Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The ARTICO study: identification of patients at high risk of vascular recurrence after a first non-cardioembolic stroke

  • Joaquín Serena1Email author,
  • Tomás Segura2,
  • Jaume Roquer3,
  • María García-Gil4,
  • José Castillo5 and
  • on behalf of the ARTICO Study
BMC Neurology201515:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0278-4

Received: 31 August 2014

Accepted: 20 February 2015

Published: 11 March 2015

Abstract

Background

About 20% of patients with a first ischaemic stroke will experience a new vascular event within the first year. The atherosclerotic burden, an indicator of the extension of atherosclerosis in a patient, has been associated with the risk of new cardiovascular events in the general population. However, no predictive models reliably identify groups at a high risk of recurrence. The ARTICO study prospectively analysed the predictive value for the risk of recurrence of specific atherosclerotic markers.

Methods

The multicentre ARTICO study included 620 consecutive independent patients older than 60 years suffering from a first non-cardioembolic stroke. We analysed classical stroke risk factors; duplex study of supraaortic trunk including intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement; quantification of internal carotid (ICA) stenosis; number, morphology and surface characteristics of carotid plaques; ankle brachial index (ABI); and the presence of microalbuminuria. Patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months after inclusion. The primary end-point was death or major cardiovascular events.

Results

Any vascular event or death at 12 months occurred in 78 (13.8%) patients. In 40 (7.1%) of these the vascular event was a stroke recurrence. Weight, history of diabetes mellitus, history of symptomatic PAD, ABI <0.9 and significant ICA stenosis (>50%) were associated with a higher risk of vascular events on follow-up in the bivariate analysis.

In the final Cox regression analysis, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, history of diabetes mellitus, symptomatic PAD (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.10–6.95; p=0.03), and particularly patients with both ICA stenosis >50% and PAD (HR 4.52; 95% CI, 2.14-9.53; p<0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of vascular events. Neither isolated ICA stenosis >50% nor isolated abnormal ABI remained associated with an increased risk of recurrence in comparison with the whole population.

Conclusions

Symptomatic PAD identifies a high risk group of vascular recurrence after a first non-cardioembolic stroke. The associated increased risk was particularly high in patients with both ICA stenosis and either symptomatic or asymptomatic PAD. Neither asymptomatic PAD alone nor isolated ICA stenosis >50% were associated with an increased risk of recurrence in this particularly high-risk group of non-cardioembolic stroke.

Keywords

Infarction Prognosis Risk factors in epidemiology Cohort studies Carotid artery disease

Background

Atherothrombosis is the first cause of death and disability in industrialized countries. Both asymptomatic and symptomatic atherosclerotic disease frequently coexist in more than one of the typical territories (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral arterial disease) and share similar stroke risk factors [1]. The atherosclerotic burden, an indicator of the extension of atherosclerosis in a patient, has been associated with the risk of new cardiovascular events in the general population [2,3]. Several studies have associated the presence of both asymptomatic and symptomatic atherosclerotic disease with the risk of cardiovascular events [4-10]. However, these studies have tended to be in the general population and often mainly of elderly patients. Few studies have been aimed at patients who have suffered a first ischaemic stroke [11-18]. In the case of the specific sub-group of non-cardioembolic strokes, the evaluation of the atherosclerotic burden could well be of great interest as about 20-40% of these patients will suffer recurrence within the first five years [19] despite the currently most appropriate secondary stroke prevention measures being taken. Although several clinical, radiological, ultrasonographic [13-18,20] and molecular markers have been identified as having predictive value for stroke recurrence, no predictive model reliably identifies patients at a high risk of a new vascular event. The management of non-cardioembolic stroke is currently almost identical in all patients. However, the identification of those who are at greater risk of vascular event recurrence should be a major objective with a view to possibly following a more intensive treatment in these patients [21,22].

