Research article
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cognitive impairment six months after ischaemic stroke: a profile from the ASPIRE-S study

  • Lisa Mellon1Email author,
  • Linda Brewer2,
  • Patricia Hall2,
  • Frances Horgan3,
  • David Williams2,
  • Anne Hickey1 and
  • on behalf of the ASPIRE-S study group
BMC Neurology201515:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0288-2

©  Mellon et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

Received: 10 September 2014

Accepted: 25 February 2015

Published: 12 March 2015

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Cognitive impairment commonly occurs in the acute phase post-stroke, but may persist with over half of all stroke survivors experiencing some form of long-term cognitive deficit. Recent evidence suggests that optimising secondary prevention adherence is a critical factor in preventing recurrent stroke and the incidence of stroke-related cognitive impairment and dementia. The aim of this study was to profile cognitive impairment of stroke survivors at six months, and to identify factors associated with cognitive impairment post-stroke, focusing on indicators of adequate secondary prevention and psychological function.

Methods

Participants were assessed at six months following an ischaemic stroke as part of the Action on Secondary Prevention Interventions and Rehabilitation in Stroke study (ASPIRE-S), which examined the secondary preventive and rehabilitative profile of patients in the community post-stroke. Cognitive impairment was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Results

Two-hundred and fifty-six stroke patients were assessed at six months. Over half of the sample (56.6%) were found to have cognitive impairment, with significant associations between cognitive impairment and female sex (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, 95% CI 1.01-2.57) and history of cerebrovascular disease (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.38-3.59). Treatment with antihypertensive medications (OR = .65, 95% CI .44-.96) and prescription of anticoagulant therapy (OR = .41, 95% CI .26-.68) were associated with reduced likelihood of cognitive impairment, however increasing number of total prescribed medications was moderately associated with poorer cognitive impairment (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.19).

Conclusions

Findings reveal levels of cognitive impairment at 6 months post-stroke that are concerning. Encouragingly, aspects of secondary prevention were identified that may be protective in reducing the incidence of cognitive impairment post-stroke. Neuropsychological rehabilitation post-stroke is also required as part of stroke rehabilitation models to meet the burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Keywords

Cognition Cognitive impairment Stroke rehabilitation Secondary prevention

Background

Stroke is the second most common cause of death in the world after ischaemic heart disease [1] and the leading cause of acquired disability, with over half of patients remaining physically dependent following a stroke [2] and approximately two-thirds having some form of neurological impairment at five years post-stroke [3]. Restoration of physical function in stroke is widely researched, with evidence demonstrating significant improvements following physical rehabilitation [4]. However strategies for restoration of cognitive dysfunction receive significantly less attention with cognitive rehabilitation post-stroke arguably the “lost dimension” of stroke rehabilitation. Estimation of the prevalence of post-stroke cognitive impairments is difficult given the range of potential deficits, including memory, attention, and visuospatial ability, thus reported rates have varied from 30-50% [5]. A degree of cognitive impairment is often evident in the immediate aftermath of stroke with many deficits resolving over the initial recovery period [6]. However longitudinal evidence in the United Kingdom [7] has demonstrated the long-term prevalence of cognitive impairment in stroke, with prevalence rates of 22% at five years and 21% at 14 years reported, highlighting the persistent pervasiveness of cognitive deficits. Cognitive impairment can have a significant impact on quality of life and activities of daily living by reducing the degree of independence of the individual [8] and is associated with long-term morbidity and disability [7].

Up to 34% of patients with dementia show significant vascular pathology [9]. Because vascular risk factors are treatable and, in some instances preventable, it may be possible to prevent, postpone, or mitigate vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), as well as the vascular exacerbation of Alzheimer’s disease. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Pendlebury and Rothwell [5] showed that 10% of patients had dementia before first stroke, 10% developed dementia in the year after first stroke and over one-third of patients developed dementia after recurrent stroke. Emerging evidence suggests that appropriate secondary prevention of recurrent events may reduce the burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment and progression to dementia. The Perindopril Protection against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) randomised clinical trial reported that active blood pressure management was associated with a 19% risk reduction in cognitive decline [10]. A recent UK study [11] also suggested that appropriate management of vascular risk factors post-stroke was associated with longer term protective benefits for onset of cognitive impairment. In particular, management of vascular risk factors, including adequate blood pressure control, lipid control and anti-thrombotic therapy were associated with reduced risk of post-stroke cognitive impairment over a 15 year follow-up period.

