Skip to main content
Download PDF

Markers of cerebral damage during delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture

BMC Neurology volume 9, Article number: 21 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

S100B protein and Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE) can increase due to brain cell damage and/or increased permeability of the blood-brain-barrier. Elevation of these proteins has been shown after various neurological diseases with cognitive dysfunction. Delirium is characterized by temporal cognitive deficits and is an important risk factor for dementia. The aim of this study was to compare the level of S100B and NSE of patients before, during and after delirium with patients without delirium and investigate the possible associations with different subtypes of delirium.

Methods

The study population were patients aged 65 years or more acutely admitted after hip fracture. Delirium was diagnosed by the Confusion Assessment Method and the subtype by Delirium Symptom interview. In maximal four serum samples per patient S100B and NSE levels were determined by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.

Results

Of 120 included patients with mean age 83.9 years, 62 experienced delirium. Delirious patients had more frequently pre-existing cognitive impairment (67% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). Comparing the first samples during delirium to samples of non-delirious patients, a difference was observed in S100B (median 0.16 versus 0.10 μg/L, p = < 0.001), but not in NSE (median 11.7 versus 11.7 ng/L, p = 0.97). Delirious state (before, during, after) (p < 0.001), day of blood withdrawal (p < 0.001), pre- or postoperative status (p = 0.001) and type of fracture (p = 0.036) were all associated with S100B level. The highest S100B levels were found 'during' delirium. S100B levels 'before' and 'after' delirium were still higher than those from 'non-delirious' patients. No significant difference in S100B (p = 0.43) or NSE levels (p = 0.41) was seen between the hyperactive, hypoactive and mixed subtype of delirium.

Conclusion

Delirium was associated with increased level of S100B which could indicate cerebral damage either due to delirium or leading to delirium. The possible association between higher levels of S100B during delirium and the higher risk of developing dementia after delirium is an interesting field for future research. More studies are needed to elucidate the role of S100B proteins in the pathophysiological pathway leading to delirium and to investigate its possibility as biomarker for delirium.

Peer Review reports

Background

Postoperative delirium following orthopedic surgery for hip fracture occurs in up to 62% of the elderly patients, many with pre-existing dementia[1]. It is characterized by fluctuating changes in cognition, consciousness and attention and lasts on average, three days[1, 2]. Three clinical subtypes of delirium are known; a hyperactive, a hypoactive, and a mixed subtype [3, 4]. So far, the suggested pathophysiological mechanisms of delirium are mostly hypothetical, but lately there is a lot of interest in the neuroinflammatory system [5–7]. Although patients usually recover after resolution of the underlying cause, delirium appears to be an important risk factor for dementia, even in people without prior cognitive impairment[8].

The high frequency of dementia after delirium possibly reflects irreversible brain damage caused by the detrimental effects of the pathophysiological mechanisms of delirium on the brain. Moreover, it can be hypothesized that postoperative delirium itself might be the consequence of transient cerebral neuronal damage caused by peri-operative hypoxia, micro embolisms[9] or hypotension[10].

S100B-protein (S100B) and Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE) have been used as markers of brain damage in various diseases[11]. S100B belongs to the family of calcium binding proteins, it is expressed mainly by astrocytes and it is found in both intra- and extracellularly in brain tissue[12]. S100B is usually elevated in blood and in CSF due to nervous system damage, via functional disturbance of membrane integrity and/or increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier. NSE is the intracytoplasmic glycolytic enzyme enolase. It is found in neurons and neuro-endocrine tissue and it is elevated in the blood circulation after increased death rate of these cells.

Elevated levels of S100B have been shown to be associated with delirium in patients after abdominal surgery[13], after cardiac surgery[14] and in sepsis-associated delirium[15]. NSE was not elevated in serum in patients with delirium tremens[16] but it has been found to correlate with the degree of cognitive dysfunction at discharge from hospital after cardiac surgery but not after non-cardiac surgery[17, 18]. In these previous studies the delirious state at the day the sample was taken was not taken into account, neither subtype. The aim of this study in elderly hip fracture patients was twofold: (1) to compare changes before and after surgery of S100B and NSE levels in serum in patients with and without postoperative delirium, and to investigate the difference in serum levels before, during and after delirium; (2) to study the serum levels of S100B and NSE in different subtypes of delirium.

