 mg once daily in the morning over ten weeks as add-on therapy to their psychiatric pharmacological treatment regimen, which remained stable during the trial.

Analyses

Safety analysis (primary endpoint)

All AEs were coded according to coding dictionaries (MedDRA version 22.0 or higher) and presented in tables by System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT), as well as findings of physical examinations, vital signs, clinical laboratory test results, and concomitant medications.

To evaluate the changes in vital signs and clinical laboratory test results from baseline to the end of treatment at week ten, we used the paired t-test or the Signed rank test (as appropriate) to test the statistical significance of the difference.

Efficacy analysis (secondary endpoint)

To evaluate the changes in depression severity during the intervention on the whole sample, data measured at baseline were compared with those at week ten using a paired t-test. After confirming the data were normally distributed, the effect of Maraviroc over time was analyzed with repeated measures ANOVAs, with time being a within-subjects factor and depression scores (as measured by the MADRS) as the dependent variables. Associations between numeric variables were determined using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis (coefficient estimate r).

The response was defined as a ≥ 50% decrease from baseline depression scale scores to the trial endpoint. Significance was evaluated at the α = 0.05 level, two-tailed, after Greenhouse-Geisser corrections. Pairwise comparisons of the study day assessments to baseline for significant main effects and interactions were performed with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons [21].

A sample size of 10 patients was required to obtain sufficient precision for this exploratory trial for safety (see details in Supplemental material). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. SPSS/WIN (version 29.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) software was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Ten participants with a recent subcortical or cortical stroke, suffering from a major depressive episode were included in the trial. They were administered Maraviroc orally at a daily dose of 300 mg in addition to their current treatment plan. Out of the 10 participants, two were female, and all participants were of Caucasian ethnicity. The average age was 61.5 ± 7.9 years (range 54–81) and the mean education level was 13.9 ± 4.2 years. The mean MADRS score at baseline was 30.4 ± 7.7, pointing to moderate-severe depression. Additional clinical and demographic details of the sample are provided in Table 1. Although we aimed to include participants whose depression developed within a year of their stroke, all participants included developed depression within six months after their documented stroke. The average time from the index stroke to enrollment was 19.4 months (SD: 18.5).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of patients completing the study
Full size table

Regarding concomitant antidepressant medication, five patients received monotherapy with an SSRI (4 escitalopram and 1 sertraline), 2 patients received a combination of an SSRI and mirtazapine (1 escitalopram and mirtazapine and 1 fluoxetine and mirtazapine); all patients receiving antidepressants remained symptomatic although receiving treatment. all patients receiving antidepressants remained symptomatic although receiving treatment. Three patients refused the use of antidepressants at the time study entrance due to fear of side effects.

Patients taking concomitant antidepressant medications at the time of screening had been treated for at least 16 weeks before screening. They remained on a stable drug dose for the duration of the study. All included patients completed the ten weeks of study drug treatment; eight completed the post-treatment eight-week follow-up period; two completed only four weeks of follow-up.

Safety

Maraviroc was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported.

There were no changes in weight, liver or renal function, cell blood counts, and electrolytes (Table 2). The adverse effects reported were: 1 dry mouth, 1 overactive bladder, 1 urinary tract infection, 1 leg weakness, 1 dyspnea, 1 dizziness, 1 elevated blood pressure, 1 insomnia. These symptoms were probably unrelated to Maraviroc and resolved before the ten-week treatment period was completed. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported and no TEAEs led to discontinuation. Pairwise comparison showed no significant difference from baseline to week 10 in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, weight, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin, creatinine and white blood cells (p = 0.104, p = 0.521, p = 0.876, p = 0.211, p = 0.970, p = 0.950, p = 0.313, p = 0.586, p = 0.100, p = 0.078, respectively).

Table 2 Mean (± SD) for weight (kilograms), vital signs, and liver and renal function on study assessment weeks
Full size table

No change was observed in neurological scores (NIHSS) or ECG parameters, as well as suicidal ideation from baseline to week 10. There was no change in weight and no reports of sexual dysfunction from baseline to week 10.