The ARTICO study aimed to prospectively analyse the association of several markers of atherosclerosis with the recurrence of new vascular events in non-cardioembolic stroke.

Methods

Study design

The ARTICO study is a prospective, multicentre, observational study undertaken in 42 Spanish neurology departments (see Additional file 1) [23]. ARTICO included independent patients older than 60 years with a recent non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke according to SSS-TOAST criteria [24]. In order to avoid unstable neurological patients with a risk of early neurological deterioration or death due to the index stroke, patients were included between day 5 and day 90. All patients were evaluated by a neurologist before inclusion in the study to confirm the nature of the event under a standardised aetiological protocol, including a complete personal and family medical history of vascular risk factors as well as clinical examination including height, weight, waist circumference, and arterial blood pressure. Routine blood and coagulation tests, and brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance were performed on all patients.

As markers of atherosclerotic disease, duplex study of the supraaortic trunks including intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement; quantification of internal carotid stenosis; number, morphology and surface characteristics of carotid plaques; ankle brachial index (ABI); and the presence of microalbuminuria were performed at study inclusion.

Patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months after inclusion. Vascular events, including stroke recurrence, ischaemic heart disease, symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), vascular surgery and death of vascular or non-vascular origin were recorded. Symptomatic PAD was only accepted as an outcome event where a patient did not have a previous history of this disease or where a patient with a previous history required peripheral vascular surgery due to clear worsening. The modified Rankin scale (mRankin) was evaluated at discharge and at 6 and 12 month visits. Additional investigations were left at the discretion of the investigator in charge of the patient. The primary end-point of the ARTICO study was death or major vascular events.

Atherothrombotic marker protocol

ABI measurement was performed using an 8 MHz probe and the same Doppler model (ES-100X) in all centres after a consensus meeting. Doppler systolic blood pressure at the right and left sides in both brachial arteries as well as both the dorsalis pedis artery and posterior tibial arteries were recorded with patients at rest for at least 5 minutes in the supine position [25,26]. The ABI was calculated centrally. Asymptomatic PAD was defined as ABI ≤0.9 whereas PAD was considered to be symptomatic when a history of walking impairment, intermittent claudication, ischaemic rest pain, and/or non-healing wounds was present [25].

Colour-duplex study of the supraaortic trunks was performed on all patients. Carotid or intracranial artery stenosis was quantified using established haemodynamic criteria by echo-Doppler ultrasonography [27-30]. Each neurosonology department used their own standardised values or, in their absence, values validated in the literature. Plaques were classified by echogenicity and surface morphology in accordance with consensus criteria [31]. IMT was measured on a still image during diastole in both common carotid arteries (CCA) at the far wall and at least 1 cm below the bifurcation on a 1 cm plaque-free segment. The highest of 6 CCA measurements was taken as the final IMT. In order to differentiate plaques from just increased IMT, a plaque was defined as focal thickening of ≥1.5 mm or either >0.5 mm or >50% of the surrounding IMT [31,32].

Microalbuminuria was determined using the local laboratory methodology in accordance with the American Diabetes Association and the National Kidney Foundation recommendations using either the 24 hour albumin/creatinine index or the nephelometric and Jaffe methods [33,34]. An albumin-to-creatinine ratio of <30 mg/g of creatinine was considered to be normal and albuminuria was considered to be present when the albumin-to-creatinine ratio was ≥30 mg/g of creatinine. The microalbuminuric range was defined as an albumin-to-creatinine ratio of between 30 and 300 mg/day of creatinine whereas an albumin-to-creatinine ratio >300 mg/day was indicative of macroalbuminuria.

The study was approved by the ethical committee of each participating centre and informed consent was obtained from patients or relatives (Additional file 2).

Statistical analysis

Proportions between groups were compared with the chi-square test. Continuous variables were expressed as mean +/− SD or median and quartiles and were compared by the Student t test or the Mann–Whitney test, as appropriate.