Methods

Patients

From May 2005 through February 2008, all consecutive patients 65 years of age or older who were acutely admitted with hip fracture to the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam were invited to participate. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or from substitute decision-makers in cases of cognitive impairment. Patients were excluded if they were not scheduled for operation or were unable to speak or understand Dutch or English. The institutional Medical Ethics Committee approved the study.

Procedures

Members of the research team completed a multidisciplinary evaluation for all study participants. Two geriatricians, a fellow in geriatric medicine, and four research nurses trained in geriatric medicine collected demographic and clinical data. The presence or absence of delirium was scored during weekdays separately by a physician and a nurse using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) [19]. We based our information for the diagnosis on our psychiatric examination of the patient, medical and nursing records including the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOS) [20], and information given by the patient's closest relative. When the diagnosis of delirium was doubtful, the patient was discussed in the geriatric consultation team to gain consensus. To identify the subtype of delirium we used the Delirium Symptom Interview with the cut-off scores described by Liptzin et al This resulted in three different subtypes: the hyperactive, hypoactive and mixed subtype[21]. The Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) was used to monitor the severity of delirium[22, 23].

Possible confounding factors, including demography, fracture characteristics, type of anesthesia, type of surgery, and peri- and postoperative complications were registered for all patients. The number of medication taken at home was taken as global measure of co-morbidity. Pre-existent global cognitive functioning was based upon anamnesis, medical history, and IQCODE-SF (Informant Questionnaire on COgnitive Decline-Short Form). The IQCODE-SF assesses the possible presence of global cognitive impairment based on the response of an informant who had known the patient for at least ten years [24]. The informant was asked to recall the situation two weeks prior to the hip fracture and compare it with the situation ten years earlier. Patients with a mean score of 3.9 or higher were considered to have global cognitive impairment [25]. To measure pre-existent physical functionality, we asked patients, or their closest relative in cases of cognitive impairment, to complete the 15-item Katz ADL scale based on the situation two weeks prior to the hip fracture[26].

A maximum of four blood samples was collected during the hospital stay under similar conditions around 11.00 am. Samples were taken during weekdays whenever patients were available for venipuncture. Blood was kept on ice after withdrawal. Serum was obtained by centrifugation for 15 minutes at 1780 g at 4°C, and aliquots were stored at -80°C. S-100B and NSE levels were measured on the Modular Analytics E170 (Elecsys module) analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim) using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIA) technique. Normal values were established for S100B as below 0.10 μg/l and for NSE as below 12.5[27, 28]. NSE will not be determined in case of even light hemolysis, because hemolysis could substantially increase the NSE value in serum due to the presence in erythrocytes[12]. Interleukin (IL) concentrations (IL-6 and IL-8) were measured using a cytometric bead array (CBA) immunoassay (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). The chemical analysts were blinded to the clinical diagnosis of the patients.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 15.0 was used for data analysis. We tested for differences in characteristics in patients with and without delirium using T-tests and Mann-Whitney Tests. Variables that were not normally distributed were expressed as median scores and inter-quartile ranges. Differences in NSE levels in different subtypes were analyzed using ANOVA and in S100B levels using the Kruskal-Wallis test. A two-tailed criterion of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlations between NSE and DRS-R-98 score, between S100B and DRS-R-98 score, and between S100B and NSE with IL-6 as well as IL-8 were determined using Spearman's rho test.

To examine the association of S100B with delirium state we used the linear mixed models approach. For S100B level the e-based log transformation was used, patient number was taken as a random effect, and day of sampling, delirious state, and the interaction between these two variables were taken as fixed effects. The association between NSE and delirium was analyzed in a similar way 'Delirious state' consisted of four categories based on the CAM scores of the patient at the moment the sample was taken: samples from patients in the non-delirious group were all categorized (1)'non-delirious', samples from patients in the delirious group were categorized (2)'before delirium', (3)'during delirium' or (4)'after delirium'. In addition, pre- or postoperative status, type of fracture, type of surgery, type of anesthesia, global cognitive impairment, and age were considered as covariates in the mixed model. In a backward selection procedure within the linear mixed models all variables with p-value above 0.05 were removed. The goodness of fit of the mixed models was inspected by assessing the distribution of the residuals.