The cognitive profile of Irish stroke survivors at six months was examined as part of the Action on Secondary Prevention Interventions and Rehabilitation in Stroke study (ASPIRE-S). The ASPIRE-S study was a prospective descriptive study which aimed to address three components of stroke care following discharge from acute hospital care, namely secondary preventive strategies, delivery of community rehabilitative care and ongoing rehabilitative need. The aim of the analysis presented in this study was to comprehensively profile post-stroke cognitive impairment and, in doing so, to determine which factors were associated with cognitive impairment in this stroke survivor cohort.

Methods

Study population and procedure

The ASPIRE-S participants were consecutively recruited first ever and recurrent stroke cases in patients of all ages admitted to three large teaching hospitals between October 1st 2011 and September 30th 2012. The North Dublin Population Stroke Study group (NDPSS) [12-14] has previously characterised the stroke population in North Dublin, providing detailed clinical information on incidence and clinical profile of stroke patients in this geographical area of Ireland. The study received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committees of the three participating hospitals. Participants consented to participate in ASPIRE-S whilst in hospital with an acute stroke, with assent from next-of-kin obtained for patients identified by the medical team as lacking capacity to give informed consent. In-hospital recruitment was conducted by the research team which included a cardiovascular research nurse, a clinical research fellow and research assistant across the three hospital sites. Consented participants were contacted at six months post-stroke to participate in a detailed assessment of secondary preventive and rehabilitative indicators. The assessment by a member of the research team took place either in the participant’s home or in dedicated clinical research facilities at one of the participating hospitals, depending on the participant’s preference.

The study focused on hospital-based case ascertainment, as NDPSS found that over 90% of stroke cases were treated in an acute hospital [12]. Case ascertainment was identified by daily review of referrals to the neurology, geriatric and stroke consultation services for each of the participating hospital sites. The World Health Organisation (WHO) definition of stroke was used to define presenting stroke as “rapidly developing clinical signs of focal or global disturbance of cerebral function, lasting more than 24 hours or leading to death with no apparent cause other than that of vascular origin” [15]. Participants were excluded if the following criteria were identified: diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage or sub-dural and extra-dural haematoma; transient ischaemic attack (TIA); residence outside the geographic area defining the source population; age < 18 years.

Measures

Baseline assessment

Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were recorded for each participant during in-hospital recruitment including age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity (Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) [16] and stroke sub-type using the Bamford classification [17] and TOAST criteria for stroke aetiology [18]. Pre-stroke functional dependency was assessed retrospectively and at 72 hours, using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) [19], a commonly used measure of global disability used as a functional outcome measure in stroke populations [20]. All members of the team received standardised training in the administration of all assessment measures to minimise measurement variability.

Six-month assessment

Ongoing rehabilitative need and functional dependency

A number of assessments were performed to assess level of disability and rehabilitative need.
  1. 1.

    Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [21]. The MoCA was developed for use in the detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and screens for the common domains of impairment in MCI. Short-term memory recall, delayed recall, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, phonemic and syntactic fluency, verbal abstraction, serial subtraction, attention, concentration and working memory and orientation to time and place are all examined in a 30-point test which can be administered in approximately 10 minutes [21]. The original MoCA publication sets the cut-off threshold for cognitive impairment as a MoCA score of less than 26. The MoCA has been reported as a valid measure for screening for cognitive impairment and dementia in stroke cohorts [22], demonstrating higher sensitivity than the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), at the cost of lower specificity [22,23].

     
  2. 2.

    Functional status was assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) [20] with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.

     
  3. 3.

    Psychological function was assessed using a number of measures included in a self-completion questionnaire which was posted to participants in the week preceding the ASPIRE-S assessment. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was included in the self-completion questionnaire, a widely used scale for assessment of mood disorder, containing two dimensions for anxiety and depression [24]. The range of scores for each dimension is 0–21, with a score of greater than 7 indicative of probable or possible presence of symptoms of mood disorder [25]. The HADS has been validated for use in stroke cohorts [26]. The Vulnerable Elders Scale (VES) was also completed by the participant as part of the self-completion questionnaire. The VES is a 13-item measure, with scores greater than a cut-off of 3 indicating vulnerability and increased risk for mortality in the subsequent two years [27]. Post-stroke health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SSQoL) [28], a 35-item scale which examines seven domains of quality of life, namely physical function, mood, role function, vision, language, thinking and energy. The maximum score is 175, with higher scores indicating better self-reported HRQoL.