Overall survival was defined as the time (in days) between the date of the index stroke and the first recurrence.

Covariates that were of known clinical interest or that were identified as significant (p < 0.05, Log-Rank test) in the Kaplan-Meyer analysis were selected for multivariate analysis, which was performed using Cox’s proportional hazard models. Multicollinearity between predictors and specifically of different atherosclerotic markers in the final Cox model was assessed. The models were fitted in a customized way by means of the ENTER method. Results were expressed as adjusted hazard ratios with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

All analyses were performed with the SPSS statistical package.

Results

Six-hundred and twenty independent patients older than 60 years suffering from a first non-cardioembolic stroke were included in the study. The median time from stroke onset to inclusion was 9 [6-20] days. Fifty-nine patients (9.5%) were excluded from the analysis as they were lost to follow-up.

The presence of classical stroke risk factors was similar to other series. The frequency of probable and possible atherothrombotic, small vessel disease and cryptogenic stroke subtypes was 16.9%, 43.4%, 20.7%, and 19.1%. Symptomatic PAD was present in 9.1% of patients whereas ABI ≤0.9 was present in 28.6%. ICA stenosis >50% was detected in 19.7% and plaques in 72.7% (29.4% anechoic/hypoechoic). Mean and standard deviation of IMT was 0.92 (0.39). Microalbuminuria was present in 21.9% and central obesity in 52.4% of patients (40.1% in men and 80.4% in women).

Patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months after inclusion. Any vascular event or death occurred in 78 (13.8%) patients. In 40 (7.1%) of these the vascular event was a recurrent stroke. In the bivariate analysis, few differences were detected in the prevalence of classical vascular stroke risk factors. Weight, history of diabetes mellitus, history of symptomatic PAD and hypoglycaemic treatment before index stroke were associated in the bivariate analysis with higher risk of vascular events on follow-up (Table 1). Table 2 shows the atherosclerotic markers analysed in patients with and without vascular events during follow-up. There were significant differences between the two groups in both abnormal ABI and symptomatic PAD. In ultrasonographic study, ipsilateral significant ICA stenosis (>50%) was more frequent in the group that would suffer further vascular events. However, no differences were found in the plaque characteristics, the presence of microalbuminuria or in IMT. When the different potential combinations of PAD and ICA were analysed, only patients with both PAD and ICA stenosis were found to have an increased risk of vascular events (Table 3).
Table 1

Classical factors associated with new vascular events at one-year follow-up

 

Primary end-point

 

Yes (n = 78)

No (n = 485)

p

Male, %

77.6

67.0

0.15

Age

72.6 (8.4)

71.1 (7.2)

0.31

Weight

78.8 (14.3)

74.8 (12.1)

0.01

Height

165.4 (7.5)

164.0 (8.0)

0.17

Body mass index

28.8 (4.7)

27.8 (4.3)

0.09

Waist circumference

101.0 (14.9)

100.1 (12.9)

0.22

Systolic blood pressure

162.4 (25.4)

152.4 (26.5)

0.06

Diastolic blood pressure

85.2 (13.3)

82.3 (13.5)

0.10

Familiar history of cardiovascular disease

   

  Stroke, %

23.1

18.1

0.52

  Ischaemic CHD, %

11.5

16.3

0.31

  Sudden death, %

5.1

3.3

0.50

Personal history

   

  Alcohol intake, % (>40gr/day)

10.4

5.0

0.07

  Active smoker, %

18.4

18.1

0.81

  Arterial hypertension, %

72.4

71.6

0.87

  Diabetes mellitus, %

51.3

32.2

0.002

  Dyslipidaemia, %

51.9

43.9

0.22

  Ischaemic CHD, %

16.9

11.4

0.18

  Symptomatic PAD, %

18.2

7.6

0.005

Treatment before index stroke

   

