Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Neurology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Increased risk of hip fractures in patients with dementia: a nationwide population-based study

  • Hao-Kuang Wang1, 2,
  • Chao-Ming Hung3,
  • Sheng-Hsiang Lin1,
  • Yi-Cheng Tai4,
  • Kang Lu2, 5,
  • Po-Chou Liliang2,
  • Chi-Wei Lin5, 6,
  • Yi-Che Lee1, 7,
  • Pei-Hsuan Fang5,
  • Li-Ching Chang8 and
  • Ying-Chun Li5Email author
BMC Neurology201414:175

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-014-0175-2

Received: 26 May 2014

Accepted: 2 September 2014

Published: 12 September 2014

Abstract

Background

Dementia has been associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. However, little research has been conducted on the impact of dementia on wrist or vertebral fracture development. The aim of this study was to investigate whether dementia is a risk factor for different types of fracture in Taiwan.

Methods

The study sample was drawn from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database of reimbursement claims, and comprised 1408 patients who visited ambulatory care centers or were hospitalized with a diagnosis of dementia. The comparison group consisted of 7040 randomly selected individuals. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to examine associations between dementia and the risk of different types of fracture.

Results

During a 3-year follow-up period, 264 patients with dementia (18.75%) and 1098 patients without dementia (15.60%) developed fractures. Dementia was independently associated with increased risk of hip fracture [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.92, 95% CI 1.48-2.49]. Patients with dementia and osteoporosis had the highest risk of developing hip fracture (adjusted HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.28-4.01). Dementia did not increase wrist fracture or vertebral fracture risk when compared to the control group, even in patients with osteoporosis.

Conclusions

Individuals with dementia are at greater risk of developing hip fracture, particularly if they also have osteoporosis. Early mental screening programs and health education should be initiated to decrease disability and dependence in patients with dementia.

Keywords

DementiaBone FractureHipOsteoporosisRetrospectiveCohort

Background

Dementia and fracture are increasingly common problems in the elderly population. About 0.5% of the global population, or more than 35 million people worldwide, have dementia. These figures are expected to increase: the number of people with dementia is set to double in the next 20 years [1],[2]. Dementia has been associated with an increased risk of falling and low bone mineral densities (BMDs) [3],[4]. Both falling and low BMDs are known risk factors for fracture, and are leading contributors to disability and dependence in patients with dementia [5]-[8].

The likelihood of a fracture depends on the force conveyed to the bone by a fall, and the strength of the bone [9]. Several recent studies have reported an association between dementia and hip fracture risk [4],[9]-[17]. People with dementia tend to have a high risk of falling, which has been assumed to explain the relationship between dementia and hip fractures [4],[9]-[17]. In addition, osteoporosis is one of the strongest predictors of hip fracture in patients with dementia [4],[10],[12],[16], and wrist and vertebral fractures are common manifestations of osteoporosis [18]. However, little research has been conducted on the impact of dementia on wrist or vertebral fracture development. Nationwide studies from Taiwan, Sweden, Australia, Canada, and Finland show that persons with AD have higher risk of hip fracture in comparison to the general population. However, many of these studies are characterized by problems such as lack of a definitive diagnosis of dementia, while others focus on only hip fractures [9],[11],[13],[15],[17]. This makes it difficult to determine the risks different types of fracture in dementia patients, particularly those with osteoporosis. The purpose of this population-based cohort study was to determine whether dementia is a risk factor for different types of fracture in Taiwan.

Methods

Database

This retrospective, population-based cohort study used data sourced from Taiwan's National Health Institute Research Database (NHIRD), which has been described previously [19]. Briefly, the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID2000) of the National Health Institute (NHI) randomly selected 1 million insured subjects from the NHIRD database, which comprises healthcare data from the medical records of all beneficiaries (more than 99% of the 23.37 million people in Taiwan). The data represent original medical claims for all islanders covered by the NHI program and are distributed by sex, age, or amount of average payroll-related insurance payments. Diagnoses and procedures are coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, Ninth Revision (ICD-9-CM) code. Insurance reimbursement claims data used in this study were available from NHIRD for public access, and patient identification has been encoded to ensure confidentiality. The details of database generation, monitoring, and maintenance are published online by the Taiwan NHRI. The study was approved by the NHRI Ethics Review Committee, Taiwan.