     

The HADS, VES and SSQoL were included in a postal questionnaire which stroke survivors received one week prior to the ASPIRE-S home assessment. During the ASPIRE-S home assessment, participants were provided with the opportunity to clarify any questions presented in the questionnaire, and ASPIRE-S researchers ensured completeness of the questionnaire.

Secondary prevention

A number of clinical efficacy markers were recorded during the six-month assessment, including resting blood pressure using a digital OMRON M6 (Intellisense™) Dual Check System, International Normalised Ratio (INR) control (average of last three INR readings) medications, medication adherence, and carbon monoxide assessment for participants documented as smokers at baseline. Pharmacological secondary prevention was examined through fasting venous blood analysis of serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose and HbA1c (diabetics only). All participants were fitted with a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor where possible.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics and non-parametric comparisons using χ2 test and Fisher’s Exact test for categorical variables and Kruskal Wallis test for continuous variables were used to examine the association between cognitive impairment (MoCA <26) and demographic and clinical characteristics. The degree of association between individual variables and cognitive impairment was estimated using the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Multivariable analysis was adjusted for age, sex and stroke severity as these variables are highly correlated with stroke outcome [29]. Considerations for modelling sample size were applied to avoid over-fitting of the models and subsequent production of biased estimates of effect size [30,31]. Statistical analysis using the cluster option in Stata 12.0 provided Huber-White-robust standard error estimates as data were collected across three differing hospital sites. Targets for secondary preventive indicators (blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol) were calculated using the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice 2012 [32] and recommendations from the EUROASPIRE III stroke study [33]. Raised blood pressure was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg. Raised cholesterol levels were defined as total cholesterol concentration ≥4.5 mmol/L, and/or LDL cholesterol ≥2.5 mmol/L, and impaired fasting glycaemia was defined as fasting glucose <7 mmol/L [33].

Results

Three hundred and two stroke cases were recruited to the ASPIRE-S study at baseline. Approximately 52% of all referred cases were ineligible for study inclusion at baseline, with the most common reasons for non-inclusion recorded as patient diagnosed as TIA following MRI imaging (17.9%), or too medically unwell during hospital admission (16%). Of the 302 stroke cases recruited at baseline, 256 assessments were completed at six months post-stroke (84.8%). Reasons for non-completion of follow-up were death in preceding six months (n = 9), declined participation (n = 22), development of serious illness (n = 6), final discharge diagnosis as not stroke (n = 4) and uncontactable (n = 5). The mean age was 69 years (±12.9; median 71 years, IQR = 61-78) at time of stroke onset, with 96.4% of patients functionally independent prior to the stroke, defined by mRS <3. Median stroke severity score on the SSS was 52 (IQR 45–58). Prevalence of functional dependence at six months post stroke (mRS ≥3) was 30.8% (N = 79), reduced from 47.5% (n = 121) at 72 hours post-stroke.

Cognitive performance at six months

MoCA assessment was completed for 226/256 participants (88.2%). The mean MoCA score was 23.5 (SD ± 4.9), with scores ranging from 7 to 30. Performance on each of the MoCA sub-domains and associated confidence intervals are presented in Table 1. Poorest performance was evident in recall (Mean = 2.53; SD ± 1.6; range 0–5), and visuospatial and executive functioning (Mean = 3.53; SD ± 1.5; range 0–5). When the standard MoCA cut-off of <26 for cognitive impairment was applied to the sample, 128 participants (56.6%) scored in the impaired range on MoCA at six months post-stroke. A higher proportion of females were categorised as cognitively impaired. The presence of a number of risk factors had an association with cognitive impairment in univariate analysis, namely history of a previous cerebrovascular event, atrial fibrillation and carotid stenosis (See Table 2). The burden of cognitive impairment was further explored by lowering the threshold for cognitive impairment on MoCA scoring to <23 [23]. The prevalence of cognitive impairment in the sample using this cut-off was 92/226 (41%), indicating a pervasive level of impairment in the sample.
Table 1

Mean domain scores for MoCA

MoCA domain

Scoring range

Mean score

95% CI

Visiospatial and executive function

0-5

3.53

3.33-3.73

Naming

0-3

2.62

2.52-2.72

Attention

0-6

5.23

5.06-5.40

Language

0-3

2.22

2.10-2.34

Abstraction

0-2

1.72

1.64-1.79

Delayed recall

0-5

2.53

2.32-2.74

Orientation

0-6

5.65

5.54-5.76

Total MoCA score

0-30

23.53

22.88-24.18

CI, Confidence Interval.