  Antiplatelet agents, %

29.5

24.7

0.39

  Statins, %

33.3

26.8

0.49

  Antihypertensive, %

61.5

60.4

0.62

  Hypoglycaemics, %

41.0

25.4

0.01

Treatment at discharge

   

  Antiplatelet agents

100

99.3

0.46

  Statins

70.0

71.8

0.84

  Antihypertensive drugs

75.6

72.8

0.65

  Hypoglycaemics

42.8

31.5

0.05

Stroke subtype

  

0.07

  Atherothrombotic

   

  Probable

25.0

15.7

 

  Possible

46.1

43.0

 

  Small vessel disease

18.4

21.0

 

  Cryptogenic

10.5

20.3

 

mRankin <2 at discharge

41.0

57.9

0.08

mRankin ≤2 at 1 year

39.0

70.3

<0.0001

CHD: cardiac heart disease. PAD: peripheral artery disease.

P-value (log-rank test).

Table 2

Atherosclerotic marker factors associated with new vascular events at one-year follow-up

 

Primary end-point

 

Yes (n = 78)

No (n = 485)

p

PAD

  

<0.0001

  No (ABI >0.90)

44.2

70.7

 

  Asymptomatic (ABI ≤0.90)

37.7

21.7

 

  Symptomatic (ABI ≤0.90 or ABI >0.90)

18.2

7.6

 

ICA Stenosis >50%

29.9

18.1

0.01

Vascular disease

  

<0.0001

  Normal ABI and ICA <50%

38.2

60.9

 

  Normal ABI and ICA >50%

6.6

10.0

 

  ABI <0.9 and ICA <50%

19.7

15.5

 

  Symptomatic PAD and ICA <50%

11.8

5.1

 

  ABI <0.9 and ICA >50%

17.1

5.9

 

  Symptomatic PAD and ICA >50%

6.6

2.5

 

Atheromatous plaques

  

0.28

  None

20.0

28.4

 

  Isolated plaque

17.3

17.5

 

  Multiple plaques

62.7

54.1

 

Echogenicity of plaques

  

0.35

  Type I (uniform anechoic)

12.1

13.4

 

  Type II (mainly hypoechoic)

15.5

16.4

 

  Type III (mainly hyperechoic)

19.0

24.7

 

  Type IV (uniform iso- or hyperechoic)

51.7

39.3

 

  Type V (calcified)

1.7

6.3

 

Plaques surface

  

0.19

  Smooth and even

61.3

72.8

 

  Uneven

37.1

25.8

 

  Ulcerated

1.6

1.4

 

IMT mm (mean, SD)

0.94 (0.46)

0.91 (0.38)

0.57

Microalbuminuria

18.2

22.4

0.52

All values are percentages unless otherwise stated.

ABI: ankle brachial index. ICA: internal carotid stenosis (either ipsi or contralateral to index stroke). IMT: intima-media thickness. PAD: peripheral artery disease.

p-value (Log-Rank test), apart from IMT (t-Student).

Table 3

Cox hazard ratios of primary outcome at one-year follow-up

 

HR

95% CI

p

Age

1.03

0.99-1.06

0.088

Sex

0.50

0.26-0.95

0.035

BMI

1.08

1.02-1.14

0.007

Systolic blood pressure

1.01

1.00-1.02

0.006

History of diabetes mellitus

2.05

1.22-3.45

0.007

mRankin scale at discharge ≥2

1.32

0.78-2.27

0.294

IMT

0.98

0.91-1.05

0.680

Vascular disease

   

  Normal ABI and ICA >50%

1.38

0.52-3.69

0.551

  ABI <0.9 and ICA <50%

1.64

0.81-3.30

0.160

  Symptomatic PAD and ICA <50%

2.76

1.10-6.95

0.030

  ABI <0.9 and ICA >50%

4.52

2.14-9.53

<0.001

  Symptomatic PAD and ICA >50%

4.72

1.75-12.70

0.002

Sex (0 = men, 1 = women), history of diabetes (0 = No, 1 = Yes) and mRankin scale at discharge ≥2 (0 = No, 1 = Yes) were included as categorical variables. Reference category of vascular disease: normal ABI and CS <50%.