Results

During the inclusion period 271 patients aged 65 years and older were admitted. A total of 55 patients were excluded due to lack of informed consent, 63 patients did not consent to extra blood withdrawal and 33 patients were excluded for logistic reasons. In and excluded patients were similar with regard to the male/female ratio, but the excluded patients were younger (mean age of 81.3 years versus 83.9 years, p = 0.005). In total 120 patients were included, 62 (52%) with delirium and 58 without. This resulted in 387 samples in total, 196 samples of delirious patients (21 samples taken before the delirious episode, 120 samples taken during the delirious episode, 55 taken after the delirious episode) and 191 samples of patients without delirium.

Patients with delirium experienced significantly more often pre-existent cognitive and functional impairment (p < 0.001) and lived in either old-people's homes or nursing homes significantly more frequently than non-delirious controls (p < 0.001) (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the type of anesthesia (p = 0.35), type of surgery (p = 0.54) or total number of complications (p = 0.19) between patients with and without delirium. The median time of admission was 14 days for patients with delirium and 11 days for patients without delirium (p = 0.04).

Table 1 Characteristics of Patients With and Without Delirium.
Full size table

Table 2 describes the levels of S100B and NSE in the first sample during the delirious episode in the delirious group compared to samples withdrawn at a comparable day before or after surgery of the non-delirious group (mean postoperative day 1.3, SD: 1.6). More delirious (81%) than non-delirious (50%) patients had levels above the normal values of S100B (p = 0.001). Also, the levels of S100B were higher in delirious patients (0.16 μg/L) compared to the non-delirious patients (0.10 μg/L) (p < 0.001). In our samples NSE was not determined in 153 (38%) of the samples, because of hemolysis due the preservation of the samples on ice after withdrawal. The NSE level was 11.7 (ng/L) both in cases and controls (p = 0.97). There was no significant correlation with S100B and NSE levels length of admission, death within the first 3 month or preoperative cognitive impairment. No correlation between NSE levels and IL-6 or IL-8 was observed, but significant correlation was found between levels of S100B and Il-6 (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) or IL-8 (r = 0.36, p < 0.001).

Table 2 S100B (μg/L) and NSE (ng/mL) values during delirium versus no delirium.
Full size table

To study the course over time of S100B, we included samples from the day before surgery until post-operative day eight because during this period samples from both delirious and non-delirious patients were available. Following a backward approach, type of surgery, type of anesthesia, global cognitive impairment, and age were removed. The final statistical model included delirious state (p < 0.001), day of blood withdrawal (p < 0.001), pre- or postoperative status (p = 0.001) and type of fracture (p = 0.036). To illustrate the effect of delirium on S100B, levels of three different example patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture were calculated and are presented in figure 1: 1) a patient who was delirious from one day before operation until eight days after operation (continuously delirious), 2) a patient who was never delirious during this period (continuously non-delirious), and 3) a patient who was delirious from the day after operation until postoperative day four (delirious day 1–4). S100B levels were highest 'during' delirium at all time-points. 'Before' and 'after' delirium S100B levels were still higher than those from 'non-delirious' patients. Delirious state was not significant in the same mixed model analysis with NSE in 233 samples. Spearman's rho test showed no significant correlation between S100B and NSE levels in the first sample (p = 0.99).

Figure 1
figure1

Three representative patients with an intertrochanteric fracture to show the changes of S100B during admission calculated with values of the mixed model analysis of all samples. The final model included delirious state (p < 0.001), day of blood withdrawal (p < 0.001), pre- or postoperative status (p = 0.001) and type of fracture (p = 0.036). Postoperative day 0 is day of surgery.

Full size image

In 34 delirious patients, delirium subtype was specified; one patient did not meet the criteria for any of the subtypes (Table 3). Specification of the subtype was missing for 23 delirious patients and from five patients no blood sample was taken during delirium. Delirious patients with known subtype were similar to delirious patients with unknown subtype with respect to age, sex and cognitive impairment, day of blood withdrawal, pre- or postoperative status and type of fracture. No large difference was observed in NSE and S100B levels in patients with different subtypes, nor was there a difference in levels between patients with known vs. unknown subtype. Of 38 patients the severity of delirium (DRS-R-98) was specified. Spearman's test revealed no significant correlation between levels of DRS-R-98 and NSE (r = 0.20, p = 0.32) or S100B (r = -0.08, p = 0.62).

