Skip to main content
Download PDF

Leukocyte inflammatory phenotype and function in migraine patients compared with matched non-migraine volunteers: a pilot study

BMC Neurology volume 22, Article number: 278 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Migraine is a neurological condition characterized by chronic inflammation. However, not much is known about the potential role of peripheral blood immune cells in the pathophysiology of migraine.

Methods

We investigated the status of peripheral blood immune cells of 15 adults with frequent episodic or chronic migraine recruited chronologically from a randomized clinical trial (RCT) on Nutrition for Migraine (NCCIH 5R01AT007813-05) and 15 non-migraine, healthy volunteers (control) matched by age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI).

Continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviationas well as medians, and comparisons between patients and healthy volunteers were performed with non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata (StataCorp. 2019. Stata Statistical Software). Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) data were processed using FlowJo software (Ashland, OR: Becton, Dickenson and Company; 2019).

Results

We observed that migraineurs had a significantly lower percentage of non-classical monocytes (CD14+CD16++) in blood circulation, compared to the control group. In addition, Migraineurs also showed a significantly lower percentage of blood CD3+CD4+ helper T cells and CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells, compared to controls. Differences in leukocyte surface markers between chronic migraine patients and their matched controls were more prominent than those between episodic migraine patients and their matched controls.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that migraine is associated with dysregulated peripheral immune homeostasis and that inflammation and autoimmunity may play a role in its pathophysiology.

Peer Review reports

Summary sentence

Migraineurs’ peripheral blood shows altered monocyte and T cell subpopulation compared with the control group, suggesting migraine is potentially associated with inflammation and autoimmune processes.

Background

Migraine is a major public health problem afflicting over 16% of women, 7% of men, and 12% of the total adult US population and costing billions in health care utilization [1, 2]. Inflammation has long been considered a risk factor in migraine pathogenesis [3, 4]. Examples of elevated inflammatory biomarkers, including fibrinogen and C reactive protein (CRP), have been reported in migraine pathology [5,6,7]. In 2001, Kemper et al. reviewed 45 clinical studies from 1966 to 1999 and found differences in serum levels of complement, immunoglobulin, histamine, cytokines, and immune cells (monocyte and polymorphonuclear leukocytes) between migraineurs and volunteers without migraine. However, the findings in the various studies were inconsistent and conflicting with each other in many cases [8, 9], indicating a need for further investigation into the role of immune system dysfunction in migraineurs.

Given this emerging link between inflammation and migraine pathogenesis, identification of leukocyte surface antigens could potentially serve as biomarkers to help with diagnosis. In 2006, Du and colleagues reported that the genes significantly up-regulated by migraine were mostly from platelet/monocytes, while others were from PMNs, CD4+, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells [10]. Research has also shown that lymphotoxin alpha (or tumor necrosis factor-beta) and α-fodrin are among the seven-upregulated genes in migraine with aura, compared with healthy controls [11]. Recently, a genomic-wide analysis using whole blood of 83 migraine cases and 83 age and gender-matched non-migraine controls revealed that multiple immune-inflammatory pathways, such as functional categories of HECS, Microglia, RACTOME, and Gene ontology biological processes, were underlying the pathophysiology of the disorder [12].

Arumugam and Parthasarathy (2016) studied the autoimmune biomarkers CD4+CD25+ population, helper and suppressor T cell populations, observing a significantly higher CD4+population and lower CD8+T cell population in migraineurs, compared to healthy volunteers. Furthermore, the CD4+CD25+ population was significantly lower in migraine patients compared to healthy volunteers [13], suggesting that migraine may be related to autoimmunity.

Monocytes comprise a heterogeneous population that plays a vital role in immune surveillance of the central nervous system (CNS). There are at least three different subsets: classical monocytes (CD14++CD16−), intermediate monocytes (CD14++CD16+) and non-classical monocytes (CD14+CD16++) [14]. Waschbisch and colleagues reported that monocytes expressing FcγRIII, or CD16+, which include both intermediate and non-classical monocytes together, were reduced in the peripheral blood and migrated to the sites of inflammation, contributing to the injury of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in CNS autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) [15]. The research literature has reported the patrolling behavior of the inflammatory non-classical monocyte subset [16,17,18,19] and the activation of genes associated with cytoskeleton mobility [16]. CD16+ monocytes have been reported migrating to the central nervous system in MS, HIV associated neurocognitive disorder, and giant cell arteritis [15, 20, 21]. To our knowledge, there is no report showing that CD16+ monocytes could migrate to the CNS, thereby decreasing the population percentage in migraineurs’ peripheral blood.

T cell surface integrins can play an important role in cellular adhesion to extracellular matrix and cell signaling. Lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) and very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) changes have been linked to migraine attacks [22, 23]. LFA-1 is an integrin and belongs to the integrin superfamily of adhesion molecules. It has been reported that T cell surface β2 subunit or CD18 is required for trafficking to the intestinal tissue during an intestinal immune reponses [24].

The objective of the present study was to characterize migraineurs’ peripheral leukocyte surface biomarkers and ex vivo functions to determine whether our findings indicate that migraine is related to neuroinflammation and autoimmunity. We used pre-intervention/baseline samples collected from a parent RCT entitled “Clinical and Metabolic Effects of Altering Omega-3 and Omega-6 Fatty Acids in Migraine” funded by an NIH R01-AT007813 (2013–2018) awarded to investigators at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill [2]. We proposed to examine the leukocyte phenotype profile and cell type function between matched non-migraine volunteers and the migraineurs’ baseline data. This comparison may provide mechanistic insights and initial therapeutic strategies for targeting inflammation in migraine.