BMI: body mass index. ICA: internal carotid stenosis. IMT: intima-media thickness (by 0.1 units). PAD: peripheral artery disease. ABI: ankle brachial index.

In the final Cox regression analysis, BMI, systolic blood pressure, history of diabetes mellitus, symptomatic PAD (HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.10–6.88; p = 0.03) and the association of ICA stenosis with both abnormal ABI (HR, 4.39; 95% CI, 2.09-9.23;p < 0.001) and symptomatic PAD with ICA stenosis (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.39-9.91; p = 0.009) remained independently associated with an increased risk of vascular events (Table 3). Neither isolated ICA stenosis >50% nor isolated abnormal ABI and IMT were associated with an increased risk of recurrence in comparison with the whole population.

Discussion

Patients with atherothrombosis or several risk factors for this disease have been found to have relatively high rates of cardiovascular events [1-10]. Given that atherosclerosis is a systemic condition, the vascular event can occur in the same vascular territory or, as is frequently the case in stroke patients, in a different one [2,35]. This increased risk is associated both with symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerosis. Although there is a well-known strong association between abnormal ABI and increased risk of severe vascular events, this association has mainly been analysed in population-based studies, often in asymptomatic patients [21,36-43] with little data about the potential relevance of ABI as a predictor of new vascular events in symptomatic patients, and particularly in those with previous atherothrombotic stroke (non-cardioembolic). Few studies have analysed the relevance of ABI [11-16] or IMT [17,18] as predictors of recurrence in patients with a previous stroke and none has provided data regarding other potential atherothrombotic markers of vascular events. The PATHOS and SCALA studies [11,12] reported high prevalence of low ABI among patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA. Tsivgoulis et al. [13] identify ABI <0.9 as an independent risk factor for recurrent stroke in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia. Similarly, Busch et al. [14], Sen et al. [15], and Purroy et al. [16] reported an independent positive, adjusted association between asymptomatic PAD and composite vascular events, including stroke, TIA, myocardial infarction, and death among patients with previous stroke. Two studies, both conducted in consecutive patients with a first ischaemic stroke of any aetiopathogenic stroke subtype using the TOAST criteria, have demonstrated the prognostic impact of IMT in predicting stroke recurrence [17,18].

To the best of our knowledge, the ARTICO study is the first study to analyse the adjusted potential predictive capacity of ABI together with additional markers of atherothrombotic disease as predictors of new vascular events in this particular group of patients where preventative treatment is almost identical. Non-cardioembolic stroke accounts for 60-70% of all ischaemic strokes in patients older than 60 years with the risk of recurrence being as high as 5-8% annually and up to 20-40% in the five years after stroke in spite of correct preventive treatment being followed [19].

One third of our non-cardioembolic stroke population had a pathological ABI, which was more frequently asymptomatic. This is a significantly higher prevalence than the 8.5-19% found in population studies [26] although in the same range as recent studies in similar populations of patients suffering from previous non-cardioembolic stroke [44,45].

In the general population, an ABI ≤0.9 has been associated with a higher number of atheromatous plaques, higher IMT [46,47] and greater prevalence of ICA stenosis >70% [48,49]. In the previously cited studies in stroke patients, an ABI ≤0.9 has been associated with a higher risk of new vascular events [11-16]. The ARTICO study found a similar association in bivariate analysis, refined by adjusting for potential confounders. In the ARTICO stroke population, symptomatic PAD, and particularly the association of both symptomatic PAD and ABI ≤0.9 with ICA stenosis >50%, were independently associated in the multivariate analysis with a 3.72 and 4.39 times increased risk of new vascular events. Such an association was not found with other analysed atherothrombotic markers such as IMT, plaque characteristics or microalbuminuria. The presence of isolated ICA stenosis >50% or asymptomatic PAD (ABI <0.9) was not associated with an increased risk of new vascular events when compared with the whole population. Like previous studies, symptomatic PAD is associated with an increased risk of recurrence and, as shown by the ARTICO study, this is even higher when associated to ICA stenosis (Table 3).