Table 3 Values of NSE (ng/mL) and S100B (μg/L) and DRS-R-98 scores during delirium in different subtypes.*
Full size table

Discussion

This study among elderly patients admitted for hip fracture showed that delirium was associated with increased level of S100B which could indicate cerebral damage either due to delirium or leading to delirium. The study population represents a typical cross-section of elderly patients admitted for hip fractures. A similar frequency of delirium (52%) has been found in other large studies of hip fracture patients[29]. The expected risk factors for delirium in surgical patients, such as functional and cognitive impairment, were confirmed in our study[30]. Next to delirium, type of fracture, pre- or postoperative status and day of blood withdrawal were all associated with S100B levels. The effect of fracture and surgery and the time course were expected covariables based on the literature[31]. Although the group of delirious patients with known subtype was small, the hyperactive type of delirium was the most common subtype of delirium in our study, similar to what has been described by others[32]. Moreover, selection bias seems improbable since the delirious patients included in this analysis did not differ in associated factors with S100B and levels of NSE and S100B compared to the delirious patients without known subtype. Because this still could have introduced a bias, future studies are needed to confirm the lack of association between subtypes and NSE or S100B.

A limitation of our study is that the NSE and S100B values were measured from peripheral blood and may not necessarily correspond to values in the brain. Under normal conditions serum NSE and NSE in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) show no significant correlation, whereas serum S100B content is lower than that in CSF[11, 33]. We are not aware of studies that determined NSE and S100B in both CSF and blood among patients with cognitive deficits such as delirium. A second limitation of our study is that only 120 of the 183 (66%) patients consented to multiple blood withdrawals. Although the excluded patients were 2.5 yrs. younger it is unlikely that this small difference would affect the protein levels.

Our results showing elevated S100B levels in delirious patients are in line with former studies [13–15]. Studies looking at postoperative cognitive deficit (POCD) and S100B after surgery show however contradicting results, with no relation between S100B and cognitive performance after cardiac surgery at discharge [17], a questionable relation directly after cardiac surgery [34], but higher levels of S100B in patients with POCD after non-cardiac surgery[18]. The definition of POCD remains controversial, but it seems likely that delirium and short-term POCD are on a continuum of postoperative cognitive brain disorders[35]. Seeing delirium as subset of POCD, our results of NSE correspond to former studies that found no association between NSE and POCD at discharge from hospital after non-cardiac surgery[18]. Maybe NSE is released only in cases of severe brain damage, such as stroke, after resuscitation or neurologically complicated surgery[18].

Importantly, S100B is a marker of cerebral damage and/or reduced integrity of the blood brain barrier. In stroke, global hypoxia and traumatic brain injury a positive correlation between S100B and cognitive outcome has been established [36]. Possibly, the high frequency of dementia after delirium could also be predicted by the level of S100B during delirium. Predictive factors for cognitive outcome after delirium are unknown, largely because of the difficulties of diagnosing pre-existent cognitive functioning in patients with delirium[5]. On the one hand delirium and dementia (or cognitive impairment) could each be caused by the same precipitating factors such as the surgical procedure[7]. On the other hand, it could be hypothesized that dementia is caused by the detrimental effects of delirium itself [5]. The neuroinflammatory system seems to be a rational pathophysiological pathway for delirium [5–7] and this same system has been described in relation to cerebral damage [11]. The correlation between the levels of S100B and the proinflammatory cytokines IL6 and IL8 in the patients in this study can be seen as an indication that the neuroinflammatory system is related to possible cerebral damage due to delirium.

Conclusion

In our study of elderly patients admitted for acute surgical repair of hip fracture we found higher S100B levels in patients with delirium than in patients without delirium with the highest levels of S100B during delirium,. No difference in S100B and NSE levels between the different subtypes of delirium was found. Future studies are needed to elucidate the place of S100B in the pathophysiological pathway leading to delirium (and possibly dementia) and investigate its role as biomarker for delirium.

