Skip to main content
Download PDF

Randomized controlled trial of intermittent hypoxia in Parkinson’s disease: study rationale and protocol

BMC Neurology volume 24, Article number: 212 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease for which no disease-modifying therapies exist. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that repeated exposure to intermittent hypoxia might have short- and long-term benefits in PD. In a previous exploratory phase I trial, we demonstrated that in-clinic intermittent hypoxia exposure is safe and feasible with short-term symptomatic effects on PD symptoms. The current study aims to explore the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and net symptomatic effects of a four-week intermittent hypoxia protocol, administered at home, in individuals with PD.

Methods/Design

: This is a two-armed double-blinded randomized controlled trial involving 40 individuals with mild to moderate PD. Participants will receive 45 min of normobaric intermittent hypoxia (fraction of inspired oxygen 0.16 for 5 min interspersed with 5 min normoxia), 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints include nature and total number of adverse events, and a feasibility-tolerability questionnaire. Secondary endpoints include Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part II and III scores, gait tests and biomarkers indicative of hypoxic dose and neuroprotective pathway induction.

Discussion

This trial builds on the previous phase I trial and aims to investigate the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and net symptomatic effects of intermittent hypoxia in individuals with PD. Additionally, the study aims to explore induction of relevant neuroprotective pathways as measured in plasma. The results of this trial could provide further insight into the potential of hypoxia-based therapy as a novel treatment approach for PD.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05948761 (registered June 20th, 2023).

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic and progressive neurodegenerative disorder for which only symptomatic treatments are currently available. The pathophysiology of PD is complex and involves multiple mechanisms, including mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Although there have been significant advances in understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying PD, disease-modifying therapies that can halt or slow down the disease progression are lacking [1]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies that can provide symptomatic relief and neuroprotection.

Recent preclinical studies have suggested that moderate hypoxia, the condition of low oxygen availability, may offer a promising non-pharmacological treatment avenue in PD [2]. Hypoxia activates evolutionarily well-preserved adaptive mechanisms that enhance neuronal viability and survival [3, 4]. Several animal studies have reported neuroprotective effects of hypoxia in neurodegenerative and mitochondrial disease models [5,6,7,8,9]. One potential mechanism through which hypoxia treatment may improve PD is via the activation of the Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) pathway. HIF-1 is a transcription factor that plays a crucial role in cellular adaptation to hypoxia by regulating the expression of genes involved in energy metabolism, angiogenesis, and neuroprotection [10,11,12]. Short-term activation of HIF-1 may lead to increased nigrostriatal dopaminergic activity [13,14,15,16], while long-term repeated exposure to moderate hypoxia may improve the systemic tolerance of cells and tissues to subsequent more severe stimuli, a process called hypoxic conditioning [2, 11, 17]. Interestingly, HIF-1 is necessary for the disease-modifying effect of exercise in preclinical substantia nigra models [18]. Intermittent hypoxia - the interspersion of hypoxia with brief periods of normoxia – therefore seems a promising method of administration as it allows for recovery and prevents tolerance to the hypoxic trigger [2, 19]. Several intermittent hypoxia studies have been conducted in elderly and fragile populations [20,21,22,23,24,25], and in a previous phase I study, we have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of hypoxia trials in individuals with mild to moderately severe PD (manuscript in preparation).

In this phase 1b-2a randomized controlled trial, we aim to investigate the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and net symptomatic effects of a four-week intermittent hypoxia protocol at participants’ homes. Mechanistic effects are explored by investigating putative neuroprotective blood markers. We hypothesize that a remote intermittent hypoxia protocol in individuals with Parkinson’s disease is (1) safe and feasible in individuals with PD without cardiorespiratory comorbidity and that a 4-week protocol (2) improves symptomatic and functional outcomes, and (3) increases hemoglobin, hematocrit and induces markers of neuroprotection.

Study objectives

Primary objective

(i) to explore the safety (number and nature of AEs) and feasibility and tolerability (questionnaire) of remote administration of intermittent hypoxia interventions in PD.

Secondary objectives

  1. (ii)

    to explore the net effects of a 4-week intermittent hypoxia protocol on a battery of standardized and functional scales, including Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale parts II and III.

  2. (iii)

    to assess the net effects of a 4-week intermittent hypoxia protocol on plasma biomarkers, indicative of neuroprotective pathway induction.

Methods/Design

Design

We will study the safety and net effects of a 4-week intermittent hypoxia protocol in a two-armed randomized controlled trial. The design and content of several elements of the current study is based on a previous exploratory phase I multiple N-of-1 trial [26].

Population

We will include 40 individuals with PD, clinically confirmed by a movement disorders-specialized neurologist.

Inclusion criteria.

  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

  • Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease by a movement disorders-specialized neurologist.

  • Hoehn and Yahr stage 1 up to and including 3.

Exclusion criteria

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Individuals with a diagnosis of restrictive and obstructive pulmonary diseases, cardiac output deficits, sleep apnea (or signs or symptoms thereof), excessive alcoholic intake, congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease NYHA classes III and IV.

  • Arterial blood gas abnormalities at screening procedure (see limits and stop criteria in Supplementary Materials).

  • Individuals with shortness of breath or other airway or breathing-related inconvenience related to lack of dopaminergic medication.