Study sample

The study group was composed of patients with dementia [International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes: 290.0, 290.1, 290.2, 290.3, 290.4, 294.1, 331.0, 331.1, and 331.2] between January 2002 and December 2004 [9]. We assigned the first ambulatory care visits or hospitalizations for receiving a dementia treatment between 2002 and 2004 as the index date. We included only cases that consisted of at least 3 NHI ambulatory-claim records, or 1 inpatient record, in order to increase the validity of dementia diagnosis. The study flow chart is shown in Figure 1. We excluded patients who were younger than 60 years of age. Then, patients diagnosed with dementia before 2001 were excluded. In addition, patients who had hip fracture (ICD-9-CM codes 733.14, 733.15, 820, 821.0, and 821.1), wrist fracture (ICD-9-CM codes 813.4, 813.5, 813.8, and 813.9), or vertebral fracture (ICD-9-CM codes 733.13, 805, and 806) prior to the index use of health care facilities were identified and excluded from the study. A total of 1408 subjects with dementia from 2002 to 2004 were enrolled in this study.
Figure 1

Flow chart of the study population.

A comparison group was randomly extracted from the records of the remaining patients in the database with identical exclusion criteria. The control group comprised 7040 randomly selected age- and sex-matched individuals without a history of dementia, with 5 comparison subjects for every patient with dementia.

Main outcome measures

The primary endpoint of this study was the occurrence of hip, wrist, or vertebral fracture as the main diagnosis during a 3-year period from the individuals' index use of health care. We further calculated different fracture incidence rates between cohorts depending on dementia subtypes. The dementia subtypes were Alzheimer's Disease (AD) (ICD-9-CM code 331.0) and unspecified dementia (ICD-9-CM codes 290.0 to 290.4, 294.1, and 331.1 to 331.2).

Statistical analysis

The SAS system (SAS System for Windows, version 9.2, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to perform the statistical analyses. We compared the distributions of demographic characteristics and selected comorbidities between cases and controls by using Pearson's chi square test. Comorbidities were included only if they occurred in either the inpatient setting or 2 or more ambulatory care claims recorded 1 year before the index ambulatory care visit. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were conducted to assess the hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of fracture after dementia, adjusting for age, sex, and selected comorbidities. In addition to the abovementioned comorbidities, we also adjusted for osteoporosis (ICD-9-CM codes 733.0) and non- osteoporosis in the regression modeling. A p value <0.05 was used to assess statistical significance in this study.

Results

The demographic data of the patients with dementia, and the controls, are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between groups in age, gender, and geographic region. Of 8448 people aged ≥60 years enrolled between 2002 and 2004, 1408 patients visited outpatient services or were admitted with a diagnosis of dementia; the 7040 people without dementia were controls. Men comprised 47.66% of patients with dementia. The mean age of the dementia cohort and control cohort was 76.38 ± 7.45 years. Patients with dementia had higher rates of coexisting diseases, including diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, respiratory system disease, peptic ulcer disease, chronic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, rheumatologic disease, and cancer.
Table 1

Comparison of demographic characteristics and comorbidities between patients with and without dementia

 

Patients with dementia

Comparison patients

 

(N=1408)

(N=7040)

Characteristic

N

%

N

%

P

Sex

    

1.000

Male

671

47.66

3355

47.66

 

Female

737

52.34

3685

52.34

 

Age, mean ± SD

76.38 ± 7.45

76.38 ± 7.45

1.000

Age

    

1.000

60-74

270

19.18

1350

19.18

 

≥ 75

1138

80.82

5690

80.82

 

Geographic region

    

0.4799

Northern

600

42.61

3017

42.86

 

Central

348

24.72

1795

25.50

 

Southern

398

28.27

1859

26.41

 

Eastern

39

2.77

238

3.38

 

Missing

23

1.63

131

1.86

 

