Skip to main content

Nonlinear relationship between glycated hemoglobin and cognitive impairment after acute mild ischemic stroke

Abstract

Background

Stroke is the second most common cause of morbidity and mortality. Even mild stroke survivors have an increased risk of cognitive impairment. Studies have been conducted on the relationship between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and cognitive decline, but the findings have been inconsistent. Therefore, this study examined the link between HbA1c levels and cognitive impairment following acute mild ischemic stroke.

Methods

Data from 311 patients with acute mild ischemic stroke admitted to Suining Central Hospital, Sichuan Province, China, from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, were evaluated. Fasting venous blood was taken to assess HbA1c levels on the day after admission. Cognitive function was assessed using the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) 3–6 months after stroke onset. We used a generalized additive model and smooth curve fitting (penalty spline method) to assess the nonlinear relationship between HbA1c and poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI).

Results

This study included 311 patients aged 23 to 96 years old (mean age: 67.37 ± 11.92 years), of whom 198 (63.67%) were men. Among the 311 stroke patients, 120 (38.59%) had PSCI. After adjusting for potential confounders, there was a nonlinear relationship between HbA1c and PSCI, with an inflection point of 8.2. To the left of the inflection point, the effect size, 95% confidence interval, and P value were 0.87, 0.58 to 1.31, and 0.5095, respectively; however, to the right of the inflection point, these numbers were 1.96, 1.08 to 3.58, and 0.0280.

Conclusion

We found a nonlinear relationship between HbA1c and PSCI. When HbA1c was greater than 8.2%, HbA1c was positively correlated with PSCI.

Peer Review reports

Background

Globally, stroke is the second most common cause of morbidity and mortality [1]. Cognitive impairment is a common complication after stroke that has a poor prognosis and places a heavy burden on families and society [2]. Mild stroke with mild clinical symptoms has a good prognosis and no obvious neurological signs. However, research shows an increased risk of developing cognitive impairment even in mild stroke survivors [3]. Therefore, early identification of important risk factors for cognitive impairment in mild stroke will enable clinicians to intervene earlier in high-risk patients.

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is used as a marker of blood glucose control since it indicates the average level of blood glucose over the previous three months [4]. It is essential for glucose control in patients with diabetes [5] and provides higher test-to-test consistency than individual fasting or postload blood glucose readings [6]. HbA1c and cognitive impairment have been previously studied, but the results have been inconsistent. Several studies have found HbA1c to be a risk factor for cognitive impairment in people with diabetes [7,8,9]. However, in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the relationship between HbA1c and cognitive impairment has not been studied in depth, and no correlation between the two has been found [10,11,12,13]. Therefore, this study examined the link between HbA1c levels and cognitive impairment following acute mild ischemic stroke and identified prospective biomarkers for poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) identification and prevention.

Materials and methods

Subjects

In this retrospective cohort study, data from 736 patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to Suining Central Hospital, Sichuan Province, China, from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, were recruited. The following were the criteria for inclusion: 1) patients were 18 years of age and older; 2) patients were hospitalized within 7 days of stroke start; 3) patients had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of less than or equal to 3; and 4) patients had acute cerebral infarction confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during hospitalization.

The following were the criteria for exclusion: 1) previous history of stroke; 2) aphasia that made it impossible to assess cognitive function; 3) history of mental problems, neurological diseases, thyroid diseases, autoimmune diseases, or tumors; and 4) prestroke dementia or cognitive impairment. A total of 311 patients with acute mild ischemic stroke were eventually included in the final analysis (as shown in Fig. 1). The ethics committees at Suining Central Hospital approved this study in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Fig. 1
figure 1

An overview of the selection process

Data collection

Covariates

On admission, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), education, smoking status, alcohol use, hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and other information were collected. Fasting venous blood was taken on the day after admission to assess fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, blood lipid, and uric acid (UA) levels. Within 72 h after hospitalization, MRI was performed. Within 24 h of admission, the NIHSS was used to determine the severity of the stroke, with a score of less than or equal to 3 indicating mild ischemic stroke. At discharge, the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess functional outcomes.

Cognitive assessments

Cognitive function was assessed using the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) 3–6 months after stroke onset [14]. The highest possible MoCA score was 30, and less than 26 was defined as cognitive impairment. A score of less than 25 was classified as cognitive impairment if the number of years of education was less than or equal to 12 years [15, 16].

Statistical analysis

Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (Gaussian distribution) or median (range) (skewed distribution) for continuous variables and as numbers and percentages for categorical variables. χ2 (categorical variables), one-way ANOVA (normal distribution), or Kruskal–Wallis H test (skewed distribution) were used to detect differences in variables among different HbA1c groups (based on tertiles). To examine the effect of HbA1c on PSCI, we constructed three different models, namely, Model 1 (no covariates were adjusted for), Model 2 (only sociodemographic variables were adjusted for) and Model 3 (covariates are presented in Table 3). A 95% confidence interval was calculated for the effect sizes. We used smooth curve fitting (penalized spline method) to account for nonlinearity between HbA1c and PSCI as well as the generalized additive model (GAM). In addition, a two-piecewise binary logistic regression model was used to further explain the nonlinearity. Next, we performed a subgroup analysis and used the likelihood ratio test to examine subgroup interactions. Modeling was performed with the statistical software packages R (http://www.R-project.org, The R Foundation) and EmpowerStats (http://www.empowerstats.com, X&Y Solutions, Inc., Boston, MA). P values less than 0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the participants

This study comprised 311 patients aged 23 to 96 years old (mean age: 67.37 ± 11.92 years), including 198 (63.67%) men. The HbA1c ranges for tertiles 1–3 (T1-3) were 4.1–5.4, 5.5–6.3, and 6.4–14.7%, respectively. Significant differences in FPG, homocysteine (HCY), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), alcohol consumption, and diabetes mellitus were observed among the groups with different HbA1c levels (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants

Characteristics of the PSCI and non-PSCI groups

Of the 311 recruited stroke patients, 120 (38.59%) of them had PSCI, and 191 had normal cognition. There were significant differences in creatinine (Cr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), UA, hypertension and atrial fibrillation between the two groups (P ≤ 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics of the PSCI and non-PSCI groups

Relationships between HbA1c and PSCI

To examine the links between HbA1c and PSCI, we utilized a binary logistic regression analysis. Table 3 shows the nonadjusted and adjusted models. In Model 1, HbA1c showed no correlation with PSCI (OR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78 to 1.17, P = 0.6568). In Model 2 (adjusted for age and sex), the result were not different (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.16, P = 0.5811). We also found no connection in Model 3, a fully adjusted model after correcting for other factors (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 1.00 to Inf, P = 1.0000). We also used HbA1c as a categorical variable (tertiles) for sensitivity analysis and found the same pattern (P = 1.0000).

Table 3 Relationships between HbA1c and PSCI

Nonlinear connection studies

We investigated the nonlinear relationship between HbA1c and PSCI in this study since HbA1c is a continuous variable (Fig. 2). The relationship between HbA1c and PSCI was discovered to be nonlinear after adjusting for potential confounders. By using a two-piecewise linear regression model, we found the inflection point at 8.2. To the left of the inflection point, the effect size, 95% CI, and P value were 0.87, 0.58 to 1.31, and 0.5095, respectively. However, to the right side of the inflection point, these numbers were 1.96, 1.08 to 3.58, and 0.0280), and we found a positive connection between HbA1c and PSCI (Table 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The nonlinear connection studies. The same adjustments were made as in model 3

Table 4 Threshold effect analysis of HbA1c on PSCI

The results of the subgroup analysis

By subgroup analysis, we further explored additional risks between HbA1c and PSCI to assess other factors that might influence the results. Age, gender, BMI, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, mRS score and NIHSS score were selected as stratification factors (Table 5). According to the results, the relationship between HbA1c and PSCI was not modified by any of the above influencing factors.

Table 5 Relationships between HbA1c and PSCI in various subgroups

Discussion

The connection between HbA1c and PSCI among participants was investigated using generalized linear model (GLM) and GAM models in this study. HbA1c was not linked with PSCI in the fully corrected model, as demonstrated. The same pattern was observed when HbA1c was treated as a categorical variable. However, a nonlinear relationship between HbA1c and PSIC was found, with different correlations on the left and right sides of the inflection point (HbA1c = 8.2%). On the left-hand side of the inflection point, HbA1c showed no significant relationship, but on the right-hand side of the inflection point, HbA1c was positively related to PSIC.

Gong et al. found that 122 (53.5%) of 228 patients with mild stroke who were assessed for cognitive impairment by MoCA 6–12 months after onset (MoCA < 22 was defined as cognitive impairment) developed cognitive impairment [17]. In a Korean study of 301 patients with acute ischemic stroke, 65 patients (21.6%) developed PSCI when cognitive impairment was assessed by the K-VCIHS-NP 3 months after onset [11]. In our study, 38.59% of patients with acute mild ischemic stroke were diagnosed with cognitive impairment 3–6 months after onset, which is different from previous studies. The reason is mainly related to the different evaluation criteria regarding cognitive function.

HbA1c and PSCI have been correlated in previous studies, but the results have been inconsistent. Two previous studies on cognitive impairment in acute ischemic stroke patients did not find a correlation between HbA1c and PSCI [12, 13]. Two other studies of cognitive impairment 3 months after stroke also found no association between HbA1c and cognitive impairment after stroke [10, 11]. However, a cohort study found that HbA1c was an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment 6–12 months after acute mild ischemic stroke by multivariate logistic regression analysis [17]. The present study is the first to identify a curvilinear relationship between HbA1c and cognitive impairment at 3–6 months after mild ischemic stroke. Previous studies that did not find differences in HbA1c between the PSCI and non-PSCI groups did not conduct analyses of nonlinear relationships [10,11,12,13].

We employed the GAM to elucidate the nonlinear interactions between HbA1c and PSCI, as well as the generalized linear model to analyze their linear relationship. We found that for every 1% increase in HbA1c greater than 8.2%, there was a 0.96-fold increase in the risk of PSCI. The clinical significance of this discovery is that the link between HbA1c and PSCI can only be seen when HbA1c reaches a particular level. The Mexican Health and Aging Study found that HbA1c ≥ 8% was associated with poorer cognitive performance in older adults with diabetes [18]. Another study found that diabetes was associated with cognitive impairment only when it was poorly controlled (e.g., HbA1c ≥ 7.5%), suggesting that it was the degree of hyperglycemia, rather than diabetes itself, that had a negative impact on cognitive health [19]. The above two studies involved diabetic patients. After adjusting for various confounding factors, our study found that HbA1c > 8.2% was an independent risk factor for PSCI. Our study found that the cut-off point was 8.2, which seems to be much higher than what we expect through basic knowledge. The reason may be related to the small sample size of people with elevated HbA1c.

HbA1c is a commonly assessed parameter that reflects the average blood glucose concentration over the past 8–12 weeks and is a good indicator for evaluating long-term blood glucose control [20]. Elevated HbA1c is caused by increased glycosylation of proteins due to hyperglycemia [21]. Hyperglycemia and dementia have been linked in many studies, both animal and clinical studies, which show that short-term hyperglycemia can lead to learning and memory loss in experimental animals [22,23,24]. In addition, previous epidemiological studies have reported that hyperglycemia and diabetes status are independently associated with the incidence of dementia [25]. Hyperglycemia is associated with poorer cognitive performance and is caused by dysregulation of insulin and the expression of insulin-degrading enzymes [26, 27]. Intracerebral insulin originates from pancreatic beta cells and relies on efficient IRec-mediated insulin transport across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to play an important role in cognition, including promoting learning and memory in older adults [28, 29].

This was the first study to identify a curvilinear relationship between HbA1c and cognitive impairment at 3–6 months after mild ischemic stroke. its effect on cognition from our study suggests the effect of average blood glucose may as a vascular risk factor on PSCI, rather than the effect of blood glucose in acute phase on PSCI. Thus, the implication of our study is the influence of pre-stroke blood glucose control on PCSI.

There were certain limitations to our research. First, as this study is a retrospective study, selection bias and lack of data are inevitable. Second, the HbA1c-PSCI relationship cannot be generalized to all ischemic stroke populations due to the exclusion of those with moderate to severe stroke severity. Third, the inclusion of people in western China creates regional and ethnic boundaries. Fourth, those with cardiopulmonary insufficiency were omitted, perhaps underestimating the prevalence of cognitive impairment, and the findings do not apply to this population. Furthermore, neuroimaging factors, including lesion size and location, were not assessed in this investigation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found a nonlinear relationship between HbA1c and cognitive impairment 3–6 months after acute mild ischemic stroke. When HbA1c was greater than 8.2%, HbA1c was positively correlated with PSCI.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analysed during this study for this report are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. Additional study data can be requested from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Gorelick PB. The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):417–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Q, Liao X, Pan Y, Jin A, Zhang Y. Association between serum uric acid levels and cognitive function in patients with ischemic stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA): A 3-Month Follow-Up Study. Neuropsych Dis Treat. 2021;17:991–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gong L, Wang H, Dong Q, Zhu X, Zheng X, Gu Y, Cai W, Zhao Y, Liu X. Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is related to post-stroke cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study of minor stroke. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2020;17(2):177–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang J, Luo X, Jin X, Lv M, Li X, Dou J, Zeng J, An P, Chen Y, Chen K, et al. Effects of Preoperative hba1c levels on the postoperative outcomes of coronary artery disease surgical treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:3547491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S62–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Selvin E, Crainiceanu CM, Brancati FL, Coresh J. Short-term variability in measures of glycemia and implications for the classification of diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(14):1545–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chakraborty A, Hegde S, Praharaj SK, Prabhu K, Patole C, Shetty AK, Mayya SS, Acharya RV, Hande HM, Prabhu MM, et al. Age related prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in the Indian population and association of serum lipids with cognitive dysfunction. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12: 798652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao W, Tian S, Zhang H, Zhu W, An K, Shi J, Yuan Y, Wang S. Association of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 and Its rs1799986 polymorphism with mild cognitive impairment in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Front Neurosci-Switz. 2020;14:743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorska-Ciebiada M, Saryusz-Wolska M, Ciebiada M, Loba J. Mild cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms in elderly patients with diabetes: prevalence, risk factors, and comorbidity. J Diabetes Res. 2014;2014: 179648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim JS, Kim C, Oh MS, Lee JH, Jung S, Jang MU, Lee SH, Kim YJ, Kim Y, Suh SW, et al. Effects of glycemic variability and hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke on post-stroke cognitive impairments. J Diabetes Complicat. 2018;32(7):682–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee M, Lim JS, Kim Y, Lee JH, Kim CH, Lee SH, Jang MU, Oh MS, Lee BC, Yu KH. Effects of glycemic gap on post-stroke cognitive impairment in acute ischemic stroke patients. Brain Sci. 2021;11(5):612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiao Y, Tian T, Wei S, Wang C, Wu L. Association between serum non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cognitive dysfunction after acute ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional study. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2020;53(12): e9487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu D, Li P, Zhou Y, Xu X, Zhang H, Liu L, Tian Z. Association between serum non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cognitive impairment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Bmc Neurol. 2016;16(1):154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. Can J Psychiat. 2007;52(5):329–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cummings-Vaughn LA, Chavakula NN, Malmstrom TK, Tumosa N, Morley JE, Cruz-Oliver DM. Veterans affairs Saint Louis University mental status examination compared with the Montreal cognitive assessment and the short test of mental status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(7):1341–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gong L, Wang H, Zhu X, Dong Q, Yu Q, Mao B, Meng L, Zhao Y, Liu X. Nomogram to predict cognitive dysfunction after a minor ischemic stroke in hospitalized-population. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13: 637363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mimenza-Alvarado AJ, Jimenez-Castillo GA, Yeverino-Castro SG, Barragan-Berlanga AJ, Perez-Zepeda MU, Avila-Funes JA, Aguilar-Navarro SG. Effect of poor glycemic control in cognitive performance in the elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Mexican Health and Aging Study. Bmc Geriatr. 2020;20(1):424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dove A, Shang Y, Xu W, Grande G, Laukka EJ, Fratiglioni L, Marseglia A. The impact of diabetes on cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(11):1769–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miedema K. Standardization of HbA1c and Optimal Range of Monitoring. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2005;240:61–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang C, Feng Q, Liao H, Yu X, Liu Y, Wang D. Anti-Diabetic Nephropathy Activities of Polysaccharides Obtained from Termitornyces albuminosus via Regulation of NF-kappaB Signaling in db/db Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Desideri G, Kwik-Uribe C, Grassi D, Necozione S, Ghiadoni L, Mastroiacovo D, Raffaele A, Ferri L, Bocale R, Lechiara MC, et al. Benefits in cognitive function, blood pressure, and insulin resistance through cocoa flavanol consumption in elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment: the Cocoa, Cognition, and Aging (CoCoA) study. Hypertension. 2012;60(3):794–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Monacelli F, Borghi R, Cammarata S, Nencioni A, Piccini A, Tabaton M, Odetti P. Amnestic mild cognitive impairment and conversion to Alzheimer’s disease: insulin resistance and glycoxidation as early biomarker clusters. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45(1):89–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim TE, Lee DH, Kim YJ, Mok JO, Kim CH, Park JH, Lee TK, Yoo K, Jeong Y, Lee Y, et al. The relationship between cognitive performance and insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with mild cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psych. 2015;30(6):551–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rawlings AM, Sharrett AR, Albert MS, Coresh J, Windham BG, Power MC, Knopman DS, Walker K, Burgard S, Mosley TH, et al. The association of late-life diabetes status and hyperglycemia with incident mild cognitive impairment and dementia: the ARIC study. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(7):1248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mayeda ER, Whitmer RA, Yaffe K. Diabetes and cognition. Clin Geriatr Med. 2015;31(1):101–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Craft S, Cholerton B, Baker LD. Insulin and Alzheimer’s disease: untangling the web. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S263–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spielman LJ, Little JP, Klegeris A. Inflammation and insulin/IGF-1 resistance as the possible link between obesity and neurodegeneration. J Neuroimmunol. 2014;273(1–2):8–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Park SJ, Chung YH, Lee JH, Dang DK, Nam Y, Jeong JH, Kim YS, Nabeshima T, Shin EJ, Kim HC. Growth hormone-releaser diet attenuates cognitive dysfunction in klotho mutant mice via insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor activation in a genetic aging model. Endocrinol Metab. 2014;29(3):336–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Lei Xu and Ming Yu carried out data collection and drafted the manuscript. Qin Xiong and Yang Du did statistical analysis and figure making. All authors read and approve the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee of Suining Central Hospital, because of the retrospective nature of the study. All protocols were approved by the Suining Central Hospital ethics committee and were conducted in accordance with their regulations and guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, L., Xiong, Q., Du, Y. et al. Nonlinear relationship between glycated hemoglobin and cognitive impairment after acute mild ischemic stroke. BMC Neurol 23, 116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03158-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03158-x

Keywords