Unlike previous population-based studies where ICA stenosis did not seem to increase the risk of vascular events when associated to low ABI [48], we find that low ABI together with ICA stenosis >50% is associated with a particularly high risk of new vascular events in patients who have suffered a first non-cardioemblic stroke.

The main contribution made by ARTICO is that this is the first study focused on analysing different atherosclerotic markers of stroke recurrence in a prospective non-cardioembolic stroke population adjusting for relevant confounders in a multivariate survival analysis.

The principal limitation is the relatively short one-year follow-up. A further limitation is the lack of analyses for the different markers and individual outcomes due to the low number of outcome events as a result, at least in part, of the intensive preventive treatment that patients received in the routine practice in line with the recommendations of the Spanish Neurological Society Stroke Group [50] (e.g. 70% of patients received statins at discharge, in spite of there only being a 50% prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia). As patients were included prospectively and shortly after stroke (9 [6-20] days), bias due to early stroke or vascular event recurrence seems unlikely. It might be argued that there is a lack of detailed information about stroke severity in our study and that the NIHSS may have a high predictive value in the outcome. However, the objective of our study was to analyse stroke recurrence as well as other vascular events. The mRankin scale was recorded to evaluate the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of patients. Another possible criticism is that a broader array of predictive atherothrombotic markers should have been studied. We selected microalbuminuria as the only renal function parameter in our study not only due to the practical need to limit the scale of the investigation but particularly because it is a well-established marker of generalised vascular dysfunction and a predictor of poor outcome after ischaemic stroke. Furthermore, there was the suspicion that microalbuminuria might promote the development of subclinical atheromatosis or destabilise subclinical atherosclerosis, a hypothesis that has recently been proposed as the cause of cardiovascular clinical events. A final possible limitation is that, in part due to the hypothesis-generating nature of the study, no formal sample size estimation was performed. In this respect it should be noted that we present one of the most extensive series to be published.

Conclusions

Specific atherothrombotic markers were found to be highly prevalent in a non-cardioembolic stroke population. The associated increased risk was particularly high in patients with both ICA stenosis plus either symptomatic or asymptomatic PAD. Both ABI and ICA should be evaluated in all non-cardioembolic strokes to identify those patients with the greatest risk of vascular recurrence who might benefit from future studies focused on additional intervention in secondary prevention.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research project was supported by an unrestricted grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Madrid, Spain) and by the Ministry of Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RIC- RD12/0042/0020 FEDER and Red INVICTUS RD12/0014).

The funding body had no involvement in the collection of data, the interpretation of data, or on the decision to publish.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Dr. Josep Trueta, IdIBGi (Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Girona)
(2)
Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete
(3)
Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari del Mar
(4)
Institut d’Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP Jordi Gol)
(5)
Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Santiago de Compostela