Comorbidities

     

Diabetes

263

18.68

119

1.69

<.0001

Dyslipidemia

193

13.71

94

1.34

<.0001

Hypertension

718

50.99

447

6.35

<.0001

Coronary heart disease

305

21.66

198

2.81

<.0001

Heart failure

65

4.62

52

0.74

<.0001

Atrial fibrillation

19

1.35

17

0.24

<.0001

Peripheral vascular disease

57

4.05

35

0.50

<.0001

Cerebrovascular disease

269

19.11

104

1.48

<.0001

Respiratory disease

238

16.90

148

2.10

<.0001

Peptic ulcer disease

252

17.90

162

2.30

<.0001

Chronic liver disease

141

10.01

66

0.94

<.0001

Chronic kidney disease

95

6.75

42

0.60

<.0001

Rheumatologic disease

43

3.05

20

0.28

<.0001

Cancer

46

3.27

43

0.61

<.0001

SD, standard deviation.

During the 3-year follow-up period, 1362 (16.12%) of 8448 patients experienced fractures. Among them, 234 were from the dementia group (15.25% of patients with dementia), and 967 from the control group (12.61% of the controls; Table 2). After adjusting for age, gender, and presence of the coexisting diseases listed above, the hazard ratio (HR) of fracture was 1.34 times greater (95% CI 1.14-1.58) in the dementia group. We further analyzed the HR values according to the different fracture sites (hip, wrist, or vertebral fracture). The HR values obtained within the hip fracture group, wrist fracture group, and vertebral fracture group were 1.92 (95% CI 1.48-2.49, p < 0.05), 1.66 (95% CI 0.97-2.55), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.67-1.14), respectively. Table 2 also shows the relative risk of different types of fracture depending on dementia subtype. It is noteworthy that the adjusted HRs for hip fracture in patients with AD was 2.19 (95% CI 1.43-2.88, p < 0.05).
Table 2

Fracture risk among sampled patients during the 3-year follow-up period from index health care utilization (N = 8,448)

 

Patients with dementia N = 1408

Alzheimer disease N = 183

Unspecific dementia N = 1225

Comparison patients N = 7040

Fracture occurrence

N.

%

N.

%

N.

%

N.

%

Total

264

18.75

38

20.77

226

18.45

1098

15.60

Crude HR (95% CI)

1.37* (1.19- 1.57)

1.40* (1.18-1.61)

1.36* (1.13-1.67)

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

1.34* (1.14- 1.58)

1.37* (1.13-1.59)

1.33* (1.11-1.63)

1.00

Hip fracture

109

7.74

17

9.29

92

7.51

306

4.35

Crude HR (95% CI)

2.03* (1.63- 2.52)

2.31* (1.57- 2.76)

2.01* (1.49- 2.93)

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

1.92* (1.48- 2.49)

2.19* (1.43- 2.88)

1.87* (1.33- 2.83)

1.00

Wrist fracture

47

3.34

7

3.83

40

3.27

177

2.51

Crude HR (95% CI)

1.43 (0.92- 2.04)

1.55 (0.95- 2.61)

1.16 (0.88- 2.74)

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

1.66 (0.97- 2.55)

1.49 (0.98- 2.57)

1.34 (0.91- 2.88)

1.00

Vertebral fracture

93

6.61

14

7.65

79

6.45

548

7.78

Crude HR (95% CI)

0.99 (0.79- 1.23)

1.00 (0.83- 1.31)

0.91 (0.72- 1.78)

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

0.88 (0.67- 1.14)

0.92 (0.69- 1.22)

0.88 (0.62- 1.53)

1.00

*P < 0.05. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Hazard ratios were calculated with the stratified Cox proportional regression method (stratified by sex, age group, and the year of index health care use) during the 3-year follow-up period. Adjustments were made for Charlson Comorbidity Index in the patients.