References

  1. 1.

    Bitsch M, Foss N, Kristensen B, Kehlet H: Pathogenesis of and management strategies for postoperative delirium after hip fracture: a review. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004, 75: 378-389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM IV-TR. Washington, DC. 2000

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    de Rooij SE, Schuurmans MJ, Mast van der RC, Levi M: Clinical subtypes of delirium and their relevance for daily clinical practice: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005, 20: 609-615. 10.1002/gps.1343.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Meagher DJ, Trzepacz PT: Motoric subtypes of delirium. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2000, 5: 75-85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Maclullich AM, Ferguson KJ, Miller T, de Rooij SE, Cunningham C: Unravelling the pathophysiology of delirium: A focus on the role of aberrant stress responses. J Psychosom Res. 2008, 65: 229-238. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    van Munster BC, Korevaar JC, Zwinderman AH, Levi M, Wiersinga WJ, de Rooij SE: Time-Course of Cytokines During Delirium in Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008, 56: 1704-1709. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01851.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Eikelenboom P, Hoogendijk WJ: Do delirium and Alzheimer's dementia share specific pathogenetic mechanisms?. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999, 10: 319-324. 10.1159/000017162.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lundstrom M, Edlund A, Bucht G, Karlsson S, Gustafson Y: Dementia after delirium in patients with femoral neck fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003, 51: 1002-1006. 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51315.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Barak M, Kabha M, Norman D, Soudry M, Kats Y, Milo S: Cerebral microemboli during hip fracture fixation: a prospective study. Anesth Analg. 2008, 107: 221-225. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181770abb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Edlund A, Lundstrom M, Brannstrom B, Bucht G, Gustafson Y: Delirium before and after operation for femoral neck fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001, 49: 1335-1340. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49261.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Goncalves CA, Leite MC, Nardin P: Biological and methodological features of the measurement of S100B, a putative marker of brain injury. Clin Biochem. 2008, 41: 755-763. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.04.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Basile AM, Fusi C, Conti AA, Paniccia R, Trefoloni G, Pracucci G, et al: S-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase as markers of subclinical cerebral damage after cardiac surgery: preliminary observation of a 6-month follow-up study. Eur Neurol. 2001, 45: 151-159. 10.1159/000052114.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rasmussen LS, Christiansen M, Rasmussen H, Kristensen PA, Moller JT: Do blood concentrations of neurone specific enolase and S-100 beta protein reflect cognitive dysfunction after abdominal surgery?ISPOCD Group. Br J Anaesth. 2000, 84: 242-244.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Herrmann M, Ebert AD, Galazky I, Wunderlich MT, Kunz WS, Huth C: Neurobehavioral outcome prediction after cardiac surgery: role of neurobiochemical markers of damage to neuronal and glial brain tissue. Stroke. 2000, 31: 645-650.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pfister D, Siegemund M, ll-Kuster S, Smielewski P, Ruegg S, Strebel SP, et al: Cerebral perfusion in sepsis-associated delirium. Crit Care. 2008, 12: R63-10.1186/cc6891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hemmingsen R, Kramp P, Dissing J: Delirium tremens: some clinico-chemical features. A study of alanine-aminotransferase, alcaline phosphatase, prothrombine and enolase. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1980, 62: 503-510. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1980.tb00639.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rasmussen LS, Christiansen M, Hansen PB, Moller JT: Do blood levels of neuron-specific enolase and S-100 protein reflect cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass?. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999, 43: 495-500. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430502.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Linstedt U, Meyer O, Kropp P, Berkau A, Tapp E, Zenz M: Serum concentration of S-100 protein in assessment of cognitive dysfunction after general anesthesia in different types of surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002, 46: 384-389. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460409.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI: Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990, 113: 941-948.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schuurmans MJ, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Duursma SA: The Delirium Observation Screening Scale: a screening instrument for delirium. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003, 17: 31-50. 10.1891/rtnp.17.1.31.53169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Liptzin B, Levkoff SE: An empirical study of delirium subtypes. Br J Psychiatry. 1992, 161: 843-845. 10.1192/bjp.161.6.843.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    de Rooij SE, van Munster BC, Korevaar JC, Casteelen G, Schuurmans MJ, Mast van der RC, et al: Delirium subtype identification and the validation of the Delirium Rating Scale – Revised-98 (Dutch version) in hospitalized elderly patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006, 21: 876-882. 