Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

A cross-sectional and longitudinal study evaluating brain volumes, RNFL, and cognitive functions in MS patients and healthy controls

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Contributed equally
BMC Neurology201818:67

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1065-9

  • Received: 6 February 2018
  • Accepted: 30 April 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The principal biomarker of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS) is believed to be brain volume, which is associated with cognitive functions and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL). A cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of the relationship between RNFL, cognitive functions and brain volume.

Methods

At baseline, relapsing patients and healthy controls underwent 1.5 T MRI to estimate the normalized volume of brain (NBV), grey (NGV), white (NWV) and peripheral grey (pNGV) matter. Cognitive functions were evaluated by BICAMS, RNFL by Spectral-Domain OCT. Patients were re-evaluated after 12 months.

Results

Cognitive functions, brain volume, and RNFL differed between the group of 66 patients and that of 16 healthy controls. In the MS group, at baseline, an association was found between: p-NGV and symbol-digit (SDMT) (p = 0.022); temporal-RNFL and NBV (p = 0.007), NWV (p = 0.012), NGV (p = 0.048), and p-NGV (p = 0.021); papillo-macular bundle-RNFL and NBV (p = 0.013), NWV (p = 0.02), NGV (p = 0.049), and p-NGV (p = 0.032). Over the observational period, we found a reduction of brain volume (p < 0.001), average-RNFL (p = 0.001), temporal-RNFL (p = 0.006), and papillo-macular bundle-RNFL (p = 0.009). No association was found between OCT, MRI, and cognitive changes.

Conclusions

Brain volume, cognitive functions, and RNFL are continuous measures of different neurodegenerative aspects. BICAMS and OCT have low costs and can be easily used in clinical practice to monitor neurodegeneration.

Keywords

  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Brain volume
  • Retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness
  • Cognitive impairments
  • BICAMS

Background

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease involving the central nervous system. The clinical course is generally relapsing at onset, and later progressive [1]. Both the inflammatory and neurodegenerative component is present from the early stages [1]. While the first aspect has been well documented and is monitored in clinical practice using conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the study of neurodegeneration is more difficult [2]. At present, an important biomarker of the neurodegenerative aspect in MS is the evaluation of brain volume by non-conventional techniques of MRI [3]. Indeed, the loss of brain volume appears to be related to the progression of the disease and the permanent accumulation of disability [3, 4]. One of the most important symptoms related to brain atrophy is the deficit of cognitive functions [5]. This is associated with several MRI markers, in particular grey matter pathology, both in terms of focal lesions and volume loss [5]. Cognitive impairment, which has variable severity and has been identified at all stages of the disease and clinical courses, affects between 40 and 70% of MS patients [6]. It appears to be associated with age, disease duration and disability [7]. Many diagnostic tools are able to explore cognitive functions in MS patients [8], although the majority of these are time consuming and require qualified personnel [8]. However, a recently developed neuropsychological assessment named “Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis” (BICAMS) can be administered by non-specifically trained healthcare staff in around 15 min [8].

In the last decades, optic coherence tomography (OCT), a new instrument for evaluating the neurodegenerative aspect of MS, has been widely studied [9, 10]. OCT is able to evaluate the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL), a defined marker of axonal loss. RNFL measurement could differentiate MS patients from healthy subjects, and it is clearly related to brain atrophy, disease duration, and disability [1014]. The most involved RNFL region is the temporal quadrant [15]. The great majority of studies exploring RNFL in MS patients have been performed using a ‘time-domain’ OCT (considered the ‘old’ OCT model), which produces less accurate images than the ‘spectral domain’ OCT (SD-OCT), especially in longitudinal studies [1619].

BICAMS and OCT share three important qualities for MS assessment in a clinical setting: brevity, ease of use, and low cost.

The present study entails a cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of the use of SD-OCT and BICAMS in the evaluation of the neurodegenerative aspects of MS. These procedures are compared with MRI brain atrophy measurements, which are currently considered the gold standard among neurodegenerative markers in MS patients.

Methods

MS-relapsing patients consecutively referred to the MS Centre of the University of Cagliari/Binaghi Hospital from March to July 2015 were prospectively included in the study. A group of healthy controls working in the Binaghi hospital was also recruited over the same time period. All the subjects signed an informed consent. The inclusion criteria for MS patients were: 18-65 years of age; relapsing remitting course; no relapses and/or steroids intake in the 30 days before enrolment and follow-up evaluation. All patients started a disease-modifying drug (DMD) prior to enrolment. Psychoactive drugs or substances that might interfere with neuropsychological performance were forbidden for both patients and healthy controls.

The ethics committee of the University of Cagliari approved the study.

At baseline, after written informed consent was given, all the subjects underwent neuropsychological assessment, brain MRI, and OCT. These three evaluations were carried out within a maximum period of three months. The evaluations were repeated for a group of MS patients after 12 months ±3. The changes from baseline and follow-up (difference between follow-up and baseline) were calculated for all of the collected MRI, OCT and BICAMS parameters collected.

Gender and age were collected for the whole cohort. In the MS group, the following clinical data were also recorded from medical records by a neurologist with expertise in MS: age at onset; clinical course; expanded disability status scale score (EDSS) at baseline; all DMD from six months before baseline until the end of the study; presence of relapses and steroid therapy in the 30 days before baseline and before the follow-up evaluation; and optic neuritis in the clinical history with indication of the affected eye. Eyes affected by previous optic neuritis were excluded from the statistical analysis.

Neuropsychological evaluation

An expert neuropsychologist (G.F.) performed the neuropsychological evaluation in a quiet room using the BICAMS. This assessment was recently developed by an expert consensus group and included: the Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT) to evaluate processing speed (or working memory); the California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLT-II) to evaluate verbal learning and memory; and the Brief Visual Memory Test Revised (BVMT-R) to evaluate visual learning and memory [8, 20]. All tests were considered normal or altered according to the authors’ definition (T score equal or inferior to 35). T score estimations were made using available normative values, with corrections for age, gender and education among the Italian population [20]. Patients were categorized as either cognitive impaired (at least one test altered) or cognitive preserved (no tests altered).

The neuropsychologist was blinded to clinical and radiological findings.

Brain MR acquisition

Brain MRI acquisition and analysis was performed at the Radiology Unit of Binaghi Hospital, Cagliari, Italy. The operator was blinded to the clinical and neuropsychological status of the subjects. The acquisition of brain MRIs was obtained in a single session, using a Siemens Magneton Avanto Scan at 1.5 T. A sagittal survey image was used to identify the anterior and posterior commissures. A dual-echo, turbo spin-echo sequence (repetition time/echo time 1/echo time 2 5 2075/30/90 milliseconds, 256 X 256 matrix, 1 signal average, 250 mm field of view, 50 contiguous 3 mm slices) yielding proton density–weighted and T2-weighted images were acquired in the transverse plane parallel to the line connecting the anterior and posterior commissures. Transverse T1-weighted (T1W) images (repetition time 35 milliseconds; echo time 10 milliseconds; 256 X 256 matrix; 1 signal average; 2,503,250 mm field of view) were acquired, yielding images of 176 contiguous 1 mm-thick slices, oriented to match the proton density of the T2-weighted image.

Brain parenchyma volumes were measured on T1W gradient echo images by using the cross-sectional version of the SIENA (structural image evaluation using normalization of atrophy) software, named SIENAX (part of FSL 4.0: http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/), a previously described method to estimate global brain volume normalized for head size [21]. MRI analysis allowed for Normalized Brain Volume (NBV), Normalized Grey Matter Volume (NGV), peripheral NGV (p-NGV), and Normalized White Matter Volume (NWV) to be obtained. Lesion refilling was performed as described previously [22].

Longitudinal evaluation of the percentage of brain volume change (PBVC) was performed using SIENA software only in patients not showing new T2 and/or gadolinium enhancing lesions during follow-up. To evaluate annualized PBVC (a-PBVC), the following formula was used: PBVC/months from baseline to follow-up * 12.

Optical coherence tomography

OCT evaluations were performed using a Spectralis SD-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering; Heidelberg, Germania). The machine is able to record ocular movements via a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (TrueTrac ®; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). TrueTrac have adapted the software to ocular movements, allowing a correct examination. Eyes that were blind due to reasons other than MS were excluded. The RNFL examination was performed by a ring scan centred on the optic nerve head. The follow-up study was made using the automatic rescan mode. The thickness of global RNFL, the temporal sector (TEMP) and the papillo-macular bundle sector (PMB) were calculated using the machine’s software, and an evaluation of subclinical previous optic neurotis was performed [23]. After excluding previous clinical and subclinical ON, the minimum value between right and left eye for the same subject was entered for analysis. Two neurologists trained in the use of the Spectralis SD-OCT performed all examinations.