Tables 3 and 4 show the relative risk of developing different types of fracture depending on the presence of osteoporosis. The risk of wrist (HR 2.39, 95% CI 0.98-5.80) or vertebral fracture (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58-1.30) did not increase in the dementia group compared to the control group, even in patients with osteoporosis. Dementia was significantly associated with higher risks of hip fracture, regardless of age, gender, presence of selected comorbidities, and osteoporosis: HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.28-4.01, p < 0.05) with osteoporosis, and HR 1.84 (95% CI 1.37-2.46, p < 0.05) without osteoporosis, according to stratified Cox proportional hazard regressions (stratified by sex, age group, and the year of index health care use).
Table 3

Fracture risk among patients with osteoporosis during the 3-year follow-up period from index health care utilization

 

Patients with dementia N = 349

Comparison patients N = 1497

Osteoporosis group

N

%

N.

%

Total

    

Osteoporosis

87

24.93

330

22.04

Crude HR (95% CI)

1.33 (1.04- 1.69)*

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

1.32 (0.98- 1.78)

1.00

Hip fracture

    

Osteoporosis

25

7.16

64

4.28

Crude HR (95% CI)

1.98 (1.24- 3.15)*

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

2.27 (1.28- 4.01)*

1.00

Wrist fracture

    

Osteoporosis

13

3.72

34

2.27

Crude HR (95% CI)

1.85 (0.92- 3.70)

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

2.39 (0.98- 5.80)

1.00

Vertebral fracture

    

Osteoporosis

45

12.89

213

14.23

Crude HR (95% CI)

1.07 (0.78- 1.48)

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

0.87 (0.58- 1.30)

1.00

*P < 0.05. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Hazard ratios were calculated with the stratified Cox proportional regression method (stratified by sex, age group, and the year of index health care use) during the 3-year follow-up period. Adjustments were made for Charlson Comorbidity Index in the patients.

Table 4

Fracture risk among patients without osteoporosis during the 3-year follow-up period from index health care utilization

 

Patients with dementia N = 1059

Comparison patients N = 5543

Non-Osteoporosis group

N

%

N.

%

Total

    

Non-osteoporosis

177

16.71

768

13.86

Crude HR (95% CI)

1.36 (1.15- 1.60)*

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

1.35 (1.11- 1.64)*

1.00

Hip fracture

    

Non-osteoporosis

84

7.93

242

4.37

Crude HR (95% CI)

2.04 (1.59- 2.62)*

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

1.84 (1.37- 2.46)*

1.00

Wrist fracture

    

Non-osteoporosis

34

3.21

142

2.56

Crude HR (95% CI)

1.32 (0.87- 1.99)

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

1.48 (0.93- 2.43)

1.00

Vertebral fracture

    

Non-osteoporosis

48

4.53

335

6.04

Crude HR (95% CI)

0.86 (0.64- 1.17)

1.00

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

0.88 (0.62- 1.25)

1.00

*P < 0.05. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Hazard ratios were calculated with the stratified Cox proportional regression method (stratified by sex, age group, and the year of index health care use) during the 3-year follow-up period. Adjustments were made for Charlson Comorbidity Index in the patients.

Discussion

The results of this population-based cohort study demonstrate significant associations between dementia and the increased risk of hip fracture, especially in AD. For patients with osteoporosis, the risk of hip fracture was greatest for those individuals with dementia. However, we found no significant association between dementia and the risk of wrist or vertebral fracture, even in patients with osteoporosis.

Previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between dementia and hip fractures [4],[9]-[17]. There are several reasons why patients with dementia may have an increased risk of having a hip fracture.

The association between dementia and fracture risk may be fall-related [4],[9],[16],[20]. People with dementia have decreased brain dopamine activity, which is associated with a decline in motor function. These individuals may also be slower to mobilize, take more steps over a defined distance, and have a greater sway path [21]-[23]. The impairments of gait and balance are associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of falls in older people with dementia. In addition, patients with dementia were more likely to have diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation within the year preceding the dementia diagnosis. Risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension can impair cerebrovascular autoregulation, leading to an increased prevalence of orthostatic hypotension, vasovagal syncope, or carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Therefore, central autonomic dysfunction contributes to falls in older people with dementia. Psychotropic medication (e.g., antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, and sedatives/hypnotics) and cardiovascular medications also have side effects on balance, reaction time, orthostatic hypotension, and extrapyramidal symptoms [4],[16]. These side effects increase the risk of falls among patients with dementia. Furthermore, visual impairment is one of the many complications in diabetes mellitus, and is also thought to contribute to the greater risk of falls. These effects help to explain the link between dementia and hip fracture.

