Skip to main content

Long-term outcome and factors associated with restenosis after combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial stenosis



The optimal treatment for intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) has not been established. We retrospectively examined the initial and long-term outcomes associated with restenosis of a combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic ICAS.


Consecutive patients who underwent balloon angioplasty and/or stenting for ≥ 70% ICAS between 2006 and 2020 were analyzed. Patients within 48 h of stroke onset were excluded. The following procedures were established as standards at our institution: (1) primary balloon angioplasty alone was initially performed; (2) stenting for insufficient dilatation, recoiling, or dissection was conducted; and (3) stenting was considered for restenosis. Intracranial ischemic and hemorrhagic complications within 30 days after treatment were used to evaluate periprocedural safety. Recurrent ischemic events, restenosis and restenosis related factors were used to be evaluate the long-term outcome.


A total of 160 patients were recruited. Initial treatment consisted of balloon angioplasty (n = 101) and stenting (n = 59). Intracranial complications within 30 days after treatment were ischemic in five (3.1%) and hemorrhagic in four patients (2.5%). The incidence of these complication was 3.1% in the stenting group and 2.5% in the balloon angioplasty group. The mean follow-up period was 53.9 months. Restenosis was found in 42 patients (26%). Recurrent ischemic events during follow-up were noted in 14 patients (8.8%), of which six patients had TIA and eight patients had ischemic stroke. Restenosis-associated factors included diabetes, coronary artery disease, percent stenosis after treatment, and balloon angioplasty in logistic univariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes (HR: 2.084, CI: 1.039–4.180, p = 0.0386), length of lesion (HR; 1.358, CI: 1.174–1.571, p < 0.0001), and balloon angioplasty (HR: 4.194, CI: 1.083–16.239, p = 0.0379) were independent predictors for restenosis.


Combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic ICAS had a low perioperative stroke rate and may improve long-term outcome. Balloon angioplasty, diabetes, and length of lesion were significantly associated with restenosis.

Peer Review reports


Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is an important etiological factor for ischemic stroke, which accounts for 8 to 10% of patients with ischemic stroke in the United States, 18% in Japan, and 46% in China [1]. The recurrence rate in patients with symptomatic ICAS is high despite optimal medical treatment, although no treatment strategy has been established [2]. A recent cohort study with a follow-up of 2.8 years reported that the recurrence rate after medical treatment in patients with symptomatic ICAS was 14.9% [3].

The Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial demonstrated the periprocedural stroke rate and death rate of intracranial stenting to be significantly higher (14.7%) than aggressive medical treatment (5.8%) [4]. However, as limitations of this trial, the rate of acute-phase patients was high and the operators had insufficient experience. The recent Wingspan Stent System Post Market Surveillance (WEAVE) trial, a prospective on-label study that used the Wingspan stent (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), reported periprocedural stroke in 2.6% of patients [5].

Primary balloon angioplasty for symptomatic ICAS has been reported since the 1990s [6]. However, periprocedural complications and restenosis remain unresolved. Recently, primary balloon angioplasty without stenting was reported to have a lower periprocedural complication rate than stenting. Recent meta-analyses showed that the incidence of stroke and death within 30 days of submaximal angioplasty were 4.9% and 3%, respectively [7, 8]. The optimal endovascular treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic ICAS who do not improve after best medical treatment has not been established.

Although balloon angioplasty alone for symptomatic ICAS has been performed in Japan since the 1990s, the Wingspan stent has been used in selected patients after its approval in July 2014 [9]. The indication of the Wingspan stent has been limited to advanced dissection or acute occlusion after balloon angioplasty in Japan. We used selective balloon angioplasty and stenting based on arterial access and lesion morphology after the initial balloon angioplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the initial and long-term outcomes of a combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic ICAS at our institution. In addition, we investigated the factors increasing the risk of restenosis associated with endovascular treatment.