References

  1. Mostaza JM, Martín-Jadraque R, Vicente I, San Martin MA, Lahoz C. Patients at high risk of cerebrovascular disease: the REACH study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27 Suppl 1:77–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Wilson PW, D’Agostino Sr R, Ohman EM, Röther J, et al. REACH Registry Investigators. One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2007;297:1197–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cimminiello C, Zaninelli A, Carolei A, Sacco S, Toni D, Gensini G. Atherothrombotic burden and medium-term prognosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: findings of the SIRIO study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33:341–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mukherjee D, Yadav JS. Carotid artery intimal-medial thickness: indicator of atherosclerotic burden and response to risk factor modification. Am Heart J. 2002;144:753–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bots ML, Grobbee DE. Intima media thickness as a surrogate marker for generalized arteriosclerosis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2002;16:341–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Syeda B, Gottsauner-Wolf M, Denk S, Pichler P, Khorsand A, Glogar D. Arterial compliance: a diagnostic marker for atherosclerotic plaque burden? Am J Hypertens. 2003;16:356–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Willens HJ, Davis W, Herrington DM, Wade K, Kesler K, Mallon S, et al. Relationship of peripheral arterial compliance and standard cardiovascular risk factors. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003;37:197–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tsioufis C, Dimitriadis K, Antoniadis D, Stefanadis C, Kallikazaros I. Inter-relationships of microalbuminuria with the other surrogates of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in hypertensive subjects. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:470–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Roquer J, Ois A, Rodríguez-Campello A, Gomis M, Munteis E, Jiménez-Conde J, et al. Atherosclerotic Burden and early mortality in acute ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:699–704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Venketasubramanian N, Röther J, Bhatt DL, Pasquet B, Mas JL, Alberts MJ, et al. REACH Investigators. Two-year vascular event rates in patients with symptomatic cerebrovascular disease: the REACH registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32:254–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Agnelli G, Cimminiello C, Meneghetti G, Urbinati S. Polyvascular Atherothrombosis Observational Survey (PATHOS) Investigators. Low ankle-brachial index predicts an adverse 1-year outcome after acute coronary and cerebrovascular events. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:2599–606.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Weimar C, Goertler M, Röther J, Ringelstein EB, Darius H, Nabavi DG, et al. Predictive value of the Essen stroke risk score and ankle brachial index in acute ischaemic stroke patients from 85 German stroke units. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:1339–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Tsivgoulis G, Bogiatzi C, Heliopoulos I, Vadikolias K, Boutati E, Tsakaldimi S, et al. Low ankle-brachial index predicts early risk of recurrent stroke in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Atherosclerosis. 2012;2:407–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Busch MA, Lutz K, Röhl JE, Neuner B, Masuhr F. Low ankle-brachial index predicts cardiovascular risk after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2009;40:3700–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sen S, Lynch Jr DR, Kaltsas E, Simmons J, Tan WA, Kim J, et al. Association of asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease with vascular events in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2009;40:3472–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Purroy F, Coll B, Oró M, Setó E, Piñol-Ripoll G, Plana A, et al. Predictive value of ankle brachial index in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:602–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsivgoulis G, Vemmos K, Papamichael C, Spengos K, Manios E, Stamatelopoulos K, et al. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness and the risk of stroke recurrence. Stroke. 2006;37(7):1913–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Talelli P, Terzis G, Katsoulas G, Chrisanthopoulou A, Ellul J. Recurrent stroke: the role of common carotid artery intima-media thickness. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14(11):1067–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Burn J, Dennis M, Bamford J, Sandercock P, Wade D, Warlow C. Long-term risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke. 1994;25:333–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mono ML, Karameshev A, Slotboom J, Remonda L, Galimanis A, Jung S, et al. Plaque characteristics of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34:343–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Banerjee A, Fowkes FG, Rothwell PM. Implications for primary and secondary prevention associations between peripheral artery disease and ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010;41:2102–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sander D, Carolei A, Diehm C, Hennerici MG, Rothwell PM. Challenges to the management of high-risk stroke patients with multiple-site occlusive vascular disease. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31:315–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Roquer J, Segura T, Serena J, Castillo J. Entothelial dysfunction, vascular disease and Stroke. The ARTICO Study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27 Suppl 1:25–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ay H, Furie KL, Singhal A, Smith WS, Sorensen AG, Koroshetz WJ. An evidence-based causative classification system for acute ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:688–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic). Circulation. 2006;113:463–654.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mostaza JM, Vicente I, Cairols M, Castillo J, González-Juanatey JR, Pomar JL, et al. Indice tobillo brazo y riesgo cardiovascular. Med Clin. 2003;121:68–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hennerici M, Neuerburg-Heusler D. Vacular diagnosis with Ultrasound: Clinical references with case studies. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1998. p. 49.Google Scholar
