- Research article
- Open Access
Behavioural interventions for people living with adult-onset primary dystonia: a systematic review
BMC Neurology volume 16, Article number: 40 (2016)
Primary dystonia is a chronic neurological movement disorder that causes abnormal muscle movements. Pain and emotional distress may accompany these physical symptoms. Behavioural interventions are used to help people with long term conditions improve their quality of life. Little is known about behavioural interventions applied to Dystonia. We report a systematic review of studies reporting current evidence of behavioural interventions for people with primary dystonia.
We did systematic searches of Medline, PsycINFO, AHMED and CINAHL. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies using a risk of bias tool. Any disagreements were resolved by liaising with an independent rater. Physiological outcomes such as dystonia severity and psychological outcomes such as sleep and depression were selected on the basis that primary dystonia causes motor and non-motor symptoms. No time limit was placed on the searches. A narrative synthesis of the results is presented.
Of 1798 titles and abstracts screened, 14 full articles were retrieved and inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Of these a final nine were eligible for the review (N = 73). Only two were Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs). Using the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) dystonia classification, that was published after this work started, all of the included studies were of idiopathic adult onset focal dystonia without associated features. These included: blepharospasm (eye dystonia) (N = 1), cervical dystonia (neck dystonia) (N = 2), writer’s cramp (hand dystonia) (N = 3) and the yips (N = 3). No studies reported on dystonia that affects two or more body regions. Studies reported good adherence and response rates to treatment. Physiological and psychological improvements were noted in all studies at weekly, monthly and yearly follow-ups. Caution should be taken when interpreting the results because of the scarcity of RCTs identified, use of small sample sizes, and inappropriate statistical methods.
We identified few studies; mainly of poor methodological quality that all studied a focal dystonia. It is not possible to draw firm conclusions. Nevertheless, the data suggests that a combined behavioural therapy approach including relaxation practice for people with idiopathic adult onset focal dystonia merits further investigation.
Dystonia is a neurological condition that can cause abnormal and repetitive muscle contractions and spasms . It is the third most commonly diagnosed movement disorder after Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor  with a prevalence variously estimated to be in range of 30–7320 per million . The wide variations on prevalence estimates reflect the different approaches and definitions used by different authors.
Idiopathic adult onset dystonias affecting one body part such as the hand (writer’s cramp) or eyes (blepharospasm) are known as focal dystonia and usually affect adults . In contrast, generalised dystonia typically occurs during childhood and causes spasms and cramping in two or more affected body regions . There may be genetic associations with some idiopathic adult onset dystonias; however, in a majority of cases the cause of disease is unknown .
Treatments for generalised and focal dystonia, including pharmaceutical or surgical options, focus predominately on the motor symptoms of the condition. Conservative therapies that have been suggested for helping people with idiopathic adult onset dystonia include: acupuncture, biofeedback, chiropractic manipulation, osteopathy, physiotherapy, speech therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) [3–6].
However People living with idiopathic adult onset dystonia can experience low self-efficacy, social withdrawal, a negative self-concept and subsequently, poor health outcomes and quality of life [7–10].
More specifically non-motor symptoms of dystonia can include impact on mood (low mood including depression) and emotions, cognitive functioning (such as memory) and impaired sleep  Similarly as with other conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, the non-motor symptoms dominate clinical impact and can lead to severe disability and an impaired quality of life .
A systematic review investigating the relationship between mental health and ‘primary and other genetic forms of dystonia’ found a relationship between dystonia and emotional disturbance, dystonia and psychiatric disorders and dystonia and cognitive difficulties .
People with cervical dystonia for example have a 91.4 % chance of meeting the criteria for a psychiatric illness compared to 35 % in the general population . Other psychiatric illnesses include; major depression, social phobia, panic disorder and for these with focal dystonia a higher risk of obsessive compulsive disorder and anxiety disorder . There is some evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy is effective in the use of the management of anxious thoughts and mood related to muscle tension which could lead to better patient outcomes, however the evidence is limited .
We report a systematic review of the evidence for all behavioural interventions for adults living with idiopathic adult onset dystonia.
The focus of this review is adults living with primary dystonia (idiopathic adult onset dystonia). We excluded studies of people with acquired dystonia to ensure we were reporting dystonia specific effects rather than the combined symptoms from any acquired disorder (e.g., psychiatric, infectious, toxic or neoplastic) .
When we developed the protocol for this review we used the terms then current and set our parameter for study entry to be a primary dystonia; this was the terminology used in our PRoSEPRO registration. Since then the Movement Disorder Society‘s new classification has been published. We did not exclude any studies on the basis of clinical features; axis one of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) classification. In axis two of the MDS classification our entry criteria map onto the idiopathic domain which includes both sporadic and familial cases. We excluded studies of people with known nervous system pathology, known degenerate causes, and those with acquired causes from axis 2 of the MDS classification.
We have post-hoc classified the included studies according to the new MDS criteria. We have, however, kept our original terminology elsewhere in the paper.
Nearly all of the studies we identified had substantial methodological limitations including poor study designs, small samples, and inappropriate statistical tests. Therefore, we were unable to conduct a rigorous meta-analysis.
Between December 2014 and January 2015 we searched: Medline, PsycINFO, AHMED and CINAHL. No date restrictions were applied. Primary dystonia is a broad category encapsulating several different types of medical conditions but studies on dystonia are inconsistently coded in publication databases. For this review, we constructed a broad (sensitive) search strategy to identify relevant studies (please refer to Fig. 1).
Relevant outcome measures included in this review are: wellbeing and/or quality of life and/or psychological functioning and/or sleep and/or other clinical measures such as dystonia severity and/or pain. We included studies of adults (≥18) reporting on individuals living with primary dystonia that examined the effect of behavioural interventions on relevant outcomes. Behavioural interventions are defined as interventions where patient behaviour is the key and the main aim to change that behaviour and can be applied at an individual level, community level or international level  (and can include highlighting thoughts processes, beliefs and appraisals and learning to challenge and modify these to improve and change behaviour .
We included studies published in English, French, German, Italian and Punjabi. Studies were excluded if they conducted research with individuals under the age of 18 years, animals and secondary types of dystonia or dystonia with another primary condition. Studies of non-behavioural - interventions e.g., medical treatments and psychodynamic therapy were excluded.
We included all primary research reporting quantitative outcome; irrespective of study design. Non-primary articles including secondary analyses, review papers, guidelines, statements, meeting summaries or comments were excluded.
Two independent reviewers (DE and CB) screened the studies’ titles and abstracts for eligibility. For potentially eligible studies’, full-texts were then screened by the rest of the team with the exception of MU who acted as an independent adjudicator, making a final decision on any disputed texts.
Assessing methodological quality
Assessments on all identified studies were performed using a risk of bias rating table that was adapted from a recent systematic review on sleep in primary dystonia . The criteria of risk were based on: diagnosis process, sample size, use of a control group, relevant and valid outcome measures, sufficient description of the intervention, medication and statistics. Risk of bias for each study was rated according to a ‘low’, ‘moderate’, ‘high’ or ‘unclear’ score.
Socio-demographic and clinical details of study participants were extracted by CB and reviewed by the rest of the team for accuracy. Information about the studies’ research question(s), setting(s), behavioural intervention(s), method(s) and outcome measure(s) were also recorded using a pro-forma. The results of the studies were extracted to evaluate psychological (e.g., quality of life, well-being, sleep) and clinical (e.g., pain, dystonia severity, functioning) outcome measures in relation to the reported behavioural intervention(s). A narrative synthesis of the results is reported.
The searches retrieved from the databases yielded 2133 hits. Two studies from one included article’s  reference list were identified and the abstracts reviewed; one was potentially eligible but the authors were unable to locate the full-text article and so it has been excluded . We examined 14 full papers and included nine: (Fig. 2 ).
We found limited evidence of the following behavioural interventions for different idiopathic adult-onset focal dystonia types: Solution-Focused Guided Imagery (SFGI) for the yips [18, 21, 22], exercise and relaxation practice  and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)  for cervical dystonia, relaxation, systematic desensitisation (SD), assertiveness training and/or Electromyography (EMG) feedback , habit reversal with in vivo exposure, awareness training and re-education  and relaxation or habit reversal therapy  for writer’s cramp and conditioning therapy and relaxation practice for blepharospasm . No studies reported on generalised dystonia. Of the nine studies we identified, two were Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) [23, 27] utilising small sample sizes. One RCT found a significant finding for improvement in handwriting quality in both the intervention and control groups at follow-up (week 20) . While all studies reported improvements in dystonia severity and/or emotional distress at weekly, monthly and yearly follow-ups, the poor methodological quality of the data means that firm conclusions cannot be drawn about the effectiveness of behavioural therapies for people living with idiopathic adult onset dystonia.
We found two RCTs (N = 20)  and (N = 23) , two are described as using multiple baseline across subjects design (N = 4) (which is when the same treatment is staggered across participants and multiple data points are obtained from the baseline, intervention and follow-up phases) [21, 22], and two case studies (N = 1) [24, 28]. The remaining three were described as being: a case study using a multiple baseline across situations design (N = 1)  (which includes studying the same behaviour across different circumstances, with an aim to test the relationship between treatment and behavioural change in a single subject), an uncontrolled multimodal study (drawing on different modalities including relaxation, systematic desensitization and assertiveness training and biofeedback which was tailored to participants), (N = 15) , and a clinical study (reporting the clinical treatment of four cases, delivered by a trained therapist) (N = 4)  (Table 2).
The studies originated from Australia , England [24, 26, 27] and the United States of America (USA) [21, 22]; Bell and Thompson , Cottraux et al.  and Sharpe  do not specify the country where their studies were conducted (Table 2).
Boyce et al. , Greenberg , Sharpe  and Wieck et al. , conducted the research in hospitals. Bell and Thompson  and Bell et al. [21, 22] observed putting on golf courses. Cottraux et al.  described their research setting as a clinical study using participants who were referred to their department. Faircloth and Reid  did not provide definite details of where their research was conducted (Table 2).
Idiopathic adult onset focal dystonia
We found one study examining blepharospasm , two studies that investigated cervical dystonia [23, 24], three studies that conducted research with patients living with writer’s cramp [25–27] and three studies that tested an intervention for the yips [18, 21, 22] which is a type of dystonia that causes ‘jerks, tremors and spasms [and] predominately affects the distal upper extremity’ (p.424) . We found the yips to occur in golfers [18, 21, 22]. Consequently, none of the identified studies included patients with generalised dystonia and therefore, the findings of this review can only report on the effectiveness of behavioural therapies for focal dystonia (Table 3).
Three studies provided a full report of participants’ ethnicity [18, 21, 22]. Greenberg  described the ethnicity of one out of his four participants. The mean age taken across the entire sample (N = 73) was 47 years (range 36–57.8 years) although it is unclear whether Wieck et al.  included the ages of three participants who withdrew (Table 2).
Of the 73 participants 27 (37 %) were female. For five studies 100 % of the sample were male [18, 21, 22, 24, 28] (Table 2). Adherence rates for all of the identified studies were at above 50 % although sample sizes for each study were very low (see Table 4). Two RCTs looking at cervical dystonia and writer’s cramp reported slightly higher levels of adherence among the control groups (91 % for Boyce et al.  and 92 % for Wieck et al. ) compared with the intervention groups (78 % for Boyce et al.  and 82 % for Wieck et al. ). Cottraux et al.  described an adherence rate of 60 % among people with writer’s cramp with two participants refusing treatment and four participants withdrawing during the intervention phase. Interestingly, Cottraux et al.  found that three participants, who had received treatment, later withdrew from the study despite reporting handwriting improvements.
Three studies looking at writer’s cramp reported participants were living with various emotional disturbances [25–27]. Of these three studies, two [25, 27] examined patients’ physical and mental health. However, Cottraux et al.  only screened 10 patients (out of the 15 originally recruited into the study) using Multiple Personality Inventory (MMPI) referred to as MimiMult. While participants who were screened with MMPI were not reported as presenting with a consistent pathological pattern, Cottraux et al.  noted that seven individuals reported chronic emotional or sexual disturbances. Furthermore, all participants had previously used various treatments including tranquillizers, bromocriptine and psychotherapy . Greenberg  reported that one participant out of four displayed general anxiety symptoms. Wieck et al.  described one participant in their study as anxious and displaying avoidance behaviour and two patients were reported with living with generalised anxiety.
Bell et al. [21, 22] did not specify how long their participants had been living with dystonia. Sharpe  was the only author who reported that the participant had been living with dystonia for under a year (10 months), stating that the participant had also experienced dystonia symptoms for four weeks 11 months earlier. The average duration of dystonia in the remaining six studies was seven years.
All of the identified studies examined various behavioural therapies. These include SFGI protocol to individuals experiencing yips [18, 21, 22], which typically causes spasms in the upper limb(s) and can occur in various sports including golf , combined behavioural and physical practice including relaxation for patients with cervical dystonia , SD, assertiveness training and/or EMG feedback on patients with writer’s cramp  and CBT for cervical dystonia . Greenberg  investigated the effectiveness of habit reversal therapy (which aims to reduce spasm and involuntary movements by delivering fine motor techniques that are opposite to the involuntary contraction) with awareness training, re-education, and ‘in vivo exposure in which a hierarchy of situations was constructed in which cramp was increasingly likely to occur.’(p.234) Sharpe  examined the effects of relaxation with conditioning therapy for one patient with blepharospasm. Finally, Wieck et al.  investigated writer’s cramp and assigned the control group individually tailored sessions of relaxation and the intervention group, habit reversal therapy. While the studies’ interventions were fairly diverse, they all focused on examining the effectiveness of enabling participants to self-manage their disability outside of the clinical setting [18, 21–28].
Eight studies reported outcome measures utilising independently assessed and/or facilitator-led ratings and/or self-report un-validated and/or validated measures to evaluate physiological and/or psychological improvement [18, 21–27].
Two studies used the Beck Depression Inventory to assess depression scores [23, 24]. Faircloth and Reid  also used un-validated self-report measures to evaluate psychological wellbeing and an un-validated measure to investigate physical functioning. The authors did not objectively measure any clinical outcomes .
The studies examining writer’s cramp observed writing frequency among participants in and outside of the clinic [25–27]. However, Greenberg  was the only author examining writer’s cramp to not use an independent assessor to verify handwriting improvements. Instead, only patients and therapists involved in treatment delivery rated handwriting quality . Cottraux et al.  utilised an independent evaluator to rate spasm frequency, handwriting quality and handwriting improvement on three separate scales that were combined to obtain the overall mean value of each participant’s handwriting improvement score. Since these data were only obtained in the clinic participants were also asked to self-evaluate their handwriting in a non-clinical setting . However, data obtained from participants outside of the clinic were not systematically scored .
Having applied the SFGI protocol, Bell and Thompson  requested that the participant and a playing partner record yip behaviour during putting. Similarly, Bell et al.  used trained observers to watch putting behaviour among the participants. Video observations of putting behaviour were used by Bell et al.  to increase inter-reliability. Bell and Thompson  and Bell et al. [21, 22] also used the SFGI protocol to ask participants questions about the severity of their dystonia.
Sharpe  did not report using any outcome measures. The authors of this review were unable to contact Sharpe  given how long ago the study was published. Nonetheless, Sharpe  provides details about outcomes post-treatment and at the 9-month follow-up.
We found very limited evidence for behavioural interventions in the treatment and management of idiopathic adult onset dystonia. All of the studies we identified were for the MDS idiopathic adult onset focal dystonias group. The findings therefore only apply to this group. There were some promising results from the RCTs and uncontrolled studies that behavioural therapies can improve peoples’ physical and emotional well-being. Some of the underlying mechanisms mapped onto the behavioural interventions specifically included action planning and problem solving to improve productivity and overall management, education and behavioural experiments to empower and help control symptoms and education and distraction to manage anxiety through cognitive restricting to lessen anxiety and also the severity of dystonia. However all of the identified studies used small samples and nearly all had substantial methodological weaknesses which precluded a rigorous meta-analysis. Therefore, none of the findings can be generalised beyond the study setting. The available evidence applies only to focal dystonias and we cannot make any comment based on possible effectiveness from empirical data for dystonias affecting more than one body segment. Nevertheless, the theoretical justification for behavioural interventions is equally applicable to more than just focal dystonias. This means that the very limited empirical data might be applicable to a wider population of those affected by dystonia. A possible reason for why there have been very few research studies examining the effectiveness of behavioural therapies for people with dystonia could be because idiopathic adult onset dystonia is often misdiagnosed as an emotional illness limiting acceptance of behavioural interventions .
There have however been other studies which have also shown that CBT could be beneficial with other movement disorders. For example in a pilot study, tailored CBT for this with depression and Parkinson disease showed a reduction in negative cognitions, reduced depressive symptoms and an increase in the sense of social support .
Strengths and limitations of the review
The authors of this review employed a rigorous search and screening strategy to identify and evaluate the relevant studies. It has highlighted an important gap in the literature and is one of the first reviews too examine behavioural interventions for the management of dystonia.
Since Sharpe’s  study was conducted some time ago the review authors were unable to obtain information about what outcome measures he utilised. Furthermore, the review found no studies examining the effects of behavioural therapies in people with generalised dystonia. Consequently, this review is limited in not being able to comment whether behavioural treatments would be effective for this patient group. Conducting a meta-analysis was not possible because of study heterogeneity.
Future research and practice
Future research is necessary to establish the effects, if any, of behavioural interventions in patients living with idiopathic adult onset dystonia. Consequently, researchers should consider RCTs with powered sample size, clearly specifying the diagnostic process involved and using physiological and psychological validated outcome measures to capture changes. Detailing the severity of patients’ dystonia could also be useful for comparing treatment effectiveness across different levels of dystonia.
Future research should also examine generalised dystonia in relation to behavioural therapies to address the current gap in the medical and psychology literature.
It is only by addressing the many challenges in designing robust studies of behavioural interventions for the dystonias that we can find out if behavioural treatments can help these stigmatising and disabling chronic disorders.
In conclusion, this review identified nine studies all with low methodological quality, making it difficult to establish the effectiveness of behavioural interventions in patients living with idiopathic adult onset dystonia. The limited data indicates, however, that behavioural therapies could have a beneficial effect for enabling individuals to manage their dystonia, particularly when combined with relaxation practice [23, 25, 27, 28]. Further high-quality research is needed to fully assess the effectiveness of holistic behavioural therapies in patients with idiopathic adult onset dystonia.
cognitive behavioural therapy
Movement Disorder Society
multiple personality inventory
randomised controlled trials
solution-focused guided imagery
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale
United States of America
Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VSC, et al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013;28(7):863–73.
Defazio G. The epidemiology of primary dystonia: current evidence and perspectives. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17 Suppl 1:9–14.
Albanese A, Asmus F, Bhatia KP, Elia AE, Elibol B, Filippini G, et al. EFNS guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of primary dystonias. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(1):5–18.
De Pauw J, Van der Velden K, Meirte J, Van Daele U, Truijen S, Cras P, et al. The effectiveness of physiotherapy for cervical dystonia: a systematic literature review. J Neurol. 2014;261(10):1857–65.
Delnooz CC, Horstink MW, Tijssen MA, van de Warrenburg BP. Paramedical treatment in primary dystonia: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2009;24(15):2187–98.
Snaith A, Wade D. Dystonia. BMJ Clin Evid. 2011;2011:1211.
Ben-Shlomo Y, Camfield L, Warner T. What are the determinants of quality of life in people with cervical dystonia? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(5):608–14.
Jahanshahi M. Psychosocial factors and depression in torticollis. J Psychosom Res. 1991;35(4–5):493–507.
Lim VK. Health related quality of life in patients with dystonia and their caregivers in New Zealand and Australia. Mov Disord. 2007;22(7):998–1003.
Zetterberg L, Lindmark B, Söderlund A, Åsenlöf P. Self-perceived non-motor aspects of cervical dystonia and their association with disability. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(11):950–4.
Kuyper DJ, Parra V, Aerts S, Okun MS, Kluger B. Nonmotor manifestations of dystonia: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2011;26(7):1206–17.
Chaudhuri KR, Healy DG, Schapira AH, National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: diagnosis and management. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(3):235–45.
Gundel H, Wolf A, Xidara V, Busch R, Ceballos-Baumann AO. Social phobia in spasmodic torticollis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(4):499–504.
Zurowski M, McDonald WM, Fox S, Marsh L. Psychiatric comorbidities in dystonia: emerging concepts. Mov Disord. 2013;28(7):914–20.
Berardelli I, Pasquini M, Roselli V, Biondi M, Berardelli A, Fabbrini G. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in movement disorders: a review. Mov Disord Clin Prac. 2015;2(2):107–15.
Cutler DM. Behavioral health interventions: what works and why? In: Anderson NB, Bulatao RA, Cohen B, editors. Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in late life. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2004. p. 643–74.
Hertenstein E, Tang NK, Bernstein CJ, Nissen C, Underwood MR, Sandhu HK. Sleep in patients with dystonia: a systematic review on the state of research and perspectives. Sleep Med Rev. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2015.04.004.
Bell RJ, Thompson CL. Solution-focused guided imagery for a golfer experiencing the yips: a case study. Athletic Insight. 2007;9(1):52–66.
Blundell N. A cure for the yips: a case study. Golf Victoria. 1990;31(5):11–23.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Bell RJ, Skinner CH, Fisher L. Decreasing putting yips in accomplished golfers via solution-focused guided imagery: A single-subject research design. J Applied Sport Psych. 2009;21(1):1–14.
Bell RJ, Skinner CH, Halbrook MK. Solution-focused guided imagery as an intervention for golfers with the yips. J Imagery Res Sport Physical Activity. 2011;6:1.
Boyce MJ, Canning CG, Mahant N, Morris J, Latimer J, Fung VSC. Active exercise for individuals with cervical dystonia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;27(3):226–35.
Faircloth S, Reid S. A cognitive-behavioural approach to the management of idiopathic cervical dystonia. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2006;37(3):239–46.
Cottraux JA, Juenet C, Collet L. The treatment of writer’s cramp with multimodal behaviour therapy and biofeedback: a study of 15 cases. Br J Psychiatry. 1983;142:180–3.
Greenberg D. Writer’s cramp – a habit for reversal? J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1983;14(3):233–9.
Wieck A, Harrington R, Marks I, Marsden C. Writer’s cramp: a controlled trial of habit reversal treatment. Br J Psychiatry. 1988;153:111–5.
Sharpe R. Behaviour therapy in a case of blepharospasm. Br J Psychiatry. 1974;124:603–4.
Smith AM, Malo SA, Laskowski ER, Sabick M, Cooney WP, Finnie SB, et al. A multidisciplinary study of the “yips” phenomenon in golf: an exploratory analysis. Sports Med. 2000;30(6):423–37.
Dobkin RD, Allen LA, Menza M. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. Mov Disord. 2007;22(7):946–52.
HS has received a funding grant from The Dystonia Society to develop a behavioural intervention with Mindfulness practice for patients living with dystonia. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This systematic review was conceived by CB, DE, GD, EH, NT, MU, HS. CB registered the review with PROSPERO and received support from DE. CB took the lead for writing this review. DE conducted database searches and CB, GD, EH, NT, HS screened the results. CB extracted the data. MU acted as an independent rater. CB authored the manuscript while the other authors read and commented on previous drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Bernstein, C.J., Ellard, D.R., Davies, G. et al. Behavioural interventions for people living with adult-onset primary dystonia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol 16, 40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0562-y
- Idiopathic adult onset dystonia
- Behavioural interventions
- Quality of life