Patient selection

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent selective primary balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial artery stenosis from the prospectively acquired endovascular treatment databases of our institution between April 2006 and September 2020. Informed consent for the procedure was obtained from all patients. The study protocol was approved by the ethics review board of our institution.

Our inclusion criteria were: (1) patients with ≥ 70% stenosis of the main trunk of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), vertebral artery (VA), or basilar artery (BA) on cerebral angiography; (2) those with a history of a stenotic-lesion-induced transient ischemic attack (TIA) or non-disabling ischemic stroke (mRS ≤ 2); and (3) interval from the last TIA or ischemic stroke ≥ 72 h. Our exclusion criteria were: (1) residual stenosis immediately after recanalization therapy for acute major intracranial artery occlusion, (2) the presence of tandem extracranial lesions, and (3) pretreatment modified Rankin Scale score ≥ 3. We performed diagnostic imaging including cerebral angiography for patients with symptomatic ICAS, and initially start medical treatment. All patients received optimal medical treatment according to the guidelines at the time of treatment. For endovascular treatment, patients were selected in consideration of the indication criteria and exclusion criteria of our institution, and treatment is performed when consent is obtained from the patients and their families. Endovascular treatment was usually performed more than 2 weeks after the most recent onset.

Diagnostic criteria for atherosclerotic intracranial artery stenosis were as follows: (1) the absence of cerebral artery dissection on cerebral angiography, and (2) patients with ≥ 2 of the following vascular risk factors: hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, smoking, pre-existing atherosclerotic stenosis in other locations, and the presence of aortic plaque. Patients with ischemic stroke perform carotid echography, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography to search for embolic sources in order to evaluate the etiology of ischemic stroke. Various blood tests and cerebrospinal fluid tests are performed to distinguish inflammatory diseases. If arterial dissection is suspected, in addition to cerebral angiography, MRA and CTA are repeated to check for morphological changes. These diagnostic studies were repeated when the stroke recurred.

The following procedures were established as standards for minimally invasive combination therapy at our institution: (1) as initial treatment, primary balloon angioplasty alone was performed, (2) stenting was conducted when balloon angioplasty lead to insufficient dilation or acute dissection, (3) stenting should be prioritized for restenotic lesions, and (4) coronary stents were used until July 2014, when the Wingspan stent was approved. Since then, Wingspan stents have been used. Two experienced neuro-interventionalists were responsible for all treatments.

In all patients, MRI/MRA was performed before treatment to evaluate infarcted cerebral foci. The ICA was classified into supraclinoid (C1-C2), cavernous (C3-C4), and petrous (C5) segments. In this study, perioperative complications within 30 days were evaluated as initial results and restenosis, and recurrent ischemic events during follow-up were evaluated as long-term outcomes. Furthermore, factors associated with restenosis and recurrent ischemic events were analyzed.

Interventional techniques

All treatments were performed under venous anesthesia with propofol and local anesthesia at the site of femoral artery puncture. After a 6-Fr guiding catheter was inserted into the distal cervical internal carotid artery or distal vertebral artery, 5,000 units of heparin was intravenously administered. Percent stenosis was evaluated using the WASID method [10]. In addition, the lesion length and shape (eccentric or concentric) were assessed.

A 0.014-inch microguidewire was guided into a distal artery vessel across the target lesion, then a Gateway balloon catheter (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) or Unryu balloon catheter (Kaneka Medics, Tokyo, Japan) was guided. The catheter measured 1.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter, slightly smaller than that of a normal artery distal to the site of stenosis, and 9 to 20 mm in length in accordance with the length of the stenotic site. The balloon catheter was dilated to a maximum atmospheric pressure of 6 atm by increasing the pressure by 1 atm every 10 s, and maintained for approximately 30 s. When the percent stenosis after dilatation was ≤ 50%, the procedure was regarded as successful. To evaluate the presence of elastic recoiling or dissection after dilatation, repeat angiography was performed several times. When acute dissection with distal blood flow deterioration or residual stenosis of 50% or more were observed, stenting was conducted. After treatment, neurological assessment was conducted and the patients were managed in the intensive care unit until the day after treatment. Anticoagulant therapy with heparin was discontinued.