  • Unable to come to the clinic for measurements in OFF phase, or having unstable dopaminergic medication.

  • Individuals with active deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Sample size calculation

As this involves a phase 1b-2a trial with no previous comparable insights to base a calculation upon, formal sample size calculations will not be possible. Similar to our previous hypoxia trial [26], n = 20 per treatment arm is considered sufficient to assess nature and number adverse events, as well as the feasibility (Appendix III) of performing a hypoxia trial remotely.

Recruitment and consent

Individuals with PD will be recruited from a national recruitment website for PD-related research (ParkinsonNEXT.nl). Participants will receive an e-mail with detailed information on the study, including an overview of time investment and risks of participation. Individuals will have a consultation by telephone with the study contact person to answer questions about the research after receiving the information. If the participant is still interested, a screening questionnaire will be sent before the physical screening procedure. The coordinating investigator will contact the participant before in-clinic screening procedure if potential exclusion criteria are met, to prevent any unnecessary participant visits. Before the on-site screening begins, the informed consent form is signed.

Premature termination of participants

Participants have the right to withdraw consent at any moment during the study period without any consequences. After withdrawal, subjects will not be replaced during the study. Follow-up of withdrawn participants will be conducted by telephone consultation within one week after the last intervention. The occurrence of adverse events will be evaluated actively on a weekly basis. If permitted by the participant, the reason for study withdrawal will be collected.

Premature termination of the study

Informed by our phase I study, we do not expect to terminate this study on the basis of adverse events. However, the study will be terminated or be put on hold if the intervention appears to be harmful or if serious adverse events occur probably or definitely due to trial interventions. Any issue regarding study continuation will be discussed in close consultation with the Data Safety Monitoring Board (discussed hereafter).

Interventional medical device

A commercially available hypoxic generator (b-Cat ALT-120, B-cat High Altitude, Tiel, the Netherlands) is used, which is similar to devices regularly used in hypoxic training studies [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The intervention will be primarily administered at the participant’s home. Therefore, the generator is modified in collaboration with the manufacturer, such that the device automatically titrates the correct fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 0.16 in a closed feedback loop with an FIO2 sensor, and automatically regulates the intervention per protocol (five times five minutes hypoxia interspersed with five minutes of normoxia, totaling 45 min). This protocol was selected based on (1) the balance between safety and clinical effects as derived from our first study [26] (manuscript submitted), (2) the literature on the spectrum of dose-related effects of intermittent hypoxia [19], and (3) the multidimensional respiratory dysfunction in PD in response to (severe) hypoxia observed in our previous study (manuscript submitted), limiting the intensity of the hypoxic stimulus as per our current stop criteria (Appendix II).

The participant wears a pulse oximeter that feeds back to a computer linked to the generator. When SpO2 drops below 80% or SpO2 input is lost for one minute, the device automatically switches off and defaults to room air. As an extra safety measure, a safety button needs to be pressed every couple of minutes in response to a flashing light signal by the participant during any intervention. When the button is not pressed, the device switches off and the participant breathes room air. Lastly, a continuous output oxygen measurement system verifies appropriate dosing. Other device settings that are normally customizable are now disabled or moved to the inside of the machine and can therefore not be reached or modified by the participant. This will increase the safety of using the hypoxicator in the home environment. Participants receive elaborate on-site instructions and a tailored instruction manual for own use. A technical schematic of the device and its safety modifications is added in Appendix IV.

Outcomes and measurements

Primary outcomes: safety and feasibility

This is the first trial that investigates the deployment of an intermittent hypoxia protocol in a remote setting. In our previous trial, we tested single sessions of different hypoxia training protocols in PD (manuscript submitted). Building on that experience, the safety, tolerability and feasibility of a month-long intermittent hypoxia protocol in PD are the primary outcomes of this study (Table 1).

Table 1 Co-primary and secondary outcome measures
Full size table

Secondary outcomes: functional and motor tests

The selection of motor and functional outcome measures is based on the findings of our previous hypoxia trial (manuscript in preparation) and aims to measure for the first time the net symptomatic effects of a one-month intermittent hypoxia protocol in PD [26]. To the existing motor test battery, we added the MDS-UPDRS part II and 6-minute walking test (Table 1) to better account for functional effects, including exercise capacity.

Secondary outcomes: plasma biomarkers

Plasma biomarkers are included as hypothesis-generating outcome measures and are based on their value in target engagement (hemoglobin, hematocrit) and sensitivity to either exercise and longitudinal disease progression.

Neurofilament-light chain (NfL) is associated with motor decline in PD [39, 40] and is reduced by exercise [41]. Clusterin is a potential important regulator of exercise effects, and might positively influence neuro-inflammation and be inversely associated with cognitive function [42,43,44,45]. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) are acute biomarkers of brain injury and might therefore give influence in whether this is upregulated in response to hypoxia as a stressor [46]. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is potentially upregulated by hypoxia and exercise [47, 48]. As research into PD plasma biomarkers keeps accelerating, novel insights will be used to modify this preliminary biomarker selection. Extra plasma will be stored for additional analyses where appropriate. Any necessary protocol amendments will be coordinated with the medical-ethical committee.