Materials and methods

Participants and ethical clearance

Fifteen consecutive migraine patients who entered the parent R01 RCT study during 2015 and 2016 were selected to be involved in this study. Both studies received approval from UNC’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Office of Human Research Ethics and all participants provided informed consent. These subjects were matched with fifteen healthy controls who were recruited to the study from the same population from which the migraineurs were drawn, through university advertising (e.g., mass email). Ascertained via telephone screening and health history questionnaire, eligible volunteers were 18 years of age or older; without chronic pain, pregnancy, or major medical/psychiatric illness; non-smokers; not taking omega-3 supplements; and without concurrent illness. Volunteers were matched to migraine participants by age (10-year categories), sex, and Body Mass Index (BMI) (< 20, 20–24.9, 25–29.9, 30–34.9, > 35). Migraine patients provided samples on the day of randomization before receiving the intervention (or the enrollment visit). If they were having a migraine attack, this visit was postponed. Both migraine patients and control group volunteers had fasted for 8 or more hours prior to phlebotomy. Samples were processed immediately.

Peripheral whole blood staining method using BD bioscience protocol

Following BD whole blood staining protocols [25], we chose three panels of antibodies, with each panel containing eight antibodies. Table 1 shows the experimental design with the intention to investigate different peripheral leukocyte populations. The antibodies used in this study included: anti-CD3 (APC-H7), anti-CD36 (PerCP-Cy5.5), anti-CD14 (V500), anti-CD16 (BV421), anti-HLA-DR (BB515), anti-CD56 (PE –Cy7), anti-CD86 (APC) (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), anti-CD163 (PE) (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), anti-CD8 (v500), anti-CD4 (PerCP-Cy5.5) (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), anti-CD25 (BB515), anti-CD18 (PE), anti-CD49d (APC), anti-CD11c (BV510), anti-CD123 (BV421), anti-CD19 (PE-Cy7), and anti-CD80 (PE). All antibodies were purchased from BD Bioscience except where stated otherwise. Briefly, appropriate volumes of fluorochrome-conjugated antibody were added to 100 μL of whole blood and incubated 15 to 30 min at room temperature. Then, the erythrocytes were lysed, and the samples were washed, fixed, and analyzed within about 24 h. Data were collected with FACS CANTO II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR).

Table 1 The three flow cytometry panels of antibodies with the intention of different population screening. Following BD whole blood staining protocols, we chose three panels of antibodies, with each panel containing eight antibodies as shown in the table.
Full size table

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) isolation, stimulation, and supernatant collection

PBMCs were isolated from freshly collected human blood samples following density gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient. Briefly, a diluted cell suspension was carefully layered over Ficoll-Hypaque in a conical tube without disturbing the interface, centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 30 min at room temperature with the brake off. The mononuclear cell layer was at the interphase. The RBC and platelets were washed and a cell counting procedure was performed by TC20™ Automated Cell Counter (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA).

In vitro stimulations of one million PBMCs per well with 100 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 24 h were set up in a 6-well culture plate. After stimulation, supernatants were collected for cytokines analysis.

Multiplex measurement of cytokines

To investigate the cytokine production by ex vivo LPS, nine cytokine (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, IFN-y, IL-4, IL-17a, IL-12 p70, and IL-21) levels in PBMC supernatants from pre- and post-LPS 24 h of stimulations were analyzed using R&D multiplex analysis system at the university’s Cytokine & Biomarker Analysis Facility Center.

Cell gating strategies

For monocyte gating, neutrophils, NK cells, B cells, and T cells were successively excluded following the strategy by Mukherjee et al. [19]. For T cell gating, subsets were chosen based on conventional bivariate scatterplots of side scatter signal and CD3+, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+ T cells subsets.

Statistical analysis

This study presented continuous variables as means ± standard deviations and medians. Due to the small sample sizes, comparisons between patients and healthy volunteers were performed with Wilcoxon signed rank tests. An exploratory sensitivity analysis was undertaken using a hierarchical linear model using random effects of the matched pair. For distributions that were non-normal, estimates were checked using transformations. If interpretation of the results did not change, the original model results were reported. Results are provided for unadjusted differences in means between groups as well as estimates adjusted for chronic migraine and meeting criteria for medication overuse headache. Our statistical analysis was performed using Stata (StataCorp. 2019. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.). Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) data were processed using FlowJo software (Ashland, OR: Becton, Dickenson and Company; 2019). Cytokine multiplex data were processed using Stata (StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.).

Results

Descriptive statistics

A total of 30 subjects – 15 migraine patients and 15 matched control individuals – participated in this study. Their demographic comparisons are listed in Table 2. As expected, 80% were female, and the mean (± standard deviation) age was 39.3 ± 12.2 in the migraine sample, and 39.7±12.2 in the controls. BMI means were 27.2±4.6 and 27.4±4.8 in migraine and control groups, respectively.

Table 2 Demographic comparison between migraine and its matched control group
Full size table

Migraine has many comorbidities, and people with migraines were significantly more likely to report comorbidities related to inflammation among other conditions [22]. The 15 migraine patients’ pain information, including headache, comorbid pain, with or without aura, whether it meets chronic migraine criteria or not, and medication overuse information are provided in the Table 3. The number of migraines in 30 days was 11.2 ± 5.7 days, and the number of headaches in 30 days was 18.6 ± 7.7 days. About 53% of the patients met chronic migraine criteria, based on the most recent diagnostic criteria (ICHD-3), i.e., headache occurring on 15 or more days/month for more than three months, which, on at least eight days/month, has the features of migraine headache. Eight out of 15 patients (53%) met the criteria for overuse of any pain medication.