Table 2

Demographic and clinical details at baseline and at six months for cognitively impaired and non-cognitively impaired stroke survivors

 

Cognitive impairment

No cognitive impairment

 
 

(n = 128; MoCA < = 25)

(n = 98; MocA >26)

 
 

N (%)

N (%)

P value

Univariate OR

95% CI

Age (Mean, ± SD)

71.8 (11.4)

63.2 (13.1)

0.001

1.06

1.02-1.09

Sex

     

Female

63 (67.7)

30 (32.3)

<0.001

2.19

1.97- 2.45

Health Insurance status as proxy SES

     

Public patient

102 (65.8)

53 (34.2)

   

Private patient

26 (36.6)

45 (63.4)

0.001

.33

.14-.63

Baseline risk factors

     

Previous TIA/Stroke

41 (74.5)

14 (25.5)

<0.001

2.83

1.6-4.9

Heart disease

42 (63.6)

24 (36.4)

0.91

1.5

.63-3.6

Hypertension

76 (60.3)

50 (39.7)

0.055

1.4

.99-1.98

Diabetes

24 (64.9)

13 (35.1)

0.059

1.5

.98-2.31

Hypercholesterolemia

65 (58.6)

46 (41.4)

0.23

1.16

.91-1.49

Smoker

34 (52.3)

31 (47.7)

0.18

.78

.54-1.12

Atrial fibrillation

53 (63.9)

30 (36.1)

<0.001

1.6

1.26-1.04

Carotid stenosis

21 (61.8)

13 (38.9)

<0.001

1.28

1.14-1.45

Bamford classification

     

TACS

6 (66.7)

3 (33.3)

0.67

1.56

.21-11.63

PACS

51 (55.4)

41 (44.6)

0.7

.92

.1-1.4

POCS

36 (53.7)

31 (46.3)

<0.001

.84

.77-.92

LACS

33 (62.2)

20 (37.8)

0.002

1.35

1.12-1.64

TOAST classification

     

Large artery atherosclerosis

19 (52.8)

17 (47.2)

0.54

.83

.46-1.49

Cardioembolism

52 (59.8)

35 (40.2)

0.22

1.23

.88-1.72

Small vessel occlusion

12 (42.9)

16 (57.1)

<0.001

.53

.45-.63

Other determined aetiology

4 (30.8)

9 (68.2)

<0.001

.31

.23-.45

Undetermined aetiology

41 (66.1)

21 (33.9)

0.3

1.72

.61-4.89

Stroke severity (SSS scale; Median, IQR)

51 (42–57.5)

56 (49–58)

<0.001

.92

.89-.94

Functional dependency

     

Pre-stroke function (mRS; Median, IQR)

0 (0–0)

0 (0–0)

0.02

2.07

1.08-3.95

Function at 72 hours (mRS; Median, IQR)

3 (1–4)

1 (0–3)

<0.001

1.56

1.41-1.71

Function at six months

2 (1–3)

1 (1–2)

<0.001

1.76

1.32-2.34

(mRS; Median, IQR)

VES (> = 3)

71 (73.2)

26 (26.8)

0.01

5.8

1.51-22.53

(n = 200)

HADS-D (>7)

24 (66.7)

12 (33.7)

0.16

2

.76-5.26

(n = 190)

HADS-A (>7)

27 (50.9)

26 (49.1)

.98

0.95

.64-1.52

(n = 190)

SSQoL (Median, IQR)

135 (110–153)

152 (135–170)

<0.001

0.97

.96-.98

(n = 173)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; SES, socioeconomic status; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; TACS, total anterior circulation stroke; PACS, partial anterior circulation stroke; POCS, posterior circulation stroke; LACS, lacunar stroke; SSS, stroke severity; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; VES, Vulnerable Elders Survey; HADS-D, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale- Depression; HADS-A, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale- Anxiety; SSQoL, Stroke Specific Quality of Life.