Another mechanism that may link dementia to hip fracture is the effect of osteoporosis. Patients with dementia have vitamin D deficiency and lower BMD, and are more likely to have osteoporosis [4],[16]. In a meta-analytic study of patients with AD, mean BMD was lower in the AD group compared with those without dementia [10]. In another case-control study, patients with dementia were more likely to have a diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to their fracture than those without dementia (43.8% vs. 37.7%, p < 0.05); however, primary preventative treatment rates were low [12]. Patients with dementia also have a lower intake of vitamin D and less sunlight exposure, which is particularly true for nursing home residents [16]. These factors indicate that patients with dementia are more likely to have osteoporosis, and may explain why the highest risk of hip fracture in our study was found for patients with dementia combined with osteoporosis.

According to our result, patients with dementia, especially the osteoporosis group, should be considered for special care to help prevent hip fracture. We suggest that health examinations that include cognitive, behavioral, or psychiatric assessment are needed, since early detection of cognitive dysfunction in patients with dementia may decrease the incidence of hip fracture. Moreover, the risk of hip fracture seems greatest in patients with dementia combined with osteoporosis, suggesting that early discovery and control of osteoporosis could decrease the risk of hip fracture [24],[25].

Another important finding in our study was the lack of any consistent associations between dementia and the risk for wrist or vertebral fracture, even in patients with osteoporosis. Fractures of the vertebrae (spine), wrist, and proximal femur (hip), are common types of fractures related to falls and osteoporosis [9],[26]-[30]. Wrist or vertebral fractures are common osteoporotic fractures. However, very few previous studies have evaluated the occurrence of wrist or vertebral fractures in dementia patients. Aggressive conservative management is preferred in most elderly patients, and wrist or vertebral fractures are often asymptomatic. These factors may explain the present findings [18],[26]-[28],[30]. Although surgical treatment has been shown to achieve better fracture union for wrist fractures, most elderly patients with wrist fracture are still treated with closed treatment [26]-[28]. In addition, there is no universally accepted definition of vertebral fracture [18],[30]. Vertebral fractures have been assessed using the subjective evaluations of radiologists based on spinal radiographs. Several different methods have been proposed for defining prevalent deformities, and it is unclear which is best [31]. Clinical vertebral fractures may cause back pain, numbness, tingling, weakness, or height loss. However, many vertebral fractures seem to arise without pain, suggesting that current medical practice simply misses most real vertebral fractures [30]. In addition, the adverse effect of wrist or vertebral fractures on most activities of daily living is not as severe as that of hip fractures. Thus, wrist or vertebral fracture are often not recognized and reported, leading to under-diagnosis and under-treatment. Early radiographic diagnosis followed by appropriate therapy would help to prevent underreporting.

The main strength of our study lies in its longitudinal database and large sample population. The problems of insufficient power and the effect of selection biases were minimized by the comprehensive coverage of the NHI system and a large sample size. Our findings match those of a majority of meta-analytic or community-based reports on the relationship between dementia and hip fracture [5],[9],[11],[13],[15],[17].

There are several limitations of this study. First, the diagnoses of dementia and fracture were made by ICD-9-CM codes. Certain selection biases may exist, and caution must be taken in extrapolating the results. For example, vertebral fracture is often considered to be a "silent disease" until patients seek treatment for other medical problems; therefore, it is possible that it is underreported as a medical condition [30]. Second, it is well known that osteoporosis is a very important risk factor for fracture. This study lacks information regarding the early recognition and treatment of osteoporosis [12]. Third, the NHI database includes only patients who sought treatment for dementia and fracture. Some information was not available, such as data on depression, low educational attainment, and rehabilitation [4],[9],[16]. Therefore, these variables could not be adjusted for in the analysis. Finally, information on causes of deaths could not be obtained from the NHI database, thereby making an analysis of the mortality ratio related to hip fracture impossible [7],[8].

Conclusions

In conclusion, patients with dementia have a significantly higher risk of hip fracture after adjustments for selective confounding factors such as age, gender, and underlying comorbidities. This study also showed that osteoporosis is an important predictor of hip fracture. Therefore, early detection of cognitive dysfunction and aggressive treatment of osteoporosis in patients with dementia may decrease the incidence of hip fractures. In addition, the dementia group did not show an increased wrist or vertebral fracture risk when compared to the control group, even in patients with osteoporosis. Care must be taken in extrapolating from these results because wrist or vertebral fracture is underreported.

Authors' contributions

YCL, KL, HKW: study design; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; preparation of initial draft. PHF, LCC: acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. CMH, SHL, YCT, PCL: study design, interpretation of data, manuscript revision. CWL, YCL: study design; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abbreviations

AD: 

Alzheimer disease

APOE4: 

Apolipoprotein E4

BMDs: 

Bone mineral densities

CI: 

Confidence intervals

HR: 

Hazard ratios

ICD-9-CM: 

International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, ninth edition

NHIRD: 

National Health Institute Research Database

NHRI: 

National Health Research Institute

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was based in part on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health, Taiwan, and managed by the National Health Research Institutes. The interpretations and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, the Department of Health, or the National Health Research Institutes.

Disclosure

This study was supported in part by grants from E-da hospital (EDAHP-101026) National Cheng Kung University (B102-113), and National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 102-2410-H-110 -069). The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University
(2)
Department of Neurosurgery, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University
(3)
Department of General Surgery, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University
(4)
Department of Neurology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University
(5)
Institute of Health Care Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University
(6)
Department of Family Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University
(7)
Department of Nephrology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University
(8)
Department of Occupational Therapy, I-Shou University