Table 3 Migraine, headache (HA), pain information and overuse of pain medication
Full size table

Comparison of CD14+CD16++ monocytes and CD14++CD16− monocytes

To examine whether migraine patients have altered blood monocytes, we analyzed the peripheral blood classic and non-classic monocytes in migraineurs and matched control group using flow cytometry. In PBMCs single cells population, we removed NK and T cells, and then divided the HLA-DR + population into three subgroups and analyzed by CD14 and CD16 expression strength (Fig. 1A). We found that the non-classical monocyte percentage (11.9 ± 10.5)) (Table 4 and Fig. 1B) was lower in the migraine group compared with the control group, (33.9 ± 21.4) (p = 0.005). In contrast, the percentage of classical monocytes (CD14++CD16−) was 49.9 ± 27.6% in the control group and 72.3. ± 18.1% in the migraine group (p = 0.06) (Table 4 and Fig. 1B). Supplemental Table 1 also provides estimates comparing individuals with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache (MOH) to controls. These estimates should be interpreted with caution due to the extremely small sample sizes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Non-classical monocytes (CD14 + CD16 + +) were significantly lower in the peripheral blood of migraine group compared with the matched control group. (A) First, the lymphocytes and monocytes populations are highlighted, and the single cell population was selected only. Then NK cells, T cells were removed. HLA-DR and SSC-A subset was selected, and three populations within the monocytes were identified by CD14 and CD16 markers. (B) Bar graph showed that non-classical monocytes (CD14 + CD16 + +) were significantly lower (11.9 ± 10.5 vs. 33.9 ± 21.4), **p = 0.005 in the peripheral blood of migraine group compared with the matched control group, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Data are represented as means ± SD, significance was determined by nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test

Full size image
Table 4 Means, standard deviations, and medians for groups defined by control and migraine status
Full size table

In exploratory sensitivity analyses using hierarchical linear models, we found significant differences at the p = 0.05 level between patients and controls comparing non-classical (mean difference[MD] -21.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] (-38.88, -4.42)) and classical monocytes (MD26.5; 95% CI: (3.04, 50.12)) in models adjusted for chronic migraine and MOH (Supplemental Table 2 ).

Percentage of CD4+ and CD4+CD25+ T cells in blood

In our migraine group, CD4 + T cells were significantly lower(64 ± 5.45 vs. 70.6 ± 8.92) (p = 0.035) and CD8 + T cells were slightly higher (p = 0.3) in the migraine group compared with the control group (Table 4 and Fig. 2). However, the CD4 + /CD8+ ratio difference is not significant (p = 0.09). (Table 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

CD4 T cell populations from migraineurs were significantly lower than controls. (A) CD4+ T cell populations from migraineurs were significantly lower than controls (64.0 ± 5.45 vs. 70.6 ± 8.92), *p = 0.035. (B) CD4+/CD8+ ratio was lowed in the migraineurs, yet the change was not significant (not shown). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Data are represented as means ± SD, significance was determined by nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test

Full size image

We identified the CD4+CD25+ population in this study and display the results in Fig. 3A. Compared with the control group, the migraine group had a significantly lower percentage of CD4+CD25+ T cells (Table 4 and Fig. 3B). CD4+CD25+ T cell percentages in matched control and migraine groups were about 8.3% and 5.7% of CD3+ T cells respectively (p = 0.001). Significant differences between groups persisted after adjustment for chronic migraine and MOH (MD -2.52; 95% CI: -4.46, -0.57)(Supplemental Table 2 ).

Fig. 3
figure 3

CD4 + CD25 + T cell populations from migraineurs were significantly lower than controls. (A) The lymphocytes and monocytes populations are highlighted, and the single cell population was selected only. CD3 + and CD4 + population were selected, respectively. Finally, CD4 + CD25+ population was highlighted. (B) CD4+ CD25+ T cell populations from migraineurs were significantly lower than controls (5.66 ± 1.35 vs. 8.29 ± 2.31), **P = 0.001. Data are represented as means ± SD, significance was determined by nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test

Full size image

Integrin CD18 in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

Compared with the matched control group, migraine patients’ CD18, which is part of the LFA-1, were lower in expression levels measured by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on both CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells, as shown in Table 4 and Fig. 4. The CD18 MFI on CD4+ helper T cells in matched control and migraine group were 735 ± 139 and 619 ± 135, respectively (p = 0.06). The CD18 MFI on CD8+ killer T cells in matched control and migraine groups were 924 ± 239 and 771 ± 250, respectively (p = 0.09)( Table 4 and Fig. 4). Adjusting for chronic migraine and MOH attenuated the differences between the two groups. We found no significant difference in peripheral blood CD49d expression between migraineurs and healthy controls and controlling for chronic migraine and MOH reversed the direction of the difference. (Table 4 and Supplemental Table 1 ).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Both CD4 + helper T cells and CD8 + killer T cells demonstrated lowered expression by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of integrin CD18, but not significantly. MFI of CD18 was lower in both CD4 + T cells and CD8 + T cells in migraineurs compared with controls, with p = 0.06 and p = 0.09, respectively. Data are represented as means ± SD, analysis was determined by nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test

Full size image

Cytokine analysis after ex vivo stimulation

We stimulated PBMCs from the recruited patients and control volunteers ex. vivo with LPS; nine cytokines from supernatant were measured using the R&D multiplex system. Out of the nine cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, IFN-y, IL-4, IL-17a, IL-12 p70, and IL-21) studied, only IL-1 β and TNF-α were in the readable ranges. No significant differences were detected. (Fig. 5A and B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cytokine analysis with 24-h LPS stimulation revealed no significant difference in inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-1 beta and TNF-a) between migraineurs and controls. Pre-stimulation and post-stimulation of IL-1β (Fig. 5A) and TNF-α (Fig. 5B) were processed using Stata software, no significant changes were found

Full size image

Other cell populations

Other than the monocytes and T cell populations, we did not find differences in B cells, NK cells, or dendritic cells between the migraineurs and the control group.