The association between sex and presence of cognitive impairment was modestly attenuated in multivariable analysis adjusted for age and stroke severity, with women more likely to have cognitive impairment than men (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.01-2.57). History of a previous cerebrovascular event was also related to an increased likelihood of cognitive impairment (OR = 2.2, 95% CI1.38-3.59). Posterior circulation (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.84-1.89) and lacunar strokes (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.38-2.14) were also more likely to score in the impaired MoCA range when adjusting for age and stroke severity (See Table 3).
Table 3

Demographic and clinical factors associated with cognitive impairment at 6 months post-stroke

 

Adjusted OR*

P-value

95% CI

Sex (female)

1.6

0.05

1.01-2.57

Age

1.06

0.003

1.02-1.11

Stroke severity (SSS scale)

.92

0.003

.88-.97

Insurance

.23

0.002

.09-.59

History of TIA/Stroke

2.22

0.001

1.38-3.59

History of atrial fibrillation

1.06

0.83

.62-1.82

History of carotid stenosis

.99

0.95

.76-1.29

POCS

1.86

<0.001

1.84-1.89

LACS

1.72

<0.001

1.38-2.14

Small artery occlusion

.46

<0.001

.43-.5

Stroke of determined aetiology

.99

1.00

.65-1.54

Stroke of undetermined aetiology

1.64

0.4

.51-5.2

Functional dependency at 6 months (mRS ≥ 3)

1.06

0.83

.63-1.79

*adjusted for age, sex and stroke severity.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SSS, stroke severity; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; POCS, posterior circulation stroke; LACS, lacunar stroke; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.

Key secondary preventive targets were assessed for their association with cognitive impairment (Table 4). Increasing number of prescribed medications was associated with higher likelihood of presence of cognitive impairment (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.19). Polytherapy with >2 antihypertensive medications (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.96) and an anticoagulant (OR = .41, 95% CI .26-.68) were shown to have a protective effect for reduced likelihood of cognitive impairment. Antiplatelet therapy was also associated with protection against cognitive impairment (OR = .38, 95% CI .13-1.11), however this effect did not reach statistical significance (Table 4). A moderate association was evident between uncontrolled total cholesterol level and increased likelihood of cognitive impairment (OR = 1.86, 95% CI .91-3.82), with the observed p-value approaching statistical signifiance.
Table 4

Secondary preventive factors associated with cognitive impairment at 6 months post-stroke

 

Adjusted OR*

P-value

95% CI

Blood pressure not at target (>140/90)

1.02

0.93

.72-1.4

Fasting glucose not at target <7 mmol/L)

1.11

0.73

.62-1.96

Serum total cholesterol not at target (>4.5 mmol/L)

1.86

0.091

.91-3.82

Number of medications

1.12

0.001

1.04-1.19

Antihypertensive

1.22

0.44

.74-2.01

Polytherapy antihypertensive (<2 vs. > = 2)

.67

0.03

.46-.96

Antiplatelet

.38

0.078

.13-.68

Anticoagulant

.41

<0.001

.26-.68

Statin

.75

.59

.28-2.04

*adjusted for age, sex and stroke severity.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Measures of psychosocial well-being were assessed for their relationship to cognitive impairment. Those identified as vulnerable on the VES, characterised by lower VES scores, were more likely to have cognitive impairment at 6 months (β = −.39, p = 0.01, 95% CI -.58 - -.22). Better quality of life on the self-reported SSQoL scale also was associated with higher MoCA scores (β = .05, p < 0.001, 95% CI .03-.08). No relationship was found between scores in the depressed or anxious range on HADS and cognitive impairment (Table 5).
Table 5

Psychological well-being factors associated with cognitive impairment at 6 months post-stroke

 

Coefficient (β)

P-value*

95% CI

Vulnerability (VES)

-.39

0.01

-.58 - -.22

SSQoL

.05

0.009

.03-.08

HADS-Depression

.32

0.09

-.12-.76

HADS- Anxiety

-.04

0.81

-.70-.62

*adjusted for age, sex and stroke severity.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VES, Vulnerable Elders Survey; SSQoL, Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Discussion

