Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of menopause on relapse rate and disability level in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Neurology volume 23, Article number: 316 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Menopause is a physiologic phase in women’s lives. Findings regarding multiple sclerosis (MS) course through menopause are diverse. So, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the impact of menopause on relapse rate, and disability status in women with MS.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and google scholar were systematically searched by two independent researchers on January 1st, 2023. They also evaluated conference abstracts, and references of the included studies. In addition, data regarding the total number of participants, name of the first author of the publication, publication year, country of origin, disease duration, disease type, annual relapse rate, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) before and after menopause were recorded.

Results

A literature search revealed 1024 records. Twenty-one full texts were evaluated, and finally, four studies were included for meta-analysis. Mean ARR before menopause ranged between 0.21 and 0.37, and after menopause ranged between 0.13 and 0.08. The SMD of mean ARR ranged between − 1.04, and − 0.29, while the pooled SMD was estimated as -0.52(95% CI: -0.88, -0.15) (I2 = 73.6%, P = 0.02). The mean EDSS before menopause ranged between 1.5 and 2, and after menopause ranged between 2 and 3.1. The SMD of EDSS ranged between 0.46, and 0.71. The pooled SMD of EDSS change (after menopause-before menopause) estimated as 0.56(95% CI: 0.38, 0.73)(I2 = 0, P = 0.4).

Conclusion

The result of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that menopause can be associated with relapse rate reduction, unlike increase in disease-related disability in women with MS.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory, neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), affecting women more than men, leading to a wide range of disability and quality of life impairment [1,2,3,4]. Different factors such as genetics, sunlight exposure (vitamin D level), smoking, and Epstein-Barr virus infection are among potential risk factors of developing MS [5, 6].

Predominance of autoimmune diseases in women is clear, which is estimated 3:1 for MS [7, 8]. Gender differences about age at disease onset, progression, and inflammation are observed, and women show slower disability accumulation, delayed reach to disability milestones, and faster recovery after relapses [9,10,11]. On the other hand, it has been shown that before puberty, males and females have the same odds of developing MS, while after puberty, females are predominately affected [12,13,14].

Strong activation of T-cells, more cytokine genes expression, and increased level of immunoglobulins highlight the role of sex hormones, specially estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone, as mediators of sex differences in autoimmune diseases such as MS [15, 16].In MS, the disease activity is suppressed during pregnancy (especially during the third trimester) due to significantly increased levels of estrogen and progesterone concentrations [17]. After delivery, a rebound of CNS inflammation is more common, and women experience relapses almost three times higher than pre-pregnancy period [17, 18].

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the risk of MS decreases by increasing menarche age (12% decrease of odds of developing MS by one year increase of menarche age) [19]. Earlier age at menarche results in oestrogen balance upset, and predisposes to MS [20].

Menopause, which is characterized by long-lasting termination of ovarian follicular activity, leads to blood level decrease of oestrogen [21], which may result in disability progression, and decreased inflammatory activity in women with MS [22].

Worsening MS-related disability after menopause may suggest that deprivation of gonadal steroid is linked to neurodegeneration, which is supported findings of a previous study, showing that anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level (indicating ovarian age) was negatively associated with higher levels of gray matter loss, and disability [23].

Findings regarding MS course through menopause are diverse. So, we designed this systematic review, and meta-analysis to estimate impact of menopause on relapse rate, and disability status.

Methods

We followed referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 [24].

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria were

retrospective or prospective cohort studies.

The exclusion criteria were

Letters to the editor, case-control, case reports, and cross-sectional studies.

Information sources

PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google scholar were systematically searched by two independent researchers on January 1st, 2023. They also evaluated conference abstracts and references of the references.

Search strategy

The MeSH terms were.

((((((((((((((((((((((Menopause[MeSH Terms]) OR (Menopause, Premature[MeSH Terms])) OR (Postmenopause[MeSH Terms])) OR (Premenopause[MeSH Terms])) OR (Menopaus*[Text Word])) OR (Menopause, Premature[Text Word])) OR (Premature Menopause[Text Word])) OR (Postmenopaus*[Text Word])) OR (Postmenopausal Period[Text Word])) OR (Period, Postmenopausal[Text Word])) OR (Post-Menopaus*[Text Word])) OR (Post Menopaus*[Text Word])) OR (Post-menopausal Period[Text Word])) OR (Period, Post-menopausal[Text Word])) OR (Post menopausal Period[Text Word])) OR (Premenopaus*[Text Word])) OR (Premenopausal Period[Text Word])) OR (Pre-Menopaus*[Text Word])) OR (Pre menopaus*[Text Word])) OR (Pre-menopausal Period[Text Word])) OR (Pre menopausal Period[Text Word])) OR (Period, Pre-menopausal[Text Word])) AND ((((((((Multiple Sclerosis[MeSH Terms]) OR (Multiple Sclerosis[Text Word])) OR (Sclerosis, Multiple[Text Word])) OR (Sclerosis, Disseminated[Text Word])) OR (Disseminated Sclerosis[Text Word])) OR (Acute Fulminating Multiple Sclerosis[Text Word])) OR (Multiple Sclerosis, Acute Fulminating[Text Word]))).

Selection process, and data collection

After obtaining all retrieved studies by two independent researchers, all results were imported to the Endnote, and duplicates were deleted. Then, Titles and abstracts were screened by two researchers, and full texts of eligible studies were evaluated.

If they disagreed regarding including a study, the third party helped them. Extracted data were entered the Excel sheet by each one and checked by the third one.

Data items

Data regarding the total number of participants, first author, publication year, country of origin, disease duration, disease type, annual relapse rate, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) before and after menopause were recorded.

Study risk of bias assessment

We assessed the risk of potential bias using the NEWCASTLE - OTTAWA QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCALE [25].

Effect measures

Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated as the effect size for annual relapse rate and EDSS. Otero-Romero et al. reported median and Inter quartile range (IQR) for EDSS, so we considered the mean as the same as median, and calculated the standard deviation from IQR (IQR/1.35).

Synthesis methods

All statistical analyses were performed using STATA (Version 14.0; Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

To determine heterogeneity, Inconsistency (I2) was calculated.

We used fixed effects model or random-effects model for meta-analysis if the heterogeneity between study results (I2) was less than 50% or more than 50%.

Certainty assessment

For each summary estimate, we reported the pooled estimate as well as 95% CI to show certainty.

Results

A literature search revealed 1024 records. After deleting duplicates, we had 660 records. Twenty-one full texts were evaluated. Finally, four studies remained for meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

the flow chart of studies inclusion

Full size image

The included studies were published between 2017 and 2020. Two were conducted in Italy, one in Portugal, and one in Spain. The number of enrolled patients ranged between 37 and 148, and mean age ranged between 47 and 50 years. One study was a conference abstract (Baroncini et al. 2017) (Table 1).

Table 1 Data extracted from studies
Full size table

The SMD of mean ARR ranged between − 1.04, and − 0.29, while the pooled SMD was estimated as -0.52(95% CI: -0.88, -0.15) (I2 = 73.6%, P = 0.02) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The pooled Standardized mean difference (SMD) of annual relapse rate analysis (ARR) (after menopause -before menopause)

Full size image

Mean EDSS before menopause ranged between 1.5 and 2, and after menopause ranged between 2 and 3.1. the SMD of EDSS ranged between 0.46, and 0.71.

The pooled SMD of EDSS change estimated as 0.56(95% CI: 0.38, 0.73) (I2 = 0, P = 0.4)(Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The pooled Standardized mean difference (SMD) of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (after-before study)

Full size image

Discussion

Menopause is a health issue that is not well considered in women with MS. Women with MS may face challenges regarding managing menopause as well as controlling their disease-related symptoms as the effects of menopause on relapse rate, and MS-related disability remain understudied.

Persistent decrease of oestrogen level after menopause may lead to MS course alteration. Immunosenescence as the consequence of sex steroid production reduction after menopause, includes lymphocyte telomere lengths decrease, and immune response alteration (cellular, and humoral) [28, 29].

To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive and systematic review, including meta-analysis regarding impact of menopause on MS-related relapses and disability.

The previous systematic review in this field, only included two studies in meta-analysis, and found that menopause does not affect relapse rate [30].

Our results show that after menopause, women with MS experience less disease-related relapses compared to reproductive time, but we could not conclude that its only due to menopause as relapse rate which indicates inflammation in MS is associated negatively with age, and relapse rate reduction could be detected by advanced age [31].

In a retrospective, observational study, Baroncini et al. included 148 women with MS (3.5 years before the final menstrual period, and after the final menstrual period). They found that ARR significantly decreased after menopause (38% reduction, p = 0.005) [21].

Their findings were along with the findings of Ladeira et al. who enrolled thirty- seven post-menopausal women with mean age of 49.8 years. During five years follow up, they investigated significant reduction of ARR (0.08 ± 0.18 post-menopause vs. 0.37 ± 0.35 pre-menopause) [22].

Alternatively, we found that disease-related disability which was measured by EDSS, increased significantly. This indicates the negative effect of menopause on disease course in women, but it should be noted that disability increases significantly by increasing age in patients with MS, and age is a significant predictor of disability progression in MS [32].

In Baroncini et al. study, the mean EDSS increased from 2 to 2.6, and in Ladeira et al. study, the mean EDSS changed from 2 to 3.1after menopause [21, 22].

In a longitudinal study, Otero-Romero et al., evaluated EDSS in women with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or MS. Among 764 eligible women, 94 enrolled in the final analysis. They found that annual increase in EDSS was significantly higher in menopausal women compared to non-menopausal women (0.049 vs. 0.019) (p value 0.02) [27].

Sex hormones contribute in developing MS, and explain the sex inequality for MS incidence [33]. Estrogens are sex steroid hormones, including estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), and estriol (E3). In pre-menopausal women, E2 is dominant while during pregnancy E2, and E3 are elevated.

Estrogen affects B cell’s maturation, differentiation, and survival [34,35,36], and we know that production of anti-myelin antibodies, presenting antigens, and producing cytokines are done by B cells [37, 38].

Higher levels of oesterogen also lead to T helper 1 to T helper 2 shift in the immune system which cause changes in immune responses [39]. The explanation for why the relapse rate decreases after menopause could be due to the reduction of CD4 T and B lymphocytes (immunosenescence),both in number and function, due to aging and the nature of the menopause [40, 41].

After menopause reduced numbers of B cells, and T cells, and increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines are obvious which could be due to age-related immunosenescence [33]. Increased level of IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor–α (TNF- α), as well as oxidative stress after menopause indicate low grade inflammation [29, 41]. It has been shown that hormone replacement therapy after menopause is associated with decreased level of interleukin-6, and natural killer cell activity [42, 43].

On the other hand, the increase in disease-related disability after menopause could be due to decreased oestrogen level, and lack of its neuroprotective effects [21]. Both human, and animal studies showed that oestrogen has neuroprotective effects, leading to better neural survival [44,45,46,47]. It has been shown that oestrogen treatment is associated with glutamate-induced apoptosis decrease, reduction of cytotoxicity of oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte process formation acceleration [48,49,50].

It is evident that the anti-inflammatory role of oestrogens after menopause decreases, which leads to aggressive, inflammatory damage of axons plus myelin sheets, as well as disability progression [51].

This systematic review has some strengths. First, it includes more studies as well as meta-analysis. Second, we analyzed both relapse rate, and disability status after menopause.

We had some limitations too. First, all studies had no data regarding type of disease and duration of the disease. Second, only one study had prospective design. All studies did not provide information regarding DMT. In meta-analysis of a smaller cohort of studies, the I2 is not a good representative of heterogeneity. EDSS data or ARR data were not provided by all studies.

Conclusion

The result of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that menopause can be associated with relapse rate reduction, unlike increase in disease-related disability in women with MS.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Ghajarzadeh M, Mahsa O, Sauraian MA, Moghadasi AN, Azimi A. Emotional intelligence (EI) of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Iran J Public Health. 2014;43(11):1550.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Azimi A, Hanaei S, Sahraian MA, Mohammadifar M, Ramagopalan SV, Ghajarzadeh M. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maedica. 2019;14(4):408.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghajarzadeh M, Azizi S, Moghadasi AN, Sahraian MA, Azimi A, Mohammadifar M et al. Validity and reliability of the persian version of the perception de la scle’rose en plaques et de ses pousse’es questionnaire evaluating multiple sclerosis-related quality of life. Int J Prev Med. 2016;7.

  4. Ghajarzadeh M, Keshtkar AA, Azimi A, Sahraian MA, Mohammadifar M, Ramagopalan SV. The effect of vitamin D supplements on clinical and para-clinical outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis: protocol for a systematic review. JMIR Res protocols. 2019;8(4):e12045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanaei S, Sahraian MA, Mohammadifar M, Ramagopalan SV, Ghajarzadeh M. Effect of vitamin D supplements on relapse rate and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) in multiple sclerosis (MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prev Med. 2021;12.

  6. Azimi A, Ghajarzadeh M, Sahraian MA, Mohammadifar M, Roostaei B, Samani SMV, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplements on IL-10 and INFγ levels in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maedica. 2019;14(4):413.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Koch-Henriksen N, Sørensen PS. The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(5):520–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krysko KM, Graves JS, Dobson R, Altintas A, Amato MP, Bernard J, et al. Sex effects across the lifespan in women with multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020;13:1756286420936166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ribbons KA, McElduff P, Boz C, Trojano M, Izquierdo G, Duquette P, et al. Male sex is independently associated with faster disability accumulation in relapse-onset MS but not in primary progressive MS. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0122686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rommer PS, Ellenberger D, Hellwig K, Haas J, Pöhlau D, Stahmann A, et al. Relapsing and progressive MS: the sex-specific perspective. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020;13:1756286420956495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Airas L. Hormonal and gender-related immune changes in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2015;132(199):62–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Salpietro V, Polizzi A, Recca G, Ruggieri M. The role of puberty and adolescence in the pathobiology of pediatric multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler Demyelinating Disorders. 2018;3:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chitnis T. Role of puberty in multiple sclerosis risk and course. Clin Immunol. 2013;149(2):192–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghezzi A. Childhood–juvenile multiple sclerosis: clinical characteristics and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2005;5(3):403–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitacre CC. Sex differences in autoimmune disease. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(9):777–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lotter H, Altfeld M, editors. Sex differences in immunity. Seminars in immunopathology. Springer; 2019.

  17. Confavreux C, Hutchinson M, Hours MM, Cortinovis-Tourniaire P, Moreau T, Group PiMS. Rate of pregnancy-related relapse in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(5):285–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ysrraelit MC, Correale J. Impact of sex hormones on immune function and multiple sclerosis development. Immunology. 2019;156(1):9–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Azimi A, Hanaei S, Sahraian MA, Mohammadifar M, Ramagopalan SV, Ghajarzadeh M. Age at menarche and risk of multiple sclerosis (MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramagopalan S, Valdar W, Criscuoli M, DeLuca G, Dyment D, Orton SM, et al. Age of puberty and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a population based study. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(3):342–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baroncini D, Annovazzi PO, De Rossi N, Mallucci G, Clerici VT, Tonietti S, et al. Impact of natural menopause on multiple sclerosis: a multicentre study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90(11):1201–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ladeira F, Salavisa M, Caetano A, Barbosa R, Sá F, Correia AS. The influence of menopause in multiple sclerosis course: a longitudinal cohort study. Eur Neurol. 2018;80(3–4):223–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Graves JS, Henry RG, Cree BA, Lambert-Messerlian G, Greenblatt RM, Waubant E, et al. Ovarian aging is associated with gray matter volume and disability in women with MS. Neurology. 2018;90(3):e254–e60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88:105906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale cohort studies. University of Ottawa; 2014.

  26. Baroncini D, Mallucci G, Rossi S, Clerici VT, Messina M, Barcella V, et al. The impact of menopause on multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, retrospective, observational study. Multiple Scler J. 2017;23(S3):460.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Otero-Romero S, Midaglia L, Carbonell‐Mirabent P, Zuluaga M, Galán I, Río J, et al. Menopause does not modify disability trajectories in a longitudinal cohort of women with clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis followed from disease onset. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29(4):1075–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cedars MI, editor. Editor biomarkers of ovarian reserve—do they predict somatic aging? Seminars in reproductive medicine. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2013.

  29. Campisi J, Robert L. Cell senescence: role in aging and age-related diseases. Aging. 2014;39:45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karageorgiou V, Lambrinoudaki I, Goulis DG. Menopause in women with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Maturitas. 2020;135:68–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Inusah S, Sormani MP, Cofield SS, Aban IB, Musani SK, Srinivasasainagendra V, et al. Assessing changes in relapse rates in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler J. 2010;16(12):1414–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Trojano M, Liguori M, Bosco Zimatore G, Bugarini R, Avolio C, Paolicelli D, et al. Age-related disability in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society. 2002;51(4):475–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maglione A, Rolla S, Mercanti SFD, Cutrupi S, Clerico M. The adaptive immune system in multiple sclerosis: an estrogen-mediated point of view. Cells. 2019;8(10):1280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hill L, Jeganathan V, Chinnasamy P, Grimaldi C, Diamond B. Differential roles of estrogen receptors α and β in control of B-cell maturation and selection. Mol Med (Cambridge Mass). 2011;17(3–4):211–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Verthelyi DI, Ahmed SA. Estrogen increases the number of plasma cells and enhances their autoantibody production in nonautoimmune C57BL/6 mice. Cell Immunol. 1998;189(2):125–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jones BG, Sealy RE, Penkert RR, Surman SL, Maul RW, Neale G, et al. Complex sex-biased antibody responses: estrogen receptors bind estrogen response elements centered within immunoglobulin heavy chain gene enhancers. Int Immunol. 2019;31(3):141–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Molnarfi N, Schulze-Topphoff U, Weber MS, Patarroyo JC, Prod’homme T, Varrin-Doyer M, et al. MHC class II–dependent B cell APC function is required for induction of CNS autoimmunity independent of myelin-specific antibodies. J Exp Med. 2013;210(13):2921–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lehmann-Horn K, Kinzel S, Weber MS. Deciphering the role of B cells in multiple sclerosis—towards specific targeting of pathogenic function. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Marzi M, Vigano A, Trabattoni D, Villa M, Salvaggio A, Clerici E, et al. Characterization of type 1 and type 2 cytokine production profile in physiologic and pathologic human pregnancy. Clin Experimental Immunol. 1996;106(1):127–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Filippi M, Wolinsky J, Comi G. Enhancement frequency decreases with increasing age in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2001;56(3):422–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gameiro CM, Romão F, Castelo-Branco C. Menopause and aging: changes in the immune system—a review. Maturitas. 2010;67(4):316–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Albrecht AE, Hartmann BW, Scholten C, Huber JC, Kalinowska W, Zielinski CC. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on natural killer cell activity in postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 1996;25(3):217–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Berg G, Ekerfelt C, Hammar M, Lindgren R, Matthiesen L, Ernerudh J. Cytokine changes in postmenopausal women treated with estrogens: a placebo-controlled study. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002;48(2):63–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Spence RD, Voskuhl RR. Neuroprotective effects of estrogens and androgens in CNS inflammation and neurodegeneration. Front Neuroendocr. 2012;33(1):105–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tiwari-Woodruff S, Voskuhl RR. Neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of estrogen receptor ligand treatment in mice. J Neurol Sci. 2009;286(1–2):81–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sarkar SN, Huang R-Q, Logan SM, Yi KD, Dillon GH, Simpkins JW. Estrogens directly potentiate neuronal L-type Ca2 + channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(39):15148-53.

  47. Petrone AB, Gatson JW, Simpkins JW, Reed MN. Non-feminizing estrogens: a novel neuroprotective therapy. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;389(1–2):40–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Liang Z, Valla J, Sefidvash-Hockley S, Rogers J, Li R. Effects of estrogen treatment on glutamate uptake in cultured human astrocytes derived from cortex of Alzheimer’s disease patients. J Neurochem. 2002;80(5):807–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Takao T, Flint N, Lee L, Ying X, Merrill J, Chandross KJ. 17beta-estradiol protects oligodendrocytes from cytotoxicity induced cell death. J Neurochem. 2004;89(3):660–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang Z, Cerghet M, Mullins C, Williamson M, Bessert D, Skoff R. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro subcellular localization of estrogen receptors α and β in oligodendrocytes. J Neurochem. 2004;89(3):674–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lorefice L, D’Alterio MN, Firinu D, Fenu G, Cocco E. Impact of menopause in patients with multiple sclerosis: current perspectives. Int J Women’s Health. 2023;15:103–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zabol university of medical sciences, Zabol, Iran

    Zahra Shahraki

  2. Student’s Scientific research center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohsen Rastkar

  3. Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran

    Elnaz Rastkar

  4. Multiple Sclerosis Research Group (MSRG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mehdi Mohammadifar, Aida Mohamadi & Mahsa Ghajarzadeh

  5. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Mahsa Ghajarzadeh

Authors
  1. Zahra Shahraki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohsen Rastkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elnaz Rastkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mehdi Mohammadifar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aida Mohamadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.S: Study design and data analysis. M.R and E.R: Data gathering and article writing. M.M: Data analysis and article writing. A.M and M.G: Methodology and article writing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahsa Ghajarzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahraki, Z., Rastkar, M., Rastkar, E. et al. Impact of menopause on relapse rate and disability level in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 23, 316 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03332-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03332-1

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us