Discussion

Using peripheral whole blood staining methodology, we found that migraineurs had both myeloid and lymphoid leukocyte surface marker changes compared with the matched control group, which supports the neurogenic inflammatory and autoimmune nature of migraine.

We demonstrated that peripheral blood non-classical monocytes (CD14+CD16++) in migraine patients were lower than controls. In migraine, triggering factors such as chronic stress, certain foods, hormonal fluctuation, depression and other unknown causes can generate sterile inflammation in CNS and activation of nociceptors [23]. In the presence of these inflammatory stimuli, circulating inflammatory monocytes can quickly migrate into affected tissues, where they differentiate into macrophages and dendritic cell subsets [26,27,28]. The patrolling monocytes localize to the endothelium of vascular inflammatory tissues and release inflammatory mediators [26, 29]. Patrolling CD16+ monocytes exhibit long-range crawling over the endothelium of vascular tissues [17, 18], and may contribute to the pathogenesis of a wide range of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, atherosclerosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease lung fibrosis, lung cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease [30,31,32]. This population of monocytes can be detected in perivascular circulation; studies have demonstrated decreased levels of nonclassical monocytes in the peripheral blood, as reported in severe forms of lupus nephritis and MS [15, 33].

Current migraine research has provided some evidence of transmigration of non-classical monocytes to the CNS. Nagata et al. searched biomarkers for migraines using microarray analysis in 2009 [11]. In their report, the expression of 15 genes were altered in migraineurs compared to controls, and one-fifth of these genes were associated with cytoskeleton proteins. It has been reported that human non-classical monocytes exhibit crawling behavior on the endothelium both in vivo and in vitro [16,17,18, 26, 30]. Non-classical monocytes highly expressed genes associated with cytoskeleton mobility, including Rho GTPase, RHOC and RHOF, and some upstream Rho activators and downstream effectors [16]. These findings are consistent with the Waschbisch clinical study regarding CD16+ monocytes migrating to the CNS in MS [15]. Tension-type headache and migraine without aura are among the most common primary headaches in MS patients [34]. CD16+ monocytes play a pivotal role in immune-surveillance of the CNS, and they could migrate to the site of inflammation and contribute to the dysfunction of the BBB and CNS autoimmune disease [15] or NeuroAIDS [35]. Both the monocyte chemokine receptor CXCR7 [35, 36] and the integrity of the BBB play roles in inflammatory migraine pathophysiology [37, 38]. Due to limitations imposed by the parent RCT, and the small sample size of this affiliated pilot study, we have not investigated the profile of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. Immune cell profiling in CSF in future studies could provide additional insights into migraine pathogenesis.

Our study also indicated the potential association between migraine and failure of immunoregulation. We detected a significantly lower peripheral blood CD4+ and its subgroup CD4+ CD25 + T cells in the migraine group compared to the matched healthy controls even after controlling for covariates (See Fig. 2 and 3). The finding of relatively lower CD4+ CD25+ T cells in migraineurs is consistent with a previous migraine study [13]. The difference between ours and Arumugam’s study are in the T cells subsets CD4 and CD8 cells. In our migraine group, CD4+ T cells were significantly lower and CD8+ T cells were slightly higher in the migraine group compared with the control group (Fig. 3A). However, the differences in CD4+/CD8+ ratio was small. (Fig. 3B) and appears to be largely due to lower ratio levels in the chronic migraine group (Table 4). These results suggest that failure of immunoregulation could play a role in migraine pathophysiology. In an experimental mouse model of autoimmune encephalomyelitis, non-classical monocytes were shown to be potent suppressors of T cells [39]. Loss of quantity and/or suppressive function of non-classic monocytes may contribute to the development of autoimmune disease. Interestingly, a recent in vitro experiment showed that the CD16+ monocytes, not CD16- classical monocyte, promoted CD4+ T cell trafficking via the endothelial barrier [15]. Provided the CD16+ monocytes did migrate to the CNS, they then may enhance T cell entry into the CNS, the latter further facilitating CD16+ monocytes’ attachment to the microvasculature and contributing to the breakdown of the BBB. This could explain why peripheral blood CD4+ T cell numbers were lower in our study.

Considering that about half of the recruited patients also fall into chronic migraine or suffer from overuse of any pain medication, we did further analysis based on these two categories themselves. The results are in supplemental Table 1 . We found that chronic migraine patients demonstrated the most significant changes compared with their matched volunteers, including non-classical monocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, CD18 MFI on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, CD49 MFI on CD4+ T cells, CD36, and CD4+ CD25+ T cell populations. We realized that the sample size was even smaller, and the pathophysiology of the transformation from episodic to chronic migraine can not be concluded at this time.

CD36 is a transmembrane protein expressed in various types of cells, including adipocytes, monocytes, macrophages, platelets, endothelial, and muscle cells [40]. This protein belongs to the scavenger receptor [40, 41] and binds to lipoproteins, apoptotic cells, and long-chain fatty acids; thus, CD36 is also known as fatty acid translocase [42]. Coburn et al. demonstrated that long chain fatty acid uptake and utilization have been defective in CD36 knockout mice [43]. Our team reported that a dietary intervention with increased omega-3 fatty acids helped to reduce headache pain [44, 45], and it has been known that omega-3 could induce the CD36 mRNA expression in an animal model [46, 47]. CD36 can bind to three classes of ligands including modified phospholipids, long chain fatty acids and domains of thrombospondin homologs [40]. Broad expression of CD36 on different cells suggests this multi-functional receptor could be involved in a broad spectrum of diseases [40, 48,49,50]. The effects of high dietary omega-3 and low omega-6 targeted alteration to treat migraine in the parent randomized clinical trial suggested that the binding of long chain fatty acid to CD36 might play vital roles in chronic headache [44] and possibly for migraine [45]. Indeed, predominant monocytes and platelets gene up-regulations are characteristic for migraine [10]. CD36 binding to domains of thrombospondin homologs and the downstream inflammation activation might play a role in migraine pathophysiology, but the details are still elusive.

T-cell subset and expression of integrins are reduced to potentially facilitate the lymphocyte transmigration to the CNS. LFA-1 is expressed on white blood cells including lymphocytes and other leukocytes and plays a crucial role in the emigration of leukocytes, leaving the bloodstream to enter the tissues. It is a heterodimeric glycoprotein with non-covalently linked subunits alpha (CD11a) and beta (CD18). Empl et al.’s study reported that migraine-with-aura patients had significantly lower LFA-1 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells than that of controls [51]. Sarchielli and colleagues found that LFA -1 on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were progressively down-regulated at two and four hours after migraine attack onset [52].

Previous research has reported that elevated levels of biomarkers of inflammation are linked to migraine [5, 53, 54]. In the early phase of inflammation, the release of excessive amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines and lipid-mediators is tied to the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction. Cytokines and chemokines are essential molecular and pain mediators in neurovascular inflammation. Some proinflammatory cytokines levels increased after migraine attacks [23, 26, 27]. In addition, cytokines might play a critical role in the initiation and persistence of pain by activating nociceptive sensory neurons [55, 56]. The most relevant cytokines related to migraines include IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and TGF-β [9, 57,58,59]. Recent studies investigating neuroinflammation in migraine reveal the role of inflammasome via inflammasome complex players including IL-1β and IL-18 [60]. In this study, we did not find significant changes of inflammatory cytokines from serum (data not provided) or ex vivo LPS stimulated PBMCs between migraine patients and matched control groups. Although IL-6 has been reported with higher production from this population in the Koon’s study [61], we found a reduced non-classical monocyte population in the peripheral blood, and this is likely to be a reason for not finding significantly increased IL-6 production. Moreover, condition of ex vivo LPS stimulation needs to be investigated in the future.

There are some limitations in this pilot study. For instance, the sample size was relatively small, and the ex vivo LPS stimulation of PBMC for cytokine production used only a single 24-h stimulation time point. Because of limited patient samples available from the clinical parent study, CSF samples were not examined.

In summary, we observed that the percentage of peripheral non-classical monocyte (CD14+CD16++) in migraine is lower than in controls, suggesting possible migration of the CD14+CD16++ population into the endothelium of cranial vessels. This migration potentially plays a role in releasing inflammatory mediators, leading to migraine pathogenesis. Future research regarding the levels of non-classic monocyte population in the CNS (for example, in cerebrospinal fluid) would be of interest to confirm the potential migration of the CD16+ monocyte population. Migraine appears to be an inflammatory disease with a lowered CD4+T cell population, specifically a lower CD4+CD25+ T cell population. These preliminary findings need to be confirmed with studies conducted on a larger sample size of patients with migraine.

If future studies can directly confirm the migration of the non-classical monocytes in the CNS of migraine patients, potential therapeutic strategies may be broadened. For example, since CD16+ monocytes express CXCR7 on cell surface; using CXCR7 antagonist might help reduce the non-classical monocytes transmigration across the BBB [35]. This study also provides additional evidence for the use of targeted alterations in dietary linolenic acid and n-3 EPA+DHA in chronic migraineurs [44, 45]. Neuroinflammation pathways, specifically those involving inflammasome proteins, such as IL-1β, IL-18, and caspase-1, seem promising candidates as biomarkers or treatment targets in migraine [60], providing some interesting direction for further study.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that migraine is associated with dysregulated peripheral immune homeostasis and that neuroinflammation and autoimmune may play a role in its pathophysiology.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and /or analysed during the current study are not able to share due to ethnical/legal restrictions. UNC Health/CDWH only permits data use on a project-by-project basis (i.e., a given IRB) and any disclosures outside of UNC require a data use agreement.