References

  1. Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM: Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2010, 28: 329-344. 10.1056/NEJMra0909142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sousa RM, Ferri CP, Acosta D, Albanese E, Guerra M, Huang Y, Jacob KS, Jotheeswaran AT, Rodriguez JJ, Pichardo GR, Rodriguez MC, Salas A, Sosa AL, Williams J, Zuniga T, Prince M: Contribution of chronic diseases to disability in elderly people in countries with low and middle incomes: a 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based survey. Lancet. 2009, 374: 1821-1830. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61829-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Amboni M, Barone P, Hausdorff JM: Cognitive contributions to gait and falls: evidence and implications. Mov Disord. 2013, 28: 1520-1533. 10.1002/mds.25674.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Friedman SM, Menzies IB, Bukata SV, Mendelson DA, Kates SL: Dementia and hip fractures: development of a pathogenic framework for understanding and studying risk. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010, 1: 52-62. 10.1177/2151458510389463.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Norring-Agerskov D, Laulund AS, Lauritzen JB, Duus BR, van der Mark S, Mosfeldt M, Jørgensen HL: Metaanalysis of risk factors for mortality in patients with hip fracture. Dan Med J. 2013, 60: A4675-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Panula J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM, Jaatinen P, Vahlberg T, Aarnio P, Kivelä SL: Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older: a population-based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011, 12: 105-10.1186/1471-2474-12-105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Khan MA, Hossain FS, Ahmed I, Muthukumar N, Mohsen A: Predictors of early mortality after hip fracture surgery. Int Orthop. 2013, 37: 2119-2124. 10.1007/s00264-013-2068-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Morrison RS, Siu AL: Survival in end-stage dementia following acute illness. JAMA. 2000, 284: 47-52. 10.1001/jama.284.1.47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nordström P, Franks PW, Gustafson Y, Nordström A: Cognitive Function in Young Men and the Later Risk of Fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2012, 27: 2291-2297. 10.1002/jbmr.1683.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhao Y, Shen L, Ji HF: Alzheimer's disease and risk of hip fracture: a meta-analysis study. Sci World J. 2012, 2012: 872173-10.1100/2012/872173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lai SW, Chen YL, Lin CL, Liao KF: Alzheimer's disease correlates with greater risk of hip fracture in older people: a cohort in Taiwan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013, 61: 1231-1232. 10.1111/jgs.12349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gleason LJ, Menzies IB, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, Friedman SM: Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in high-risk patients prior to hip fracture. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012, 3: 79-83. 10.1177/2151458512454878.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Scandol JP, Toson B, Close JC: Fall-related hip fracture hospitalisations and the prevalence of dementia within older people in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of linked data. Injury. 2013, 44: 776-783. 10.1016/j.injury.2012.11.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zapatero A, Barba R, Canora J, Losa JE, Plaza S, San Roman J, Marco J: Hip fracture in hospitalized medical patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013, 14: 15-10.1186/1471-2474-14-15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Weller I, Schatzker J: Hip fractures and Alzheimer's disease in elderly institutionalized Canadians. Ann Epidemiol. 2004, 14: 319-324. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bukata SV, Kates SL, O’Keefe RJ: Short-term and long-term orthopaedic issues in patients with fragility fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011, 469: 2225-2236. 10.1007/s11999-011-1779-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Tolppanen AM, Lavikainen P, Soininen H, Hartikainen S: Incident hip fractures among community dwelling persons with Alzheimer's disease in a Finnish nationwide register-based cohort. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e59124-10.1371/journal.pone.0059124.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ensrud KE, Schousboe JT: Clinical practice. Vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364: 1634-1642. 10.1056/NEJMcp1009697.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang HK, Lin SH, Sung PS, Wu MH, Hung KW, Wang LC, Huang CY, Lu K, Chen HJ, Tsai KJ: Population based study on patients with traumatic brain injury suggests increased risk of dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012, 83: 1080-1085. 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Buchner DM, Larson EB: Falls and fractures in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia. JAMA. 1987, 257: 1492-1495. 10.1001/jama.1987.03390110068028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bäckman L, Lindenberger U, Li SC, Nyberg L: Linking cognitive aging to alterations in dopamine neurotransmitter functioning: recent data and future avenues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010, 34: 670-677. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Volkow ND, Logan J, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Gur RC, Wong C, Felder C, Gatley SJ, Ding YS, Hitzemann R, Pappas N: Association between agerelated decline in brain dopamine activity and impairment in frontal and cingulate metabolism. Am J Psychiatry. 2000, 157: 75-80. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Volkow ND, Gur RC, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Moberg PJ, Ding YS, Hitzemann R, Smith G, Logan J: Association between decline in brain dopamine activity with age and cognitive and motor impairment in healthy individuals. Am J Psychiatry. 1998, 155: 344-349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sato Y, Kanoko T, Satoh K, Iwamoto J: Risk factors for hip fracture among elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2004, 223: 107-112. 10.1016/j.jns.2004.03.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Soong YK, Tsai KS, Huang HY, Yang RS, Chen JF, Wu PC, Huang KE: Risk of refracture associated with compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in Taiwan. Osteoporos Int. 2013, 24: 511-521. 10.1007/s00198-012-1984-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Diaz-Garcia RJ, Oda T, Shauver MJ, Chung KC: A systematic review of outcomes and complications of treating unstable distal radius fractures in the elderly. J Hand Surg Am. 2011, 36: 824-835. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.02.005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Haug L, Gabl M: A prospective randomized trial comparing nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in patients sixty-five years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011, 93: 2146-2153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Arora R, Gabl M, Gschwentner M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Lutz M: A comparative study of clinical and radiologic outcomes of unstable colles type distal radius fractures in patients older than 70 years: nonoperative treatment versus volar locking plating. J Orthop Trauma. 2009, 23: 237-242. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819b24e9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim JK, Koh YD, Kook SH: Effect of calcium phosphate bone cement augmentation on volar plate fixation of unstable distal radial fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011, 93: 609-614. 10.2106/JBJS.J.00613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cummings SR, Melton LJ: Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002, 359: 1761-1767. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Christensen L, Cummings SR: Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res. 1999, 14: 90-101. 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.1.90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement