Skip to main content

Advertisement

Comparison of the perioperative time courses of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and its inhibitor (TIMP-1) during carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA)

Article metrics

  • 638 Accesses

Abstract

Background

Our aim was to compare the perioperative time courses of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and its inhibitor (TIMP-1) in during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Methods

In our prospective study, twenty-five patients who were scheduled to undergo CAS were enrolled. We used a matched, historical CEA group as controls. Blood samples were collected at four time points: T1: preoperative; T2: 60 min after stent insertion; T3: first postoperative morning; and T4: third postoperative morning. Plasma MMP-9 and TIMP-1 levels were measured by ELISA.

Results

In the CEA group, the plasma levels of MMP-9 were significantly elevated at T3 compared to T1. In the CAS group, there was no significant difference in MMP-9 levels in the perioperative period. MMP-9 levels were significantly higher in the T3 samples of the CEA group compared to the CAS group. Significantly lower TIMP-1 levels were measured in both groups at T2 than at T1 in both groups. MMP-9/TIMP-1 at T3 was significantly higher than that at T1 in the CEA group compared to both T1 and the CAS group.

Conclusions

CAS triggers smaller changes in the MMP-9-TIMP-1 system during the perioperative period, which may correlate with a lower incidence of central nervous system complications. Additional studies as well as cognitive and functional surveys are warranted to determine the clinical relevance of our findings.

Trial registration

NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine, Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03410576, 24.01.2018, Retrospectively registered

Background

Ischaemic stroke is one of the leading causes of death, dementia and disability in the developed world [1, 2]. Among stroke survivors, the risk of recurrent attacks remains high. Significant stenosis of the internal carotid artery is a well-known risk factor of ischaemic stroke [3]. Intervention of the stenotic carotid artery can decrease the risk of stroke. The gold standard intervention is carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a less invasive therapeutic method with increasing popularity [4,5,6]. Although both methods have well-known complications, clinical trials have found that the risk of death or recurrent stroke within 30 days of surgery in symptomatic patients was higher among the CAS patients than among the CEA patients [7,8,9,10,11,12]. According to the 2014 AHA/ASA stroke prevention guideline for low- or average-risk symptomatic patients, CAS is an alternative to CEA when the internal carotid artery stenosis is greater than 70% by non-invasive imaging or greater than 50% by catheter-based imaging and if the anticipated rate of periprocedural stroke or death is less than 6% [13]. For patients younger than 70 years old, the risk of periprocedural complications (stroke, myocardial infarction or death) and the long-term risk of ipsilateral stroke is equal whether they undergo CAS or CEA [13]. CAS is also a reasonable treatment modality among patients with symptomatic severe stenosis (> 70%) and concurrent anatomic or medical conditions that increase the risks of surgery or in cases with specific circumstances such as radiation-induced stenosis or restenosis after CEA [13].

The gold standards of periprocedural stroke diagnosis are clinical parameters and neuroimaging. In recent years, various biomarkers of neural damage have been tested and validated; however, a single biomarker that is capable of identifying neural damage is not yet available [14]. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) have already been examined in CEA- and CEA-associated periprocedural stroke [15, 16]. MMPs play a crucial role in extracellular matrix turnover, degradation and remodelling. In addition, the effects of MMPs in signalling pathways have been confirmed and evaluated in various physiological and pathophysiological conditions [17,18,19]. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is a gelatinase enzyme and a marker of inflammation. Although it lacks specificity in the monitoring of neuronal damage, increased perivascular tissue levels and microglial production of MMP-9 were observed in acute stroke patients. Higher MMP-9 levels have been found to be associated with increased oxidative stress, apoptosis, blood-brain-barrier (BBB) dysfunction and development of cerebral oedema [20]. According to in vitro results, TIMP-1 can play a protective role in neuronal apoptosis and neurotrophic action, but in vivo data are controversial, as the possibility of secondary TIMP-1 increases as a result of BBB injury [21]. The interaction between MMPs and TIMPs is stoichiometric, and therefore, MMP/TIMP ratios can be used to reflect MMP-TIMP activity.

In one of our earlier studies, we examined the time course of CEA-related changes in MMP-9 and TIMP-1 [22]. Although Giuliani et al. investigated the levels of MMP-9 (and other biomarkers) in CEA patients versus CAS patients, the perioperative changes in the plasma levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 have not yet been evaluated [23]. The aim of our study was to compare the perioperative changes of the plasma levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in CEA and CAS.

Methods

Our study was carried out in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the 2008 Declaration of Helsinki at the Clinical Centre of University of Pécs in Hungary between October 2013 and November 2015. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Scientific and Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Pécs in Hungary. Following verbal and written information about the study, all enrolled patients provide their written informed consent to participate in our study. In total, twenty-five elective CAS patients were enrolled. The exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of malignant diseases, inflammatory and systemic autoimmune disorders, psychiatric disorders and previous debilitating stroke. For all patients, a preoperative anaesthetic assessment was routinely performed prior to the elective procedures. During this assessment, signs of ongoing infections or trauma were excluded.

In a study recently published by our workgroup, a group of 54 patients undergoing CEA was evaluated [22]. In the present study, a matched subgroup of 30 patients from the previously obtained data served as a historical control.

Surgical procedures

A detailed description of the CEA procedure and blood sampling schedule is available in our prior publication [22]. The CEA group samples were collected at the following four time points (T1–4): T1, at the time of the insertion of the arterial line; T2, 60 min after cross-clamp release; T3, the first postoperative morning; and T4, the third postoperative morning.

CAS operation

CAS was performed under regional anaesthesia with lidocaine. Pre- or intraoperative sedation was not performed on our CAS patients. After catheterising the right femoral artery, diagnostic angiography was performed in all cases. After the precise localisation of the stenosis, a guide catheter was inserted with the help of a hydrophilic guide wire. Then, through this guide catheter, a microwire was inserted through the stenotic area. Once the appropriate position was achieved, the lumen was opened with the gradual dilatation of the stent. During the dilatation, 0.5 mg of intravenous atropine was administered to prevent bradycardia. CAS patients were admitted to the neurosurgery ward after the procedure for postoperative monitoring. Blood samples from CAS patients were collected via an arterial cannula. Sampling was performed at three time points (T1–3): T1, at the time of the insertion of the arterial line; T2, 60 min after stent insertion; and T3: the first postoperative morning. The fourth sampling (on the third postoperative morning) was not performed because the patients were discharged from the hospital on the second postoperative day.

Plasma was isolated from heparin-anticoagulated blood samples by low speed centrifugation at 4 °C and stored at − 80 °C until they were analysed in a single batch at the end of the study. MMP-9 and TIMP-1 levels were measured with quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Then, spectrophotometric (Multiskan Ascent microplate photometer, Type: 354, Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) reading of the absorbance at 450 nm was compared to standard curves. Plasma concentrations of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 were expressed as ng/ml.

Statistical analysis

Non-parametric tests were used since the data distribution was found to be not normal by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. CEA patients and CAS patients were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with post hoc Dunn test was used to compare data of the different time points in both patient groups. The analyses were conducted by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics software, version 21.0 (IBM Corporation, USA). Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the demographic data, comorbidities, major complications and pre-existing medical conditions and treatments of the two analysed groups. There was no significant difference between the CAS group and the control CEA group in the number of patients enrolled, age, gender, medications, comorbidities and major complications. Age, gender, procedure laterality, previous stroke, presence of contralateral stenosis, prior ipsi- or contralateral surgery, smoking, pre-existing hypertension and diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic medication did not influence the plasma levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 at any time points. The plasma levels of MMP-9 among diabetic patients treated with insulin analogues were significantly higher in the T2 samples (Table 2). Lipid lowering agents and aspirin did not influence the plasma levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 at any time point. Baseline (T1) plasma MMP-9 levels of the patients treated with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists were significantly lower (Table 3). Intraoperative hypo- or hypertension had no effect on plasma MMP-9 or TIMP-1 levels in the present study.

Table 1 Demographic and characteristic data of patients
Table 2 Effect of insulin analogue on plasma MMP-9 levels
Table 3 Effect of ADP receptor antagonists on plasma MMP-9 levels

In the CEA group, significantly higher plasma MMP-9 levels were measured at T3 compared to baseline (T1). There were no differences in the plasma MMP-9 levels in the CAS group at any time point (p > 0.05). In the T3 samples, plasma MMP-9 levels were significantly higher in the CEA group compared to the CAS group (Table 4 and Fig. 1).

Table 4 Plasma MMP-9, TIMP-1 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 levels in the study groups
Fig. 1
figure1

Changes in plasma MMP-9 concentrations in the two patient groups. CEA: carotid endarterectomy group (striated); and CAS: carotid artery stenting group (grey). Samples: 1, preoperative values; 2, 60 min after cross-clamp release/stent insertion; 3, postoperative day 1; and 4, postoperative day 3. *: p < 0.05 compared to sample 1; and #: p < 0.05 compared to CAS

Significantly lower plasma TIMP-1 levels were measured in both groups at T2 compared to baseline (Table 4 and Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Changes in plasma TIMP-1 concentrations in the two patient groups. CEA: carotid endarterectomy control group (striated); and CAS: carotid artery stenting group (grey). Samples: 1, preoperative values; 2, 60 min after cross-clamp release/stent insertion; 3, postoperative day 1; and 4, postoperative day 3. *: p < 0.05 compared to sample 1

MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratios at T3 were significantly higher than baseline in the CEA group and the CAS group (p < 0.05) (Table 4 and Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Changes in plasma MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratios in the two patient groups. CEA: carotid endarterectomy control group (striated); and CAS: carotid artery stenting group (grey). Samples: 1, preoperative values; 2, 60 min after cross-clamp release/stent insertion; 3, postoperative day 1; and 4, postoperative day 3. *: p < 0.05 compared to sample 1; and #: p < 0.05 compared to CAS

Discussion

Interventions on the extracranial carotid artery are relatively common vascular procedures worldwide. The gold standard intervention is still CEA; however, according to the 2014 AHA/ASA stroke prevention guideline, CAS can be equally effective and less invasive in selected cases [13]. Careful preoperative assessment and management are essential to identify the patients who may benefit from the less invasive nature of an endovascular operation compared to an open surgery.

Most studies on the MMP-9-TIMP-1 system in CEA and CAS have assessed changes at only a single time point [16, 23, 24]. Thus, our primary aim was to describe the time course of changes in MMP-9 and TIMP-1 levels during the perioperative period of CAS, compare the results to CEA and identify factors influencing these changes.

Muzahir et al. provided information regarding the correlation of MMP/TIMP levels with age, gender and diurnal activity [25]. There were no significant differences in the demographic data of the patients between the study groups, and all surgeries started in the morning; therefore, we could not ascribe the identified differences to population bias. Although hypo- and hypertension were more prevalent in the CEA group, these complications were promptly addressed.

The role of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in cardiovascular remodelling is being intensively investigated [26, 27]. In paediatric hypertension, Niemirska et al. found sex-related elevations in the plasma concentrations of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 [28]. In our recent study, age, gender and pre-existing hypertension did not influence the plasma levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 at any time point.

The plasma level of MMP-9 has been found to be an independent risk factor for atherothrombotic events [29]. Among patients with coronary artery disease, concurrent type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with higher plasma levels of MMP-9 [30]. This highlights the role of MMP-9 in diabetes-associated atherothrombosis. In our study, diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic medication did not influence the plasma levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 at any time point. Noticeably, the plasma levels of MMP-9 among diabetic patients treated with insulin analogues were significantly higher 60 min after reperfusion, but the difference was no longer detectable in the T3 or T4 samples. In contrast with our results, in vitro and animal studies have found that insulin treatment specifically inhibits MMP-9 expression [31]. Additional investigation of increased case numbers is necessary to resolve this contradistinction.

The mechanism by which ADP receptor antagonists influence plasma MMP-9 levels is not clear; however, the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) induced expression of MMP-9 has been investigated in different cell types [32, 33]. Choi et al. found that ATP induced microglial activation through the non-transcriptional activation of MMP-9, which can be inhibited by a P2Y receptor antagonist (including clopidogrel) in cell culture [34]. Sternberg et al. observed a reduction in MMP-9 plasma levels after clopidogrel administration in acute ischaemic stroke [35]. TIMPs can inhibit MMP-dependent platelet adhesion and aggregation. The effect of TIMPs on platelet aggregation can be enhanced by aspirin and ADP receptor antagonists. Reduced platelet aggregation caused by ADP receptor antagonist treatment may retroactively influence the expression of TIMPs [36].

After a transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke, both the increase of MMP and decrease of TIMP levels can occur as a result of ischaemic damage and, later, as a result central nervous system repair [37, 38]. The significant increase of MMP-9 levels in the CEA group on the first postoperative day may indicate subclinical BBB dysfunction and/or microembolisation [16]. Using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, Tedesco et al. observed a higher incidence of postprocedural microembolisation after CAS than after CEA [39], but Montorsi et al. found that the risk of microembolisation could be decreased with a proximal endovascular occlusion approach [40]. Another cause of the higher MMP-9 in the CEA group on the first postoperative day could be the longer carotid flow restriction compared to the endovascular procedure (CAS). The significant decrease of TIMP-1 in both groups during the study may be an indicator of increased extracellular matrix turnover following reperfusion [37, 38]. The higher MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio on the first postoperative day in the CEA group originated from the higher plasma MMP-9 levels but seems to have been not significantly influenced by the TIMP-1 levels.

Limitations of our study: The extent of the resulting tissue damage from the two surgical procedures (CEA and CAS) are different. MMP-9 and TIMP-1 are commonly viewed as biomarkers of different pathophysiological conditions, but they also have biological properties and thus could potentially affect outcomes. As previously described by Agren et al., elevated MMP-9 levels are present in healing wounds, which may contribute to the elevated MMP-9 levels on the day after CEA surgery [41]. Another limitation of our study is that preoperative MRI was not routinely performed to determine the size of the previous ischaemic lesion; however, previous debilitating stroke was one of our exclusion criteria. Although the presence of contralateral carotid artery stenosis did not influence the plasma levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 at any time point, an examination of the effects of atherosclerosis in other arteries was not part of our study.

Conclusions

According to our study, there were no significant differences in the incidence of neurological complications between the two groups during the perioperative period. However, the endovascular procedure triggers smaller changes in the MMP-9-TIMP-1 system, which may suggest a lower incidence of central nervous system damage. This finding may originate from a lower incidence of BBB dysfunction and/or microembolisation and a shorter carotid flow restriction time; however, the exact mechanism is not completely clear. Postoperative neuroimaging (such as MRI) may help identify subclinical changes; however, postoperative neuroimaging in a complication-free group was not performed. Additional studies in a larger group of patients, including a cognitive and functional survey at 1 and 6 months, are necessary to identify subtle differences in the functional outcome between the two procedures.

Abbreviations

ADP:

Adenosine diphosphate

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

BBB:

Blood-brain-barrier

CAS:

Carotid artery stenting

CEA:

Carotid endarterectomy

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

IA:

Insulin analogue

ICA:

Internal carotid artery

MMP-9:

Matrix metalloproteinase-9

MMPs:

Matrix metalloproteinases

TIMP-1:

Tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1

TIMPs:

Tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases

References

  1. 1.

    Zorowitz RD, Chen E, Bianchini Tong K, Laouri M. Costs and rehabilitation use of stroke survivors: a retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:309–20.

  2. 2.

    Soler EP, Ruiz VC. Epidemiology and risk factors of cerebral ischemia and ischemic heart diseases: similarities and differences. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2010;6:138–49.

  3. 3.

    Dickerson LM, Carek PJ, Quattlebaum RG. Prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76:382–8.

  4. 4.

    Liapis CD, Bell PRF, Mikhailidis D, Sivenius J, Nicolaides A, Fernandes e Fernandes J, et al. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:1–19.

  5. 5.

    Yip H-K, Sung P-H, Wu C-J, Yu C-M. Carotid stenting and endarterectomy. Int J Cardiol. 2016;214:166–74.

  6. 6.

    Featherstone RL, Dobson J, Ederle J, Doig D, Bonati LH, Morris S, et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (international carotid stenting study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–94.

  7. 7.

    Meier P, Knapp G, Tamhane U, Chaturvedi S, Gurm HS. Short term and intermediate term comparison of endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c467.

  8. 8.

    Meller SM, Salim Al-Damluji M, Gutierrez A, Stilp E, Mena-Hurtado C. Carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis: contemporary results from a large single center study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88(5):822–30.

  9. 9.

    Bonati LH, Ederle J, McCabe DJH, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, Gaines PA, et al. Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:908–17.

  10. 10.

    SPACE Collaborative Group, Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, Eckstein H-H, Fraedrich G, et al. Thirty day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1239–47.

  11. 11.

    Bonati LH, Ederle J, Dobson J, Engelter S, Featherstone RL, Gaines PA, et al. Length of carotid stenosis predicts peri-procedural stroke or death and restenosis in patients randomized to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:297–305.

  12. 12.

    Choi JC, Johnston SC, Kim AS. Early outcomes after carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2015;46:120–5.

  13. 13.

    Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2014;45:2160–236.

  14. 14.

    Li J, Wang Y. Blood biomarkers in minor stroke and transient ischemic attack. Neurosci Bull. 2016:1–6.

  15. 15.

    Ramos-Fernandez M, Bellolio MF, Stead LG. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 as a marker for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;20:47–54.

  16. 16.

    Molloy K, Thompson M, Schwalbe E, Bell PR, Naylor A, Loftus I. Elevation in plasma MMP-9 following carotid endarterectomy is associated with particulate cerebral embolisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:409–13.

  17. 17.

    Lorente L, Martín MM, Labarta L, Díaz C, Solé-Violán J, Blanquer J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9, −10, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 blood levels as biomarkers of severity and mortality in sepsis. Crit Care. 2009;13:R158.

  18. 18.

    Mühl D, Nagy B, Woth G, Falusi B, Bogár L, Weber G, et al. Dynamic changes of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in severe sepsis. J Crit Care. 2011;26:550–5.

  19. 19.

    Mühl D, Ghosh S, Uzuelli JA, Lantos J, Tanus-Santos JE. Increases in circulating matrix metalloproteinase-9 levels following fibrinolysis for acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2010;125:549–53.

  20. 20.

    Chaturvedi M, Kaczmarek L. Mmp-9 inhibition: a therapeutic strategy in ischemic stroke. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;49:563–73.

  21. 21.

    Crocker SJ, Pagenstecher A, Campbell IL. The TIMPs tango with MMPs and more in the central nervous system. J Neurosci Res. 2004;75:1–11.

  22. 22.

    Nagy B, Woth G, Mérei Á, Nagy L, Lantos J, Menyhei G, et al. Perioperative time course of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), its tissue inhibitor TIMP-1 & S100B protein in carotid surgery. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143:220–6.

  23. 23.

    Giuliani E, Genedani S, Moratto R, Veronesi J, Carone C, Bonvecchio C, et al. Neural damage biomarkers during open carotid surgery versus endovascular approach. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:1671–9.

  24. 24.

    Gaudet JG, Yocum GT, Lee SS, Granat A, Mikami M, Connolly ES, et al. MMP-9 levels in elderly patients with cognitive dysfunction after carotid surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17:436–40.

  25. 25.

    Tayebjee MH, Lip GYH, Blann AD, MacFadyen RJ. Effects of age, gender, ethnicity, diurnal variation and exercise on circulating levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and −9, and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 and −2. Thromb Res. 2005;115:205–10.

  26. 26.

    Marchesi C, Dentali F, Nicolini E, Maresca AM, Tayebjee MH, Franz M, et al. Plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in hypertension. J Hypertens. 2012;30:3–16.

  27. 27.

    Galis ZS, Khatri JJ. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and Atherogenesis. Circ Res. 2002;90(3):251–62.

  28. 28.

    Niemirska A, Litwin M, Trojanek J, Gackowska L, Kubiszewska I, Wierzbicka A, et al. Altered matrix metalloproteinase 9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 levels in children with primary hypertension. J Hypertens. 2016;34:1815–22.

  29. 29.

    Blankenberg S, Rupprecht HJ, Poirier O, Bickel C, Smieja M, Hafner G, et al. Plasma concentrations and genetic variation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and prognosis of patients with cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2003;107(12):1579–85.

  30. 30.

    Marx N, Froehlich J, Siam L, Ittner J, Wierse G, Schmidt A, et al. Antidiabetic PPARγ-activator rosiglitazone reduces MMP-9 serum levels in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(2):283–8.

  31. 31.

    Schuyler CA, Ta NN, Li Y, Lopes-Virella MF, Huang Y. Insulin treatment attenuates diabetes-increased atherosclerotic intimal lesions and matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Endocrinol. 2011;210:37–46.

  32. 32.

    Wesley UV, Bove PF, Hristova M, McCarthy S, van der Vliet A. Airway epithelial cell migration and wound repair by ATP-mediated activation of dual oxidase 1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:3213–20.

  33. 33.

    Huwiler A, Akool e-S, Aschrafi A, Hamada FMA, Pfeilschifter J, Eberhardt W. ATP potentiates interleukin-1 beta-induced MMP-9 expression in mesangial cells via recruitment of the ELAV protein HuR. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(51):51758–69.

  34. 34.

    Choi MS, Cho KS, Shin SM, Ko HM, Kwon KJ, Shin CY, et al. ATP induced microglial cell migration through non-transcriptional activation of matrix Metalloproteinase-9. Arch Pharm Res. 2010;33:257–65.

  35. 35.

    Sternberg Z, Chichelli T, Sternberg D, Sawyer R, Ching M, Janicke D, et al. Relationship between inflammation and aspirin and Clopidogrel antiplatelet responses in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:327–34.

  36. 36.

    Santos-Martínez MJ, Medina C, Jurasz P, Radomski MW. Role of metalloproteinases in platelet function. Thromb Res. 2008;121:535–42.

  37. 37.

    Montaner J, Alvarez-Sabín J, Molina C, Anglés A, Abilleira S, Arenillas J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase expression after human Cardioembolic stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(8):1759–66.

  38. 38.

    Zhao B-Q, Wang S, Kim H-Y, Storrie H, Rosen BR, Mooney DJ, et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in delayed cortical responses after stroke. Nat Med. 2006;12:441–5.

  39. 39.

    Tedesco MM, Lee JT, Dalman RL, Lane B, Loh C, Haukoos JS, et al. Postprocedural microembolic events following carotid surgery and carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:244–50.

  40. 40.

    Montorsi P, Caputi L, Galli S, Ciceri E, Ballerini G, Agrifoglio M, et al. Microembolization during carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque: a randomized trial of proximal versus distal cerebral protection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1656–63.

  41. 41.

    Agren MS, Jorgensen IN, Andersen M, Viljanto J, Gottrup P. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 level predicts optimal collagen deposition during early wound repair in humans. Br J Surg. 1998;85:68–71.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for all the help and support from their technical co-workers and nurses in the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Therapy and the Department of Neurosurgery at the University of Pécs as well as Csilla Fajtik from the Department of Surgical Research and Techniques for providing the supportive help in completing the present study.

Funding

This study was supported by the Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities in the framework of the research project 20765–3/2018/FEKUTSTRAT at University of Pécs and was supported by PTE ÁOK-KA-2017-07.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

ÁM participated in the design of the study, data acquisition, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. BN participated in the design of the study, data acquisition, statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. GW participated in the data interpretation, statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. JL participated in the design of the study, data interpretation and performed blood sample analysis. FK participated in the design of the study and performed endovascular surgery. LB participated in data interpretation and revised the manuscript. DM participated in design of the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Ákos Mérei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Prior to this study, permission was sought and obtained from the Institutional Scientific and Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Pécs in Hungary (5016/2013). Following verbal and written information about the study, all enrolled patients provide their written informed consent to participate in our study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Carotid stenting
  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Matrix metalloproteinase
  • MMP-9
  • TIMP-1