This study profiled the prevalence of cognitive impairment in a sample of Irish stroke survivors, and investigated the relationship between cognitive impairment and demographic, secondary preventive, clinical, and psychosocial factors. Findings from this study indicate that over 50% of patients exhibited cognitive impairment six months post-stroke. This finding is similar to previous reported rates of cognitive impairment, which can vary from approximately 30%-74% depending on follow-up time and stroke subtype [34,35]. The six month measurement window presented in this study can be considered as relatively recent following stroke occurrence, however longitudinal findings from the South London Stroke Register indicate a significant ongoing prevalence of cognitive impairment, with a rate of 21% evident up to 15 years post-stroke [7]. In this analysis, females, those with a history of cerebrovascular disease and those experiencing a posterior circulation or lacunar infarct were most likely to exhibit cognitive impairment. We also found that presence of cognitive impairment was associated with increased likelihood of patient vulnerability and poorer quality of life. Given this high prevalence of cognitive impairments post-stroke and its contribution to dementia progression and poor psychological outcome, cognitive rehabilitation is a required component of stroke rehabilitation. The current evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in stroke is sparse, with very few studies using randomised designs [36].

Findings from this study support emerging evidence for the important role of secondary preventive strategies in prevention of post-stroke cognitive decline and transitions to dementia [5,11]. Results showed that polytherapy for hypertension, i.e. taking two or more antihypertensive medications, demonstrated a protective effect for the presence of cognitive impairment at six months post stroke. Prescription of both anticoagulant and antihypertensive therapies also demonstrated a protective effect, suggesting that appropriate pharmacotherapy post-stroke may contribute towards slowing of cognitive decline post-stroke in addition to prevention of further stroke. Previous studies have reported the protective association between optimal risk factor control and reduced cognitive impairment, with protective effects reported up to ten years post-stroke in a UK population-based study [11]. There was an observed trend in this analysis between uncontrolled total cholesterol and the presence of cognitive impairment, although did not reach statistical significance in this instance. This relationship has been confirmed in previous studies. A Finnish longitudinal cardiovascular risk factors study found that mid-life serum cholesterol levels were associated with an increased risk of vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in later life, even after adjustment for statin therapy [37]. Serum cholesterol control is a key component of basic secondary preventive strategies in cardiovascular conditions, but still remains a challenge.

Interestingly, there appeared to be a relationship between prescribed complex medication regimens and presence of cognitive impairment in this sample, with greater numbers of prescribed medications related to higher likelihood of cognitive impairment. Cognitive impairment has been cited as a common barrier to successful medication management in the elderly [38], and polypharmacy in older populations is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality [39]. Important interactions between polypharmacy, cognitive impairment and adverse drug reactions have been reported in the literature [40]. Correct adherence requires both time, effort and understanding on behalf of the patient, thus as the complexity of the regimen is increased, so also is the burden on the patient [41]. Managing a complex medication regimen whilst exhibiting signs of post-stroke cognitive impairment is likely to increase the risk of non-adherence, resulting in deleterious effects on secondary prevention targets, further cognitive decline, substantially increased risk of recurrent stroke, with its associated implications for subsequent dementia. Non-adherence to medications has been found to be common for patients with cardiovascular diseases, with a progressive decline in adherence to prescribed secondary preventive medications evident with the passage of time [42], and is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. In the context of stroke, cognitive impairment is likely to interfere with patients’ capacity to adhere to their medication regimen.

The NICE guidelines recommend that each stroke patient should receive cognitive screening, regardless of stroke severity, within 6 weeks of their stroke, in order to identify cognitive deficits, including higher level impairments that may impede normal activities of daily living [43]. Evaluation of current practices for assessment of cognitive impairment in the in the UK revealed that up to 85% of healthcare professionals routinely screen for cognitive impairment, however significant heterogeneity exists in method of assessment [44]. Little Irish data exists to demonstrate that post-stroke cognition is routinely tested, and the Irish National Cardiovascular Health Policy has highlighted that the lack of inclusion of cognitive rehabilitation as part of standard stroke rehabilitation is of prominent concern [41]. A lack of standardisation in definition, evaluation and the timing of assessment for post-stroke cognitive impairment exists [45]. The MoCA in particular is subject to ongoing debate. It is argued that the universal cut-off score of less than 26 may over diagnose the existence of true cognitive impairment [46], and cut-offs of less than 23 have been suggested as having better clinical utility in stroke [46,47]. Its brevity is useful in the context of stroke where patient fatigue may be prevalent, however, it is a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and therefore does not capture all post-stroke deficits. In-depth neuropsychological testing, such as the NINDS [48], which accounts for a wide range of potential deficits and abilities is a recommended form of assessment [48].

Limitations

The study was an observational cohort study, with no matched non-stroke group available for comparison of cognitive outcomes. Cognitive impairment was measured at only one time point during the stroke recovery period, and pre-stroke cognitive function was not measured. Although the observed prevalence of impairment at six months was high, pre-existing cognitive decline may have been evident in some cases, given the age profile of the sample and the finding that a quarter of the sample had experienced a previous cerebrovascular event. It is suggested that a measure such as the Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) [49] be incorporated into research designs were possible to capture an indicator of pre-stroke cognitive function. Patients with TIA were excluded from the present analysis. It has been demonstrated that approximately a third of patients with TIA can exhibit impairment in at least one domain of cognitive function following a TIA [50], therefore it may be important to screen for cognitive changes in minor cerebrovascular events in addition to confirmed stroke cases [51]. The aim of this study was to provide as yet unknown data on post-stroke cognitive impairment in an Irish cohort, and focused on global cognitive impairment. Further exploration of the relevance of impairments in different domains for the development of appropriate rehabilitation interventions is needed. Finally, the findings of study are limited to stroke cases presenting to hospital. Population studies in Ireland indicate that 90% of stroke cases are treated in acute care, however those who do not present to hospital may differ in stroke severity, and thus may have very different cognitive outcomes. Future work should attempt to capture outcomes for stroke cases treated exclusively in the community.

Conclusions

The predicted international population age profile shift will result in more individuals at risk of stroke, an increased burden on health and community services for stroke, and a greater cost to national economies. This paper reports findings from the ASPIRE-S study relating to prevalence of cognitive impairment in a cohort of patients 6 months post-stroke, and found a high prevalence of cognitive impairment six months post stroke. Addressing cognitive impairment is of significant importance, both for the individual with stroke who is prevented from resuming engagement in normal life by impairments in cognition, for patients’ families and for wider society who ultimately support the care of those with post-stroke cognitive impairment. Appropriate targeting of secondary prevention control and specific cognitive rehabilitation has the potential to prevent recurrent stroke and the progression from cognitive impairment to dementia in people with stroke.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the ASPIRE-S Steering Group members: Professor Hannah McGee, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; Professor Emer Shelley, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; Professor Peter Kelly, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin; Dr Eamon Dolan, Connolly Hospital, Dublin.

Funding

The ASPIRE-S research was supported by a Health Research Award from the Irish Health Research Board (HRB; grant number 1404/7400).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychology, Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
(2)
Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
(3)
School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