Sample size and statistical analysis

At an alpha level of 5%, and for a statistical power of 90%, a minimum of 61 patients was needed to observe a significant correlation of at least 0.4 (threshold between a weak and moderate correlation).

Comparisons between MS patients and healthy controls at baseline were made using independent samples Student’s t-test for age, chi-square test for gender, Mann-Whitney for education, and linear regression models for MRI parameters and SDMT. Regression models were adjusted for age (MRI parameters) and education (SDMT).

Partial correlation coefficients were estimated to assess the cross-sectional correlations at baseline between cognitive functions, RNFL and MRI characteristics. These correlations were adjusted for age, gender, EDSS (MRI and RNFL), and education.

A multivariable model for each MRI volume (considered as dependent variable) was performed to assess the impact, quantified by R2 value, of each RNFL and cognitive functions characteristics on MRI parameters. Only variables for which univariable analysis showed a p value < 0.10 were considered for the multivariable model, and a stepwise approach was adopted to select those included in the model.

One-year changes in MRI, cognitive functions and RNFL were assessed using paired samples Student’s t-test.

To assess the correlations between the longitudinal changes in cognitive functions, RNFL and MRI characteristics, partial correlation coefficients were estimated using delta changes between baseline and one year. Correlations between baseline and longitudinal changes were also assessed. These were adjusted for age, gender, EDSS (MRI and RNFL) and education.

Stata (v.14; StataCorp.) was used for the computation of results.

Results

We included 66 MS subjects (female: 48; 72.7%) and 16 healthy controls (female: 9; 56.25%). Mean age at baseline was 43.4 years (SD: 12) in patients, and 46.8 years (SD: 9) in healthy controls. Mean education was 11.6 years (SD: 4.16) in patients, and 14.3 years (SD: 4.19) in healthy subjects. In the MS group, the mean duration of the disease was 10.8 years and the median EDSS was 2 (range: 0 - 7.5). Ten patients were not included in the OCT study due to poor compliance. In 4 other patients, the OCT evaluation was made only in 1 eye, as the other eye was blind for reasons other than MS.

Baseline values of NBV, NWV, NGV, p-NGV, SDMT, CVLT-II, BVMT-R, average-RNFL, TEMP-RNFL, and PMB-RNFL are reported in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical and demographic features

 

MS (n = 66)

HC (n = 16)

p-value

Age, mean (SD)

43.4 (12)

46.8 (9)

0.32

Gender, n(%)

  

0.21

 Females

48 (72.7)

9 (56.3)

 

 Males

18 (27.3)

7 (43.7)

 

Education (years), median (range)

13 (5-21)

13 (8-19)

0.096

 Disease duration, mean; median (range)

10.8; 8.5 (0-34)

  

 EDSS, median (range)

2 (0-7.5)

  

 NBV, mean (SD)

1473.5 (81.9)

1519.6 (38.4)

0.006^

 NWV, mean (SD)

694 (39.9)

728.1 (19.1)

0.003^

 NGV, mean (SD)

777.7 (72)

791.5 (33.1)

0.14^

 p-NGV, mean (SD)

609.6 (52.1)

616.2 (28.7)

0.11^

 SDMT, mean (SD)

45.1 (12.3)

53.3 (8.4)

0.037*

 CVLT-II, mean (SD)

41.6 (10.3)

 

 BVMT-R, mean (SD)

47.6 (10.8)

 

 RNFL, mean (SD)

93.8 (10.7)

101.8 (9.9)

0.014

 TEMP-RNFL, mean (SD)

63.3 (11)

 

 PMB-RNFL, mean (SD)

49.6 (9.4)

 

^ - linear regression model adjusted for Age; *linear regression model adjusted for education

MRI measures (NBV, NWV, NGV, p-NGV) are expressed in ml

Cognitive measures (SDMT, CVLT-II, BVMT-R) are expressed in T score

The comparison between healthy controls and patients at baseline showed higher NBV (p = 0.006), higher NWV (p = 0.003), and higher RNFL thickness (p = 0.014) in the first group. The healthy subjects group also demonstrated better performance at SDMT (p = 0.037). No significant differences were found in NGV and p-NGV.

Cross sectional analysis in MS patients at baseline

In Table 2 were reported all baseline correlations. A significant correlation between: p-NGV and SDMT (p = 0.022); NGV and SDMT (p = 0.013); NGV and BVMT (p = 0.048); TEMP-RNFL and NBV (p = 0.007); TEMP-RNFL and NWV (p = 0.012); TEMP-RNFL and NGV (p = 0.048); TEMP-RNFL and p-NGV (p = 0.021); PMB-RNFL and NBV (p = 0.013); PMB-RNFL and NWV (p = 0.02); PMB-RNFL and NGV (p = 0.049); PMB-RNFL and p-NGV (p = 0.032). The correlations between SDMT and p-NGV are shown in Fig. 1, while the correlations between TEMP-RNFL and MRI parameters in Fig. 2.
Table 2

Partial correlations among OCT, cognitive and MRI parameters

Neurodegenerative assessment

Variables

r

p-value

SD-OCT

Average-RNFL

SDMT

0.01

0.96

CVLT-II

0.20

0.18

BVMT-R

0.08

0.60

NBV

0.25

0.095

NWV

0.16

0.28

NGV

0.22

0.14

p-NGV

0.29

0.06

TEMP-RNFL

SDMT

0.01

0.95

CVLT-II

0.09

0.57

BVMT-R

0.08

0.58

NBV

0.40

0.007

NWV

0.37

0.012

NGV

0.30

0.048

p-NGV

0.36

0.021

PMB-RNFL

SDMT

0.044

0.78

CVLT-II

0.09

0.55

BVMT-R

0.13

0.38

NBV

0.37

0.013

NWV

0.35

0.02

NGV

0.30

0.049

p-NGV

0.33

0.032

SDMT

NBV

0.20

0.10

NWV

−0.07

0.56

NGV

0.21

0.11

p-NGV

0.31

0.022

CVLT-II

NBV

0.09

0.48

NWV

0.06

0.66

NGV

0.04

0.78

p-NGV

0.01

0.97

BVMT-R

NBV

0.11

0.38

NWV

0.05

0.68

NGV

0.18

0.17

p-NGV

0.22

0.11

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Correlation between SDMT and p-NGV

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Correlation between TEMP-RNFL and the following brain volume measures: NGV, NBV, NWV, and p-NGV

Average-RNFL thickness displayed a correlation with both NBV (p = 0.10), and p-NGV (p = 0.06) even thought it did not reach the statistical significance. The OCT measures did not correlate with the results of BICAMS tests.

Since p-NGV correlated with both OCT and cognitive performances, a multivariable model was implemented. After selection, SDMT and TEMP-RNFL, together with age and disease duration, were significantly associated with p-NGV (Table 3). The multivariable model increased R2 from 38.3% (with age) to 48.5% with the inclusion of SDMT (∆R2 of 10.2%), and to 65.2% with the inclusion of TEMP-RNFL (∆R2 of 16.7%).
Table 3

Effect of cognitive and OCT characteristics on p-NGV at baseline. The increase of R2 associated with the inclusion of significant characteristics in the model was reported

 

B (95% CI); p-value

∆R2

Model 1

SDMT (T-score)

1.20 (0.46-1.95); p = 0.002

+ 0.102

Model 2

SDMT (T-score)

1.20 (0.44-1.95); p = 0.003

 

TEMP-RNFL

1.26 (0.35-2.16); p = 0.008

+ 0.167

Both models include age and disease duration at baseline

Longitudinal analysis

At follow-up, 26 patients did not repeat the OCT, 30 did not repeat the brain MRI, and 25 did not repeat the neuropsychological evaluation. The longitudinal evaluations of all the three measures were therefore available for 36 patients, while in a further 4 subjects only OCT and BICAMS, but not MRI, were performed at follow-up.

The mean percentage of brain volume change from baseline to follow-up was 0.57 (SD: 0.54, p: < 0.001). All the OCT parameters changed significantly from baseline to follow-up. A mean decrease of 1.3 (SD: 1.7) for average-RNFL (p < 0.001); 1.2 (SD: 1.9) for TEMP (p = 0.001); and 1.4 (SD: 2.2) for PMB (p = 0.001) was observed. No significant changes were detected in all the BICAMS tests results.

No significant correlation was found between OCT, MRI and cognitive changes.

Discussion

We found that the evaluation of RNFL thickness by SD-OCT and cognitive functions by BICAMS are able to differentiate the group of MS patients from that of healthy controls, as previously shown by numerous studies [811], as well as being independent markers of neurodegeneration. These were compared with brain volume evaluation performed with MRI - the most commonly used instrument for MS follow-up and what is generally considered the gold standard marker for monitoring the degenerative component of the pathology.

Our data confirmed the association between both assessments and brain volume measures [5, 1014]. In particular, we found that the BICAMS tests correlate with NGV, especially with cortical atrophy, which is notoriously associated with cognitive decline [5]. Moreover, we found a significant correlation between specific OCT parameters (temporal quadrant and PMB thickness) and brain volume measurements. This correlation appears to be stronger with global and white brain volume than grey matter volume. This result is in line with previous studies in which OCT measures were found to be associated with total brain volume and normalized white matter volume [12, 24], or both normalized white and grey matter volumes [11].

An innovative aspect of our work was the combined analysis of brain atrophy, RNFL thickness, and cognitive functions. Indeed, while the association between brain volume and the other two parameters has been clearly assessed previously, and confirmed by our data, there is less evidence of a possible correlation between RNFL thickness and cognitive impairment. Toledo et al. performed a unique study exploring this issue [25]. They found a significant correlation between SDMT and RNFL thickness, both for the average and the temporal quadrant. However, this result was not confirmed by our work, and we did not observe any correlation between RNFL (average, temporal and PMB) and BICAMS tests. It is worth noting that Toledo et al. performed their OCT analysis with a smaller sample and using a less accurate time-domain machine.

The lack of association between RNFL thickness and cognitive impairment, as for their correlation with different brain volume regions (only grey matter for BICAMS tests, both grey and white matter for TEMP-RNFL and PMB-RNFL), leads us to hypothesize that RNFL and cognitive impairment may represent different aspects of neurodegeneration in MS. Indeed, cognitive decline is secondary to axonal loss, dendritic transection and apoptosis [26]. Moreover, as well as the grey matter pathology, cognitive impairment is mainly associated with primitive degeneration present from the initial stages of the disease, as entirely independent degenerative process, and only partially it is secondary to inflammation. [6, 27]. Otherwise, RNFL thickness may equally be associated with both primitive degeneration and degeneration due to an inflammatory component. In particular, the thinning observed by OCT may be due to clinical and subclinical episodes of ON, primary neurodegeneration of the retinal ganglion cells and their axons, or retrograde transsynaptic degeneration of the ganglion cells and their axons due to MS lesions in the posterior visual pathways [28].

Longitudinally, no significant changes in BICAMS tests scores emerged. This was probably due to a well-known practice effect [20].

A reduction was observed in the mean percentage of brain volume, and in all the OCT parameters considered. However, the longitudinal trend of the two measures did not correlate, perhaps due to the fact that they do not reflect the same specific inflammatory and degenerative brain damage in MS pathology. When considering the brain atrophy measure, we also need to take into account the well-known phenomenon of so-called ‘pseudo-atrophy’ [4], which hinders the correct evaluation of the degenerative and inflammatory components. Thus, some patients could have a ‘false’ light reduction of brain volume over the course of one year due to the presence of inflammatory oedema. To note that all the patients were clinically stable between baseline and follow-up, and no active lesions in brain MRI were observed.

The study was also subject to some limitations.

First, follow-up may have been too short to observe significant changes in the degenerative component, which is present since the initial stages of the disease and is characterized by slow progression.

Second, while our cohort of participants is of a comparable size to that of previous cross-sectional studies, it may be too small to provide clear longitudinal results. Moreover, patients were heterogeneous for the duration of disease, DMD, and grade of inflammation at MRI. However, the great majority of them were clinically stable during the observational period, and no optic neuritis was recorded between baseline and follow-up.

Conclusions

Our study shows that the evaluation of brain volume, cognitive functions, and RNFL thickness are different continuous measures of neurodegeneration. Unconventional MRI, with its significant costs and requirement for qualified personnel, is more difficult to use in all MS settings. BICAMS and OCT, however, which can be performed at low cost after minimal training, may be suitable for use in clinical practice to assess different aspects of neurodegeneration.

Abbreviations

a-PBVC: 

Annualize of percentage of brain volume change

BICAMS: 

Brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis

BVMT-R: 

Brief visual memory test revised

CVLT-II: 

California verbal learning test II

DMD: 

Disease-modifying drug

EDSS: 

Expanded disability status scale

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

MS: 

Multiple sclerosis

NBV: 

Normalized volume of brain

NGV: 

Normalized volume of grey

NWV: 

Normalized volume of white

OCT: 

Optical coherence tomography

PBVC: 

Percentage of brain volume change

PMB: 

Papillo-macular bundle

pNGV: 

Normalized volume of peripheral grey

RNFL: 

Retinal nerve fibre layer

SD: 

Spectral domain

SD: 

Standard deviation

SDMT: 

Symbol digit modalities test

TEMP: 

Temporal

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the patients and their caregivers for their time and commitment to this research.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the intellectual rights owned by the hospital and the authors. However, they are partially available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JF, GF, GC participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript. AS performed the statistical analysis. JF, GC carried out the OCT acquisition, performed MRI data analysis and interpretation. VS, MAB, FC carried out the MRI acquisition. GF, LL performed MRI data analysis and interpretation. GF, MB carried out the neuropsychological evaluation. EC, MGM helped draft the manuscript and revise it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects included signed informed consent. The ethics committee of the University of Cagliari approved the study.

Competing interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Multiple Sclerosis Center Binaghi Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, via Is Guadazzonis 2, 09126 Cagliari, Italy
(2)
Department of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, Via Pastore, 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy
(3)
Unit of Radiology, Binaghi Hospital, ATS Sardegna, via Is Guadazzonis 2, 09126 Cagliari, Italy

References

  1. Kamm CP, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH. Multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future outlook. Eur Neurol. 2014;72(3-4):132–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Río J, Rovira À, Tintoré M, Otero-Romero S, et al. Disability progression markers over 6-12 years in interferon-β-treated multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler. 2017;1:1352458517698052.Google Scholar
  3. Sastre-Garriga J, Pareto D, Rovira À. Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: clinical relevance and technical aspects. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017;27(2):289–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. De Stefano N, Airas L, Grigoriadis N, et al. Clinical relevance of brain volume measures in multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(2):147–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rocca MA, Amato MP, De Stefano N, et al. Clinical and imaging assessment of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(3):302–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(12):1139–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ruano L, Portaccio E, Goretti B, et al. Age and disability drive cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis across disease subtypes. Mult Scler. 2017;23(9):1258–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Langdon D. Cognitive assessment in MS. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2015;5(6 Suppl):43–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Parisi V, Manni G, Spadaro M, et al. Correlation between morphological and functional retinal impairment in multiple sclerosis patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(11):2520–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gordon-Lipkin E, Chodkowski B, Reich DS, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer is associated with brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2007;69(16):1603–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sepulcre J, Murie-Fernandez M, Salinas-Alaman A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of retinal abnormalities in predicting disease activity in MS. Neurology. 2007;68(18):1488–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Grazioli E, Zivadinov R, Weinstock-Guttman B, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is associated with brain MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2008;268(1-2):12–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Siger M, Dziegielewski K, Jasek L, et al. Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer as a potential measure of axonal loss and brain atrophy. J Neurol. 2008;255(10):1555–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dörr J, Wernecke KD, Bock M, et al. Association of retinal and macular damage with brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18132.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamirel C, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2010;166(12):978–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lange AP, Sadjadi R, Saeedi J, et al. Time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of retinal nerve Fiber layer in MS patients and healthy controls. J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:564627.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(7):1271–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Watson GM, Keltner JL, Chin EK, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and central macular thickness measurements among five different optical coherence tomography instruments in patients with multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis. J Neuro-Oncol. 2011;31(2):110–6.Google Scholar
  19. Arthur SN, Smith SD, Wright MM, et al. Reproducibility and agreement in evaluating retinal nerve fibre layer thickness between stratus and Spectralis OCT. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(2):192–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Goretti B, Niccolai C, Hakiki B, et al. The brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS): normative values with gender, age and education corrections in the Italian population. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:171.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M, et al. Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. NeuroImage. 2002;17(1):479–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Battaglini M, Jenkinson M, De Stefano N. Evaluating and reducing the impact of white matter lesions on brain volume measurements. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(9):2062–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Arnow S, Wilson JA, et al. Retinal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography and risk of disability worsening in multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(6):574–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Young KL, Brandt AU, Petzold A, et al. Loss of retinal nerve fibre layer axons indicates white but not grey matter damage in early multiple sclerosis. Eur J Nurol. 2013;20(5):803–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Toledo J, Sepulcre J, Salinas-Alaman A, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy is associated with physical and cognitive disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2008;14(7):906–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterson JW, Bö L, Mörk S, Chang A, et al. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(3):389–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Benedict RH, Shucard JL, Zivadinov R, et al. Neuropsychological impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison with multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2008;18(2):149–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Britze J, Pihl-Jensen G, Frederiksen JL. Retinal ganglion cell analysis in multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8531-y.

Copyright

Advertisement