Abbreviations

BBB:

Blood brain barrier

BMI:

Body mass index

CNS:

Central nervous system

LFA-1:

Lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1

MFI:

Mean fluorescence intensity

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

PBMC:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PMNs:

Polymorphonuclear leukocytes

VLA-4:

Very late antigen-4

n-3:

Omega-3

References

  1. Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton RB, Scher AI, et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(3):193–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01288.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mann JD, Faurot KR, MacIntosh B, Palsson OS, Suchindran CM, Gaylord SA, et al. A sixteen-week three-armed, randomized, controlled trial investigating clinical and biochemical effects of targeted alterations in dietary linoleic acid and n-3 EPA+DHA in adults with episodic migraine: Study protocol. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2018;128:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2017.11.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williamson DJ, Hargreaves RJ. Neurogenic inflammation in the context of migraine. Microsc Res Tech. 2001;53(3):167–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1081.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Waeber C, Moskowitz MA. Migraine as an inflammatory disorder. Neurology. 2005;64(10 suppl 2):S9–15. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.64.10_suppl_2.S9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tietjen GE, Khubchandani J, Herial N, Palm-Meinders IH, Koppen H, Terwindt GM, et al. Migraine and vascular disease biomarkers: A population-based case-control study. Cephalalgia. 2017:333102417698936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417698936.

  6. Mahajan R, Anand KS, Mahajan RK, Juneja A. Inflammatory biomarkers in migraine-a prospective observational study. Int J Sci Res. 2020;9(1).

  7. Sarıcam G. Relationship between migraine headache and hematological parameters. Acta neurologica Belgica. 2021;121(4):899–905.

  8. Kemper RH, Meijler WJ, Korf J, Ter Horst GJ. Migraine and function of the immune system: a meta-analysis of clinical literature published between 1966 and 1999. Cephalalgia. 2001;21(5):549–57. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.2001.00196.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruno PP, Carpino F, Carpino G, Zicari A. An overview on immune system and migraine. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2007;11(4):245–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Du X, Tang Y, Xu H, Lit L, Walker W, Ashwood P, et al. Genomic profiles for human peripheral blood T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, monocytes, and polymorphonuclear cells: Comparisons to ischemic stroke, migraine, and Tourette syndrome. Genomics. 2006;87(6):693–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.02.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagata E, Hattori H, Kato M, Ogasawara S, Suzuki S, Shibata M, et al. Identification of biomarkers associated with migraine with aura. Neurosci Res. 2009;64(1):104–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2009.02.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerring ZF, Powell JE, Montgomery GW, Nyholt DR. Genome-wide analysis of blood gene expression in migraine implicates immune-inflammatory pathways. Cephalalgia. 2017:333102416686769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102416686769.

  13. Arumugam M, Parthasarathy V. Reduction of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cells in migraine: Is migraine an autoimmune disorder? J Neuroimmunol. 2016;290:54–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.11.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sampath P, Moideen K, Ranganathan UD, Bethunaickan R. Monocyte Subsets: Phenotypes and Function in Tuberculosis Infection. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9 1726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01726.

  15. Waschbisch A, Schroder S, Schraudner D, Sammet L, Weksler B, Melms A, et al. Pivotal Role for CD16+ Monocytes in Immune Surveillance of the Central Nervous System. J Immunol. 2016;196(4):1558–67. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1501960.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong KL, Yeap WH, Tai JJY, Ong SM, Dang TM, Wong SC. The three human monocyte subsets: implications for health and disease. Immunol Res. 2012;53(1):41–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-012-8297-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Auffray C, Sieweke MH, Geissmann F. Blood Monocytes: Development, Heterogeneity, and Relationship with Dendritic Cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27(1):669–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saha P, Geissmann F. Toward a functional characterization of blood monocytes. Immunol Cell Biol. 2011;89(1):2–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mukherjee R, Kanti Barman P, Kumar Thatoi P, Tripathy R, Kumar Das B, Ravindran B. Non-Classical monocytes display inflammatory features: Validation in Sepsis and Systemic Lupus Erythematous. Scientific Reports. 2015;5 1:13886. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13886.

  20. Veenstra M, León-Rivera R, Li M, Gama L, Clements JE, Berman JW. Mechanisms of CNS Viral Seeding by HIV+ CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes: Establishment and Reseeding of Viral Reservoirs Contributing to HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders. mBio. 2017;8 5:e01280–17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01280-17.

  21. van Sleen Y, Wang Q, van der Geest KSM, Westra J, Abdulahad WH, Heeringa P, et al. Involvement of Monocyte Subsets in the Immunopathology of Giant Cell Arteritis. Scientific reports. 2017;7 1:6553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06826-4.

  22. Buse DC, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Bostic R, Dodick DW, Schwedt TJ, et al. Comorbid and co-occurring conditions in migraine and associated risk of increasing headache pain intensity and headache frequency: results of the migraine in America symptoms and treatment (MAST) study. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2020;21 1:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-1084-y.

  23. Ramachandran R. Neurogenic inflammation and its role in migraine. Semin Immunopathol. 2018;40(3):301–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-018-0676-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marski M, Ye AL, Abraham C. CD18 is required for intestinal T cell responses at multiple immune checkpoints. J Immunol. 2007;178(4):2104–12. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.2104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nicholson JK, Rao PE, Calvelli T, Stetler-Stevenson M, Browning SW, Yeung L, et al. Artifactual staining of monoclonal antibodies in two-color combinations is due to an immunoglobulin in the serum and plasma. Cytometry. 1994;18(3):140–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990180305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas G, Tacke R, Hedrick CC, Hanna RN. Nonclassical patrolling monocyte function in the vasculature. Arterioscler Thromb Vac Biol. 2015;35(6):1306–16. https://doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.114.304650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Italiani P, Boraschi D. From Monocytes to M1/M2 Macrophages: Phenotypical vs. Funct Differ Front Immunol. 2014;5:514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Reports. 2014;6:13. https://doi.org/10.12703/P6-13.

  29. Abdulkhaleq LA, Assi MA, Abdullah R, Zamri-Saad M, Taufiq-Yap YH, Hezmee MNM. The crucial roles of inflammatory mediators in inflammation: A review. Veterinary world. 2018;11(5):627–35. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.627-635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kapellos TS, Bonaguro L, Gemünd I, Reusch N, Saglam A, Hinkley ER, et al. Human Monocyte Subsets and Phenotypes in Major Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. Frontiers in immunology. 2019;10:2035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02035.

  31. Min D, Brooks B, Wong J, Salomon R, Bao W, Harrisberg B, et al. Alterations in Monocyte CD16 in Association with Diabetes Complications. Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012: 649083. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/649083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Narasimhan PB, Marcovecchio P, Hamers AAJ, Hedrick CC. Nonclassical Monocytes in Health and Disease. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37(1):439–56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Barrera García A, Gómez-Puerta JA, Arias LF, Burbano C, Restrepo M, Vanegas AL, et al. Infiltrating CD16+ Are Associated with a reduction in peripheral cd14+cd16++ monocytes and severe forms of lupus nephritis. Autoimmune Diseases. 2016;2016:9324315. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9324315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. La Mantia L, Prone V. Headache in multiple sclerosis and autoimmune disorders. Neurol Sci. 2015;36(Suppl 1):75–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2146-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Veenstra M, Williams DW, Calderon TM, Anastos K, Morgello S, Berman JW. Frontline Science: CXCR7 mediates CD14+CD16+ monocyte transmigration across the blood brain barrier: a potential therapeutic target for NeuroAIDS. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;102(5):1173–85. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.3HI0517-167R.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Chatterjee M, von Ungern-Sternberg SNI, Seizer P, Schlegel F, Büttcher M, Sindhu NA, et al. Platelet-derived CXCL12 regulates monocyte function, survival, differentiation into macrophages and foam cells through differential involvement of CXCR4–CXCR7. Cell Death & Disease. 2015;6 11:e1989-e. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2015.233.

  37. Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, Hoffmann J, Schankin C, Akerman S. Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing. Physiol Rev. 2017;97(2):553–622. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00034.2015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. DosSantos MF, Holanda-Afonso RC, Lima RL, DaSilva AF, Moura-Neto V. The role of the blood-brain barrier in the development and treatment of migraine and other pain disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:302. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Slaney CY, Toker A, La Flamme A, Bäckström BT, Harper JL. Naïve blood monocytes suppress T-cell function. A possible mechanism for protection from autoimmunity. Immunol Cell Biol. 2011;89 1:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.2010.110.

  40. Choromańska B, Myśliwiec P, Choromańska K, Dadan J, Chabowski A. The role of CD36 receptor in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017;26(4):717–22. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/62325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Xie S, Lee YF, Kim E, Chen LM, Ni J, Fang LY, et al. TR4 nuclear receptor functions as a fatty acid sensor to modulate CD36 expression and foam cell formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(32):13353–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905724106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zheng JS, Chen J, Wang L, Yang H, Fang L, Yu Y, et al. Replication of a Gene-Diet Interaction at CD36, NOS3 and PPARG in Response to Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplements on Blood Lipids: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. EBioMedicine. 2018;31:150–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Coburn CT, Knapp FF Jr, Febbraio M, Beets AL, Silverstein RL, Abumrad NA. Defective uptake and utilization of long chain fatty acids in muscle and adipose tissues of CD36 knockout mice. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(42):32523–9. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M003826200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ramsden CE, Faurot KR, Zamora D, Suchindran CM, Macintosh BA, Gaylord S, et al. Targeted alteration of dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty acids for the treatment of chronic headaches: a randomized trial. Pain. 2013;154(11):2441–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ramsden CE, Zamora D, Faurot KR, MacIntosh B, Horowitz M, Keyes GS, et al. Dietary alteration of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids for headache reduction in adults with migraine: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;374: n1448. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Alexander Aguilera A, Hernández Díaz G, Lara Barcelata M, Angulo Guerrero O, Oliart Ros RM. Induction of Cd36 expression elicited by fish oil PUFA in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Nutr Biochem. 2006;17(11):760–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yuan F, Wang H, Tian Y, Li Q, He L, Li N, et al. Fish oil alleviated high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease via regulating hepatic lipids metabolism and metaflammation: a transcriptomic study. Lipids Health Dis. 2016;15:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-016-0190-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Febbraio M, Silverstein RL. CD36: Implications in Cardiovascular Disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(11):2012–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2007.03.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Kennedy DJ, Kuchibhotla S, Westfall KM, Silverstein RL, Morton RE, Febbraio M. A CD36-dependent pathway enhances macrophage and adipose tissue inflammation and impairs insulin signalling. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89(3):604–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sharif O, Matt U, Saluzzo S, Lakovits K, Haslinger I, Furtner T, et al. The scavenger receptor CD36 downmodulates the early inflammatory response while enhancing bacterial phagocytosis during pneumococcal pneumonia. J Immunol. 2013;190(11):5640–8. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1202270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Empl M, Sostak P, Breckner M, Riedel M, Muller N, Gruber R, et al. T-cell subsets and expression of integrins in peripheral blood of patients with migraine. Cephalalgia. 1999;19 8:713–7; discussion 697. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019008713.x.

  52. Sarchielli P, Alberti A, Baldi A, Coppola F, Rossi C, Pierguidi L, et al. Proinflammatory Cytokines, Adhesion Molecules, and Lymphocyte Integrin Expression in the Internal Jugular Blood of Migraine Patients Without Aura Assessed Ictally. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2006;46 2:200–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00337.x.

  53. Gormley P, Winsvold BS, Nyholt DR, Kallela M, Chasman DI, Palotie A. Migraine genetics: from genome-wide association studies to translational insights. Genome Med. 2016;8 1:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0346-4.

  54. Khaiboullina SF, Mendelevich EG, Shigapova LH, Shagimardanova E, Gazizova G, Nikitin A, et al. Cerebellar Atrophy and Changes in Cytokines Associated with the CACNA1A R583Q Mutation in a Russian Familial Hemiplegic Migraine Type 1 Family. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang J-M, An J. Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;45(2):27–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/AIA.0b013e318034194e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Patti F, Nicoletti A, Pappalardo A, Castiglione A, Lo Fermo S, Messina S, et al. Frequency and severity of headache is worsened by Interferon-β therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;125(2):91–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01532.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Franceschini A, Vilotti S, Ferrari MD, van den Maagdenberg AMJM, Nistri A, Fabbretti E. TNFα levels and macrophages expression reflect an inflammatory potential of trigeminal ganglia in a mouse model of familial hemiplegic migraine. PloS one. 2013;8 1:e52394-e. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052394.

  58. Martelletti P, Zicari A, Realacci M, Fiore G, De Filippis S, Stirparo G, et al. Expression of NOS–2, COX–2 and Th1/Th2 cytokines in migraine. J Headache Pain. 2001;2(Suppl 1):s51–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101940170010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Munno I, Centonze V, Marinaro M, Bassi A, Lacedra G, Causarano V, et al. Cytokines and Migraine: Increase of IL-5 and IL-4 Plasma Levels. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 1998;38 6:465–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3806465.x.

  60. Kursun O, Yemisci M, van den Maagdenberg AMJM, Karatas H. Migraine and neuroinflammation: the inflammasome perspective. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2021;22 1:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01271-1.

  61. Kong BS, Kim Y, Kim GY, Hyun J-W, Kim S-H, Jeong A, et al. Increased frequency of IL-6-producing non-classical monocytes in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2017;14 1:191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0961-z.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The postdoctoral office location was at the Program on Integrative Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. The benchwork was conducted in Dr. Lishan Su's laboratory at the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill. Dr. Guangming Li offered generous technical support. Dr. Can Cui helped set up the strategy for the FlowJo analysis. Drs. Xuewei Zhu, Christopher Ramsden, Lishan Su, and Peng Liu generously helped proofread the manuscript. Ms. Theresa Watson from St. Mary-of-the-Woods College and Mr. Steve Baker helped with figure editing.

Funding

The parent grant funded by NIH NCCIH R01-AT007813 (2013–2018) was awarded to Dr. John D. Mann as principal investigator at the UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. The study’s first author (H.L.) was financially supported by NIH T32 Fellowship NCCIH 5T32AT003378 and the study itself was supported by an NC TraCS2K from UNC Translational and Clinical Science Institute award 2KR691507 (H.L.). Funding for publication costs was contributed by Yantai Double Hundred Program, University and Locality Collaborative Program (NO. 2021 XDHZ082) to co-author Q.F. 

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hongtao Li and Qiang Fu Both authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science and Mathematics, Hulman Hall Room116, Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College, 1 St Mary of Woods Coll, IN, 47876, USA

    Hongtao Li

  2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Program On Integrative Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Hongtao Li, Keturah R. Faurot, Susan A. Gaylord & John Douglas Mann

  3. School of Pharmacology, Institute of Aging Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, 264003, People’s Republic of China

    Qiang Fu & Yufei Sun

  4. Division of Comprehensive Oral Health, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Kamaira Philips

  5. Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    John Douglas Mann

Authors
  1. Hongtao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiang Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kamaira Philips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yufei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Keturah R. Faurot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Susan A. Gaylord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John Douglas Mann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.L. designed the experiments, performed the experiments, and was the primary author of this manuscript. Q.F. contributed to experimental design, data processing, and statistical analysis. K.P. recruited and consented the control group, performed experiments with H.L., and critically revised this manuscript. Y.S. processed the flow cytometry raw data, statistical analysis, and generated related graphs. K.R.F. was a Co-I on the parent R01, and was involved with the NC TraCS 2 k grant application (protocol), data analysis and editing the manuscript as the senior author. S.G. and J.D.M. participated in editing the manuscript and management of the NIH T-32 fellowship grant NCCIH 5T32AT003378, as well as participating as Co-I and PI on the parent RO1. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongtao Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was carried out according to the guidelines and regulations for human research ethics and good clinical and lab practice. The Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill reviewed and approved the experimental protocols (Study # 15–1139). Participants in the study gave informed consent for their participation, including completing questionnaires and providing blood specimens for analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The contents of this publication are solely the authors' responsibility and so do not represent the official views and opinions of the N.I.H.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Supplemental Table 1.1

Means, standard deviations, and medians for groups defined by control and migraine status, sub-setting by chronic vs episodic and medication overuse. Supplemental Table 1.2  Means, standard deviations, and medians for groups defined by control and migraine status, sub-setting by chronic vs episodic and medication overuse. Supplemental Table 1.3  Means, standard deviations, and medians for groups defined by control and migraine status, sub-setting by chronic vs episodic and medication overuse.

Additional file 2. 

Supplemental Table 2. Differences between migraines and controls adjusted for MOH and Chronic Migraine

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Fu, Q., Philips, K. et al. Leukocyte inflammatory phenotype and function in migraine patients compared with matched non-migraine volunteers: a pilot study. BMC Neurol 22, 278 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02781-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02781-4

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us