Other study parameters

In addition to the outcome measures, information about age, gender, disease severity (Hoehn and Yahr scale), disease duration, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) and use of concomitant medication (including any changes during trial participation) are collected.

Measurement frequency

In-clinic measurements will be performed at baseline, in the week after the 4-week intervention period and 4 weeks after the last intervention session, except for the feasibility questionnaire that will be sent once, immediately after the intervention period. Adverse events are evaluated on a weekly basis.

Randomization, blinding and treatment allocation

The study is participant- and outcome assessor-blinded. Allocation to intervention order will be randomized by a computer-generated randomization scheme in R using block randomization. The lab technician is not blinded for safety and monitoring purposes and will oversee the randomization process. Although ventilation is expected to increase with ~ 20% mostly due to increased tidal volume and possibly respiratory rate, the extensive evidence-based experience of the study team and study advisors is that participants will not notice changes in their breathing at an FIO2 of 0.16 [50,51,52,53]. Indeed, blinding was assessed and successful in our latest hypoxia trial in PD where participants were exposed to multiple independent interventions of continuous and intermittent mild to moderate hypoxia (manuscript submitted).

Study procedures

Screening procedure

First, participants will fill in an online questionnaire (Appendix I) about cardiac or pulmonary diagnoses or symptoms and smoking, to exclude individuals with relevant cardiorespiratory abnormalities. If this questionnaire does not yield any exclusion criteria, participants are invited for an in-hospital screening procedure.

During this screening procedure, informed consent will first be ascertained, and the informed consent form will be signed. Subsequently, participants will be screened for cardiac abnormalities using an electrocardiogram and blood for baseline measurement is drawn and processed per standard plasma procedures. Then, participants undergo neurological testing, and finally participants will be blindly exposed to the active study intervention under arterial blood gas (ABG) and cardiopulmonary monitoring of an experienced pulmonary lab technician. ABG will be taken at the start of the intervention, and in the last 5 min of hypoxia. If oxygen saturation reaches 82%, an extra ABG will be taken in-between to investigate arterial pO2. Stop criteria during this intervention are pre-defined (Appendix II). Continuous non-invasive cardiorespiratory monitoring is conducted using the Cosmed® metabolic monitoring system (Quark metabolic cart for cardiopulmonary exercise testing [CPET], COSMED Srl, The Metabolic Company, Italy).

Intervention procedures

Interventions will be conducted three times a week, for four weeks in total. The first intervention will take place in the hospital under supervision of a pulmonary technician. Any subsequent intervention will take place at home, with a pulmonary technician present for instructions and monitoring at least once. If necessary for safety purposes, this technician will be additionally present for one or more subsequent interventions. After that, remote expert assistance is present through a live (video)call during each session in the first intervention week. Supervision can be extended when necessary for safety during subsequent weeks. Mandatory weekly videocalls ascertain adequacy of administration, safety and compliance. Participants are explicitly encouraged to spread the three interventions over any week as much as possible. By exception, an occasional intervention on the day following a previous intervention will be allowed.

Before the first session, the pulmonary technician will explain the working mechanism of the machine and will give ample time for questions. This includes the auto-off function of the machine, and when to contact the study team. When one individual has completed the Intervention phase, the machine will be collected and will be delivered to the next participant. In-between, machine parts that are part of the breathing circuitry will be cleaned for re-use.

Outcome measurement

Participants will be tested in-clinic for all secondary outcome measures except PDQ-39 in a practically defined OFF-medication state (> 12 h after intake after the last dose of dopaminergic medication). This OFF testing will be conducted in the morning and is a widely used and proportional method of ascertaining no relevant effects of exogenic dopamine on outcome measurement [54,55,56,57,58]. PDQ-39 is filled in by participants through an online survey. Because driving capability may be influenced by being OFF, we ask participants to refrain from driving to the in-hospital appointments themselves. Instead, they may be driven by partner, family, acquaintance or public transport. Travel expenses for clinic visits are covered.

Statistical analysis

Primary study outcomes

Safety (i.e., number and nature of adverse events) and the feasibility (i.e., questionnaire (details)) will be analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Secondary study outcomes

Secondary study outcomes (functional and motor testing, and plasma markers of target engagement) will be analyzed by linear mixed models (for linear effects between T0, T1 and T2), and if applicable, with post-hoc analyses using ANOVA.

Interim analysis

An interim analysis of study progress and safety will be performed after 20 individuals have completed the study. This will not involve a futility analysis because of the early phase of this clinical trial.

Monitoring and registration

Quality assurance and monitoring

The study will be monitored regarding the health, safety and rights of participants, protocol adherence and quality of data and data reporting during this trial at study initiation, twice during the study (on-site) and once at study completion. On-site monitoring visits (performed by a specialized study monitor) will assess the progress of the study, study procedures, used study materials and identify any concerns that result from review of the subject Informed Consent documentation, study records, collected data and study management documents. The study monitor will also ensure the Investigator adheres to all applicable regulations.

Data safety monitoring board

A data safety monitoring board (DSMB) will be established, which will consist of a PD-specialized neurologist, an anesthesiologist, a pulmonologist, an epidemiologist, and a patient representative. The DSMB will monitor the occurrence of adverse events and the study-related overall health of participants in this trial. An interim analysis will be performed after the successful completion of the study procedures by the first twenty participants to provide the DSMB with the latest recruitment data and safety outcomes, after which the Board will come to a consensus regarding study continuation or any adjustments. No member of the board has a conflict of interest with the sponsor of the study.