  28. De Bray JM, Glatt B. Quantitation of atheromatous stenosis in the extracranial internal carotid artery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995;5:414–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, Taylor Jr LM, Lee RW, Cummings CA, et al. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:152–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Alexandrov AV, Brodie DS, McLean A, Hamilton P, Murphy J, Burns PN. Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke. 1997;28:339–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. De Bray JM, Baud JM, Dauzat M. Consensus concerning the morphology and the risk of carotid plaques. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;7:289–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34:290–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Molitch ME, DeFronzo RA, Franz MJ, Keane WF, Mogensen CE, Parving HH, et al. Nephropathy in diabetes (Position Statement). Diabetes Care. 2004;27 suppl 1:S79–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Keane WF, Eknoyan G. Proteinuria, albuminuria, risk, assessment, detection, elimination (PARADE): a position paper of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:1004–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996;348:1329–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Newman AB, Shemanski L, Manolio TA, Cushman M, Mittelmark M, Polak JF, et al. Ankle-arm index as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The Cardiovascular Health Study Group. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:538–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsai AW, Folsom AR, Rosamond WD, Jones DW. Ankle-brachial index and 7-year ischemic stroke incidence: the ARIC Study. Stroke. 2001;32:1721–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Criqui MH, Langer RD, Fronek A, Feigelson HS, Klauber MR, McCann TJ, et al. Mortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:381–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Jager A, Kostense PJ, Ruhé HG, Heine RJ, Nijpels G, Dekker JM, et al. Microalbuminuria and peripheral arterial disease are independent predictors of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, especially among hypertensive subjects: five-year follow-up of the Hoorn Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:617–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration, Fowkes FG, Murray GD, Butcher I, Heald CL, Lee RJ, et al. Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:197–208.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Leng GC, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG, Whiteman M, Dunbar J, Housley E, et al. Incidence, natural history and cardiovascular events in symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the general population. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:1172–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rothwell PM, Coull AJ, Silver LE, Fairhead JF, Giles MF, Lovelock CE, et al. Population-based study of event-rate, incidence, case fatality, and mortality for all acute vascular events in all arterial territories (Oxford Vascular Study). Lancet. 2005;366:1773–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Meves SH, Diehm C, Berger K, Pittrow D, Trampisch HJ, Burghaus I, et al. Peripheral arterial disease as an independent predictor for excess stroke morbidity and mortality in primary-care patients: 5-year results of the getABI study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29:546–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Alvarez-Sabín J, Gil-Núñez A, Quintana M, Barbera G, Grupo de investigadores del estudio APICA. Prevalence of asymptomatic peripheral artery disease in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke. Neurologia. 2009;24:366–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Topakian R, Nanz S, Rohrbacher B, Koppensteiner R, Aichner FT, OECROSS Study Group. High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29:248–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Allan PL, Mowbray PI, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG. Relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. The Edinburgh Artery Study. Stroke. 1997;28:348–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Papamichael CM, Lekakis JP, Stamatelopoulos KS, Papaioannou TG, Alevizaki MK, Cimponeriu AT, et al. Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:615–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ogren M, Hedblad B, Isacsson SO, Janzon L, Jungquist G, Lindell SE. Non-invasively detected carotid stenosis and ischaemic heart disease in men with leg arteriosclerosis. Lancet. 1993;342:1138–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mostaza JM, González-Juanatey JR, Castillo J, Lahoz C, Fernández-Villaverde JM, Maestro-Saavedra FJ. Prevalence of carotid stenosis and silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic subjects with a low ankle–brachial index. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:104–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Alonso De Leciñana M, Egido JA, Casado I, Ribó M, Dávalos A, Masjuan J, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Neurologia. 2014;29:102–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Serena et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.