Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Retinal microvascular parameters are not significantly associated with mild cognitive impairment in the Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing

BMC Neurology volume 21, Article number: 112 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The retinal and cerebral microvasculature share similar embryological origins and physiological characteristics. Improved imaging technologies provide opportunistic non-invasive assessment of retinal microvascular parameters (RMPs) against cognitive outcomes. We evaluated baseline measures for associations between RMPs and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from participants of the Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NICOLA).

Methods

RMPs (central retinal arteriolar / venular equivalents, arteriole to venular ratio, fractal dimension and tortuosity) were measured from optic disc centred fundus images and analysed using semi-automated software. Associations between RMPs and MCI were assessed by multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders including age, sex, alcohol consumption, smoking status, educational attainment, physical activity, cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension, mean arterial blood pressure, triglycerides, diabetes, body mass index, and high density lipoprotein levels. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Data were available for 1431 participants, of which 156 (10.9%) were classified with MCI defined by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≤ 26, with subjective cognitive decline, in the absence of depression or problems with activities of daily living. Participants had a mean age of 62.4 ± 8.5 yrs. and 52% were female. As expected, individuals with MCI had a lower MoCA score than those without (23.5 ± 2.6 versus 26.3 ± 2.7, respectively), were more likely to be female, have a lower level of educational attainment, be less physically active, more likely to have CVD, have higher levels of triglycerides and lower levels of high density lipoprotein. No significant associations between RMPs and MCI were detected in unadjusted, minimally adjusted or fully adjusted regression models or subsequent sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

Previous studies have reported both increased retinal venular calibre and reduced fractal dimension in association with mild cognitive impairment. Our study failed to detect any associations between RMPs and those individuals at an early stage of cognitive loss in an older community-based cohort.

Peer Review reports

Background

Population ageing has resulted in increased prevalence of age-related conditions that negatively impact healthcare systems, policies and demands, primarily as a consequence of reduced mortality [1, 2]. The most rapidly growing demographic in Northern Ireland (NI) is those aged > 50 years (yrs), necessitating improved understanding of the impact of age-related conditions [3]. Cognitive impairment significantly impacts activities of daily living (ADL), especially among the aged [4, 5]. During the ageing process, cognitive skills such as conceptual reasoning, memory, and processing speed decline. Some individuals may exceed a threshold characterised as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which may progress to dementia in up to 50% of cases over 5 years [6,7,8,9,10,11]. MCI is characterised by subtle changes in cognitive function, although everyday life generally remains largely unaffected. Severe cognitive impairment that leads to dementia results in an extensive loss of cognitive ability and ultimately, independent living [12]. Given life expectancy has increased globally, an improved understanding of normal ageing processes will advance measures of successful and healthy ageing and differentiation of normal and diseased states [13, 14].

The characteristic disease aetiology of MCI is not fully understood, despite its influence on increased morbidity among the elderly. Cerebral microvascular disease has previously been associated with an increased risk of both MCI and Alzheimer’s disease [15,16,17,18,19], possibly through common microvascular factors such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking and inflammation [20,21,22]. Furthermore, variation in cerebral microvascular characteristics, such as increased tortuosity and arteriolar narrowing, have been reported in association with degenerative changes during the onset of dementia [23, 24]. The retinal and cerebral microvasculature share similar embryological origins and physiological characteristics [25], and advanced retinal imaging has facilitated the non-invasive assessment of associations between retinal microvascular parameters (RMPs) and cognitive function [25,26,27,28,29]. Previously, reduced retinal microvascular calibre and fractal dimension have been reported in association with cognitive impairment with suggestions that this may reflect cerebral microvascular variation, especially in older adults [30, 31]. The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between RMPs and MCI in the Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NICOLA).

Methods

Study population

NICOLA is a longitudinal cohort study of 8468 participants aged 50 years and over, living in the Northern Ireland community (individuals in care homes or other residential institutions were excluded [32, 33];). The study was established in 2012 with three main components: a computer-aided personal interview (CAPI), a self-completion questionnaire and health assessment. The CAPI extensively assessed demographic, social and health-related factors. Biological samples and measures of cardiovascular, physical, cognitive and visual function, including retinal fundus photography, were collected. Ethical approval was provided by the School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences Ethics Committee, Queen’s University Belfast and written informed consent obtained prior to participation, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (SREC 12/23).

Measurement of cognitive function and classification of MCI

Data was available for 3741 participants that attended a health assessment which included a 30 point Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to evaluate cognitive function. This included a short-term memory recall task, assessment of visuospatial abilities and executive function, a phonemic fluency task, and a two-item verbal abstraction task. Attention, concentration, language, orientation to time and working memory were also assessed [13]. An extra point was added to the MoCA test score for participants with less than 12 years of formal education. Participants were investigated for subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and a series of questions based on difficulties associated with basic ADL, such as dressing, walking, bathing or showering, eating, getting in or out of bed, and using the toilet. SCD was assessed qualitatively at CAPI by participant response to a five point rating of their day-to-day memory with fair to poor, the least favourable options, characterised as SCD. Participants also completed the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale questionnaire (CES-D) which consisted of 20 questions that were scored from 0 to 3, to assess depressive symptoms. Summative scores ranged from 0 to 60, with values ≥16 indicative of depression (DEPR [34];). Individuals who failed to complete the MoCA, reported difficulties with ADL activities, and had DEPR (CES-D ≥ 16) or retinal images of insufficient quality, were excluded from the analysis. MCI was defined as a combination of MoCA test score ≤ 26 with SCD, in the absence of DEPR or problems with ADL activities. In a sensitivity analysis, a stricter MCI definition used a MoCA score ≤ 23 in the presence of SCD or problems with ADL activities and the absence of DEPR.

Other variables

Mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), was taken as the average of two individual systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements (2/3 DBP + 1/3 SBP). Diabetic status was defined using a combination of participant percentage haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c > 6.5%), diabetic medication use or self-reported diabetes. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) was by self-report and included a history of angina, heart attack, congestive heart failure or stroke. Educational attainment was dichotomised on the basis of primary or secondary level education and above (including university education). Smoking status was dichotomised as current versus non-smoker. Alcohol consumption was categorised into four groups; non-drinker, light drinker (0–7 units per week), moderate drinker (7–14 units per week) and heavy drinker (> 14 units per week). Physical activity (PA) was categorised as low, moderate or highly active in accordance with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) by calculating the average time per day spent in each activity domain (work, transport and leisure) and the intensity of that time spent [35, 36]. Hypertension was categorised on the basis of self-report or use of antihypertensive medication.

Measurement of retinal images

Retinal photography was undertaken following dilation from a single drop of 1% tropicamide using a Canon CX-1 Digital Fundus Camera (Canon USA, Melville, NY, USA). RMPs included central retinal arteriolar equivalent (CRAE), central retinal venular equivalents (CRVE), arteriole to venular ratio (AVR), fractal dimension and tortuosity quantified from optic disc centred fundus images using the semi-automated software Vessel Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina (VAMPIRE; VAMPIRE group, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, Version 3.1, Fig. 1), by a trained grader that was blinded to participant data [37, 38]. Analysis was performed mostly on left eye retinal images except when unavailable or of insufficient quality, in which case right eye images was used. A paired samples t-test was used to compare a sub-sample of left and right eye measures from 75 participants. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were compared to determine intergrader reliability with mean values of 0.87 (CRAE) and 0.91 (CRVE).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Retinal fundus image assessment using VAMPIRE software. Optic disc centred retinal fundus image assessment using the Vessel Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina (VAMPIRE) software. Arterioles (red), venules (blue) and deleted segments (white) are indicated. The retinal microvascular parameters for arteriolar and venular calibre (CRAE, CRVE, and AVR), are calculated from measurements captured in zones B (1.0 to 1.5 optic disc diameters from the centre of the optic disc). Fractal dimension and tortuosity are calculated from measurements captured in zone C (1.0 to 2.5 optic disc diameters from the centre of the optic disc)

Full size image

Statistical analysis

All statistical tests were completed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). All RMPs were transformed into standardised Z-scores (a standard deviation [SD] increase or decrease from the mean) before consideration within regression models. Population summary measures were described using mean and SD for continuous variables or frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Independent samples t-tests and chi-squared tests compared the distribution of participant characteristics with and without MCI. Logistic regression evaluated associations between RMPs and MCI status categorised as a binary trait. Minimally adjusted models included age and sex, while fully adjusted models also included alcohol consumption, smoking status, educational attainment, PA, CVD, hypertension, MABP, triglycerides, diabetes, body mass index (BMI) and high density lipoprotein (HDL). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Data were available for 1431 participants who met the study inclusion criteria (Fig. 2). There were 156 (10.9%) and 1275 (89.1%) participants classified with and without MCI respectively. Participants had a mean age of 62.4 ± 8.5 yrs. and 52% were female, with 87% categorised with an educational attainment of secondary level or above (including higher education and university; Table 1). The mean MoCA score for all participants was 26.0 ± 2.8. MABP was 98.1 ± 12.6 mmHg, and 22, 6 and 30% of participants were characterised with diabetes, CVD and hypertension, respectively. Individuals with MCI had a lower MoCA score than those without (23.5 ± 2.6 versus 26.3 ± 2.7, respectively), had a higher mean age (64.4 ± 8.8 yrs. versus 62.1 ± 8.4 yrs) and a lower percentage were female (45% versus 53%, respectively). Those with MCI had higher mean triglycerides (1.8 ± 1.2 mmol/L versus 1.6 ± 0.9 mmol/L, respectively) and evidence of CVD (12% versus 6%). Those without MCI had higher mean HDL cholesterol (1.7 ± 0.5 mmol/L versus 1.6 ± 0.4 mmol/L, respectively) and educational attainment (89% versus 76%, Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A flow chart of participant inclusion and exclusion criteria

Full size image
Table 1 Participant summary characteristics
Full size table

Left and right eye CRAE and CRVE measures from 75 participants were not significantly different (PCrae = 0.08; PCrve = 0.89). No significant associations between RMPs and MCI in unadjusted (Table 2), minimally adjusted (which included age and sex) or fully adjusted comparisons (which also included alcohol consumption, smoking status, educational attainment, PA, CVD, hypertension, MABP, triglycerides, diabetes, BMI, and HDL; Table 3).

Table 2 Summary of participant retinal microvascular parameters
Full size table
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of retinal microvascular parameters and Mild Cognitive Impairment status
Full size table

A sensitivity analysis to examine a more severe MCI phenotype defined by a MoCA threshold ≤23 in the presence of SCD or problems with ADL activities and the absence of DEPR reclassified some of the 1431 participants characterising 61 (4.3%) and 1370 (95.7%) with and without MCI, respectively. As expected, individuals with MCI had a lower MoCA score than those without (20.8 ± 2.0 versus 26.2 ± 2.7, respectively), had a higher mean age (66.4 ± 9.4 yrs. versus 62.2 ± 8.4 yrs) and lower percentage female (43% versus 53%, respectively; Supplementary Table 1). AVR was significantly associated with MCI in unadjusted (Supplementary Table 2) and minimally adjusted models (which included age and sex; P = 0.04), but did not survive full adjustment for age, sex, alcohol consumption, smoking status, educational attainment, PA, CVD, hypertension, MABP, triglycerides, diabetes, BMI and HDL (P > 0.05; Supplementary Table 3). No further significant associations were detected between RMPs and MCI in unadjusted (Supplementary Table 2), minimally adjusted or fully adjusted comparisons (P > 0.05; Supplementary Table 3).

Discussion

Advances in imaging technologies have enabled in vivo non-invasive, opportunistic, quantitative evaluation of retinal characteristics with vascular health [39]. Previous population-based studies reported associations between RMPs and MCI [15, 29, 30] although these have been mostly limited to vessel calibre with several also considering fractal dimension and tortuosity [31, 40]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of five studies reported associations between decreased arteriolar and venular fractal dimension and cognitive impairment [41]. The case definitions used in all five studies were variable and included a significant proportion of participants with more advanced dementia [41]. Although, we were unable to replicate their findings, the direction of effect observed in our study were similar, despite the less severe phenotype within our population-based study.

Liew and colleagues characterised 121 participants with MCI (6.1%) according to a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) threshold ≤23 from 1988 participants aged 49–97 yrs. from the cross-sectional population-based Blue Mountain Eye Study. They reported associations between wider venular calibre and cognitive impairment, the strongest being in persons with hypertension, and hypothesised this may reflect cerebral venular narrowing associated with cognitive decline [30]. In contrast, we found little support of association between CRVE and MCI in the current study (OR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.15; P = 0.68). Other studies have suggested a MoCA threshold of 26 may limit the specificity of cognitive assessment through an over estimation of those affected [42,43,44,45,46]. Interestingly, a recent meta-analysis reported improved diagnostic accuracy using a MoCA threshold ≤23 to reduce the number of false-positive MCI participants [47]. In addition, our findings also failed to support the previously reported associations between retinal arteriolar narrowing in 809 older Latinos [48]. To improve the sensitivity of the MCI definition in our study, those with DEPR were excluded and the MoCA threshold reduced ≤23 in the presence of SCD or problems with ADL activities. This sensitivity analysis also failed to detect any significant associations between RMP and MCI (Supplementary Tables 1, 2 and 3). Further analyses that used an MCI definition not constrained by the presence of DEPR (CES-D score ≥ 16), also failed to identify any significant associations in a fully adjusted binary logistic regression model that also included CES-D score as a covariate (data not shown).

Our study had several strengths including the large population-based study design. The participants were well-characterised, with a significant number of potential confounders considered, including demographic factors, clinical variables, co-morbidities and medications. Furthermore, the availability of optic disc centred retinal fundus images provided a more accurate quantification of RMPs compared to macula centred images, which often limit assessment to the retinal temporal arcades. In this study, retinal images from the left eye were analysed except when unavailable or of insufficient quality, in which case right eye images, were used. Use of data from a single eye is unlikely to have limited the study outcomes, as similar investigations have previously reported high bilateral RMP comparisons [49,50,51], similarly supported by data from a subset of NICOLA participants.

Characterisation of MCI (based on MoCA ≤26 and SCD with no limitations in ADL, independent of DEPR) was well defined and in line with similar studies [52]. The MoCA was better suited to our study population as it was primarily developed as a valid and reliable screening tool for MCI, in turn, offering greater sensitivity and specificity in comparison to the MMSE [13, 44, 53, 54]. Previous studies have suggested MoCA offers improved sensitivity for the characterisation of MCI, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, stroke and Parkinson’s disease [13, 43, 44, 53, 55,56,57,58]. Exclusion of participants with DEPR further improved the accuracy of MCI characterisation, given those with depressive symptoms are more likely to score poorly in a MoCA [59]. Furthermore, differences between mild and major neurocognitive disorders are determined by the degree to which cognitive decline restricts daily functioning. In major neurocognitive disorders or dementia, cognitive impairment negatively impacts independence in basic ADLs such as walking, bathing and eating. In comparison, those with mild neurocognitive disorders or MCI, largely remain self-sufficient, although subtle problems may arise in complex activities (instrumental ADLs) [60]. Therefore, the exclusion of individuals reporting difficulties with basic ADLs strengthens the MCI definition and reduces the likelihood of including those with more advanced cognitive impairment.

The NICOLA participants were aged 50 yrs. and above, with a mean age of 62 years, thereby limiting the number of participants with MCI. In the Cardiovascular Health Study, MCI prevalence increased from 19% in participants < 75 yrs. to 29% in those 85 yrs. and older [61]. Kumar and colleagues reported lower MCI prevalence in participants aged 60 to 64 yrs. (3.7%), a demographic similar to our study [62]. Tyrovolas and colleagues, reported MCI prevalence of 10.1% in 5364 participants of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), not dissimilar to the comparably aged NICOLA participants in the current study (10.9%) [52].

Our study had some limitations. Although NICOLA is a longitudinal study, only baseline data were available for the present analysis. The largely Caucasian study participants aged ≥50 yrs. excluded institutionalised individuals and those with dementia and may represent the ‘worried-well’, i.e. those that attended the health assessment were more likely to have been conscious about their health, thereby limiting the generalisability of our findings to the wider population. Despite adjustment for potential confounders, the possibility of residual confounding remains. Retinal imaging and cognitive function measures were only available for the 1431 participants that met the inclusion criteria which represented only 38% of those that attended for health assessment and may represent a further source of selection bias (Supplementary Table 4). It was not feasible to undertake a formal neuropsychological assessment within the NICOLA study. We determined MCI using the most robust measures of cognition (MoCA), subjective concerns (SCD), function (ADLs) and depressive symptoms (CES-D) available. Finally, MCI is not consistently characterised across all population-based studies, although our definition was comparable to similar studies [52].

Conclusion

The increasing prevalence of MCI highlights the importance of sufficient provision within healthcare systems for the early identification of at risk individuals in this emerging public health problem. Despite previously reported associations between wider retinal venular calibre and reduced measures of retinal fractal dimension and MCI, we were unable to find any supporting evidence that variation in retinal microvascular parameters might help identify those individuals at increased risk.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Northern Ireland Cohort for Longitudinal Ageing (NICOLA) but restrictions apply to the availability of this data. Data access is available by request through the NICOLA Data Access Committee (https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/NICOLA/InformationforResearchers/).

Abbreviations

NICOLA:

The Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing

BMI:

Body mass index

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

CRAE:

Central retinal arteriolar equivalent

CRVE:

Central retinal venular equivalent

AVR:

Retinal arteriole/venular Ratio

SD:

Standard deviation

PX:

Pixels

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

CI:

Confidence intervals

β:

Beta value

ICC’s:

Intraclass correlation coefficients

VAMPIRE:

Vessel Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina

MABP:

Mean arterial blood pressure

RMPs:

Retinal microvascular parameters

Yrs:

Years

MoCA:

Montreal Cognitive Assessment

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

CAPI:

Computer-aided personal interview

GPAQ:

Global Physical Activity Questionnaire

NI:

Northern Ireland

MMSE:

Mini-Mental State Examination

ADL:

Activities of daily living

SCD:

Subjective cognitive decline

DEPR:

Depression

CES-D:

CENTRE for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale questionnaire

PA:

Physical activity

References

  1. Harada CN, Love MCN, Triebel K. Normal cognition and aging. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013;29(4):737–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Orlove NV, Coletta C, Van Asten F, Qian Y, Ding J, Alghatrif M, et al. Age-related changes of the retinal microvasculature. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0215916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gateway to Research. The Northern Ireland Cohort for longitudinal Ageing (NICOLA)-CAPI. 2013. http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk/projects?ref=ES%2FL008459%2F1. Accessed 27th Jan 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hedden T, Gabrieli JD. Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:87–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Beijsterveldt CE, van Boxtel MP, Bosma H, Houx PJ, Buntinx F, Jolles J. Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal cognitive aging study: the Maastricht aging study (MAAS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:216–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reichman WE, Fiocco AJ, Rose NS. Exercising the brain to avoid cognitive decline: examining the evidence. Aging Health. 2010;6(5):565–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Craik F, Salthouse T. The handbook of aging and cognition. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salthouse T. Consequences of age-related cognitive declines. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:201–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deary IJ, Corley J, Gow AJ, Harris SE, Houlihan LM, Marioni RE, et al. Age-associated cognitive decline. Br Med Bull. 2009;92:132–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klimova B, Valis M, Kuca K. Cognitive decline in normal ageing and its prevention: a review on non-pharmacological lifestyle strategies. Clin Interv Ageing. 2017;12:903–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wisdom NM, Mignogna J, Collins RL. Variability in Wechsler adult intelligence scale-IV subtest performance across age. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27:389–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mariani E, Monastero R, Mecocci P. Mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2007;12(1):23–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Massaldjieva RI. Differentiating normal cognitive aging from cognitive impairment No dementia: A focus on constructive and visuospatial abilities. 2018. https://www.intechopen.com/books/gerontology/differentiating-normal-cognitive-aging-from-cognitive-impairment-no-dementia-a-focus-on-constructive. Accessed 28th Mar 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wong TY, Klein R, Sharrett AR, Nieto FJ, Boland LL, Couper DJ, et al. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and cognitive impairment in middle-aged persons, the ARIC study. Stroke. 2002;33(6):1487–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Graham JE, Rockwood K, Beattie BL, Eastwood R, Gauthier S, Tuokko H, et al. Prevalence and severity of cognitive impairment with and without dementia in an elderly population. Lancet. 1997;349(9068):1793–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rockwood K, Wentzel C, Hachinski V, Hogan DB, MacKnight C, McDowell I. Prevalence and outcomes of vascular cognitive impairment: vascular cognitive impairment investigators of the Canadian study of health and aging. Neurology. 2000;54(2):447–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hachinski V, Munoz D. Vascular factors in cognitive impairment: where are we now? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;903(1):1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, Riley KP, Greiner PA, Markesbery WR. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease: the Nun study. JAMA. 1997;277(10):813–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Biessels GJ, Staekenborg S, Brunner E, Brayne C, Scheltens P. Risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(1):64–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding J, Strachan MWJ, Reynolds RM, Frier BM, Deary IJ, Fowkes FG, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and cognitive decline in older people with type 2 diabetes: the Edinburgh type 2 diabetes study. Diabetes. 2010;59(11):2883–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Witt N, Wong TY, Hughes AD, Chaturvedi N, Klein BE, Evans R, et al. Abnormalities of retinal microvascular structure and risk of mortality from ischemic heart disease and stroke. Hypertension. 2006;47(5):975–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moody DM, Brown WR, Challa VR, Ghazi-Birry HS, Reboussin DM. Cerebral microvascular alterations in aging, leukoaraiosis, and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;826:103–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buee L, Hof PR, Bouras C, Delacourte A, Perl DP, Morrison JH, et al. Pathological alterations of the cerebral microvasculature in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementing disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 1994;87:469–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Naidu VV, Ismail K, Amiel S, Kohli R, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Sivaprsad S, et al. Associations between retinal markers of microvascular disease and cognitive impairment in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: a case control study. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Patton N, Aslam T, Macgillivray T, Pattie A, Deary IJ, Dhillon B. Retinal vascular image analysis as a potential screening tool for cerebrovascular disease: a rationale based on homology between cerebral and retinal microvasculature’s. J Anat. 2005;206(4):319–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwa VIH, van der Sande JJ, Stam J, Tijmes N, Vrooland JL. Amsterdam vascular medicine group. Retinal arterial changes correlate with cerebral small-vessel disease. Neurology. 2002;59(10):1536–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGrory S, Ballerini L, Okely JA, Ritchie SJ, Doubal FN, Doney ASF, et al. Retinal microvascular features and cognitive change in the Lothian-birth cohort 1936. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;11:500–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patton N, Pattie A, McGillivray T, Askam T, Dhillon B, Gow A, et al. The association between retinal vascular network geometry and cognitive ability in an elderly population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(5):1995–2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liew G, Mitchell P, Wong TY, Lindley RI, Cheung N, Kaushik S, et al. Retinal microvascular signs and cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(10):1892–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheung CYL, Ong SY, Ikram MK, Ong YT, Chen CP, Venketasubramanian N, et al. Retinal vascular fractal dimension is associated with cognitive dysfunction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(1):43–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Neill RA, Maxwell AP, Kee F, Young I, McGuinness B, Hogg RE, et al. Association of retinal venular tortuosity with impaired renal function in the Northern Ireland cohort for the longitudinal study of ageing. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. O'Neill RA, Maxwell AP, Kee F, Young I, Hogg RE, Cruise S, McGuinness B, McKay GJ. Association of reduced retinal arteriolar tortuosity with depression in older participants from the Northern Ireland cohort for the longitudinal study of ageing. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meast. 1977;1(3):385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Metcalf KM, Baquero BI, Coronado Garcia ML, Francis SL, Janz KF, Laroche HH, et al. Calibration of the global physical activity questionnaire to Accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mumu SJ, Ali L, Barnett A, Merom D. Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fetit AE, Doney AS, Hogg S, Wang R, MacGillivray T, Wardlaw JM, et al. A multimodal approach to cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes incorporating retinal, genomic and clinical features. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3591.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McKay GJ, Paterson EN, Maxwell AP, Cardwell CC, Wang R, Hogg S, et al. Retinal microvascular parameters are not associated with reduced renal function in a study of individuals with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3931.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ikram MK, Ong YT, Cheung CY, Wong TY. Retinal vascular caliber measurements: clinical significance, current knowledge and future perspectives. Ophthalmologica. 2013;229(3):125–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ong YT, Hilal S, Cheung CYL, Xu X, Chen C, Venketasubramanian N, et al. Retinal vascular fractals and cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2014;4(2):305–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu H, Wang C, Chen C, Xu X, Zhu Y, Sang A, et al. Association between retinal vascular geometric changes and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurol. 2020;16(1):19–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rossetti HC, Lacritz LH, Cullum CM, Weiner MF. Normative data for the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample. Neurology. 2011;77(13):1272–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Roalf DR, Moberg PJ, Xie SX, Wolk DA, Moelter ST, Arnold SE. Comparative accuracies of two common screening instruments for classification of Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(5):529–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaya Y, Aki OE, Can UA, Derle E, Kibaroğlu S, Barak A. Validation of Montreal cognitive assessment and discriminant power of Montreal cognitive assessment subtests in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer dementia in Turkish population. J Geriatr Psych Neur. 2014;27(2):103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pinto TCC, Santos MSP, Machado L, Bulgacov TM, Rodrigues-Junior AL, Silva GA, et al. Optimal cut-off scores for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in the Brazilian version of the Montreal cognitive assessment among the elderly. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2019;9:44–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Milani SA, Marsiske M, Cottler LB, Chen X, Striley CW. Optimal cutoffs for the Montreal cognitive assessment vary by race and ethnicity. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;10:773–81.

  47. Carson N, Leach L, Murphy KJ. A re-examination of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) cut-off scores. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(2):379–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gatto NM, Varma R, Torres M, Wong TY, Johnson PL, Segal-Gidan F, et al. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and cognitive function in Latino adults in Los Angeles. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(3):127–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wong TY, Knudtson MD, Klein BE, Meuer SM, Hubbard LD. Computer-assisted measurement of retinal vessel diameters in the beaver dam eye study: methodology, correlation between eyes, and effect of refractive errors. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(6):1183–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cheung N, Tikellis G, Saw SM, Amirul Islam FM, Mitchell P, Wang JJ, et al. Relationship of axial length and retinal vascular caliber in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(5):658–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Leung H, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Tan AG, Wong TY, Hubbard LD, et al. Computer-assisted retinal vessel measurement in an older population: correlation between right and left eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31(4):326–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, Lara E, Santini ZI, Haro JM. Mild cognitive impairment is associated with falls among older adults: findings from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA). Exp Gerontol. 2016;75:42–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Trzepacz PT, Hochstetler H, Wang S, Walker B, Saykin AJ. Relationship between the Montreal cognitive assessment and mini-mental state examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Luis CA, Keegan AP, Mullan M. Cross validation of the Montreal cognitive assessment in community dwelling older adults residing in the south eastern US. Int J Geriatr Psych. 2009;24(2):197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Freitas S, Simões MR, Alves L, Santana I. Montreal cognitive assessment: validation study for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013;27(1):37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, Have TT, Colcher A, Horn SS, et al. Montreal cognitive assessment performance in patients with Parkinson’s disease with “normal” global cognition according to mini-mental state examination score. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(2):304–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lam B, Middleton LE, Masellis M, Stuss DT, Harry RD, Kiss A, et al. Criterion and convergent validity of the Montreal cognitive assessment with screening and standardized neuropsychological testing. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(12):2181–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yates JA, Clare L, Woods RT, MRC CFAS. Subjective memory complaints, mood and MCI: a follow-up study. Aging Ment Health. 2017;21(3):313–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cornelis E, Gorus E, Beyer I, Bautmans I, De Vriendt P. Early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia through basic and instrumental activities of daily living: development of a new evaluation tool. PLoS Med. 2017;14(3):e1002250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Lopez OL, Jagust WJ, DeKosky ST, Becker JT, Fitzpatrick A, Dulberg C, et al. Prevalence and classification of mild cognitive impairment in the cardiovascular health study cognition study: part 1. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(10):1385–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kumar R, Dear KB, Christensen H, Ilschner S, Jorm AF, Meslin C, et al. Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in 60- to 64-year-old community-dwelling individuals: the personality and Total health through life 60+ study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;19(2–3):67–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the participants of the NICOLA Study, and the whole NICOLA team, which includes nursing staff, research scientists, clerical staff, computer and laboratory technicians, managers and receptionists. The Atlantic Philanthropies, the Economic and Social Research Council, the UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Northern Ireland, the Centre for Ageing Research and Development in Ireland, the Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister, the Health and Social Care Research and Development Division of the Public Health Agency, the Wellcome Trust/Wolfson Foundation and Queen’s University Belfast provide core financial support for NICOLA. The authors alone are responsible for the interpretation of the data and any views or opinions presented are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NICOLA Study team.

Funding

Rachael O’Neill was supported by a PhD studentship from the Department for Education, Northern Ireland. This work was supported by the following funders who provide core financial support for the NICOLA Study: the Atlantic Philanthropies; the Economic and Social Research Council; the UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Northern Ireland; the Centre for Ageing Research and Development in Ireland; the Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister; the Health and Social Care Research and Development Division of the Public Health Agency; the Wellcome Trust/Wolfson Foundation; and Queen’s University Belfast. The authors alone are responsible for the interpretation of the data and any views or opinions presented are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NICOLA Study team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland

    R. A. O’Neill, A. P. Maxwell, E. N. Paterson, F. Kee, I. Young, R. E. Hogg, S. Cruise, S. Murphy, B. McGuinness & G. J. McKay

Authors
  1. R. A. O’Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. P. Maxwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. N. Paterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Kee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. E. Hogg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. Cruise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. B. McGuinness
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. G. J. McKay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RON undertook retinal measurements, data analysis and was a major contributor to the writing of the manuscript. GMK and APM proposed the research hypothesis and were major contributors to the writing of the manuscript. FK and IY conceived and designed the NICOLA. BMG acquired and interpreted NICOLA health assessment data. RH acquired and interpreted NICOLA ophthalmic data. BMG, EP, SM and SC evaluated the CAPI data and characterised the case definitions. All authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, were appropriately investigated and resolved. Finally, all authors read and approved the final manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. J. McKay.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from participants prior to taking part following ethical approval from the Queen’s University Belfast School Research Ethics Committee in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki (SREC 12/23).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1.

Participant summary characteristics using a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of ≤23 in the presence of SCD or problems with ADL activities and the absence of DEPR. Supplementary Table 2. Summary of participant retinal microvascular parameters using a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of ≤23 in the presence of SCD or problems with ADL activities and the absence of DEPR. Supplementary Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of retinal microvascular parameters and Mild Cognitive Impairment status characterised by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of ≤23 in the presence of SCD or problems with ADL activities and the absence of DEPR. Supplementary Table 4. Comparison of demographic characteristics between all participants with retinal fundus imaging with and without VAMPIRE retinal measures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Neill, R.A., Maxwell, A.P., Paterson, E.N. et al. Retinal microvascular parameters are not significantly associated with mild cognitive impairment in the Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing. BMC Neurol 21, 112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02137-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02137-4

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us