Discussion

In this phase 1b-2a randomized controlled trial, we will for the first time assess the safety and net effects of a four-week intermittent hypoxia protocol in people with mild to moderate PD.

Various previous studies have investigated hypoxia in PD. These trials included both healthy adults (with or without intense exercise interventions in hypoxic conditions [35, 59, 60]) as well as individuals with cardiovascular or pulmonary disease [20,21,22, 61, 62]. As hypoxia protocols differ importantly between studies, we have weighed the evidence and created a balance between safety and efficacy [19]. In this, we specifically consider the respiratory dysfunction in people of older age, and even more in people with PD, including a reduced hypoxic ventilatory response [63,64,65]. Therefore, we deploy a slightly higher FIO2 than deployed in some other hypoxic training studies, although the proposed protocol is still regarded a potent stimulus [19].

Previous studies found increases in hematopoiesis and cardiovascular fitness for comparable protocols, assuring target engagement [31, 66, 67]. These previously established beneficial effects on cardiovascular function in healthy humans are the prime reason to include the 6MWT as a marker of light- to moderate-intensity endurance [68]. Further exploration into the mechanisms of action is a specific objective of this study, and therefore, a selection of putative plasma markers of neuroprotection and neuronal injury is included in this study. It should be noted that for various of these markers, sensitivity to hypoxia and post-exposure timeline are unknown.

The HIF-1 pathway, which is regarded the prime mediating pathway for adaptive responses to hypoxic training protocols, is increasingly regarded as a potential target for the development of small-molecule approaches that can activate neuroprotective pathways in PD [69]. Various studies have been conducted with HIF enhancers or inhibitors of prolyl hydroxylase, the enzyme that constitutively breaks down HIF in normoxic environments. These studies have demonstrated neuroprotection in basal ganglia in parkinsonian models [3, 15, 70, 71], primarily through improving mitochondrial biogenesis, turnover and electron transport chain efficiency, and subsequently decreasing oxidative stress and pro-apoptotic pathway induction [72,73,74]. This clinical study may therefore additionally accelerate the translation of such preclinical insights into a target for repurposed pharmacological compounds [69]. It should be noted that the hypoxia response pathway is largely, but not completely, HIF-dependent [75], and that HIF-1 activation in normoxic conditions is not disease-modifying in some preclinical models of neurodegeneration [6, 7].

A prime novelty of this study is the remote, home-based nature of administration of a hypoxic training protocol. To the best of our knowledge, this approach has not been performed previously in individuals with a neurodegenerative condition, although remotely administered hypoxic protocols have been proposed previously [76]. Important considerations for the home-based use of an hypoxic intervention include the feasibility of intermittent hypoxia as a non-pharmacological intervention. Although in-center protocols have also pursued multiple-week protocols, home-based administration is a necessity for feasible application of low-burden intermittent hypoxia protocols in long-term practice. The same argument holds for the scalability of the intervention, as well as the long-term compliance to interventions in PD [77].

Some limitations of this study need to be considered. First, the intervention duration will likely be insufficient for structural or long-term symptomatic effects beyond the study period. Most previous studies that have investigated intermittent hypoxia in other populations have either not included long-term follow-ups or have not been able to show lingering effects beyond the intervention period [62, 78]. In this study, we therefore also included a longer-term follow-up of one month after the intervention period to assess the longer-term stability of effects on clinical symptoms and blood-based markers. Recent evidence suggests that interspersion of hypoxia with either hyperoxia or hypercapnia might respectively enable a more rapid recovery after hypoxia or enhance the potency of effect on mitochondrial metabolism, providing an opportunity for comparison to the current protocol [20, 79, 80]. This study includes a relatively low number of participants, which hampers its power to detect smaller treatment effects on several included standardized scales. Furthermore, this study design is unable to provide meaningful insight into the potential neuroprotective merits of intermittent hypoxia in PD, apart from yielding hypothesis-generating insights that may be derived from the plasma biomarker selection. Indeed, previous neurological biomarker studies in hypoxic training studies are limited to BDNF [81,82,83,84,85], demonstrating conflicting results. This highlights that despite the broad biomarker selection, biomarkers may only provide limited insight into the potential neuroprotective benefit.

In conclusion, intermittent hypoxia may represent a relatively simple, low-cost, and easily applicable and potentially scalable strategy that could be added to the current arsenal of non-pharmacological therapies for PD. This study is designed to investigate the safety and symptomatic effects of a multiple-week intermittent hypoxia protocol in PD and will thus provide essential insights for future studies to better understand its therapeutic potential in PD.

Appendix I

  1. 1.

    Have you experienced chest pain in the past 5 years?

  2. 2.

    Have you fainted for an unexplained reason in the past 5 years?

  3. 3.

    Are you short of breath or exhausted after short or mild exertion, such as climbing the stairs or running errands?

  4. 4.

    Do you have heart failure or other heart disease?

  5. 5.

    Do you become stuffy or short of breath when lying down (in bed)?

  6. 6.

    Do you have (have you had) a heart murmur?

  7. 7.

    Do any of your parents, brothers, sisters or your children under the age of 50 have heart disease (myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, hypertrophy, cardiomyopathy, pulmonary QT syndrome or dysrhythmia)?

  8. 8.

    Did any of your parents, brothers, sisters or children die suddently/unexpectedly (sudden cardiac death)?

  9. 9.

    Do you have high blood pressure requiring multiple medications?

  10. 10.

    Do you smoke or have you smoked? No / Yes, namely: .

  11. 11.

    Have you lived or worked in an environment where there was a lot of smoking or you breathed other polluted air? No / Yes, namely: .

  12. 12.

    Do seasons, weather or air quality change your breathing to the extent that you may become short of breath or exhausted as a result?

  13. 13.

    Do you have any lung disease (e.g. asthma, bronchitis/COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, emphysema)? If yes (which disease, severity, medication).

  14. 14.

    Do you often suffer from coughing or have a lot of trouble coughing up mucus?

  15. 15.

    Do you have sleep apnoea (breathing stops during sleep)?

  16. 16.

    On average, do you consume more alcoholic drinks than 3 units (men) or 2 units (women) per day?

  17. 17.

    Does not taking your parkinsonian medication make you feel stuffy, short of breath or exhausted, or does not taking it cause you to wheeze or whoop?

  18. 18.

    Do your parkinsonian symptoms become unbearable by delaying or not taking your morning medication?

  19. 19.

    Has anything changed about your parkinsonian medication (different drug or dose) in the past month?

  20. 20.

    Do you think you will need more or different parkinsonian medication in the next month?

  21. 21.

    Do you have any treatments that you find difficult(er) to momentarily interrupt or should not interrupt (e.g. as per your neurologist’s strict instructions), such as medication patches, deep brain stimulation (DBS) or a medication pump?

Appendix II

Stop criteria

Subjective parameters

  • Dizziness, discomfort and stress scores higher than 7 on a 10-point Likert scale.

Vital parameters

  • Heartrate > 140/min.

  • Breathing frequency > 25 per minute.

  • Oxygen saturation < 80%.

Arterial blood gas (during screening procedures)

  • pO2 < 40 mmHg (5.33 kPa).

  • pCO2 < 25 mmHg (3.33 kPa).

  • pH > 7.55.

Other

  • Occurrence of any serious adverse event, or the necessity to intervene for participant wellbeing.

Appendix III

  1. 1.

    Feasibility questionnaire.

  2. 2.

    The interventions were uncomfortable.

  3. 3.

    Breathing through the mask was hard.

  4. 4.

    Breathing through the mask was frightening.

  5. 5.

    I become claustrophobic with the mask on my face.

  6. 6.

    The intervention was tiring.

  7. 7.

    The intervention was tedious to undergo.

  8. 8.

    The intervention was painful.

  9. 9.

    The intervention took too long.

  10. 10.

    I got a headache during interventions.

  11. 11.

    I felt short of breath during intervention.

  12. 12.

    I felt nauseous during the intervention.

  13. 13.

    I could undergo this intervention for longer periods.

  14. 14.

    I felt safe undergoing the intervention at home.

  15. 15.

    I would undergo this intervention at home from now on only with someone from the hospital present.

  16. 16.

    I would recommend this intervention to others with Parkinson’s disease.

  17. 17.

    I find this intervention logical as a Parkinson’s treatment.

Appendix IV

figure a

*

Data availability

Anonymized data will be shared with The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (the study funder). This data may be kept for storage at a central repository either hosted by The Michael J. Fox Foundation, its collaborators, or consultants and will be kept indefinitely. Anonymized data will be made publicly available by the Foundation for the intended use of research in Parkinson?s disease as well as other biomedical research studies that may not be related to Parkinson?s disease

Abbreviations

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

HIF-1:

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1

FIO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

MDS-UPDRS:

Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating scale

TUGT:

Timed Up and Go Test

6MWT:

Six-minute walking test

DSMB:

Data safety monitoring board

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

ABG:

Arterial blood gas

LEDD:

Levodopa-equivalent daily dose

BBB:

Blood–brain barrier

MJFF:

Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research

References

  1. McFarthing K, Rafaloff G, Baptista MAS, Wyse RK, Stott SRW. Parkinson’s Disease Drug therapies in the clinical Trial Pipeline: 2021 update. J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11:891–903. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-219006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Burtscher J, Syed MMK, Lashuel HA, Millet GP. Hypoxia Conditioning as a Promising Therapeutic Target in Parkinson’s Disease? Mov Disord. 2021;36:857–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain IH, et al. Hypoxia as a therapy for mitochondrial disease. Science. 2016;352:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain IH et al. Genetic Screen for Cell Fitness in High or Low Oxygen Highlights Mitochondrial and Lipid Metabolism. Cell 181, 716–727 e711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.029 (2020).

  5. Ferrari M, et al. Hypoxia treatment reverses neurodegenerative disease in a mouse model of Leigh syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E4241–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1621511114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain IH et al. Leigh Syndrome Mouse Model Can Be Rescued by Interventions that Normalize Brain Hyperoxia, but Not HIF Activation. Cell Metab 30, 824–832 e823, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.07.006 (2019).

  7. Ast T et al. Hypoxia Rescues Frataxin Loss by Restoring Iron Sulfur Cluster Biogenesis. Cell 177, 1507–1521 e1516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.045 (2019).

  8. Khazal FA, et al. A conditional mouse model of complex II deficiency manifesting as Leigh-Like syndrome. Faseb J. 2019;33:13189–201. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201802655RR.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li G, et al. Intermittent hypoxic conditioning restores neurological dysfunction of mice induced by long-term hypoxia. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023;29:202–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.13996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Correia SC, et al. Defective HIF signaling pathway and brain response to hypoxia in neurodegenerative diseases: not an iffy question! Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19:6809–22. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612811319380013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Correia SC, Moreira PI. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: a new hope to counteract neurodegeneration? J Neurochem. 2010;112:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06443.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agani FH, Pichiule P, Chavez JC, LaManna JC. The role of mitochondria in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 expression during hypoxia. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:35863–7. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M005643200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Broderick PA, Gibson GE. Dopamine and serotonin in Rat Striatum during Invivo Hypoxic-Hypoxia. Metab Brain Dis. 1989;4:143–53. doi:Doi 10.1007/Bf00999391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Z, Yan J, Chang Y, Yan SSD, Shi H. Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 as a target for neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18:4335–43. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986711797200426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Witten L, et al. HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibition augments dopamine release in the rat brain in vivo. J Neurosci Res. 2009;87:1686–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.21988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schnell PO, et al. Regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase promoter activity by the Von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein and hypoxia-inducible transcription factors. J Neurochem. 2003;85:483–91. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01696.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Speer RE, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylases as targets for neuroprotection by antioxidant metal chelators: from ferroptosis to stroke. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;62:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.01.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Smeyne M, Sladen P, Jiao Y, Dragatsis I, Smeyne RJ. HIF1alpha is necessary for exercise-induced neuroprotection while HIF2alpha is needed for dopaminergic neuron survival in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Neuroscience. 2015;295:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Navarrete-Opazo A, Mitchell GS. Therapeutic potential of intermittent hypoxia: a matter of dose. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014;307:R1181–1197. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00208.2014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bayer U, et al. Effects of intermittent hypoxia-hyperoxia on mobility and perceived health in geriatric patients performing a multimodal training intervention: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1184-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Burtscher M, et al. Intermittent hypoxia increases exercise tolerance in patients at risk for or with mild COPD. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009;165:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2008.10.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burtscher M, et al. Intermittent hypoxia increases exercise tolerance in elderly men with and without coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2004;96:247–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sajjadi E, et al. Acute intermittent hypoxia and respiratory muscle recruitment in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a preliminary study. Exp Neurol. 2022;347:113890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trumbower RD, et al. Caffeine enhances intermittent Hypoxia-Induced gains in walking function for people with chronic spinal cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2022;39:1756–63. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Welch JF, Nair J, Argento PJ, Mitchell GS, Fox EJ. Acute intermittent hypercapnic-hypoxia elicits central neural respiratory motor plasticity in humans. J Physiol. 2022;600:2515–33. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP282822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Janssen Daalen JM, et al. Multiple N-of-1 trials to investigate hypoxia therapy in Parkinson’s disease: study rationale and protocol. BMC Neurol. 2022;22:262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02770-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dobashi S, Koyama K, Endo J, Kiuchi M, Horiuchi M. Impact of Dietary Nitrate supplementation on executive function during Hypoxic Exercise. High Alt Med Biol. 2019;20:187–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2018.0114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Horiuchi M, Ni INA, Miyazaki M, Ando D, Koyama K. Impact of Resistance Exercise under Hypoxia on Postexercise Hemodynamics in Healthy Young Males. Int J Hypertens 2018, 1456972, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1456972 (2018).

  29. Spurling KJ, Zammit C, Lozewicz S. Mains-powered hypoxic gas generation: a cost-effective and safe method to evaluate patients at risk from hypoxia during air travel. Thorax. 2011;66:731–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.141655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Harwood B, Wright J, Burnet S. Reliability and validity of the Hypoxico Everest Summit II altitude generator. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology 0, 1754337121995976, https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337121995976.

  31. Saeed O, et al. Improved exercise performance and skeletal muscle strength after simulated altitude exposure: a novel approach for patients with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2012;18:387–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vivodtzev I, et al. Mild to moderate sleep apnea is linked to hypoxia-induced motor recovery after spinal cord injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202002-0245LE.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Torpel A, Peter B, Hamacher D, Schega L. Dose-response relationship of intermittent normobaric hypoxia to stimulate erythropoietin in the context of health promotion in young and old people. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119:1065–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04096-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hayes HB, et al. Daily intermittent hypoxia enhances walking after chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2014;82:104–13. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.Wnl.0000437416.34298.43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Burtscher M, Gatterer H, Faulhaber M, Gerstgrasser W, Schenk K. Effects of intermittent hypoxia on running economy. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31:644–50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Treml B, et al. Carry-over Quality of pre-acclimatization to Altitude elicited by intermittent hypoxia: a Participant-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial on Antedated acclimatization to Altitude. Front Physiol. 2020;11:531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00531.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Trumbower RD, Jayaraman A, Mitchell GS, Rymer WZ. Exposure to acute intermittent hypoxia augments somatic motor function in humans with incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:163–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311412055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Trumbower RD, Hayes HB, Mitchell GS, Wolf SL, Stahl VA. Effects of acute intermittent hypoxia on hand use after spinal cord trauma: a preliminary study. Neurology. 2017;89:1904–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000004596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin CH, et al. Blood NfL: a biomarker for disease severity and progression in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2019;93:e1104–11. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu Y, Dou K, Xue L, Li X, Xie A. Neurofilament light as a biomarker for motor decline in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:959261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.959261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Joisten N, et al. Exercise diminishes plasma neurofilament light chain and reroutes the Kynurenine Pathway in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000982.

  42. De Miguel Z, et al. Exercise plasma boosts memory and dampens brain inflammation via clusterin. Nature. 2021;600:494–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04183-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jiang C, et al. Serum neuronal exosomes predict and differentiate Parkinson’s disease from atypical parkinsonism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91:720–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jongbloed W, et al. Clusterin levels in plasma Predict Cognitive decline and progression to Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;46:1103–10. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hsu JL, Lee WJ, Liao YC, Wang SJ, Fuh JL. The clinical significance of plasma clusterin and abeta in the longitudinal follow-up of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9:91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0319-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Diaz-Arrastia R, et al. Acute biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: relationship between plasma levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.3040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rahmani F, et al. Plasma levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Res. 2019;1704:127–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hirsch MA, van Wegen EEH, Newman MA, Heyn PC. Exercise-induced increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor in human Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Neurodegener. 2018;7:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-018-0112-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bowen DJ, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:452–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Loeppky JA, et al. Ventilation during simulated altitude, normobaric hypoxia and normoxic hypobaria. Respir Physiol. 1997;107:231–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-5687(97)02523-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Serebrovskaya T, et al. Intermittent hypoxia (IH) improves hypoxic ventilatory sensitivity and blood dopamine (DA) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Pathophysiology. 1998;5:234–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-4680(98)81208-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Serebrovskaya TV, et al. Geriatric men at altitude: hypoxic ventilatory sensitivity and blood dopamine changes. Respiration. 2000;67:253–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000029507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu X, et al. Enhanced cerebral perfusion during brief exposures to cyclic intermittent hypoxemia. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017;123:1689–97. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00647.2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Espay AJ, et al. On state freezing of gait in Parkinson disease: a paradoxical levodopa-induced complication. Neurology. 2012;78:454–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182477ec0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Cubo E, et al. Early morning off-medication dyskinesias, dystonia, and choreic subtypes. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1379–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.9.1379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lang AE, Widner H. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: patient selection and evaluation. Mov Disord. 2002;17(Suppl 3):94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Dewey RB Jr., Hutton JT, LeWitt PA, Factor SA. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of subcutaneously injected apomorphine for parkinsonian off-state events. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1385–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.9.1385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lucas McKay J, et al. Freezing of Gait can persist after an acute levodopa challenge in Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2019;5:25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-019-0099-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Bonetti DL, Hopkins WG. Sea-level exercise performance following adaptation to hypoxia: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2009;39:107–27. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939020-00002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Faulhaber M, Gatterer H, Haider T, Patterson C, Burtscher M. Intermittent hypoxia does not affect endurance performance at moderate altitude in well-trained athletes. J Sports Sci. 2010;28:513–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903581588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mallet RT, Manukhina EB, Ruelas SS, Caffrey JL, Downey HF. Cardioprotection by intermittent hypoxia conditioning: evidence, mechanisms, and therapeutic potential. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315:H216–32. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00060.2018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Bayer U, et al. Intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic training on cognitive performance in geriatric patients. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017;3:114–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2017.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Seccombe LM, et al. Abnormal ventilatory control in Parkinson’s disease–further evidence for non-motor dysfunction. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011;179:300–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2011.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Serebrovskaya T, et al. Hypoxic ventilatory responses and gas exchange in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Respiration. 1998;65:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000029224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Roggla G, Weber W, Roggla M. Parkinson’s disease and impaired chemosensitivity to hypoxia. Lancet. 2000;356:2099. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74308-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Park HY, Jung WS, Kim J, Lim K. Twelve weeks of exercise modality in hypoxia enhances health-related function in obese older Korean men: a randomized controlled trial. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019;19:311–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tobin B, Costalat G, Renshaw GMC. Intermittent not continuous hypoxia provoked haematological adaptations in healthy seniors: hypoxic pattern may hold the key. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020;120:707–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04310-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. de Groot PC, Thijssen DH, Sanchez M, Ellenkamp R, Hopman MT. Ischemic preconditioning improves maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:141–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1195-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Janssen Daalen JM, et al. The Hypoxia response pathway: a potential intervention target in Parkinson’s Disease? Mov Disord. 2024;39:273–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.29688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lin AM, Chen CF, Ho LT. Neuroprotective effect of intermittent hypoxia on iron-induced oxidative injury in rat brain. Exp Neurol. 2002;176:328–35. https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.2002.7938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Milosevic J, et al. Lack of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha impairs midbrain neural precursor cells involving vascular endothelial growth factor signaling. J Neurosci. 2007;27:412–21. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2482-06.2007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Johansen JL, et al. HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibition increases cell viability and potentiates dopamine release in dopaminergic cells. J Neurochem. 2010;115:209–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06917.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Parsanejad M, et al. Regulation of the VHL/HIF-1 pathway by DJ-1. J Neurosci. 2014;34:8043–50. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1244-13.2014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Li X, et al. Therapeutic potential of a Prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor FG-4592 for Parkinson’s diseases in Vitro and in vivo: regulation of Redox Biology and mitochondrial function. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Nimje MA, Patir H, Tirpude RK, Reddy PK, Kumar B. Physiological and oxidative stress responses to intermittent hypoxia training in Sprague Dawley rats. Exp Lung Res. 2020;46:376–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01902148.2020.1821263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Serebrovskaya TV, Xi L. Intermittent hypoxia training as non-pharmacologic therapy for cardiovascular diseases: practical analysis on methods and equipment. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016;241:1708–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370216657614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Janssen Daalen JM, Schootemeijer S, Richard E, Darweesh SKL, Bloem BR. Lifestyle interventions for the Prevention of Parkinson Disease: a recipe for action. Neurology. 2022;99:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Glazachev O, Kopylov P, Susta D, Dudnik E, Zagaynaya E. Adaptations following an intermittent hypoxia-hyperoxia training in coronary artery disease patients: a controlled study. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:370–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Tregub PP, et al. Molecular mechanisms of Neuroprotection after the intermittent exposures of Hypercapnic Hypoxia. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073665.

  80. Alekseeva TM, et al. Hypercapnic hypoxia as a rehabilitation method for patients after ischemic stroke. Neurol Res. 2024;1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2024.2343510.

  81. Becke A, et al. Daily Intermittent Normobaric Hypoxia over 2 weeks reduces BDNF plasma levels in young adults - a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Satriotomo I, et al. Repetitive acute intermittent hypoxia increases growth/neurotrophic factor expression in non-respiratory motor neurons. Neuroscience. 2016;322:479–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Schega L, et al. Effect of intermittent normobaric hypoxia on aerobic capacity and cognitive function in older people. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:941–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Törpel A, Peter B, Lessmann V, Brigadski T, Schega L. in Active Healthy Ageing (2015).

  85. Wilkerson JE, Mitchell GS. Daily intermittent hypoxia augments spinal BDNF levels, ERK phosphorylation and respiratory long-term facilitation. Exp Neurol. 2009;217:116–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.01.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank expert by experience mr. Gerben Kestens for his input on study methodology and logistics.

Funding

This study is fully supported by the Michael J. Fox Foundation (MJFF, Therapeutic Pipelines Program, funding number MJFF-019201). Prior to funding this study, the funder did not peer-review the study protocol. The study funder will be informed during the study, but is not involved in study design, execution or data collection, analysis or interpretation, or in writing or publication matters. Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders was supported by a Centre of Excellence grant by the Parkinson Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Jules M. Janssen Daalen, Marjan J. Meinders & Bastiaan R. Bloem

  2. Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical BioSciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Jules M. Janssen Daalen & Dick H.J. Thijssen

  3. UnshakeableMD, Oshawa, ON, Canada

    Soania Mathur

  4. Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Hieronymus W.H. van Hees

  5. University of British Columbia, Center for Heart, Lung and Vascular Health, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, Kelowna, Canada

    Philip N. Ainslie

Authors
  1. Jules M. Janssen Daalen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marjan J. Meinders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soania Mathur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hieronymus W.H. van Hees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Philip N. Ainslie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dick H.J. Thijssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bastiaan R. Bloem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MJM, DHJT and BRB obtained funding for the study. JMJD, MJM, PNA, HWHH, DHJT and BRB contributed to study design. BRB is primary investigator, JMJD is coordinating investigator and responsible for outcome assessment and data collection. JMJD, MJM, DHJ and BRB are responsible for general study execution. JMJD, DHJT, MJM and BRB will contribute to data analysis. JMJD wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors have read, critically revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jules M. Janssen Daalen or Bastiaan R. Bloem.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study will be performed according to the guidelines stated in the ‘Declaration of Helsinki’ from 2013 and ‘the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO)’ of the Civil Code of the Netherlands. This study has been reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee East Netherlands, The Netherlands, (reference number NL.83301.091.23) and has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05948761, registered June 20th, 2023). Participants receive verbal and written information about the study and written informed consent will be obtained before screening. Participants are covered by trial insurance issued specifically for this study by Radboud University Medical Center.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Bastiaan R. Bloem has received honoraria from serving on the scientific advisory board for Abbvie, Biogen, UCB, and Walk with Path; has received fees for speaking at conferences from AbbVie, Zambon, Roche, GE Healthcare, and Bial; and has received research support from The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, UCB, Abbvie, the Stichting Parkinson Fonds, the Hersenstichting Nederland, the Parkinson Foundation, Verily Life Sciences, Horizon 2020, the Topsector Life Sciences and Health, and the Parkinson Vereniging. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janssen Daalen, J.M., Meinders, M.J., Mathur, S. et al. Randomized controlled trial of intermittent hypoxia in Parkinson’s disease: study rationale and protocol. BMC Neurol 24, 212 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03702-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03702-3

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us