10.1002/gps.1577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Trzepacz PT, Baker RW, Greenhouse J: A symptom rating scale for delirium. Psychiatry Res. 1988, 23: 89-97. 10.1016/0165-1781(88)90037-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jorm AF: A short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): development and cross-validation. Psychol Med. 1994, 24: 145-153.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    de Jonghe JF: Differentiating between demented and psychiatric patients with the Dutch version of the IQCODE. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997, 12: 462-465. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199704)12:4<462::AID-GPS510>3.0.CO;2-Q.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Weinberger M, Samsa GP, Schmader K, Greenberg SM, Carr DB, Wildman DS: Comparing proxy and patients' perceptions of patients' functional status: results from an outpatient geriatric clinic. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992, 40: 585-588.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Smit LH, Korse CM, Bonfrer JM: Comparison of four different assays for determination of serum S-100B. Int J Biol Markers. 2005, 20: 34-42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Muley T, Ebert W, Stieber P, Raith H, Holdenrieder S, Nagel D, et al: Technical performance and diagnostic utility of the new Elecsys neuron-specific enolase enzyme immunoassay. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003, 41: 95-103. 10.1515/CCLM.2003.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bruce AJ, Ritchie CW, Blizard R, Lai R, Raven P: The incidence of delirium associated with orthopedic surgery: a meta-analytic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007, 19: 197-214. 10.1017/S104161020600425X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dasgupta M, Dumbrell AC: Preoperative risk assessment for delirium after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006, 54: 1578-1589. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00893.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Linstedt U, Kropp P, Moller C, Zenz M: [Diagnostic value of s-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase as serum markers for cerebral deficiency after general anesthesia. Study in patient with hip or knee replacement]. Anaesthesist. 2000, 49: 887-892. 10.1007/s001010070042.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Santana SF, Wahlund LO, Varli F, Tadeu VI, Eriksdotter JM: Incidence, clinical features and subtypes of delirium in elderly patients treated for hip fractures. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005, 20: 231-237. 10.1159/000087311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Casmiro M, Maitan S, De PF, Cova V, Scarpa E, Vignatelli L: Cerebrospinal fluid and serum neuron-specific enolase concentrations in a normal population. Eur J Neurol. 2005, 12: 369-374. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.01021.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jonsson H, Johnsson P, Backstrom M, Alling C, utovic-Bergh C, Blomquist S: Controversial significance of early S100B levels after cardiac surgery. BMC Neurol. 2004, 4: 24-10.1186/1471-2377-4-24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rudolph JL, Marcantonio ER, Culley DJ, Silverstein JH, Rasmussen LS, Crosby GJ, et al: Delirium is associated with early postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Anaesthesia. 2008, 63: 941-947. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05523.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Stroick M, Fatar M, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Fassbender K, Bertsch T, Hennerici MG: Protein S-100B – a prognostic marker for cerebral damage. Curr Med Chem. 2006, 13: 3053-3060. 10.2174/092986706778521751.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/21/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the other members of the research team, JL Parlevliet, JL Popma, CMM van Rijn, ACL Scheffer, MJA van der Zwaan and chemical analyst E Delic.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Barbara C van Munster, Aeilko H Zwinderman & Johanna C Korevaar

  2. Department of Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Barbara C van Munster & Sophia E de Rooij

  3. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Catharina M Korse & Johannes M Bonfrer

Authors
  1. Barbara C van Munster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catharina M Korse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sophia E de Rooij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johannes M Bonfrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aeilko H Zwinderman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Johanna C Korevaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara C van Munster.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

BM and SR performed the data collection. CK and JB carried out the immunoassay. BM performed the statistical analysis under supervision of JK and AZ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Munster, B.C., Korse, C.M., de Rooij, S.E. et al. Markers of cerebral damage during delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture. BMC Neurol 9, 21 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-21

Download citation

Keywords

  • Neuron Specific Enolase
  • Postoperative Delirium
  • S100B Level
  • Blood Withdrawal
  • Confusion Assessment Method

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us