Effect on depression

The mean MADRS score decreased from 30.4 ± 7.7 at baseline to 14 ± 8.3 at week 10 (end of treatment period), representing a mean change of -16.4 ± 9.3, t9 = 5.6; p < 0.001, (Fig. 1A and B). The effect size of the change in MADRS scores between the baseline and week 10 was substantial, with Cohen’s D value of 1.76 95% and a CI 0.73 to 2.76).

Fig. 1
figure 1

(A) Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores of the patients included in the study. B Mean difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores over ten weeks of open treatment with Maraviroc versus eight weeks of follow-up. C 16-item quick inventory of depressive symptoms- self-report (QIDS-SR16) scores of the patients included in the study. D Clinical global impression (CGI) scores of the patients included in the study. E GAD-7 scores of the patients included in the study

Full size image

MADRS scores decreased during the study as a function of time (F4,36 = 19.3, p > 0.001); pairwise comparison showed a significant difference from baseline starting at week two and continuing through week 10.

Corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons to baseline found that scores at week 4 (mean Δ = 12.8, d = 2.69, 95% CI 2.87 to 22.73; p = 0.01); week 7 (mean Δ = 13.3, d = 2.6, 95% CI 3.71 to 22.89; p = 0.006); and week 10 (mean Δ = 16.4, d = 2.95, 95% CI 5.54 to 27.27; p = 0.003) were significantly lower than baseline (Fig. 1A). Clinical exams by a psychiatrist confirmed significant improvements in depressive symptoms in all completers on week 4, week seven, and week 10 of the trial. After cessation of treatment, this trend reversed and the mean MADRS scores increased from week 10 to week 18 by 6.1 + 9.6 points; p = 0.014 (Fig. 1B).

After ten weeks of Maraviroc treatment, 40% (4 out of 10) of patients attained remission, defined as a MADRS total of 10 or less (Fig. 1A), and 50% (5 out of 10) of the patients demonstrated a response, signifying a reduction in MADRS scores by more than 50% from their baseline measurements at week 10.

A non-parametric analysis (utilizing the Mann–Whitney test) to investigate differences in baseline variables revealed that, in comparison to individuals who did not achieve remission, remitters entered the study sooner after their stroke (remitters mean time post-stroke: 8.8 + 5.51 months, while the non-remitters had a mean time post-stroke of 26.5 + 21.2 months; p = 0.09, not significant, but may imply a trend). Three of the four remitters were receiving a stable daily dosage of 20 mg escitalopram during the study trial, while one was not taking any antidepressants.

Similar to the observation in the MADRS score, the QIDS-SR16 self-report score also demonstrated a decline from baseline to week 10: -6.8 ± 6.4, t9 = 3.4; p = 0.008. Yet, unlike the result observed in the MADRS, the mean QIDS-SR16 score continued to decline slightly through week 18 (after study drug cessation): -7.8 ± 6.6 compared to baseline, t5 = 2.9; p = 0.033; Fig. 1C). The Geriatric depression scale (GDS) also demonstrated a decline from baseline to week 10: -3.6 ± 2.9, p = 0.016.

The mean change in the severity of illness using the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) score from baseline to week ten was − 1.7 ± 1.3, t9 = 4.3, p = 0.002; Fig. 1D). Mean change in the severity of illness using the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score from baseline to week 10: +0.8 ± 0.79, t9 = 3.2; p = 0.011).

Time to response

The mean (± SD) time to response for depressive symptoms was 3.1 (± 1.2) weeks (n = 5, median = 3.5). All patients maintained this response through week 10.

Effect on anxiety

The mean GAD-7 score at baseline was 8.7 ± 5.6, and at week ten 7.0 ± 6.0. The effect size of the difference in anxiety symptoms was not significant (Fig. 1E).

Effect on cognitive scores

Eight patients improved their cognitive scores from baseline to week 10: the mean global cognitive score for all patients at baseline was 85.3 ± 14.4, and the mean global cognitive score at week 10 was 90.9 ± 12.7, p = 0.038 (Fig. 2). The mean MoCA score at baseline was 23.7 ± 1.9, and the mean MoCA score at week 10 was 24.8 + 2.4, p = 0.003.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean cognitive scores of patients included at baseline and after ten weeks of treatment with Maraviroc

Full size image

Effect on function and behavior

Seven patients improved their functional and behavioral scores from baseline to week 10: the mean SIS score for all patients at baseline was 52 ± 26.5, and the mean SIS score at week 10 was 65.0 ± 17.3, p = 0.014; the mean Q-LES-Q-SF score for all patients at baseline was 46.4 ± 10.5, and the mean Q-LES-Q-SF score at week 10 was 52.7 ± 8.7, p = 0.003; the mean RNLI score for all patients at baseline was 31.9 ± 9.3, and the mean RNLI score at week 10 was 36.9 ± 9.0, p = 0.049.

Effect on C-reactive protein (CRP)

Although within the normal range, mean blood CRP levels decreased significantly from baseline to the end of treatment at week 10 (2.6 ± 1.9 vs. 1.7 ± 1.6, p = 0.011). Baseline CRP levels correlated with baseline MADRS scores (r = 0.762, p = 0.017).

Discussion

This 10-week open-label, proof-of-concept clinical trial is the first to explore the safety and effect of add-on treatment with maraviroc, a CCR5 antagonist, on depressive symptoms in patients suffering from PSD. The main findings were in accordance with our initial hypothesis: [1] Maraviroc was well tolerated, with no documented severe adverse incidents or discontinuations attributed to intolerance [2]. Maraviroc did not affect heart rate, blood pressure, weight, liver or renal function, and cell blood counts [3]. Over the course of the study, we observed an improvement in depressive symptoms as measured by the MADRS: with a mean time-to-response of ~ 3 weeks [4]. Some responders experienced worsening of their depressive symptoms after stopping the study drug. Notably, among the five responders, four achieved remission and not merely an improvement in their depressive symptoms. The common adverse events of infections (upper respiratory and herpes simplex) and postural hypotension, reported in HIV patients, were not observed.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time Maraviroc was tested in depressed patients. Our findings agree with prior data implying that blockade of the CCR5 (whether occurring naturally in humans or manually induced in rodents) may improve post-stroke sequela in multiple neuropsychiatric domains [9,10,11, 22]. We suggest that the two main mechanisms of action that explain the efficacy of CCR5 blockade, as seen in our results, are the modulation of immune processes, including inflammation, and the induction of synaptogenesis.

It is well known that a cerebral infarct can induce a plethora of inflammatory and cytokine signaling, with an upregulation of cellular activity aimed at clearing damaged tissue and restoring severed connections. Previous studies suggest a link between these post-stroke inflammatory responses and the development of PSD [23,24,25,26,27]; Other studies point to left-sided lesions [28], lesion size [29], and extent of small vessel disease in the white matter and subcortical regions as predictors of PSD [30, 31]. Indeed, the biological basis of PSD may differ from that of MDD diagnosed in patients with no known vascular insults. It cannot be examined as a separate entity from the stroke but rather as a process sharing common pathways. This might explain why drugs used to treat “regular” MDD, mainly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), often fail to produce an adequate response in patients with PSD - especially with substantial white matter vascular pathology [32, 33]. In a study by Chollet and colleagues, the CCR5-Δ32 mutation had a more pronounced effect on the recovery of neurological impairments in the NIH stroke scale than fluoxetine [34]. In our small study, CRP levels, which showed a correlation with depressive scores, decreased significantly from baseline to the end of treatment at week 10, implying an anti-inflammatory effect. We have previously reported that carriers of the CCR5-Δ32 mutation had lower C-reactive protein (CRP) at admission to hospital after stroke [11].

In the primate brain, CCR5 blockade attenuated activation of glial cells and neuroinflammation [35]. In humans, Maraviroc inhibited chemokine-dependent migration of inflammatory cells through the endothelium [36]. Thus, the potential anti-inflammatory effect attributed to CCR5 blockade may be at least partially responsible for alleviating post-stroke depression symptoms.

There is a growing consensus that ischemic lesions (single and multiple) of the neural circuits that connect the prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, and amygdala may disrupt mood regulation and executive function, leading to depression. Furthermore, there appears to be a threshold by which further damage to specific white matter tracts triggers the onset of PSD [37]. Enabling recovery of affected brain regions is therefore crucial. As previously mentioned, CCR5 kd in rodents in an experimental stroke model was shown to prevent the loss of synaptic connections in the adjacent cortex, promote the formation of new connections, and stabilize dendritic spines during maximal spine loss. CCR5 blockade induced a remarkable degree of axonal sprouting in the bi-hemispheric or callosal connections of the pre-motor cortex 10. In humans, recovery after stroke is associated with plasticity in the pre-motor cortex and is partly driven by bilateral connections [38]. It is prudent to assume that the same process mediates recovery from PSD – an assumption strengthened by our previous finding that the CCR5-Δ32 mutation is a possible protective factor for PSD [11].

Our study has several limitations. First, it is a small open-label pilot study powered for safety only and not powered for efficacy. The results of such a pilot study could be used to rank-order Maraviroc as a potential therapy thereby proving an empirically justified approach to therapy development. Second, we cannot exclude a significant placebo effect because this was an open-label design. Therefore, all the efficacy data should be considered as hypothesis-generating, and larger placebo-controlled trials should be conducted to verify these results. Two such studies are underway by our group: The MARCH trial testing maraviroc for post-stroke cognitive impairment [39], which will also examine PSD as a secondary endpoint, and another large placebo-controlled study that will test maraviroc in PSD patients (NCT04966429). Third, in the current study, the interval between the index stroke and study entry varied significantly. This makes the interpretation of our results more challenging. Lastly, although the loss to follow-up was mild, extrapolation was necessary to estimate probable measures in patients lost to follow-up.

Our study’s strengths included its novelty, the inclusion of patients not responding adequately to antidepressant medication, and the rigorous follow-up of patients using psychiatric and neurological (cognitive) evaluations.

Despite its limitations, this open-label proof-of-concept trial suggests that daily Maraviroc augmentation treatment is safe in PSD patients. It may also potentially improve PSD symptoms with few adverse events. This pilot study is an important step in designing a larger, more comprehensive randomized-control study of Maraviroc in PSD.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Broomfield NM, Quinn TJ, Abdul-Rahim AH, Walters MR, Evans JJ. Depression and anxiety symptoms post-stroke/TIA: prevalence and associations in cross-sectional data from a regional stroke registry. BMC Neurol. 2014;14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12883-014-0198-8.

  2. Ayerbe L, Ayis S, Wolfe CDA, Rudd AG. Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1192/BJP.BP.111.107664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tene O, Shenhar-Tsarfaty S, Korczyn AD, Kliper E, Hallevi H, Shopin L, Auriel E, Mike A, Bornstein NM, Assayag EB. Depressive symptoms following stroke and transient ischemic attack: is it time for a more intensive treatment approach? Results from the TABASCO cohort study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(5):673–80. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14M09759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maes M, Yirmyia R, Noraberg J, Brene S, Hibbeln J, Perini G, Kubera M, Bob P, Lerer B, Maj M. The inflammatory & neurodegenerative (I&ND) hypothesis of depression: leads for future research and new drug developments in depression. Metab Brain Dis. 2009;24(1):27–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11011-008-9118-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Duman RS, Aghajanian GK, Sanacora G, Krystal JH. Synaptic plasticity and depression: new insights from stress and rapid-acting antidepressants. Nat Med. 2016;22(3):238–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/NM.4050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pawluk H, Woźniak A, Grześk G, Kołodziejska R, Kozakiewicz M, Kopkowska E, Grzechowiak E, Kozera G. The role of selected pro-inflammatory cytokines in Pathogenesis of ischemic stroke. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:469–84. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S233909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim YK, Na KS, Myint AM, Leonard BE. The role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in neuroinflammation, neurogenesis and the neuroendocrine system in major depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016;64:277–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNPBP.2015.06.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sorce S, Myburgh R, Krause KH. The chemokine receptor CCR5 in the central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;93(2):297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNEUROBIO.2010.12.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou M, Greenhill S, Huang S, Silva TK, Sano Y, Wu S, Cai Y, Nagaoka Y, Sehgal M, Cai DJ, Lee YS, Fox K, Silva AJ. CCR5 is a suppressor for cortical plasticity and hippocampal learning and memory. Elife. 2016;5(DECEMBER2016). https://doi.org/10.7554/ELIFE.20985.

  10. Joy MT, Ben Assayag E, Shabashov-Stone D, Liraz-Zaltsman S, Mazzitelli J, Arenas M, Abduljawad N, Kliper E, Korczyn AD, Thareja NS, Kesner EL, Zhou M, Huang S, Silva TK, Katz N, Bornstein NM, Silva AJ, Shohami E, Carmichael ST. CCR5 is a therapeutic target for recovery after stroke and traumatic brain Injury. Cell. 2019;176(5):1143–e115713. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2019.01.044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tene O, Hallevi H, Molad J, Usher S, Seyman E, Bornstein NM, Shenhar-Tsarfaty S, Ben Assayag E. CCR5-∆32 polymorphism: a possible protective factor for post-stroke depressive symptoms. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021;46(4):E431–40. https://doi.org/10.1503/JPN.200197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Abel S, Back DJ, Vourvahis M. Maraviroc: pharmacokinetics and drug interactions. Antivir Ther. 2009;14(5):607–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/135965350901400514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parra J, Portilla J, Pulido F, Sãnchez-De La Rosa R, Alonso-Villaverde C, Berenguer J, Blanco JL, Domingo P, Dronda F, Galera C, Gutirrez F, Kindeln JM, Knobel H, Leal M, Lpez-Aldeguer J, Mario A, Miralles C, Molt J, Ortega E, Oteo JA. Clinical utility of maraviroc. Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(8):527–42. https://doi.org/10.2165/11590700-000000000-00000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia-Perez J, Rueda P, Staropoli I, Kellenberger E, Alcami J, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Lagane B. New insights into the mechanisms whereby low molecular weight CCR5 ligands inhibit HIV-1 infection. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(7):4978–90. https://doi.org/10.1074/JBC.M110.168955.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernández I, de Lazzari E, Inciarte A, Diaz-Brito V, Milinkovic A, Arenas-Pinto A, Etcheverrry F, García F, Leal L, Fernandez E, Gonzalez E, Lucero C, Leon A, Garcıa F, Manzardo C, Nicolas D, Bodro M, del Rıo A, Cardozo C, Cervera C, Pericas JM, Sanclemente G, de la Calle C, Morata L, Soriano A, Espinosa G, Blanco J, ́L, Martınez E, Mallolas J, Miró J, Laguno M, Rojas J, Martınez-Rebollar M, Gonzalez-Cordon A, Cervera C, Knobel H, Peraire J, Domingo P, Clotet B, Dalmau D, Cruceta A, Arnaiz JA, Gatell JM. Network meta-analysis of post-exposure prophylaxis randomized clinical trials. HIV Med. 2021;22(3):218–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/HIV.12964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. American Psychiatric Association APA. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Ed.).; 2013.

  17. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134(4):382–9. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.134.4.382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Arnow B, Klein DN, Markowitz JC, Ninan PT, Kornstein S, Manber R, Thase ME, Kocsis JH, Keller MB. The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54(5):573–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01866-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guy W. CGI clinical global impressions. ECDEU Assess Man. Published online; 1976.

  20. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHINTE.166.10.1092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ludbrook J. On making multiple comparisons in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1991;18(6):379–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1440-1681.1991.TB01468.X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Molad J, Hallevi H, Seyman E, Rotschild O, Bornstein NM, Tene O, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM, Mirelman A, Ben Assayag E. CCR5-∆32 polymorphism-a possible protective factor from gait impairment amongst post-stroke patients. Eur J Neurol. 2023;30(3):692–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/ENE.15637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ben Assayag E, Tene O, Korczyn AD, Shopin L, Auriel E, Molad J, Hallevi H, Kirschbaum C, Bornstein NM, Shenhar-Tsarfaty S, Kliper E, Stalder T. High hair cortisol concentrations predict worse cognitive outcome after stroke: results from the TABASCO prospective cohort study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;82:133–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2017.05.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shenhar-Tsarfaty S, Assayag E, Ben, Bova I, Shopin L, Cohen M, Berliner S, Shapira I, Bornstein NM. Persistent hyperfibrinogenemia in acute ischemic stroke / transient ischemic attack (TIA). Thromb Haemost. 2008;99(1):169–73. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH07-08-0484.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller AH. Norman Cousins Lecture. Mechanisms of cytokine-induced behavioral changes: psychoneuroimmunology at the translational interface. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23(2):149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBI.2008.08.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Connor JC, André C, Wang Y, Lawson MA, Szegedi SS, Lestage J, Castanon N, Kelley KW, Dantzer R. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediate the upregulation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and the induction of depressive-like behavior in mice in response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin. J Neurosci. 2009;29(13):4200–9. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5032-08.2009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Maes M, Leonard BE, Myint AM, Kubera M, Verkerk R. The new 5-HT hypothesis of depression: cell-mediated immune activation induces indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, which leads to lower plasma tryptophan and an increased synthesis of detrimental tryptophan catabolites (TRYCATs), both of which contribute to the onset of depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011;35(3):702–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNPBP.2010.12.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Starkstein SE, Robinson RG, Price TR. Comparison of cortical and subcortical lesions in the production of poststroke mood disorders. Brain. 1987;110(4):1045–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/BRAIN/110.4.1045. (Pt 4).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang T, Jing X, Zhao X, Wang C, Liu Z, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Wang Y. A prospective cohort study of lesion location and its relation to post-stroke depression among Chinese patients. J Affect Disord. 2012;136(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAD.2011.06.014.

  30. Yasuno F, Taguchi A, Yamamoto A, Kajimoto K, Kazui H, Kudo T, Kikuchi-Taura A, Sekiyama A, Kishimoto T, Iida H, Nagatsuka K. Microstructural abnormality in white matter, regulatory T lymphocytes, and depressive symptoms after stroke. Psychogeriatrics. 2014;14(4):213–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/PSYG.12084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pavlovic AM, Pekmezovic T, Zidverc Trajkovic J, Svabic Medjedovic T, Veselinovic N, Radojicic A, Mijajlovic M, Tomic G, Jovanovic Z, Norton M, Sternic N. Baseline characteristic of patients presenting with lacunar stroke and cerebral small vessel disease may predict future development of depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016;31(1):58–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/GPS.4289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Simpson S, Baldwin RC, Jackson A, Burns AS. Is subcortical disease associated with a poor response to antidepressants? Neurological, neuropsychological and neuroradiological findings in late-life depression. Psychol Med. 1998;28(5):1015–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329179800693X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Patankar TF, Baldwin R, Mitra D, Jeffries S, Sutcliffe C, Burns A, Jackson A. Virchow-Robin space dilatation may predict resistance to antidepressant monotherapy in elderly patients with depression. J Affect Disord. 2007;97(1–3):265–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAD.2006.06.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF, Thalamas C, Berard E, Lamy C, Bejot Y, Deltour S, Jaillard A, Niclot P, Guillon B, Moulin T, Marque P, Pariente J, Arnaud C, Loubinoux I. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(2):123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70314-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mondal S, Rangasamy SB, Roy A, Dasarathy S, Kordower JH, Pahan K. Low-Dose Maraviroc, an antiretroviral drug, attenuates the Infiltration of T Cells into the Central Nervous System and protects the Nigrostriatum in Hemiparkinsonian Monkeys. J Immunol. 2019;202(12):3412–22. https://doi.org/10.4049/JIMMUNOL.1800587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Piconi S, Foschi A, Malagoli A, Carli F, Zona S, Milic J, Ricci ED, Rizzardini G, Guaraldi G. Impact of prolonged maraviroc treatment on non-AIDS-related comorbidities in HIV-positive patients: a retrospective cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(9):2723–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAC/DKZ227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Robinson RG, Jorge RE. Post-stroke Depression: a review. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(3):221–31. https://doi.org/10.1176/APPI.AJP.2015.15030363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kantak SS, Stinear JW, Buch ER, Cohen LG. Rewiring the brain: potential role of the premotor cortex in motor control, learning, and recovery of function following brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(3):282–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311420845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Assayag EB, Molad J, Seyman E, Rotschild O, Zeltzer E, Sadeh-Gonik U, Bregman N, Alpernas A, Segal Y, Bashat DB, Nathan T, Hawwari M, Tene O, Hallevi H. Preventing post-stroke dementia. The MARCH Trial. Protocol and statistical analysis plan of a randomized clinical trial testing the safety and efficacy of Maraviroc in post-stroke cognitive impairment. Eur Stroke J. 2022;7(3):314–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873221098857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hen Hallevi and Einor Ben Assayag contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Oren Tene

  2. Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel

    Jeremy Molad, Ofer Rotschild, Aviva Alpernas, Muhamad Hawwari, Hen Hallevi & Einor Ben Assayag

  3. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Oren Tene

  4. Department of Neurology-Stroke, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

    Estelle Seyman

  5. Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Nir Giladi

  6. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Nir Giladi, Hen Hallevi & Einor Ben Assayag

  7. Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Nir Giladi, Hen Hallevi & Einor Ben Assayag

Authors
  1. Oren Tene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy Molad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ofer Rotschild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aviva Alpernas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhamad Hawwari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Estelle Seyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nir Giladi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hen Hallevi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Einor Ben Assayag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Dr. Einor Ben Assayag had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Einor Ben Assayag, Oren Tene, Hen Hallevi, Nir Giladi. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Einor Ben Assayag, Oren Tene, Hen Hallevi, Jeremy Molad, Estelle Seyman, Nir Giladi, Ofer Rotschild, Aviva Alpernas, Muhamad Hawwari. Drafting of the manuscript: Einor Ben Assayag, Oren Tene, Hen Hallevi. Critical manuscript revision for important intellectual content: Estelle Seyman, Nir Giladi, Aviva Alpernas, Muhamad Hawwari. Statistical analysis: Einor Ben Assayag. Study supervision: Einor Ben Assayag.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Einor Ben Assayag.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Institutional Review Board, the Tel aviv Sourasky Medical Center ethics committee (REC Ref: 0056-20-TLV). Informed consent was obtained from all the participants in the study via approved institutional consent form. All the procedures were followed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Consort guidelines

Our study adheres to CONSORT guidelines.

Competing interests

Drs Ben Assayag, Tene, Hallevi and the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center have a pending patent application filed #62/978,324. No other disclosures were reported.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tene, O., Molad, J., Rotschild, O. et al. Blocking CCR5 activity by maraviroc augmentation in post-stroke depression: a proof-of-concept clinical trial. BMC Neurol 24, 190 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03683-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03683-3

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us