References

  1. Mendis S. Stroke disability and rehabilitation of stroke: World Health Organization perspective. Intern J Stroke. 2013;8(1):3–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Royal College of Physicians. National Sentinel Stroke Clinical Audit 2010. Dublin, Ireland: Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party; 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Parag V, Senior H, Lawes CM, Ratnasabapathy Y, et al. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study. Part 1: Gender, stroke types, ethnicity, and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010;75(18):1597–607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):833–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(11):1006–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Salvadori E, Pasi M, Poggesi A, Chiti G, Inzitari D, Pantoni L. Predictive value of MoCA in the acute phase of stroke on the diagnosis of mid-term cognitive impairment. J Neurol. 2013;260(9):2220–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Douiri A, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Prevalence of poststroke cognitive impairment: South London Stroke Register 1995–2010. Stroke. 2013;44(1):138–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. British Psychological Society. Briefing paper 19: psychological services for stroke survivors and their families. Leicester: British Psychological Society; 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Iemolo F, Duro G, Rizzo C, Castiglia L, Hachinski V, Caruso C. Pathophysiology of vascular dementia. Immun Ageing. 2009;6:13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Tzourio C, Anderson C, Chapman N, Woodward M, Neal B, MacMahon S, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(9):1069–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Douiri A, McKevitt C, Emmett ES, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Long-term effects of secondary prevention on cognitive function in stroke patients. Circulation. 2013;128(12):1341–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly PJ, Crispino G, Sheehan O, Kelly L, Marnane M, Merwick A, et al. Incidence, event rates, and early outcome of stroke in Dublin, Ireland: the North Dublin population stroke study. Stroke. 2012;43(8):2042–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hannon N, Callaly EL, Moore A, Ni Chroinin D, Sheehan O, Marnane M, et al. Improved late survival and disability after stroke with therapeutic anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: a population study. Stroke. 2011;42(9):2503–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ni Chroinin D, Callaly EL, Duggan J, Merwick A, Hannon N, Sheehan O, et al. Association between acute statin therapy, survival, and improved functional outcomes after ischemic stroke. The North Dublin Population Stroke Study. Stroke. 2011;42:1021–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organisation. International classification of impairments, disabilites and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 1980.Google Scholar
  16. Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke–background and study protocol. Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1985;16(5):885–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991;337(8756):1521–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):35–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957;2(5):200–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int J Stroke. 2009;4(3):200–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lees R, Selvarajah J, Fenton C, Pendlebury ST, Langhorne P, Stott DJ, et al. Test accuracy of cognitive screening tests for diagnosis of dementia and multidomain cognitive impairment in stroke. Stroke. 2014;45(10):3008–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cumming TB, Churilov L, Linden T, Bernhardt J. Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination are both valid cognitive tools in stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;128(2):122–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the beck depression Inventory, hospital anxiety and depression scale, SCL-90 and hamilton depression rating scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(5):386–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ, Solomon DH, Young RT, Kamberg CJ, et al. The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(12):1691–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke. 1999;30(7):1362–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jl S, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Grau-Sepalveda MV, Pan W, et al. Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2480–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(3):411–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Green SB. How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivar Beh Res. 1991;26(3):499–510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Ž, Verschuren M, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2012;3:2012.Google Scholar
  33. Heuschmann PU, Kircher J, Nowe T, Dittrich R, Reiner Z, Cifkova R, et al. Control of main risk factors after ischaemic stroke across Europe: data from the stroke-specific module of the EUROASPIRE III survey. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Aug 19. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  34. Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe C. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(2):158–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, Jansen BP, de Haan EH, Kappelle LJ. Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(5–6):408–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nair RD, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD002293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Solomon A, Kivipelto M, Wolozin B, Zhou J, Whitmer RA. Midlife serum cholesterol and increased risk of Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia three decades later. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(1):75–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Campbell NL, Boustani MA, Skopelja EN, Gao S, Unverzagt FW, Murray MD. Medication adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic evidence-based review. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012;10(3):165–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007;5(4):345–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Larson EB, Kukull WA, Buchner D, Reifler BV. Adverse drug reactions associated with global cognitive impairment in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107(2):169–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. May C, Montori VM, Mair FS. We need minimally disruptive medicine 2009. BMJ. 2009-08-11 23:06:19.Google Scholar
  42. Ho PM, Bryson CL, Rumsfeld JS. Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes. Circulation. 2009;119(23):3028–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Stroke Quality Standard. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010.Google Scholar
  44. Lees RA, Broomfield NM, Quinn TJ. Questionnaire assessment of usual practice in mood and cognitive assessment in Scottish stroke units. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(4):339–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Dong Y, Lee WY, Basri NA, Collinson SL, Merchant RA, Venketasubramanian N, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination in detecting patients at higher risk of dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(11):1749–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Waldron-Perrine B, Axelrod BN. Determining an appropriate cutting score for indication of impairment on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27(11):1189–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Coen RF, Cahill R, Lawlor BA. Things to watch out for when using the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(1):107–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hachinski V. The 2005 Thomas Willis Lecture: stroke and vascular cognitive impairment: a transdisciplinary, translational and transactional approach. Stroke. 2007;38(4):1396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jorm AF. The Informant Questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): a review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2004;16(3):275–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. van Rooij FG, Schaapsmeerders P, Maaijwee NA, van Duijnhoven DA, de Leeuw FE, Kessels RP, et al. Persistent cognitive impairment after transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2270–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pendlebury ST, Wadling S, Silver LE, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Transient cognitive impairment in TIA and minor stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(11):3116–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mellon et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement