Skip to main content

Identifying comorbidities and lifestyle factors contributing to the cognitive profile of early Parkinson’s disease

Abstract

Background

Identifying modifiable risk factors for cognitive impairment in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and estimating their impact on cognitive status may help prevent dementia (PDD) and the design of cognitive trials.

Methods

Using a standard approach for the assessment of global cognition in PD and controlling for the effects of age, education and disease duration, we explored the associations between cognitive status, comorbidities, metabolic variables and lifestyle variables in 533 PD participants from the COPPADIS study.

Results

Among the overall sample, 21% of participants were classified as PD-MCI (n = 114) and 4% as PDD (n = 26). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia was significantly higher in cognitively impaired patients while no between-group differences were found for smoking, alcohol intake or use of supplementary vitamins. Better cognitive scores were significantly associated with regular physical exercise (p < 0.05) and cognitive stimulation (< 0.01). Cognitive performance was negatively associated with interleukin 2 (Il2) (p < 0.05), Il6 (p < 0.05), iron (p < 0.05), and homocysteine (p < 0.005) levels, and positively associated with vitamin B12 levels (p < 0.005).

Conclusions

We extend previous findings regarding the positive and negative influence of various comorbidities and lifestyle factors on cognitive status in early PD patients, and reinforce the need to identify and treat potentially modifiable variables with the intention of exploring the possible improvement of the global cognitive status of patients with PD.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cognitive impairment has long been considered a late complication of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [1, 2]. However, it is currently accepted that cognitive changes of varying severity can be detected from the onset of the disease, and that a significant proportion of PD patients will develop dementia (PDD) during the course of the illness [1,2,3,4,5].

Among the early and heterogeneous cognitive manifestations of PD, alterations that fulfill criteria for mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) are associated with an increased risk of PDD [6,7,8]. At diagnosis, PD-MCI is found in up to 36% of PD patients. Prevalence increases up to 57% after 3.5 years, and progresses to dementia in around 36% of patients within 4 years of diagnosis [3, 9]. The long-term prevalence of PDD is about 80% [2]. Accordingly, both PD-MCI and PDD are frequent features of PD. However, although both entities -especially dementia- have a devastating impact, treatments to delay or prevent the progression of cognitive deterioration in PD are lacking [10]. Recognizing and understanding the mechanisms underlying the development and progression of cognitive impairment in PD is therefore an urgent unmet need. Identifying potentially modifiable variables that may contribute to the progression of cognitive deterioration could improve clinical practice and benefit cognitive trials.

Among the universe of PD patients who will develop dementia, the range of patterns and trajectories in which the condition will progress is wide. The challenge is to predict which early PD patients are likely to develop incident dementia at a more rapid rate. The severity of cognitive changes occurring in PD has been attributed to several neuropathological mechanisms that influence the extent and the progression of brain damage [11]. Genetic factors such as MAPT haplotypes [12,13,14], GBA mutations or variants of the nurturin gene [15], age, disease duration, protein misfolding and aggregation, synaptic dysfunction and loss, neuroinflammation, and epigenetics are all known to contribute to cognitive changes in PD [16,17,18,19,20]. However, the association between potentially treatable comorbidities, lifestyle factors and cognitive deterioration has been little explored in large samples of early-PD populations, and even less explored using PD-validated and recommended cognitive instruments [17, 21]. Refining such information could enable the design of strategies to prevent key risk factors, improve therapies, slow the progression dementia, and optimize sample selection for cognitive trials.

For this purpose, we used the basal assessments of the COPPADIS study (COhort of Patients with PArkinson’s DIsease in Spain) [22, 23]. The COPPADIS is an observational, 5-year follow-up, nationwide, multicenter study aimed to further clarify the course of PD. It provides data related to a patient’s lifestyle, the presence of other associated comorbidities, and multiple measurements obtained from plasma. The study was designed to use a global cognitive instrument to assess participants’ cognitive status: the PD-specific Parkinson’s Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS) [24]. Recent guidelines from the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) include the PD-CRS (as ‘recommended’) among the instruments suitable for PD [21]. Based on a large and representative sample of patients with early-stage PD, our main objectives were to explore the possible contribution of potentially modifiable comorbid variables and lifestyle factors to global cognitive functioning.

Methods

Participants and variables

Cross-sectional data from the COPPADIS study (database released on May 2019) were used. Details regarding the methods used in the COPPADIS study can be found in the original publications [22, 23]. From the cross-sectional database of 901 participants (207 healthy controls and 694 PD patients) we included only PD participants for whom the following variables were available: age, disease duration, body weight, L-dopa (LD) daily dose, dopamine agonist (DA) daily dose, and LD equivalent daily dose, Hoehn &Yahr (H&Y) stage [25], the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III) [26], the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [27], and the Parkinson’s Disease - Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS) [24]. We also collected data regarding the regularity of physical exercise and cognitive stimulation throughout the previous year. We also recorded any history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, cardiopathy, arrythmia, smoking, alcohol consumption and supplementary vitamins intake. Several blood testing variables were also collected: levels of protein s100B, TNF alpha, IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, vitamin B12, methylmalonic acid, homocysteine, CRP, uric acid, ferritin, and iron. We excluded patients with a history of chronic anemia, other neurologic diseases, or severe non-compensated diseases. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and all procedures were performed in accordance with the standards of the ethics committee at each study site, and in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs) for continuous variables and as percentages for the categorical variables. Taking into account the normal distribution of the scores according to the Shapiro-Wilk test, we performed group comparisons using independent t tests and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) for continuous variables, Mann–Whitney for ordinal data, and the χ2 test for categorical variables.

Descriptive analysis of the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample was performed. According to the PD-CRS, the sample was grouped as cognitively preserved (PD-NC=PD-CRS total score > 80), PD-MCI (PD-CRS total score < 81 and > 64), and PD-dementia (PDD) (PD-CRS total score < 65) [24, 28]. One-way ANOVA and subsequent post-hoc t-test and chi-square comparisons were performed to assess group differences. Bivariate Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis, logistic regression analysis and linear regression analysis (Mild = 0.20–0.35; Moderate = 0.36–0.60; and High > 0.60) were used controlling the effect of age, education or other potentially confounding variables to explore possible associations between the variables of interest.

Results

Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics

The sample consisted of 533 participants (mean age = 62.5 ± 8.6; mean disease duration = 5.52 ± 6 months; median H&Y stage = 2; IQR = 1–4). Table 1 includes all data regarding the participants´ main clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Using the PD-CRS, among the total sample we found = 114 (21%) were PD-MCI, and 26 (4.8%) were PDD.

Table 1 Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample

As seen in Table 2, no significant differences were found between cognitive groups regarding disease duration, body weight, or medication. Patients in the PD-MCI and the PDD groups were significantly older than those in the PD-NC group [F(1,532) = 31.8; p < 0.001]. No differences were found regarding age between PD-MCI and PDD groups [t(140) = − 0.81; p = 0.419]. Regarding education level, the proportion of patients with secondary and university studies was significantly higher in the PD-NC group than in the PD-MCI group (χ2 < 0.001). The proportion of patients with secondary and university studies was also higher in the PD-NC group than in the PDD group (χ2 < 0.001). No differences in education were found between the PD-MCI and PDD groups (χ2 = 0.203).

Table 2 Clinical, sociodemographic and assessment values for each cognitive group

Bivariate correlation analysis showed a significant moderate association between older age and worse cognitive status (r = − 0.410; p < 0.001). However, disease duration was not significantly associated with global cognitive performance.

Cognitive and neuropsychiatric profile

Significant differences were found between groups in the total PD-CRS score [F(1,532) = 430.2; p < 0.001] and in related sub-scores. We found a clear pattern of worse performance in the PD-CRS total score in the PD-MCI group with respect to the PD-NC group [t(507) = 34.2; p < 0.001], and in the PDD group with respect to the PD-MCI [t(140) = 15.6; p < 0.001] and PD-NC [t(419) = 32.1; p < 0.001] groups. As depicted in Table 2, we also found significant differences between patients in the PD-NC and PD-MCI groups, and between patients in the PD-MCI and PDD groups in the scores from all the subtests comprising the PD-CRS.

The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (Table 3) presenting with sufficient severity to be considered clinically relevant (NPI > 1) differed significantly between groups for dysphoria (p < 0.05) and for apathy (p < 0.005). These differences were driven by an increased prevalence of dysphoria in the PD-MCI group (41.8%) with respect to the PD-NC (28.8%) and PDD groups (33.3%), and by a progressively higher prevalence of apathy in the three groups (PD-NC = 21.4% vs PD-MCI = 35.4% vs PDD = 42.9%). Post-hoc comparisons determined higher scores for dysphoria in the PD-MCI group than in the PD-NC group [t(507) = − 2.17; p < 0.05], and higher scores for apathy in the PD-MCI group than in the o PD-NC group [t(507) = − 2.98; p < 0.005]. Higher apathy scores were also found in the PDD group with respect to the PD-NC group [t(419) = − 2; p < 0.05]. Clinically relevant apathy increased the odds ratio for being classified as PD-MCI by 2 [OR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.2–3.2] and for being classified as PDD by 2.2 [OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 0.9–5.5].

Table 3 Neuropsychiatric symptoms

Comorbidities and lifestyle factors

No differences were found between cognitive groups regarding the proportion of patients performing regular physical exercise, or between those performing regular cognitive stimulation during the previous year. However, in the total sample, the PD-CRS total score was significantly associated with the regularity of physical exercise (β = 0.105; p < 0.05) and cognitive stimulation (β = 0.120; p < 0.01).

The prevalence of hypertension was significantly higher in the PD-MCI group (45.6%) than in the PD-NC (30.3%; p < 0.005) and PDD groups (34.6%; p < 0.05) and was associated with an increased risk of 1.9 for PD-MCI [OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.2–2.9]. The prevalence of diabetes was significantly increased in the PD-MCI (15.8%) and PDD (15.4%) groups with respect to the PD-NC group (5.6%), and it was associated with a three times greater risk for PD-MCI [OR = 3.1; CI = 1.6–6.1] and a two times greater risk for PDD [OR = 2.1; CI = 0.6–6.4]. Dyslipidemia was also significantly increased in both the PD-MCI (39.5%) and the PDD (38.5%; p < 0.05) groups with respect to PD-NC group (28.8%). No between-group differences were found for the other comorbidities, including history of smoking, alcohol intake and use of supplementary vitamins. Regarding values collected in blood samples, these were available for the 33.6% of the sample (74.4% PD-NC; 21.2% PD-MCI; 4.3% PDD). Between-group differences were significant for IL-2 [F(1,532) = 6.1; p < 0.05] and for IL-6 [F(1,532) = 4.9; p < 0.01] levels, and a tendency was found for methylmalonic acid levels [F(1,532) = 2.7; p = 0.07]. Post-hoc comparisons determined that these differences were driven by higher IL-2 levels in PDD with respect to both PD-MCI [t(507) = − 4.4; p < 0.05] and PD-NC [t(507) = − 28; p < 0.005], and by higher IL-6 values in PDD with respect to PD-NC [t(507) = − 6.6; p < 0.05].

Correlates and predictors analysis

Linear regression analysis showed significant associations between higher PD-CRS total score and younger age (β = − 0.416; p < 0.001), education level (β = − 0.451; p < 0.001) and lower UPDRS-III (β = − 0.102; p < 0.05). Significant associations independent of age, education and motor status were also found between the PD-CRS total score and the NPI apathy score (β = − 0.173; p < 0.005).

In the bivariate Pearson’s correlation analysis performed in the total sample, the PD-CRS total score was negatively associated in an almost negligible range with the levels of Il2 (r = − 0.146; p < 0.05), Il6 (r = − 0.178; p < 0.05), homocysteine (r = − 0.172; p < 0.05) and iron (r = − 0.171; p < 0.05). However, these values were also strongly associated with age and LD daily dose. Accordingly, to prevent the potential influence of age and LD, these variables were included as covariates in a linear regression model. This analysis showed a significant association between PD-CRS total score and vitamin B12 values (β = 0.169; p < 0.05), homocysteine levels (β = − 0.194; p < 0.05) and iron levels (β = 0.177; p < 0.05), and a specific mild association between PD-CRS posterior-cortical performance and IL2 values (β = − 0.269; p < 0.005).

Logistic regression analysis (step forward conditional) was used to explore the classification ability of the various measures. Along with age, the model included education, UPDRS-III, measures regarding comorbidities, non-motor symptoms, neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive performance, lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol intake, regularity of exercise), and blood-sample measurements. Focusing on the PD-NC and PD-MCI groups, we observed that beyond the PD-CRS, age (β = 0.091; p < 0.001), education level (β = − 1.06; p < 0.001) and dysphoria (β = 0.058; p < 0.01) were the strongest contributors to PD-MCI classification. Regarding the PDD group, the strongest associations were found with age (β = 0.102; p < 0.05), education level (β = − 2; p < 0.001), UPDRS-III (β = 0.056; p < 0.05), and apathy severity (β = 0.197; p < 0.05). Regarding blood-sample values, no significant associations were found with PD-MCI. However, Il6 values were associated with PDD (β = 0.076; p < 0.05).

Discussion

Our main findings confirm that metabolic variables such as interleukins, homocysteine, iron, and vitamin B12 have an impact on cognitive status in early PD patients, while physical exercise and cognitive stimulation have a protective effect.

According to the recommended Level I instrument (the PD-CRS), the prevalence of PD-MCI in the COPPADIS sample at baseline was 21%, whereas the prevalence of PDD was 4%. In the main, these prevalences of cognitive impairment are equivalent to those reported in other cohorts of early-stage PD patients [29,30,31]. Our data thus highlight the number of subjects in a representative population of early PD patients who meet criteria for PD-MCI and even PDD.

As expected, older age was significantly associated with worse cognitive status, but disease duration was not, supporting the idea that disease duration is not necessarily associated with the extent of cognitive deterioration, at least during the early stages of PD, and that other factors intervene in this population.

PD-MCI and PDD were associated with older age and with education level, but no differences were found between PD-NC and PD-MCI groups regarding motor status and disease stage. Conversely, although the range was similar in terms of disease duration, the PDD group scored significantly worse in the UPDRS and had a greater H&Y staging than the PD-NC and PD-MCI groups. This again suggests that other mechanisms, not necessarily related to disease duration only, participate in the exacerbation of PD both at motor and cognitive levels [32,33,34].

Among the potentially treatable comorbidities, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia appeared to be more frequent among patients with PD-MCI and PDD. These variables play a critical role in the development of vascular lesions and alterations of white matter in the general population. This type of injury is usually accompanied by cognitive signs that may trigger cognitive impairment and dementia. In future studies, therefore, it is necessary to emphasize the contribution of brain anomalies secondary to these variables in the development of cognitive impairment in PD. Focusing on lifestyle factors, we found no significant differences between groups in terms of regularity of physical exercise, cognitive stimulation, smoking, or alcohol intake. However, in the overall sample, there was a positive association between the regularity of physical exercise, cognitive stimulation, and global cognitive status. Unfortunately, the data analyzed do not allow us to specify which type of physical and cognitive exercise, or the frequency of such activities, could be potentially beneficial. In this sense, our results justify more detailed future study concerning the potential beneficial effect of physical and cognitive exercise programs.

Evidence suggesting that exercise may positively influence the general management and the cognitive outcomes in PD is increasing. Intervention programs of moderate intensity aerobic exercise 2–3 times per week can lead to long-term improvement in attention/working memory and executive function [35] in non-demented patients with mild-to-moderate PD. The association between higher cognitive scores and regularity of physical exercise found in the present study concurs with this information and supports the implementation of strategies to motivate adherence to regular exercise programs. Although the body of evidence is not large, a small beneficial effect on cognition can still be demonstrated with cognitive training in non-demented PD patients [36,37,38]. Notably, as is the case of physical exercise, most gains were noted in selected tests of attention, working memory and executive skills, while not improvement was noted in global cognition.

From the values collected in blood samples, interleukins IL-2 and IL-6 levels were significantly increased in the PDD group compared to those in the PD-MCI and PD-NC groups. The association of these values with the LD daily dose regime suggested that these results could be influenced by drug treatment. However, when controlling for this effect we still found a significant association between PD-CRS total score and levels of vitamin B12, homocysteine and iron, and a specific association between Il2 levels and PD-CRS posterior-cortical performance. Both increased homocysteine and decreased vitamin B12 levels have been associated with mild cognitive impairment and risk of progression to Alzheimer’s type dementia, vascular dementia, and cognitive impairment in PD [39,40,41,42]. Homocysteine, the metabolic product of methionine, has toxic effects on neurons and vascular walls, and its levels are regulated by several pathways, which in turn are conditioned by factors such as age, genetics, diet, gender and pharmacological treatments. In PD, treatment with LD has been found to contribute to hyperhomocysteinemia [43]. Therefore, it is especially relevant to take into account that in addition to the cardiovascular risk factors that patients with PD may have, treatment has an effect on metabolism that can add complexity to the relationship between PD, cardiovascular pathology and cognitive impairment. In this sense, it is also important to take into account that our results show a relationship between homocysteine levels, vitamin B12 and cognitive status that is independent of age and LD treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to emphasize that abnormalities in homocysteine values in PD may not respond exclusively to the effect dictated by dopaminergic treatment. In any case, taking into account this relationship and that found in previous studies, the need to consider the effect of this variable when we explore cognition in PD and the mechanisms that associate more aggressive cognitive phenotypes is indisputable. Recently, a relationship between levels of iron accumulation and cognitive changes in PD has also been demonstrated [44, 45]. Iron is ubiquitous in numerous normal biological processes and in neurodegeneration [46], and undoubtably, brain iron accumulation exerts significant deleterious effects on cognition. Although the relationship between plasma iron levels and cognition is much less well understood, the reported findings reinforce the need to explore the mechanisms involved in the increase in plasma iron levels and the possible contribution of these levels to cognitive impairment in PD. Both Il2 and Il6 pro-inflammatory cytokines that stimulate the inflammatory and auto-immune processes have been suggested to contribute to apoptosis and neurodegeneration in several diseases, including multiple sclerosis [47], Alzheimer’s disease [48], and PD [49], and to play a possible role in exacerbating cognitive decline in relatively early stages.

The major strength of this study is the use of a large and representative observational sample recruited from different practice settings to establish the influence of modifiable risk factors on the cognitive profile of early-PD patients. A second strength is the use of a PD-specific and recommended cognitive assessment instrument. Some limitations should be acknowledged. The COPPADIS cohort is not a de novo cohort, and patients less than 6 years from diagnosis were enrolled at all levels of cognitive impairment and disease duration. The study does not include data on other potential modifiers of cognitive status such as Mediterranean diet, caloric restriction, or social engagement that were not part of the COPPADIS sample, and it does not explore the effect of the considered variables on the structural integrity of grey matter and white matter tracts.

Undoubtedly, any attempt to mechanistically explain the translation between the values detected in our measurements and their partial effect on the progression of cognitive impairment in PD - which appears to be mainly linked to the multiple processes involved in the pathogenesis of the disease -, could be an oversimplification. Nevertheless, while we await the development of more specific treatments, our data support the need for a global prevention strategy to manage cognitive impairment in early-PD, targeting the identified risk factors. Early identification of cognitive impairment in PD must be carried out using adequate screening instruments. Prevention and treatment of metabolic aspects and other corrective measures, and stronger strategies to motivate practice and adherence to regular exercise and cognitive stimulation programs should be encouraged.

On the basis of our results, future research regarding cognitive impairment in PD should take into account the role of the comorbidities described here. Specifically, it would be especially relevant to explore the cognitive progression profile of the participants in the COPPADIS study based on the variables identified in the present study. Likewise, it would be interesting to explore the brain correlates that could accompany the way in which these variables are expressed. In addition, the effect mediated by comorbidities should be taken into account when designing clinical trials.

Conclusions

Metabolic variables such as interleukins, homocysteine, iron, and vitamin B12 have an impact on cognitive status in early PD patients, and physical exercise and cognitive stimulation have a protective effect. Beyond the main neuropathological mechanisms.

that influence the progression of cognitive impairment in PD, our data also support the need to consider other frequent comorbidities and variables related to lifestyle when addressing cognitive impairment in PD.

Availability of data and materials

The protocol and the statistical analysis plan are available on request from the corresponding author. De-identified participant data are not available for legal and ethical reasons.

References

  1. Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Lolk A, Nielsen H, Kragh-Sorensen P. Risk of dementia in Parkinson's disease: a community-based, prospective study. Neurology. 2001;56(6):730–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hely MA, Reid WG, Adena MA, Halliday GM, Morris JG. The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson's disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord. 2008;23(6):837–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Lolk A, Kragh-Sorensen P. Prevalence and characteristics of dementia in Parkinson disease: an 8-year prospective study. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(3):387–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Perry R, Wentzel-Larsen T, Lolk A, et al. The rate of cognitive decline in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(12):1906–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30(12):1591–601.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoogland J, Boel JA, de Bie RMA, Geskus RB, Schmand BA, Dalrymple-Alford JC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease dementia. Mov Disord. 2017;32(7):1056–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman JG, Litvan I. Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Minerva Med. 2011;102(6):441–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez-Horta S, Kulisevsky J. Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2019;126(7):897–904.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aarsland D, Zaccai J, Brayne C. A systematic review of prevalence studies of dementia in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2005;20(10):1255–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Obeso JA, Stamelou M, Goetz CG, Poewe W, Lang AE, Weintraub D, et al. Past, present, and future of Parkinson's disease: a special essay on the 200th anniversary of the shaking palsy. Mov Disord. 2017;32(9):1264–310.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Aarsland D, Creese B, Politis M, Chaudhuri KR, Ffytche DH, Weintraub D, et al. Cognitive decline in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(4):217–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Seto-Salvia N, Clarimon J, Pagonabarraga J, Pascual-Sedano B, Campolongo A, Combarros O, et al. Dementia risk in Parkinson disease: disentangling the role of MAPT haplotypes. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(3):359–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams-Gray CH, Evans JR, Goris A, Foltynie T, Ban M, Robbins TW, et al. The distinct cognitive syndromes of Parkinson's disease: 5 year follow-up of the CamPaIGN cohort. Brain. 2009;132(Pt 11):2958–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sampedro F, Marin-Lahoz J, Martinez-Horta S, Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J. Early Gray matter volume loss in MAPT H1H1 de novo PD patients: a possible association with cognitive decline. Front Neurol. 2018;9:394.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sampedro F, Marin-Lahoz J, Martinez-Horta S, Perez-Gonzalez R, Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J. CLU rs11136000 promotes early cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35(3):508–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Emre M, Aarsland D, Brown R, Burn DJ, Duyckaerts C, Mizuno Y, et al. Clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia associated with Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2007;22(12):1689–707 quiz 837.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Litvan I, Aarsland D, Adler CH, Goldman JG, Kulisevsky J, Mollenhauer B, et al. MDS task force on mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: critical review of PD-MCI. Mov Disord. 2011;26(10):1814–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Halliday GM, Leverenz JB, Schneider JS, Adler CH. The neurobiological basis of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2014;29(5):634–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hepp DH, Vergoossen DL, Huisman E, Lemstra AW, Netherlands Brain B, Berendse HW, et al. Distribution and load of amyloid-beta pathology in Parkinson disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2016;75(10):936–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johar I, Mollenhauer B, Aarsland D. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2017;132:275–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Skorvanek M, Goldman JG, Jahanshahi M, Marras C, Rektorova I, Schmand B, et al. Global scales for cognitive screening in Parkinson's disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2018;33(2):208–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Santos Garcia D, Jesus S, Aguilar M, Planellas LL, Garcia Caldentey J, Caballol N, et al. COPPADIS-2015 (COhort of patients with PArkinson's DIsease in Spain, 2015): an ongoing global Parkinson's disease project about disease progression with more than 1000 subjects included. Results from the baseline evaluation. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(11):1399–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Santos-Garcia D, Mir P, Cubo E, Vela L, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Marti MJ, et al. COPPADIS-2015 (COhort of Patients with PArkinson's DIsease in Spain, 2015), a global--clinical evaluations, serum biomarkers, genetic studies and neuroimaging--prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, long-term study on Parkinson's disease progression. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J, Llebaria G, Garcia-Sanchez C, Pascual-Sedano B, Gironell A. Parkinson's disease-cognitive rating scale: a new cognitive scale specific for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23(7):998–1005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17(5):427–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goetz CG, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS): process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord. 2007;22(1):41–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44(12):2308–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fernandez de Bobadilla R, Pagonabarraga J, Martinez-Horta S, Pascual-Sedano B, Campolongo A, Kulisevsky J. Parkinson's disease-cognitive rating scale: psychometrics for mild cognitive impairment. Mov Disord. 2013;28(10):1376–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aarsland D, Bronnick K, Williams-Gray C, Weintraub D, Marder K, Kulisevsky J, et al. Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: a multicenter pooled analysis. Neurology. 2010;75(12):1062–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Muslimovic D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B. Cognitive profile of patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2005;65(8):1239–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yarnall AJ, Breen DP, Duncan GW, Khoo TK, Coleman SY, Firbank MJ, et al. Characterizing mild cognitive impairment in incident Parkinson disease: the ICICLE-PD study. Neurology. 2014;82(4):308–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Domellof ME, Ekman U, Forsgren L, Elgh E. Cognitive function in the early phase of Parkinson's disease, a five-year follow-up. Acta Neurol Scand. 2015;132(2):79–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pedersen KF, Larsen JP, Tysnes OB, Alves G. Natural course of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: a 5-year population-based study. Neurology. 2017;88(8):767–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Munhoz RP, Teive HA, Eleftherohorinou H, Coin LJ, Lees AJ, Silveira-Moriyama L. Demographic and motor features associated with the occurrence of neuropsychiatric and sleep complications of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(8):883–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. David FJ, Robichaud JA, Leurgans SE, Poon C, Kohrt WM, Goldman JG, et al. Exercise improves cognition in Parkinson's disease: the PRET-PD randomized, clinical trial. Mov Disord. 2015;30(12):1657–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Leung IH, Walton CC, Hallock H, Lewis SJ, Valenzuela M, Lampit A. Cognitive training in Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2015;85(21):1843–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kampling H, Brendel LK, Mittag O. (Neuro) psychological interventions for non-motor symptoms in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic umbrella review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2019;29(2):166–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Orgeta V, McDonald KR, Poliakoff E, Hindle JV, Clare L, Leroi I. Cognitive training interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2:CD011961.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Seshadri S. Elevated plasma homocysteine levels: risk factor or risk marker for the development of dementia and Alzheimer's disease? J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;9(4):393–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. White AR, Huang X, Jobling MF, Barrow CJ, Beyreuther K, Masters CL, et al. Homocysteine potentiates copper- and amyloid beta peptide-mediated toxicity in primary neuronal cultures: possible risk factors in the Alzheimer's-type neurodegenerative pathways. J Neurochem. 2001;76(5):1509–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jacobsen DW. Homocysteine and vitamins in cardiovascular disease. Clin Chem. 1998;44(8 Pt 2):1833–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Xie Y, Feng H, Peng S, Xiao J, Zhang J. Association of plasma homocysteine, vitamin B12 and folate levels with cognitive function in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Lett. 2017;636:190–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rogers JD, Sanchez-Saffon A, Frol AB, Diaz-Arrastia R. Elevated plasma homocysteine levels in patients treated with levodopa: association with vascular disease. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(1):59–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wood H. Brain iron correlates with cognitive change in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(4):184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas GEC, Leyland LA, Schrag AE, Lees AJ, Acosta-Cabronero J, Weil RS. Brain iron deposition is linked with cognitive severity in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(4):418–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ward RJ, Zucca FA, Duyn JH, Crichton RR, Zecca L. The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(10):1045–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kong BS, Kim Y, Kim GY, Hyun JW, Kim SH, Jeong A, et al. Increased frequency of IL-6-producing non-classical monocytes in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):191.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Swardfager W, Lanctot K, Rothenburg L, Wong A, Cappell J, Herrmann N. A meta-analysis of cytokines in Alzheimer's disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;68(10):930–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Reale M, Iarlori C, Thomas A, Gambi D, Perfetti B, Di Nicola M, et al. Peripheral cytokines profile in Parkinson's disease. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23(1):55–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all patients and their caregivers who collaborated in this study. We extend our grateful to “Fundación Española de Ayuda a la Investigación en Parkinson y otras Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas” (Curemos el Parkinson; www.curemoselparkinson.org), and to Alpha Bioresearch (www.alphabioresearch.com). The complete list with all the researchers of the COPPADIS Study Group can be found in supplementary material.

Funding

Fundación Curemos el Parkinson (https://curemoselparkinson.org/) covered the expenses derived from hiring a CRO and from carrying out complementary tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

SMH: Conception; Design; Acquisition; Analysis; Interpretation; Draft. HBK: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. AHB: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. BPS: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. DSG: Conception; Design; Acquisition; Analysis; Interpretation; Draft. TDF: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. SJ: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. MA: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. LP: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. JGC: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. NC: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. BVP: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. JHV: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. ICL: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. LLM: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. IGA: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. AAR: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. MJC: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. LLD: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. VP: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. JGM: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. CB: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. BSV: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. MAS: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. LV: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. SE: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. EC: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. FCP: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. JMC: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. PSA: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. MAL: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. NLA: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. IG: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. MBE: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. MS: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. JRM: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. CVM: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. MK: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. OFB: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. JGA: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. CPJ: Acquisition; Interpretation; Draft. PMM: Conception; Design; Acquisition; Analysis; Interpretation; Draft. PM: Conception; Design; Acquisition; Analysis; Interpretation; Draft; JK: Conception; Design; Acquisition; Analysis; Interpretation; Draft. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Kulisevsky.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were performed in accordance with the standards of the Ethics Committee at each study site, and in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. For this study, we received approval from the Galician Ethics Committee for Clinical Research in Spain (2014/534; 02/DEC/2014). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study before the start of the study. COPPADIS-2015 was classified by the AEMPS (Agencia Española del Medicamento y Productos Sanitarios) as a Post-authorization Prospective Follow-up study with the code COH-PAK-2014-01.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

12883_2021_2485_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Additional file 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Horta, S., Bejr-Kasem, H., Horta-Barba, A. et al. Identifying comorbidities and lifestyle factors contributing to the cognitive profile of early Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurol 21, 477 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02485-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02485-1

Keywords

  • Parkinson’s disease
  • PD-MCI
  • Cognition
  • Lifestyle
  • Coppadis