Periprocedural assessment

In all patients, MRI/MRA was performed the day after treatment. As procedure-associated complications within 24 h after treatment, we evaluated arterial dissection, vascular perforation, distal artery occlusion, acute occlusion, and acute in-stent thrombosis. Furthermore, we evaluated all ischemic events, systemic complications, and deaths within 30 days.

Medical management

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was performed from at least 1 week before treatment. Aspirin and clopidogrel were administered to most patients; however, cilostazol was administered to patients treated by Wingspan stent who had clopidogrel resistance, which was based on platelet aggregation evaluated by the VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay (Accumetrics Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) was started the day after treatment in patients who underwent balloon angioplasty alone. When stenting was conducted, DAPT was continued for 6 months and switched to SAPT in the ischemic event- or restenosis-free patients. Risk factor control in the patients consisted of achieving systolic blood pressure less than 140 mmHg, the administration of statins for dyslipidemia, and blood glucose control for DM.

Follow-up management

MRI and cerebral angiography were performed after 6 months to evaluate the presence of restenosis. Subsequently, MRI and MRA were conducted every 6 to 12 months. In this study, restenosis was defined as ≥ 50% stenosis. Recurrent ischemic events (cerebral infarction or TIA) were assessed in all regions in addition to the treated stenotic artery. Restenosis patients with recurrence of ipsilateral ischemic events were retreated with balloon angioplasty or stenting. Medical treatment was continued for asymptomatic restenosis patients. However, if the degree of restenosis progressed in a relatively short period of time, retreatment was considered. Additional treatment was indicated for the following patients: (1) those with ≥ 70% restenosis within 1 year after treatment, and (2) those with ≥ 50% restenosis with recurrent ischemic events. As long-term outcomes, restenosis and recurrent ischemic events were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Continuous variables with non-normal distribution were summarized as medians (interquartile range). Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages.

Restenosis-associated factors included age, sex, vascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, DM, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease), stenotic artery (MCA, ICA, VA and BA), duration from last attack to treatment, percent stenosis before and after treatment, treatment procedure, length and shape of the stenotic lesion, maximum diameter of the balloon catheter or stent, and recurrence of ischemic events (TIA and ischemic stroke). Logistic univariate analysis was used for the factors that influenced the development of restenosis. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (version 9.4, IBM, USA).


The baseline characteristics of the patients (n = 160) are shown in Table 1. Their ages ranged from 39 to 88 years, with a mean of 67.6 years. There were 124 males and 36 females. The stenotic arteries consisted of the MCA in 68 patients (43%), ICA in 49 (31%), VA in 31 (19%), and BA in 12 (8%). Concerning ischemic symptoms, cerebral infarction was observed in 118 patients (74%) and TIAs were observed in 42 (26%). Seven out of 160 patients had multiple intracranial severe stenosis. In this study, only obvious symptomatic stenosis was treated. The median interval from an attack until treatment was 21 days. Aspirin at 100 mg and clopidogrel at 75 mg were administered to 133 patients (83%), and aspirin at 100 mg and cilostazol at 200 mg were administered to 27 (17%).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients receiving endovascular treatment

Periprocedural results

As initial treatment, balloon angioplasty was performed in 101 patients (63%) and stenting was performed in 59 (37%) (Table 2). The treatment procedures were successful in all patients. The mean percent stenosis decreased from 78.2 ± 8.7% to 26.6 ± 13.3%. The length of lesion was 8.4 ± 3.3 mm. The morphology of the stenotic lesion was eccentric in 44.4% and concentric in 55.6%. The maximum diameter of the balloon catheter or stent used was 2.7 ± 0.9 mm. Wingspan and coronary stents were used in 43 and 16 patients.

Table 2 Procedural results and follow-up ischemic events

Perioperative intracranial complications within 30 days after treatment occurred in a total of nine patients (5.6%). Ischemic complications were noted in five patients (3.1%), consisting of three (3.0%) in the balloon angioplasty group and two (3.4%) in the stenting group. Perforator infarction was observed in three patients in the balloon angioplasty group and none in the stenting group. Furthermore, distal embolism (n = 1) and in-stent thrombosis (n = 1) were observed.

Hemorrhagic complications were observed in four patients (2.5%), consisting of acute arterial dissection-related subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 1) and hyperperfusion syndrome-related intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 1) in the balloon angioplasty group, and subarachnoid hemorrhage related to distal vessel perforation (n = 1) and hemorrhagic infarction-related intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 1) in the stenting group. One patient with intracerebral hemorrhage after stenting for basilar artery stenosis died. The total number of patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic intracranial complications was five (5.0%) in the balloon angioplasty group and four (6.8%) in the stenting group,which were nearly identical. Comparison of stenosis improvement and perioperative complications between the coronary stent and the Wingspan stent groups showed similar results. On the other hand, restenosis and recurrent ischemic events tended to be slightly less common in the Wingspan stent group than in the coronary stent group (Table 2).

Recurrent ischemic events during follow-up were noted in 14 patients (8.8%), of which 6 patients had TIA and 8 patients had ischemic stroke. Eight of the 14 patients had ipsilateral ischemic events, of which 5 had TIA and 3 had ischemic stroke. Recurrence of these ischemic events occurred on average 43.1 ± 48.7 months after treatment without fatal strokes.

Restenosis features

Posttreatment follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 182 months, with a mean of 53.9 months and median of 35 months. Of the 160 patients, restenosis was observed in 42 (26.3%) during follow-up periods. The incidence of restenosis was 5.8% per year. Overall restenosis occurred with a mean of 16.1 months and a median of 6.5 months, a mean of 15.7 months and a median of 6 months in the balloon angioplasty group, and a mean of 18.4 months and a median of 9 months in the stenting group. Restenosis was noted in 35 (34.7%) patients of the balloon angioplasty group and in seven (11.9%) of the stenting group.

An analysis of the factors that influence the development of restenosis is shown in Table 3. Significant factors associated with restenosis were DM (p = 0.0108), coronary artery disease (p = 0.0443), clopidogrel (p = 0.0471), posttreatment stenotic rate (p = 0.0039), and balloon angioplasty (p = 0.0025) in logistic univariate analysis. Recurrent ischemic events during follow-up were noted in six patients (14%) in the patients with restenosis and in eight (6.8%) in the patients without restenosis. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the recurrence of ischemic events.

Table 3 Examination of factors affecting restenosis by logistic univariate analysis

Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that DM (HR: 2.084, CI: 1.039—4.180, p = 0.0386), length of lesion (HR; 1.358, CI: 1.174—1.571, p < 0.0001), and balloon angioplasty (HR: 4.194, CI: 1.083—16.239, p = 0.0379) were independent predictors for restenosis (Table 4). Antiplatelet drugs were excluded from this multivariate analysis due to insufficient data on long-term oral medications.

Table 4 Multivariate Cox regression analysis for prediction factors of restenosis after endovascular treatment

Long-term outcomes

Forty-five sessions of additional treatment for restenosis were performed in 37 patients. Of the 45 sessions, stenting and balloon angioplasty were performed in 24 (53%) and 21 (47%), respectively. The mean interval from initial treatment until additional treatment was 17.1 ± 24.4 months, with a median of 8 months.

The Kaplan–Meier estimation of the cumulative probability of restenosis after endovascular treatment is shown in Fig. 1. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year Kaplan–Meier rates (with 95% confidence interval) for restenosis after endovascular treatment among all 160 patients were 20.8% (15.0—28.4), 24.5% (18.1—32.7), 25.8% (19.1—34.3), 34.4% (25.6—45.3), and 39.6% (29.3—51.9), respectively. The incidence of restenosis was highest within the first year after endovascular treatment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curve for the cumulative probability of restenosis after endovascular treatment. Kaplan–Meier estimate of the cumulative restenosis rates in patients who received endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial stenosis. The 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year Kaplan–Meier rates (with 95% confidence interval) for restenosis after endovascular treatment among all 160 patients were 20.8% (15.0–28.4), 24.5% (18.1–32.7), 34.4% (25.6–45.3), and 39.6% (29.3–51.9), respectively


Currently, there is no consensus regarding endovascular treatment strategies for intracranial stenosis. The problems of periprocedural complications and restenosis after treatment have not yet been resolved. We performed this retrospective study focusing on minimally invasive combination therapy tailored to individual patients rather than prioritizing intracranial stenting, and evaluated the periprocedural safety, long-term outcome, and factors associated with restenosis.

An increasing number of studies have recommended balloon angioplasty alone with minimally invasive techniques, such as submaximal dilatation [8]. The advantage of balloon angioplasty alone without stenting has been reported to be the limited damage to the vessel and relatively easy navigation. A meta-analysis showed that the incidence of stroke and death within 30 days was 4.9%, and that after Day 30 was 3.7% [11]. Another meta-analysis revealed that the incidences of stroke and death within 30 days and after 1 year were 3 and 5%, respectively [12]. The incidence of perioperative complications related to balloon angioplasty alone for symptomatic stenosis of the MCA was reported to be 4.2% [13]. In this study, the incidence of perioperative intracranial complications was 5.0% in the balloon angioplasty group and 6.8% in the stenting group.

The usefulness of stenting for symptomatic ICAS was not confirmed in a randomized controlled trial with medical treatment. Among ischemic complications, the incidence of perforator infarction was the highest, and basilar artery stenosis, advanced age, and DM were significantly associated with ischemic complications [14]. However, the results of treatment in a high-volume center through strict patient selection, excluding patients with acute ischemic stroke, were favorable. Wang et al. reported that the incidence of complications related to Wingspan stent insertion for MCA stenosis was 1.4% in the phase of skilled techniques [15]. Ma et al. reported that the incidence of perioperative complications in the Wingspan-stent-treated group was 4% [16]. In the WEAVE trial, the incidence of complications related to on-label procedures was 2.6% [5]. The conditions for on-label procedures in the United States included an age of 22 to 80 years, history of cerebral infarction (≥ 2 episodes), interval of ≥ 8 days from the onset of cerebral infarction, 70–99% stenosis, lesion length of ≤ 14 mm, and vascular diameter of ≥ 2 mm. On the other hand, the specifications of the Wingspan stent system, which was approved by the FDA in the United States in 2005, have not been modified to date, which raises an issue as a thick, hard delivery system must be guided.

There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment strategy for symptomatic ICAS. To select an optimal treatment method, the site of the stenotic artery, lesion shape, and access route to the lesion are examined, and comprehensive risk assessment regarding treatment procedures is conducted. The patient’s clinical factors and interval from the final ischemic attack are important factors to consider. At our institution, the indication and procedure of treatment are determined through strict preoperative risk assessment. For initial treatment, primary balloon angioplasty alone is performed, and stenting is considered in patients with insufficient dilation, marked acute dissection, or restenosis. We do not recommend stenting as initial treatment for lesions of the MCA or BA involving perforators or branching vessels, which have a high incidence of complications [14].

One of the disadvantages of balloon angioplasty is considered to be more restenosis than stenting. Ueda et al. reported that restenosis was observed in 31.9% of patients who underwent primary balloon angioplasty for symptomatic MCA stenosis with a median follow-up of 63 months [13]. Previous studies reported the incidence of restenosis after balloon angioplasty alone as 24 to 50% [17, 18]. Three recent meta-analyses demonstrated that the rate of restenosis was 8.9% [7], 18.4% [11], and 20% [12].

In the SAMMPRIS trial, the 3-year cumulative incidence of restenosis after stenting for symptomatic ICAS was 14% [19], Furthermore, restenosis was reported to be significantly associated with recurrent ischemic stroke [19, 20]. The Wingspan One-year Vascular Events and Neurologic Outcomes trial demonstrated a relatively low 8.5% 1-year stroke and death rate in Wingspan-stent-treated patients [21]. A meta-analysis demonstrated that the incidences of restenosis in the United States and Asia were 28.8 and 13.6%, respectively, demonstrating a regional difference [22]. Furthermore, this meta-analysis demonstrated that younger age was related to high in-stent restenosis rates [22]. A systemic review of symptomatic intracranial stenting reported that the rate of restenosis was 15.6% [23]. However, risks factors of restenosis after endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial stenosis have not yet been established.

A recent randomized trial reported that compared with bare metal stents (BMS), drug-eluting stents (DES) reduced the risks of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic high-grade ICAS [24]. Another randomized trial found that the use of a DES compared with a BMS resulted in a decreased risk of ISR, a similar rate of successful implantation of the stent, and similar adverse events [25]. A small single-center study reported that drug-eluting balloons may be a promising alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic high-grade ICAS showing a significantly lower rate of ischemic stroke recurrence or ISR in comparison with the Wingspan stent-treated patients with a similar safety profile [26].

In this study, the overall incidence of restenosis was 26.3% and 5.8% per year. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that DM, length of the lesion, and balloon angioplasty were independent predictors for restenosis. DM was reported to be an independent relevant factor for restenosis and recurrent ischemic events after balloon angioplasty alone for symptomatic MCA stenosis [13]. Several studies reported that DM was a predictive factor for restenosis after balloon-mounted stenting for ICAS [27, 28]. For percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary lesions, DM is an important predictive factor for restenosis [29]. Neointimal hyperplasia at the lesion site may be primarily involved in the pathogenesis of restenosis. DM promotes neointima formation after PCI [30]. The following clinical factors related to restenosis after PCI have been reported: vascular diameter, lesion length, stent length, and degree of residual stenosis [31]. These characteristics may also be similar for endovascular treatment for intracranial artery stenosis.

This study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study at a single center; thus, there was a bias in patient/treatment selection and no control medical arm. Our study design did not compare the superiority or inferiority of treatment outcomes in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent groups. In the future, a randomized controlled trial with multiple large-volume centers is needed to demonstrate whether this combination therapy is superior to aggressive medical treatment. Second, the results were obtained from a small number of Japanese patients, which may limit the generalizability of our results. Third, the follow-up data on clinical events or images were limited and incomplete data were included.

Endovascular treatment for patients with symptomatic arteriosclerotic ICAS may have potential of better clinical outcome if patients properly selected and treated by an experienced neuro-interventionalist at a high-volume center. However, our results do not allow us to define a profile for patients with this disease to choose between medical treatment and endovascular treatment. Furthermore, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment for symptomatic ICAS and the patients targeted.


A combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for patients with symptomatic arteriosclerotic intracranial artery stenosis is a feasible procedure with a low incidence of perioperative complications. It may have the potential for better initial and long-term outcomes for appropriately selected patients. Significant restenosis-associated factors were balloon angioplasty and DM. Additional prospective and randomized trials are required to confirm the efficacy of this treatment for recurrent ischemic strokes.

Availability of data and materials

The data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



Intracranial stenosis


Middle cerebral artery


Internal cerebral artery


Vertebral artery


Basilar artery


Transit ischemic attack


Modified Rankin scale


Diabetes mellitus


Dual antiplatelet therapy


Single antiplatelet therapy


Hazard ratio


Percutaneous coronary intervention


Intracranial artery stenosis


  1. White H, Boden-Albala B, Wang C, Elkind MSV, Rundek T, Wright CB, Sacco RL. Ischemic stroke subtype incidence among whites, blacks, and Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Circulation. 2005;111:1327–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan Y, Meng X, Jing J, Li H, Zhao X, Liu L, Wang D, Johnston SC, Wang Y, Wang Y, CHANCE Investigators. Association of multiple infarctions and ICAS with outcomes of minor stroke and TIA. Neurology. 2017;88:1081–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hurford R, Wolters FJ, Li L, Lau KK, Kuker W, Rothwell PM, Oxford Vascular Study Phenotyped Cohort. Prevalence, predictors, and prognosis of symptomatic intracranial stenosis in patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Neurology. 2020;19:413–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, Janis LS, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Torbey MT, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ, SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:993–1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander MJ, Zauner A, Chaloupka JC, Baxter B, Callison RC, Gupta R, Song SS, Yu W, WEAVE Trial Sites and Interventionalists. Final results in 152 on-label patients. Stroke. 2019;50:889–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Connors JJ III, Wojak CC. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic lesions: evolution of technique and short-term results. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:415–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kadooka K, Hagenbuch N, Anagnostakou, Valavanis A, Kulcsar Z. Safety and efficacy of balloon angioplasty in symptomatic intracranial stenosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroradiol. 2020;47:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dumont TM, Sonig A, Mokin M, Eller JL, Sorkin GC, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Levy EI, Siddiqui AH. Submaximal angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: a prospective Phase I study. J Neurosurg. 2016;125:964–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ueda T, Takada T, Usuki N, Takaishi S, Tokuyama Y, Tatsuno K, Hamada Y, Yoshie T. Outcome of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis at a high volume center. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;132:63–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI. A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:643–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stapleton CJ, Chen YF, Shallwani H, Alaraj A, Amin-Hanjani S, Charbel FT. Submaximal angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a meta-analysis of peri-procedural and long-term risk. Neurosurgery. 2020;86:755–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seyedsaadat SM, Yolcu YU, Neuhaus A, Rizvi A, Alzuabi M, Murad MH, Brinjikji W, Bydon M, Kallmes DF. Submaximal angioplasty in the treatment of patients with symptomatic ICAD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2020;12:380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ueda T, Takada T, Nogoshi S, Yoshie T, Takaishi S, Fukano T. Long-term outcome of balloon angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27:1870–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fiorella D, Derdeyn CP, Lynn MJ, Barnwell SL, Hoh BL, Levy EI, Harrigan MR, Klucznik RP, McDougall CG, Pride GL Jr, Zaidat OO, Lutsep HL, Waters MF, Hourihane JM, Alexandrov AV, Chiu D, Clark JM, Johnson MD, Torbey MT, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ, Turan TN, Lane BF, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI, SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Detailed analysis of periprocedural sterokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS). Stroke. 2012;43:2682–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang ZL, Gao BL, Li TX, Cai DY, Zhu LF, Xue JY, Bai WX, Li ZS. Outcomes of middle cerebral artery angioplasty and stenting with wingspan at a high-volume center. Neuroradiology. 2016;58:161–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma N, Zhang Y, Shuai J, Jiang C, Zhu Q, Chen K, Liu L, Li B, Shi X, Gao L, Liu Y, Wang F, Li Y, Liu T, Zheng H, Mo D, Gao F, Wang Y, Wang Y, Feng L, Miao Z. Stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in China: 1-year outcome of a multicenter registry study. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018;3:176–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marks MP, Wojak JC, Al-Ali F, Jayaraman M, Marcellus ML, Connors JJ, Do HM. Angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: clinical outcome. Stroke. 2006;37:1016–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qureshi AI, Hussein HM, El-Gengaihy A, Abdelmoula M, K Suri MF. Concurrent comparison of outcomes of primary angioplasty and of stent placement in high-risk patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1053–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Lynn MJ, Turan TN, Cotsonis GA, Lane BF, Montgomery J, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI, SAMMPRIS Investigators. Nonprocedural symptomatic infarction and in-stent restenosis after intracranial angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial (stenting and aggressive medical management for the prevention of recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis). Stroke. 2017;48:1501–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao P, Wang D, Zhao Z, Cai Y, Li T, Shi H, Wu W, He W, Yin L, Huang S, Zhu F, Jiao L, Ji X, Qureshi AI, Ling F. Multicenter prospective trial of stent placement in patients with symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1275–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alexander MJ, Zauner A, Gupta R, Alshekhlee A, Fraser JF, Toth G, Given C, Mackenzie L, Kott B, Hassan AE, Shownkeen H, Baxter BW, Callison RC, Yu W. The WOVEN trial: Wingspan one-year vascular events and neurologic outcomes. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2021;13:307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peng G, Zhang Y, Miao Z. Incidence and risk factors of in-stent restenosis for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:1447–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang T, Yang K, Luo J, Gao P, Ma Y, Wang Y, Li L, Liu Y, Feng Y, Wang X, Jiao L. Outcomes after stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2020;267:581–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jia B, Zhang X, Ma N, Mo D, Gao F, Sun X, Song L, Liu L, Deng Y, Xu X, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Guan S, Zhang F, Li B, Zheng H, Liu X, Liu Y, Chen K, Shuai J, Wan J, Wang J, Shi X, Li T, Chang B, Liebeskind DS, Yu W, Miao Z, NOVA Trial Investigators. Comparison of drug-eluting stent with bare-metal stent in patients with symptomatic high-grade intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:176–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Si JH, Ma N, Gao F, Mo DP, Luo G, Miao ZR. Effect of drug-eluting stent vs. bare metal stent for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial and vertebral stenosis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022;13:854226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gruber P, Garcia-Esperon C, Berberat J, Kahles T, Hlavica M, Anon J, Diepers M, Nedeltchev K, Remonda L. Neuro Elutax SV drug-eluting balloon versus Wingspan stent system in symptomatic intracranial high-grade stenosis: a single-center experience. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2018;10:e32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. The SSYLVIA study investigators. Stenting of symptomatic atherosclerotic lesions in the vertebral or intracranial arteries (SSYLVIA). Stroke. 2004;35:1388–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu SG, Znamg RL, Liu WH, Yin Q, Zhou ZM, Zhu WS, Zhu YL, Xu GL, Liu XF. Predictive factors for in-stent restenosis after balloon-mounted stent placement for symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:499–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cutlip DE, Chhabra AG, Baim DS, Chauhan MS, Marulkar S, Massaro J, Bakhai A, Cohen DJ, Kuntz RE, Ho KKL. Beyond restenosis; five-year clinical outcomes from second-generation coronary stent trials. Circulation. 2004;110:1226–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kornowski R, Mintz GS, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Bucher TA, Hong MK, Popma JJ, Leon MB. Increased restenosis in diabetes mellitus after coronary interventions is due to exaggerated intimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 1997;95:1366–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, Sanidas EA, Mintz GS, Mehran R. In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1897–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank all staff physicians, radiographers, and nurses at our stroke center.


This study has not received funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Study design, procedure performance, data analysis, and manuscript preparation: TU. Procedure performance, data collection, and data analysis: ST and TY. Procedure performance and data collection: NU, KT, HO, and TA. Statistical analysis: YK. Procedure performance, data analysis and interpretation: TT. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshihiro Ueda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the ethics review board of St. Marianna University. (No.5137/ 9 February 2021) The need for written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ueda, T., Takaishi, S., Yoshie, T. et al. Long-term outcome and factors associated with restenosis after combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial stenosis. BMC Neurol 22, 477 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Intracranial artery stenosis
  • Balloon angioplasty
  • Stenting
  • Restenosis